Steam NT Live: Cyrano de Bergerac

NT Live: Cyrano de Bergerac

NT Live: Cyrano de Bergerac is a movie starring Michele Austin, Adam Best, and Nari Blair-Mangat. An intense, raw and deep revival of Rostand's Cyrano de Bergerac by the Jamie Lloyd Company.

Other Titles
National Theatre Live: Cyrano de Bergerac, National Theater Live: Cyrano de Bergerac, National Theatre Live: Cyrano De Bergerac, Cyrano De Bergerac Presented by Comedie-Francaise
Running Time
2 hours 40 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Jamie Lloyd
Martin Crimp, Edmond Rostand
Nari Blair-Mangat, Adam Best, Philip Cairns, Michele Austin
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

An intense, raw and deep revival of Rostand's Cyrano de Bergerac by the Jamie Lloyd Company.

Comments about drama «NT Live: Cyrano de Bergerac» (17)

Alice photo

I can't believe how much I enjoyed this movie. I saw it last night and I can't wait to watch it again and again. The actors were all excellent, especially the young boy who plays the child, who looks just like the kid in the book. This movie is a true masterpiece. The story and characters are very interesting. I recommend it to everyone. Also, I am writing this review only because I am so impressed by the movie and I wanted to write it. I can't remember the last time I saw a movie that moved me so much. It is a great movie, even though it is a bit slow at times. I don't know why it's not on DVD, but I hope that it will be on DVD in a few years. This is one of those movies you will enjoy watching over and over again. And you won't be disappointed. Good job!

Betty photo

This is one of the best films of all time. A combination of music, visuals, acting, and of course the story of a young boy and his grandmother. While the film is a little slow at times, it is worth the watch and it leaves you with so many emotions. The grandmother in particular is so real, it makes you realize how much it takes for a child to be a grown up. The soundtrack is so great and the atmosphere is perfect for the film. The only thing that is wrong with the film is that the story could have been a little longer. For me it was a perfect movie and I recommend everyone to see it.

Billy photo

There's not much to say about this movie. it's just a wonderful experience. I must say it's the first time I've seen a movie where I could see the characters develop and develop. the story is outstanding, the music is great, and the cinematography is very beautiful. There are so many things I can say about this movie but I won't say them all. In short, this movie will be remembered for a long time.

Elizabeth L. photo
Elizabeth L.

The director of "The New World" and "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" has a small but interesting film about two American brothers who, after their father dies, move to Paris to be with their mother and sister. The two brothers, Pedro and Juan, have never known much of life in America, but when the sister passes away and the mother goes back to Peru, the brothers decide to stay with her. Pedro is a successful designer, while Juan, a hotel manager, is on the brink of insanity and wants to be an author. Pedro is a romantic and Juan is the shy one. One day, the two brothers meet a prostitute, who is in love with a young Chilean, Alejandra, who has an American accent. The boys decide to take Alejandra back to the States, where Alejandra is expecting her first child. When Alejandra comes to live with the family in New York, Pedro begins to act very strange, and becomes very upset and depressed. When Alejandra finds out what Pedro has become, she leaves the family and moves in with a friend, who does not know Alejandra. While Alejandra has been staying with the family, Pedro has become involved in the new family, and becomes obsessed with Alejandra. Alejandra is very surprised to see Pedro, but Pedro does not explain why he is obsessed with Alejandra, and he does not even seem to know why he is obsessed. Pedro eventually begins to fall in love with Alejandra, but does not tell her what he is doing. The entire film is based on Alejandra, and is very sad. The film is very much like "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon", and is very sad, but in a different way. The film is very sad, but it is also very interesting and it is very well made. The film is good because it is based on two men who are obsessed with another man, and the way they deal with this is very interesting. The film is also interesting because the father has a heart of gold and he is trying to help Pedro, but in the end he is completely lost. I give this film a 7 out of 10.

Roy S. photo
Roy S.

