Steam He's Out There

He's Out There

He's Out There is a movie starring Yvonne Strahovski, Anna Pniowsky, and Abigail Pniowsky. On vacation at a remote lake house, a mother and her two young daughters must fight for survival after falling into a terrifying and bizarre...

Other Titles
カッターヘッド 真夜中の切断魔, Dışarıda, Odakint vár, Он је тамо негде, Scarecrow, Él viene por ti, He's out there, Una presencia extraña, Noche siniestra, Leļļu nams, Ele Está Lá Fora
Running Time
1 hours 29 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Thriller, Horror
Quinn Lasher
Mike Scannell
Anna Pniowsky, Yvonne Strahovski, Ryan McDonald, Abigail Pniowsky
Canada, USA
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

On vacation at a remote lake house, a mother and her two young daughters must fight for survival after falling into a terrifying and bizarre nightmare conceived by a psychopath.

Comments about thriller «He's Out There» (19)

Debra Spencer photo
Debra Spencer

It's definitely worth seeing. The cinematography is awesome, and the film is so well acted that I was able to believe that what I was watching was a true story. There are twists and turns, but the twist at the end is also one of the best I've seen in any film. Some of the characters are a bit thin, but I found the film to be quite likable and would recommend it to anyone looking for a horror/thriller. I give it a 7 out of 10.

Joan Green photo
Joan Green

This movie had the potential to be one of the best horror movies ever made, but it's not. It's not terrible, but it's not great either. It has some scary moments, but they are few and far between. The story is quite interesting, but it's not very well done. The acting is okay, but not great. I enjoyed the movie a little bit, but I didn't like it as much as I thought I would. There is a great amount of blood and gore in this movie, but I just don't think it was necessary. It's just too over the top. If you're a fan of the horror genre, you'll probably enjoy this movie. If you're not a fan of horror, you won't.

Karen photo

For a while I actually thought I might enjoy this, just the idea of such an ordinary man being the lone survivor of a string of horrific murders. However, I was left scratching my head when I realised how this was structured and how it ended. First off, as mentioned before, the film was filmed as a documentary with a documentary style soundtrack, and this is where the problem arises. The first thirty minutes or so, although the pacing is great, it is not without its flaws. The lack of focus on each individual character could have been effective, and one of the actors, Tracie Harris, could have been much better, but I couldn't fault the majority of the acting. It is interesting that much of the first half of the film is filmed from the point of view of the female lead and her husband, although it seems like the story would have been better served as a documentary. The last half hour, however, is an improvement over the first. The transition from an ordinary, middle-class family man to an isolated man of great strength and determination is a great point and gives the film a much needed arc. This was one of the most effective scenes, although the ending seemed rushed and, to be honest, predictable. In all, I'm still very happy I watched it and I think it is a shame the producers were unable to include a more mature interpretation of the storyline. I recommend this to anyone who enjoys crime/horror films.

Kathleen photo

I don't think it is too much to ask that a movie is enjoyable, and this one is. I don't think it is a masterpiece, but it is fun. The characters are interesting, the story is original, and the effects are fantastic. The main characters are a bit too broad, and the story is a bit convoluted. It is not a movie that should be taken to the movies, but it is a good movie to watch on a rainy afternoon, and I recommend it.

Martha Wheeler photo
Martha Wheeler

I am a big fan of the Stephen King series and the rest of his work. I love the supernatural aspect of his work. So when I saw this movie, I was very intrigued. I think the movie was great, it had everything a horror movie should have. There were some parts where I was very scared and I didn't want to leave the room. The movie is very well written, the actors were great and the directing was great. The only thing I didn't like was the ending. I think they could have done better. I don't want to give it away but I do want to say that the ending was very good and I would recommend it to anyone who likes Stephen King's work. It's a great movie.

Joyce S. photo
Joyce S.

Okay, so the DVD release of "Out There" is titled "Night, 20/08/1928", which is a real shame, because this was supposed to be a follow-up to the bizarre "Night, 20/05/1928" (the one I linked to in my review of "The Goblin Warrior"). And that movie is a classic horror flick. The DVD of "Night, 20/08/1928" offers a terrible (and not very good) fake commentary track, and doesn't include the deleted scenes. But, if you are interested, you can find out a lot more about the plot and events of "Night, 20/08/1928" in a lot more detail, and also watch a pretty amazing documentary on the making of the movie, that will either make you like the movie more, or make you not like it. If you like this movie, I would highly recommend it, because it's very underrated, and has a unique and cool atmosphere to it.

