Steam Silencio

Silencio

Silencio is a movie starring Novak Ricardo Cañamar, Anna Cetti, and Michel Chauvet. In order to save her son's life, Ana embarks on a quest to find a powerful stone from the Zone of Silence, located in Mexico. Someone finds out the...

Running Time
1 hours 38 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Drama, Mystery, Thriller
Director
Lorena Villarreal
Writer
Lorena Villarreal
Actors
Michel Chauvet, Novak Ricardo Cañamar, Anna Cetti, Shayne Coleman
Country
Mexico
Year
2018
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

In order to save her son's life, Ana embarks on a quest to find a powerful stone from the Zone of Silence, located in Mexico. Someone finds out the power the stone possesses and believes it is a power worth killing for.

Comments about drama «Silencio» (17)

Margaret Howard photo
Margaret Howard

Hilarious '80s black comedy that takes a seemingly innocent look at the end of the world and tries to make the viewer feel as if they've been there. Even the parts of the film that aren't explicitly racist are very lighthearted and feel good, but the film does have some moments of horror, especially towards the end. This is a perfect film for anyone who loves a good story and has a sense of humor, though I'm sure it would be difficult to understand a lot of the dialogue and/or humor.

Eric Bennett photo
Eric Bennett

i saw this movie at the very last minute,it was on the shelf for a month,i was super excited to see it.i wasn't sure what to expect,i watched it a few times and i just never got bored of it.the first time i saw it i was just mesmerized,i had to see it again because i was still mesmerized.it was a great movie,i would recommend this movie to everyone.i am so glad that it was in theaters.i would love to see it again.if you haven't seen it yet.go see it!

Andrea M. photo
Andrea M.

The story revolves around a woman who is about to give birth to her first child. After an abortion she is then diagnosed with a rare disease that will kill her. She is then forced to take a "home" pregnancy test, which is an instrument that has been implanted into her abdomen. However, the test has the potential to detect a lethal virus that is not on the test. The only way to be sure is to give birth to the child. It is a difficult decision to make. If she gives birth to a child with the disease she will be in danger. If she gives birth to a child with the virus she will be free of the disease. The movie is about the conflict between the two. The movie is an interesting story and I found it interesting that the film was made in the 1970's. However, the movie is not really a horror movie, it is more of a drama. The movie was a bit slow in the beginning. The beginning is really slow, I found myself waiting for the movie to get going. However, I did find the movie to be good. The movie is a bit slow in the beginning, but once the movie gets going, the movie becomes very good. The movie is not a great movie, but it is a good movie. The movie is not a horror movie, but it is a drama. Overall, I would give the movie a 7/10.

Matthew Morales photo
Matthew Morales

One of the first films I saw was a film called "A Walk to Remember" starring Julianne Moore. The movie was a tear jerker and a very moving one. At the time I didn't know anything about this film except the basic plot and that it starred Julianne Moore. The first time I saw the film I thought it was just plain awful and I kept turning it off. So the second time I saw it I was moved to tears. And the third time I saw it I was moved to tears again. That was about the only time I watched this film, but it was one of those movies that I watched over and over. The film is a love story about a family whose lives are torn apart by a car accident that is blamed on a man named Danny (played by Julianne Moore). I don't know how to describe it, but I was affected by the film. The acting was good, but the film itself was one that was haunting. The film took me through the emotions of the characters. The story was powerful, but the acting was great. I can't remember the last time I watched a film that took me to that deep. I didn't feel like I was watching a movie, I felt like I was watching a movie that affected me deeply. I don't know what was the cause of the film's success. Maybe it's because I love Julianne Moore, but she was one of the reasons. Her acting was very good and her role was very difficult. Her performance was excellent and she did an excellent job of showing her emotion and pain. I think it's because she acted her part so well. The story was not bad and it didn't need to be, but I don't think that it could have been better. It was well made, but it was just not good enough. It was a very good film that I would recommend watching, but it is not one that I will watch again. It is very good and worth watching, but I don't think it is one that I would watch again.