I saw this movie on a rainy day when I didn't have anything else to do. I had no idea what I was going to see and was surprised to find out I had been promised a live action adaptation of the English movie. I am not an expert on the original story, but I'm going to try to remember some of the details and make a good description. It is based on the story of "Cyrano" (a translation is not necessary), who is a youth from a middle-class family. He is known for his strength, bravery, and bravery. He is given a gift by a friend, who is the head of the village, that he will never see again, and in return, he is given the power to see and touch people's souls, as well as a piece of paper that contains the letter to his grandfather, that can be given to him. The first person to read the letter, after the other people, is the village elder. After that, the rest of the people begin to receive the gift, and the power to see and touch people's souls. So, the townspeople and the village elders have to work together to save Cyrano from his kidnappers. This movie is quite a good story. It is told from the perspective of the protagonist, who is in the town, and of the people that are present, and it is not just about the story. The villagers of the village are very well portrayed. I didn't like the ending of the movie, which was too abrupt. It was very strange, and I don't think that the audience would be that excited by the ending. I liked the special effects in the movie, especially the sets. They were beautiful, and the village is set in a beautiful place. The acting is good, and the cinematography was good, but the characters and the acting are not the best. The young actors (John Hillerman, Jack Thompson) were good, but the adults were not that good. The only actor that is outstanding is Edward Fox, and he does a great job as Cyrano. The only other actor that was outstanding is the director of photography. The score is not very good, but it is very beautiful, and the movie is very well filmed. This movie is worth seeing, and I have recommended it to everyone I know. It is a good movie, and I think that it is worth watching.

Virginia photo

The story of a young boy's attempt to complete the medieval epic with his father's help is wonderfully told. Filmed in traditional time-stamping fashion, the film is a fine example of how far French cinema has come since the 1970s. The direction is impeccable, the performances are superb, and the story is beautifully crafted. It's a pleasure to see such an authentic medieval setting, as well as a rare glimpse into the character of Pierre, the young boy who seeks to complete the classic tale.

Jonathan P. photo
Jonathan P.

Although this is a good movie, it is a very strange movie. It is a French adaptation of a novel written by Jules Verne. The book, The Three Musketeers, is an extremely popular and legendary novel of French authors, and it is impossible to find a copy of this book. In fact, the book is in two versions: one is a novel, the other is a story about the life of the Musketeers. The author of the novel, Jules Verne, said he would never allow anyone to make a movie of the book, because he wanted to write an interesting book, but he made a movie of a boring story. This is one of the few movies that is made of the book, and the movie is very interesting. The movie is very interesting because the acting is amazing. I don't know if it is possible to see the entire movie of the book, but if you watch this movie, you will see what a brilliant movie is.

Harold Kelley photo
Harold Kelley

Cyrano de Bergerac (1973) is a marvelous film. The acting, the cinematography, the dialogue, the story - all combine to make a unique film. Some of the performances are very convincing, and the performances from the leading male actor, Eric Bana, are excellent. But I also have to say that I'm very disappointed that one of the main characters, Martin Amis, who plays Olivier Amis, is not in the film. I wish he would have been. He does a very good job, and I admire the way he handles the character. I am very disappointed that he did not appear in the film, but that's my only complaint. In fact, I also feel the same way about the role that he did in the musical version of "La Traviata". However, I have to say that I do not agree with the opinion of others who say that this film is "boring" or "overly dramatic". It's not. In fact, I found it to be very "funny", "entertaining", and "relentlessly entertaining". It's not very complicated, and it's very entertaining to see how the play comes together to form a film. The story is also very well told, and it doesn't waste time trying to be funny. There is an important story that is not told in the film, and it's the one that makes the film unique. The way the film tells the story is very effective, and the way the story is told is very clever. The story does not only tell us the story, but it also tells us the themes that are important in the play. The film is extremely well made. It's gorgeous, it's photographed, and the performances are very convincing. I would recommend it to anyone who enjoys great films and great cinema.

Sharon S. photo
Sharon S.

The movie is not bad. It has some issues in the screenplay. I'm a fan of the book. Some parts in the screenplay were completely changed. Like when Count Guillaume ordered the captain to carry the cross. I don't know why. The movie does have a few flaws, but it's not as bad as some other movies of this type. It's not great, but it's not horrible either. The actors are very good. Some parts are overacted, but I guess that is how they felt. Overall, it's worth seeing.

Carol photo

I don't know much about this film, and I don't really like it. The first ten minutes of the film is fine. I like the idea that the protagonist is not in love with someone but he doesn't want to have sex with her, which I find a bit strange. After that, the film really gets a bit boring. The story is fine but the acting is sub-par. The main problem is that the actors seem to be not comfortable with the language. The main actors are very familiar with French and the subtitles seem very unnecessary. I can't help but think that the actors are just doing the best they can and hope that they can find better roles. Overall, I give it a 6 out of 10. It's not an awful film, but it's not good either.