Lawrence photo

I was very surprised to find out that this movie was actually made and directed by the same guy. I read a few comments on this site and there were a few things I found odd. I have not seen "The Blair Witch Project" and do not have much familiarity with the genre. I will not even try to describe the plot here. As far as movies go, this is the most successful horror film that I have ever seen. I would have to say it's the only one that I can consider "great". Sure there are other great movies out there that aren't bad, but this is one of those movies that takes you to the edge of your seat from beginning to end. There are scenes where you just want to scream, scream, and scream and you actually do! If you are a fan of the genre, then I think you should really see this. As far as the effects, I thought they were outstanding. They weren't anything like the ones in the "Scream" movies or "Scream 2". The fact that the scenes are so scary is what keeps you interested in the film, instead of the other elements. As far as the acting goes, I have to say that Nicole Kidman and Christopher Plummer are both fantastic in this film. The whole movie just feels so natural and real. The actors really brought the characters to life. To be fair, I have not seen Plummer in anything before, so it will be hard for me to compare him to Kidman. As far as the music, I have to say that it was awesome. The music was just very creepy and added to the atmosphere of the movie. This movie had some really great scenes, and even some that really are scary. I think it's a must-see movie. I thought this was a great horror movie and I think it is one of the best movies of 2006. It's worth checking out.

Howard photo

They call it "Monster of the Week". Here's the thing, no one's ever seen a Monster before. Not even the Monster who killed the guy who was talking to the girl and killed the other monster. I'm no expert but I can see how this could go down as a slasher flick. This was going to be a Christmas movie and it turned out to be a Christmas movie. I don't think I could call it an original idea. If the movie was truly original, why did they remake "The Thing" from the seventies. It's a half-assed attempt to make a new Slasher movie. I don't think they could have even done better if they had tried. The movie opens with a murderer going around killing women in a mall. The killer is killing all the women for no reason at all. That's when they come across the mall girl who is alone in the mall. She's probably just wearing her Christmas sweater. She doesn't do anything and she isn't caught by anyone. Then she's killed again. From then on, it becomes a fun movie to watch. The killer uses different ways to kill the girls and the camera angle changes. I know most of you guys don't pay attention to it but it's worth watching. The music and the lighting are a big help. It gives the movie that added feeling of reality. So here's the movie for you. If you don't like the movie, just try to stay away from the reviews. I guarantee you it will improve. And don't believe what the critics say. They all hate this movie. I would rather watch this movie again than the more popular Scream movies. My vote: 6/10.

Jeffrey Garza photo
Jeffrey Garza

You can thank the studio for that. The film begins like it is going to be a crazy movie. You can't even count the number of times you're saying "I'm not sure what that means!" The tension builds up to a climax, but the climactic resolution is never resolved. So it's all a little rushed and very, very drawn out. And that's the beauty of it, the "plot" is just left hanging. So you have to guess what's going on the whole way through. There are even several scenes that have no meaning at all, other than being the bare bones of what's going on. It's a shame because it was good. Just badly executed. But then, most movies are. The actors are fine, and I have to say I like the fact that they were under an actor. The plot is nothing special, but I guess you could say that about most horror movies. Not many of the things that go on are really scary. There's a knife in the hand, and then a woman having her face slit in the bathroom. Those are pretty minor and may be hard to believe. But they don't really help, especially since the movie was only 85 minutes long. I felt like this was very much more like the book than the movie. Not as good, but it's a good movie. It's not one of the best horror movies I've seen, but it's worth a look.

Douglas Willis photo
Douglas Willis

What a strange movie. I'm not a big fan of horror movies, but I thought it was a good one. It starts off with a guy being chased through the woods by a killer that he believes is in the woods. The killer isn't really scary, but the film is entertaining enough to keep you entertained. The last scene is where the movie really picks up. The killer has made his way to a local motel. He has taken the place hostage, and is ready to kill anyone that gets in his way. The killer is a very disturbing man, and I can't say that I liked him. I think he was a little over the top. I don't know if the writer was trying to make the killer more disturbing, but it didn't work. I think the writer just didn't like the character, and tried to make him more disturbing. I think the writers did a good job with the killer. The guy was creepy, and I think the writers did a good job with him. The last scene was very good, and was very creepy. I give this movie a 7 out of 10.

Amanda Olson photo
Amanda Olson

There are certain kinds of movies that I just cannot get enough of, it seems. Once you've seen something once, I'm pretty much going to give it a thumbs up. As a director and writer, Michael Haneke has done everything possible to make it impossible to avoid the inevitable-cliche dialogue, nonsensical and unneeded subplots, and most of all, a complete lack of any sense of character. While there are a few good moments in "Saw V" (sometimes, but rarely, making use of psychological horror), the vast majority of it is riddled with awkward and unimportant plot elements. Whether it be the unbalanced and irrelevant characters, or the fact that the writers just have no idea what to do with the idea of these werewolves, this movie is a total waste of time and money. The performances are great, though, and it's not difficult to enjoy the performances of some of the best actors in Europe (most notably, the cast of "The Cell"). And I guess that's the most important thing, right? For all of you who've already seen "Saw V," you know what I'm talking about, so you know exactly what to expect. Once again, the director and writer have not only made an awesome movie, but they've also made a masterful piece of art that will surely not be forgotten. So, if you haven't already seen "Saw V" because you're tired of it already, I would recommend you to see it. It will surely be the first movie in your DVD collection, and it will surely be the first movie in your personal collection that will remain in your memory for a long time. And when it comes to my personal collection, it will remain in my mind long after I've seen "Saw V."