Douglas Harvey photo
Douglas Harvey

The story is about a former soldier who was brainwashed and who is now a psychotic. He's looking for revenge on the people who did him wrong and he gets help from a psychiatrist who has a different opinion about the subject. The movie has some twists and turns but it's a bit slow at some points. The ending is very surprising and it leaves you in a state of shock. The acting is good but the story is a bit slow at some points. This movie is worth watching.

Marilyn photo
Marilyn

When I read the reviews of this movie, I thought to myself, "what is wrong with people?" I thought the movie would be a clever comedy, but it's not. It's a mystery. What I found was that this movie was not as good as I thought it would be. The main plot was good, but I found it a bit slow and drawn out. This is not a movie I would pay to see, but I have seen a few movies like this, and it wasn't worth the money. The acting was not good, especially from Leonardo DiCaprio and Kirsten Dunst. They seemed like they were trying too hard. They were not convincing, and I didn't buy into the characters, either. However, I thought they did a great job with the special effects, and the atmosphere. The movie is worth seeing for the mystery, but I still think it's worth a rental.

Danielle photo
Danielle

As you can see, I'm a fan of the Hitchcock films. But "Strangers on a Train" is not my favorite of them. For me it was more of a "chick-flick" but it's got a good story. The film centers on a woman who was sexually abused as a child by her father. She and her mother start a "chick-flick" with their friends in which they make fun of their father's sexual abuse. The way it works out is they wind up getting involved in the father's underground cult. If you like Hitchcock and are interested in his movies, I recommend you go see "Strangers on a Train" but don't expect a masterpiece. It's not that. But I did like it and I think you will too.

Gerald G. photo
Gerald G.

Cinematography: 8/10 Atmosphere: 7/10 Scenery: 7/10 Script: 7/10 Acting: 7/10 Ending: 8/10 Not a great movie, but is definitely worth seeing.

Laura Obrien photo
Laura Obrien

Like the book it's based on, this film is a re-telling of the infamous but true story of one of the most notorious murders in US history, the 1991 slayings of four members of a family at their home in upstate New York. This film focuses on the investigation of the case, the trials of the case, and the trail of information that leads to the killer. The story is well-written, with many great performances. The performances of the entire cast are absolutely fantastic, especially William Mapother, who is sensational. If you like thriller, mystery, or just crime films, this is the one for you.

Harold P. photo
Harold P.

Now I'm not a big fan of Sci-Fi movies, but I thought I would check this out after seeing the trailer. I'm so glad I did! This was a very well done movie. The acting was very well done, and the whole story line was very engaging. The story was interesting, and there were enough clues to give you the answer you want. I really liked the first half of the movie, and enjoyed it very much. I thought the second half was good as well. I don't think I will ever watch another Sci-Fi movie, but I will be watching this one, and hopefully I will see it again soon.

Carol Cox photo
Carol Cox

On the face of it, The Preacher's Wife is a pretty straightforward thriller, which is a shame, because this film is about the complicated relationship between a man and his wife, which is much more complicated than the story would lead you to believe. This film is not perfect, but it is a well-made film, with some great performances. I was surprised to see the cinematography was done by Ang Lee, who has directed only one other film. He is well-suited to the subject matter of the film, and has crafted an interesting story with a solid script. On the other hand, the film is somewhat slow, and the climax was a little rushed. The film doesn't really have a very good ending, but overall, The Preacher's Wife is a good film, which is definitely not for everyone.

Jean photo
Jean

The movie was well-directed. I'm not a big fan of Hollywood, but I really liked the movie. The story was great. I also think it was a good example of how to make a film in a non-traditional way. The movie does have a few flaws, though, the main one being the editing. The movie sometimes jumps around, but for the most part it is good. Another problem I had with the movie was that some of the dialogue was forced. For example, the guy who gets the doll and kills the mother. I mean, if the guy is not supposed to kill the mother, the guy should have said something like, "It was a mistake." The movie also had a few flaws in the acting. There were a few instances where the actors were just playing the lines as they were spoken, and I don't think that the people that did it really did it well. Overall, I liked the movie, and I think it was well-done. I definitely recommend it.