Madison K. photo
Madison K.

I am sorry that this film doesn't go into greater detail of the film's themes. This film is very good and I think it deserves more attention. I think it is better than "The Princess Bride" and "The Grinch Who Stole Christmas" (I've seen them both). I was very surprised with how much I liked it. I've been a fan of Shakespeare since I was a child and I haven't seen this movie before but I'm glad I did. I just found it very interesting. I didn't understand all the themes of the film. However, I think this film is worth the time to watch it. I think it is very very good.

Howard G. photo
Howard G.

Pity the lives of those who couldn't get tickets to the Screenings. The movies were worth the wait. I thought the movie would have gotten a little more laughs, but it was still worth the wait. The actors were a pleasure to watch. They were funny, but a little over-the-top. However, that is part of the fun of this movie. It is a bit of a romantic, with some funny scenes. The fight scenes were very good. The dancing was also good. The movie does have a bit of a heart, and there were some scenes that you can't help but feel sorry for the people who were involved. The movie was not a complete success, but I enjoyed it very much. It was nice to see some actors I had not heard of before, like Eric Bana and Paul Bettany. I would say this is a film for the older viewers. 7/10

Christian R. photo
Christian R.

It is a pretty good film and it is a shame that the people who made this film didn't have the guts to release it as a full length film on DVD. This film has some very good points about it. It is a fairly believable story about a family that is trying to make it as a family. But it is not a good story. It is more like a soap opera. And if you are looking for a family film, then this isn't it. The mother is an airhead. The father is a dullard. The daughter is a very emotional child. The brother is a man who is on his way to being a spoiled brat. And the other brother is a snivelling coward. And the daughter has a major temper tantrum. So I think that the film is a bit better than it looks on the surface. There are some good performances from the actors and the director is good at capturing the family life of this family. But I think that this film could have been much better. And for this reason, I think that the film is only worth seeing if you are interested in this sort of family drama. It is a good story, but the problem is that it is not a good story. It is a soap opera and I think that this film is just another soap opera. It is a good story, but the soap opera is all that it is.

Jacob C. photo
Jacob C.

So much has been said about the film but I think this film would make a great exhibition. It is a lot like Shakespeare's plays. It is also much like the films of David Lean, who made the Richard III plays. So if you are interested in the history of these plays then this film will be of great interest. The idea that the play was an act of love is the basis for the film. But for me the film was very much like the play. For the most part the film did an excellent job of moving from one scene to another. One scene was reminiscent of Hamlet's scene in King Lear. This is a good thing but it also made it a bit confusing for me. It also made it a bit hard to see where the film was going to take us. I didn't know what the film was about until about half way through the film. But that is really the only problem I had with the film. The film itself is not bad. It is really quite good. It is a good film to see on a rainy day with a bowl of popcorn.

Jonathan R. photo
Jonathan R.

I'm not a fan of the TV series and felt that the movie had no depth. In fact, I would have rather seen the movie based on the TV series. I don't understand why this movie won the awards, it didn't live up to what the TV series was. My advice is to wait until the DVD comes out, but watch the movie first.

Stephen A. photo
Stephen A.

Mystery and Drama. It's interesting that people in the theater were wondering what the heck was going on, and when it was all over, they were asking "What was that all about?" And my friend who was sitting across the room thought it was really cool. Not a bad movie. Not a bad movie, but it's not good. If you're looking for a movie, I would recommend Mystery and Adventure, or maybe Something in the Night.

Crystal Long photo
Crystal Long

I have read the reviews for this movie and I have to say that I was a little disappointed. I was expecting the movie to be full of romance and the sort of story that would appeal to me, but it turned out to be very dark. I was also expecting the movie to be about "daring" and "breaking the rules" and "not sticking to the rules" but the movie was actually very dark and very much "no rules". The movie was very hard to watch because the acting was very very bad. The characters didn't make any sense at all and the acting was really bad. The fact that the movie is in black and white makes it even harder to watch. The scenes with the couple where they talk about the rules and the lines between them were really very boring and didn't make any sense. I also expected that they would have to kill the "dragon" in order to get the antidote to save their lives but instead they were "free" of the "dragon" and then there was a chase scene in which they were running around and fighting with the "dragon" which was a total waste of time. I really don't understand what the purpose of the movie was. Maybe it was to show that you have to stick to the rules if you want to survive. But if you want to watch a movie that will make you think, then go and see something else.