Bruce J. photo
Bruce J.

It is a good idea to introduce a mood of dread with the film's first ten minutes. It creates a tone that can't be missed in this horror movie. No surprises are promised for the second part of the movie. There is the original angle about a ghost killing people. This is the main subject of this thriller which was made with relative low budget. Here we see a story about a businessman who starts work for a secret organization for secret clients. The organization doesn't make any promises. It is a real wonder what will happen in the next scene. The first two part of the movie are packed full of blood and violence, so it is definitely good for horror movie lovers. The scenes of violence will keep you wondering what will happen next. And the credits are mixed with some beautiful background music. Some of the credit songs are played on the soundtrack which are really excellent and pleasant to hear. The movie was a nice surprise and recommended to all. It is a horror movie with lots of suspense and suspenseful moments. It is probably a masterpiece for hardcore horror fans.

Jerry Lane photo
Jerry Lane

This is a truly strange film, and it has a lot of the same elements as other films in the genre. The story is quite clever and the acting is quite good. It's really a great film to watch with friends and not have to think about what you're watching.

Anthony Mills photo
Anthony Mills

I loved this movie. The atmosphere is intense and the atmosphere of the movie is good. The story is good too. The monsters are like something out of a scary movie. The horror in this movie is stronger than the horror in the movie Exorcist II. There are a lot of scenes in this movie that are really scary. The direction of this movie is good. There are a lot of good things about this movie, but there are also a lot of things that aren't good. The story is not so good, and the story of the movie is so bad that I can't tell you what the movie is supposed to be about. The director is terrible. He is really bad in this movie, and I feel that he is one of the worst directors. He has many mistakes in this movie. For example, he made the movie last almost two hours, but he had one scene that was supposed to be the beginning of the movie. The other thing is that he made a monster that was supposed to be strong, but he didn't showed the monster. The movie is like one of the worst movies I've ever seen. The worst thing is the monster. The monster is really weak. The monster is the worst monster I've ever seen. This is the best monster in the world. The director made the best monster. The monster is really powerful. The movie is very slow and boring. The movie is really bad, and the movie is really good. This is the best movie of the year. I'm not gonna say much about this movie, because the movie is really good. The movie is really bad. The worst thing is the director. He is really bad. If you're gonna watch this movie, you have to wait for a long time. The director is really bad.

Rachel Newman photo
Rachel Newman

I liked the movie. I'll watch it again. The fact that most of the actors weren't huge name actors is a bit surprising. The character build-up is perfect. The plot is really effective and it's like a mini series on the monster itself. The ending was kind of confusing, I'd have liked to know why it happened but not to the point where you have to ask yourself why it happened. And it really is a monster, not a figment of your imagination. It's believable. You do have to suspend disbelief a lot of times when dealing with these monsters, but the way they were built up made it easier for me to accept them. It wasn't a bad movie, it was just a better and more enjoyable movie for me to watch over and over.

Brian Y. photo
Brian Y.

This movie is like the other one with the music. They both have a similar feeling to it. I like the music, it makes me jump a little bit. It was good to watch. The actors were good, they are good actors. The movie was good. It's not the best horror movie, but it's a good one.

Emily photo

I'm not really a fan of horror movies, but this movie was really scary. It was a great movie, especially the ending, which was really sad. It's not a movie I would watch over and over again, but it is a great movie. I think it's worth a watch.

Kelly Austin photo
Kelly Austin

I found this movie very entertaining. The movie starts off very slow and boring but it builds up nicely and I didn't want it to end. The ending was very disturbing and very disturbing. I think that the ending was good because I never saw a movie that had that kind of ending. The movie is not scary, but it is a good movie to watch with friends. The actors in the movie are very good. I think that the movie is worth watching and I think that it is one of the best horror movies I've seen. I recommend it to all the horror fans.

Samantha M. photo
Samantha M.

I saw this movie last night and it was pretty good. It has a good plot and it's not boring. I was surprised that this was made on a small budget. It had some good scares and the actors did a good job. I really like the ending, though. I think this movie would be better if they made it a little longer. I think this would be a good movie to rent if you're in the mood for a horror movie.