Sandra Howard photo
Sandra Howard

The thought of a young and vibrant actress being abducted by a weird man and his creepy family seems like an intriguing premise, yet it's the film's handling of the material that is so unbelievably over-the-top that it actually makes you cringe. Or maybe I just can't get over the fact that Mariel Hemingway (Julian Sands) is not a young woman at all, but a sixty-five-year-old who's one-quarter Chinese. When we first meet her, she's standing in the middle of the street with her hands behind her head in a strange gesture that leaves no doubt that she's not at all beautiful. I was already curious to know how Hemingway would be able to sustain a physical beauty for so long. She's more like a statue than a real woman. Then, she suddenly appears in a rather disorienting way with her hands in the air, which could have been taken as a sign that she's suddenly come back from the dead, but instead is totally unexpected. Then, she suddenly appears at the end of a "rehearsal" of a "naked-kill" with a gun. The killer's name is Kevin Bacon, and I found it ironic that this would be the same person who called the woman's father a "dumb ass" for not believing his daughter, and the next day offered his condolences and apologized for the language incident. Still, I couldn't help but feel bad for the daughter who's kidnapped. The other director, David Cronenberg, did a great job of keeping the film at a respectable pace, but the plot is so far out of whack that I felt as though I was watching an animation. When the real story comes into play, the film feels almost like it was just thrown together in an attempt to bring the film's plot to an acceptable length. In fact, the film's plot is so convoluted that I couldn't really get into it. The first half of the film is almost silent, and I couldn't tell what was going on. The second half is about as "filler" as you can get, with the family showing up in a variety of odd circumstances. I couldn't tell what was happening with the missing girl, and the character who was supposedly Julia Roberts' cousin, was the only one who seemed to have any depth. While it's not a bad film by any means, I really felt as though I was just thrown into this world of a bizarre family. I suppose it's possible to enjoy this film if you've never seen it, but for someone who has seen it, I can't say I recommend it.

Vincent G. photo
Vincent G.

I was intrigued by the story of a young woman who loses her husband in a car accident and then finds out that he was involved in the death of her son. The acting is superb, especially by the young girl and the mother. The story is also well written. There is no real character development and the movie is a bit slow moving. It is a good movie to see with the family but it could have been better.

Tyler photo
Tyler

The one thing that kept this film from becoming a true classic was the casting. Nothing about this film was original. You can tell right away from the first scene that the acting was subpar and not really memorable. It was just a "cute kid" and a "cute girl" and some action. For the most part, this is the kind of film you'd watch on a Sunday afternoon on your boring old TV, not when you're in the mood for a good thriller. The direction by F. Gary Gray was absolutely dreadful. The action scenes were very bland and the entire movie was shot in dark tones. The camera work was not sharp and the lighting was extremely bland. All of this would be a great reason to skip this movie. I don't have a problem with the way the director shot some of the scenes, I just found it to be extremely boring and uninspired. I also found the character development to be really weak. The main character, who is played by Michael Chiklis, is one of the most unappealing actors I have ever seen. His dialogue was annoying, and he just seemed to be acting out a play from memory. The guy just never has any charm, and I could not help but feel sorry for him. The last time I saw him was in the 2005 film "Funny Games". He has since done a couple of movies and one of them was the Oscar-nominated "Doubt". I would highly recommend this film to anyone who likes a good thriller or if you just want to relax and have a nice movie to watch on a Sunday afternoon. I give it a B-.

Andrew M. photo
Andrew M.

A good thriller that should be enjoyed for its ability to make the viewer think about the truth of what is going on in a society. The film follows the story of a young man, Vincent, who works in a factory in a middle class neighborhood. Vincent is a quiet man, but when he sees a young woman walking through the factory with a man, Vincent decides to help her. He then is accused of murder, and is sent to prison for a long time. Vincent is a very intelligent man, but he is also very trusting. He does not want to believe what he is accused of, but he has to live with the guilt. The film shows the way that society works in the United States, and how people try to cover up the truth. Vincent is a man who believes in what he is accused of, but he does not want to believe the truth. The film is very well done, and it makes you think about the truth of what is going on in society.

Rachel P. photo
Rachel P.

The movie itself is a fairly good thriller, with a few twists and turns. The ending is a bit of a letdown, but the movie is good overall. It is worth watching.