Steam Extraction


Extraction is a movie starring Chris Hemsworth, Bryon Lerum, and Ryder Lerum. Tyler Rake, a fearless black market mercenary, embarks on the most deadly extraction of his career when he's enlisted to rescue the kidnapped son of an...

Other Titles
タイラー・レイク -命の奪還-, Dhaka, Τάιλερ Ρέικ: Η Φυγάδευση, Misión de rescate, Out of the Fire, 驚天營救, Vyslobodenie, Tyler Rake: Extraction, Tyler Rake: Ocalenie, Resgate, Tyler Rake: A kimenekítés, Tyler Rake
Running Time
1 hours 56 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Thriller, Action
Sam Hargrave
Ande Parks, Joe Russo, Anthony Russo, Fernando León González, Joe Russo, Ande Parks
Chris Hemsworth, Ryder Lerum, Bryon Lerum, Rudhraksh Jaiswal
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

In an underworld of weapons dealers and traffickers, a young boy becomes the pawn in a war between notorious drug lords. Trapped by kidnappers inside one of the world's most impenetrable cities, his rescue beckons the unparalleled skill of a mercenary named Tyler Rake, but Rake is a broken man with nothing to lose, harboring a death wish that makes an already deadly mission near impossible.

Comments about thriller «Extraction» (6)

Kevin C. photo
Kevin C.

I really enjoyed this film. It kept me interested and entertained. The violence is intense and it is not overly silly. The acting was good. This is a simple and yet effective revenge story. There is no plot to this movie. It is more of a journey and it is quite an impressive journey as well. The scenery is beautiful and the effects are good. This is a good movie for action fans and it is a good movie for the whole family.

Carl W. photo
Carl W.

Overall, I found the movie pretty good, the story is pretty good, the acting is good. The problems I found in the movie are that the characters are not developed enough. The storyline is pretty weak, and so is the acting of the leads. All the bad things in the movie are just what I found as flaws in the story, so I will not go into them. The plot is really not that interesting, or it makes no sense. And the action scenes are really not that great either. There are some really cool special effects, but they aren't that great. For example, I don't think they could have gotten away with using the special effects in the beginning of the movie. So there's one scene where the guys have a super explosion, and then they do some slow motion to simulate the explosion. That is cool, but it was the kind of explosion that only happens once a year. But the explosion in the middle of the movie? That was really cool. The action scenes are fun, and the people fighting in the background are cool. The car chase scene is really cool, and I really enjoyed that. The music and sound effects are really cool. It's one of the coolest movies I've ever seen. And the special effects are really cool. The movie is really good for action and sci-fi fans, but there are some things that I think are a little off. I'll talk about them in a bit. The movie's original ending is a little odd, but it's not really too bad. And the ending of the movie is really bad. The ending is just. And the action scenes are cool, but not that great. The action is okay, but the movie is really boring. The movie is really good for sci-fi fans, but not really good for action fans. The movie is pretty good, but not really good. 7/10

Denise A. photo
Denise A.

Okay, as many of you know, I really like the style of the early Bond films, and the Bond franchise was able to successfully carry its own merits over the years. From the first film, the films would slowly but steadily mature into a more realistic and dramatic story, as well as incorporate elements from all types of genres. With that said, here's a review of an oldie but a goodie. The film in question is, The Collector (1964) and it is the second Bond film I have seen in a row. The Collector is the film that started the "Beatles/Hitlers" theme and I must admit that my interest was sparked by the climax of the film. I liked the film very much and would love to see it again, but I can't say I would watch it again, especially considering the decline in quality of films in the recent years. There were a few points in the film that were genuinely shocking, but I don't know if the film would have been that good if the director and writer had just dropped the "Beatles/Hitlers" bit and focused on the more relevant stuff. The film has a very good cast and I think the director handled it well. I liked Michael York in this film, but the others are good too, especially the supporting cast. The film is definitely worth a watch, even though it is rather dated. Even though this is the second Bond film I have seen, it is still a good film. It is a shame that this film has become a bit dated and is slowly becoming a slum of a film with really average action scenes. But the film is still worth a watch and I would watch it again. 7/10

Johnny B. photo
Johnny B.

Johannesburg is a tale of three friends who go into the jungle to film a horror film with their friends that they will shoot for a documentary. This film gets a rating of 7/10 from me. It is not one of the best horror movies I've seen, but it is not the worst either. It is a very good movie, with good cast, nice photography and well made, and entertaining. My main gripe about this movie is the score. It is one of the worst scores I've ever seen. It is very very annoying to have an 80 minutes score of a film as annoying as this one. I don't like it at all. This is a very good horror movie, with good cast and good camerawork, but it's score is over the top. I recommend watching this movie, but it's not going to be in my top 10 horror movies I've seen. I gave it 7/10.

Paul Patel photo
Paul Patel

I was hoping to see a more serious, darker, and suspenseful movie, but it was pretty much a dog-eat-dog situation from the start. I'm not going to give away the plot details. If you're the kind of person who needs to know all of that, don't bother watching. If you're looking for a movie that involves human-bear interaction, don't bother watching. Unfortunately, the best parts of the film are in the trailer, which was released a week before the film's release. I wasn't expecting anything else. At least the movie was entertaining enough to save for the actual film itself. If you've read my previous review of Falling Skies (and I had to do it myself) you know I'm not really a big fan of the post-apocalyptic genre, but I'm really glad I saw this movie. I'm going to give it a 7/10, because it was entertaining. The acting was good, and there were some genuinely good scenes. There was also some tension throughout the movie. If you're the kind of person who likes a movie that involves action, I would say you should check out this movie.

Brenda P. photo
Brenda P.

I do not like action movies that are all about explosions and gunfire. This one was different. It was not in a good way. It seemed like they were trying to make it a comedy, but that just didn't work. It was more of a thriller. I don't know how they got it done, but it was just not good. They should have gotten it better in post-production. Then it would have been better. I thought it was bad. In fact, I would not have paid to see it, and I was tempted to skip it.