Steam The Dying of the Light

The Dying of the Light

The Dying of the Light is a movie starring Bernie Anderson, Paul Bader, and Jon Berberian. A documentary that explores the history and craft of motion-picture presentation through the lives and stories of the last generation of...

Other Titles
Το φως που χάνεται
Running Time
1 hours 35 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Peter Flynn
Peter Flynn
Paul Bader, Jon Berberian, Bernie Anderson, Dorman Bermingham
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

A documentary that explores the history and craft of motion-picture presentation through the lives and stories of the last generation of career projectionists.

Comments about documentary «The Dying of the Light» (24)

Ralph H. photo
Ralph H.

This is a very good documentary, with an excellent, well-rounded plot and the ability to explain the science behind the survival of the human race. It also discusses how the mind is a factor in our survival. I would highly recommend this movie to anyone who enjoys science and its underlying principles. It also touches on the subject of man's soul and how he can use that to manipulate and manipulate the world around him. Overall, it's a very well-done documentary that is well-worth your time.

Diane Gilbert photo
Diane Gilbert

The documentary examines the life of the artist, artistically and personally. He has lived, been hospitalized, and been abandoned. The documentary is a bit hard to watch at times, but the interviewees do a great job with their limited time. It is nice to see a number of artists and a few artists friends sharing their perspectives and stories. This is the only documentary I have seen that contains a running commentary of the artist's life. I would recommend it to anyone who is a fan of the artist, or even a fan of artists. It is very sad to see the artist suffering and the interviewer trying to make sense of the artist's life. The filmmaker was very good at conveying the artist's suffering.

Jacob F. photo
Jacob F.

As an actor, I've seen a lot of films that I'd love to watch again, but they were so underwhelming I just couldn't bring myself to do it. It's like I can't enjoy a movie when the lead actor has a serious medical problem that is never really addressed. But this film had a few great moments, and the story was good, even though it wasn't in the best of ways. I think the director's got a bit carried away with the physical nature of the illness, and some of the movie is a bit graphic. I think if they had spent more time on the physical aspects, and less time on the medical aspect, they could have had a better film. Overall, I thought this film was good. It was interesting, and the plot was interesting. It was a bit unrealistic, and there were a couple of parts that were a bit too quick. The acting was good, and the film did have a good message. It was just too slow. The ending was a bit forced, and the pacing was a bit too slow. Overall, it was a good film, but I just wish it had more speed and a better ending.

Kathleen photo

I'm not sure why this film is only being given a 7 rating. It is, in my opinion, a great documentary about the effects of smoking on people. The subjects in this film are so common that it is easy to just assume they are all smoking. However, I can't help but think that some of them are actually smoking, and it is not really clear what is causing it. One thing I really like about this film is that it isn't 100% about the effects of smoking, but is more about how people have become addicted to it. It is not really a "smoking film" as the subject matter is smoking and the documentary focuses on the effect it has on the individuals. The film also touches on the effects of it on families and how it affects people. It also touches on the effects on the environment. This film has an interesting plot, although it is a little confusing at times. It is also not as informative as I would have liked. I would recommend this documentary for people who are interested in how smoking affects people. It is not really an educational film as it is not really about how smoking affects people, but about how people become addicted to it.

Amber photo

This is the first film that I have seen that I truly enjoyed. It was a little slow in parts, but overall it was well worth the wait. I found the actors and actresses to be very believable. I also liked the use of the color red in the film. The color red is often used in movies to depict the color red in a negative way. The color red is used in the film to convey the feelings of the characters, and also to convey the feelings of the viewer. I believe that this is a very important film, because it shows that color can be used in a positive way to convey a message. The story is very simple, but the message is very powerful. I believe that this film is a must see for everyone. I believe that this is a film that everyone should see. I give this film a 10/10.

Julie Murray photo
Julie Murray

The film has a good start, with the close of the war. There are a lot of funny moments, but this is not the film for the kids. It is too long for the younger ones, and it's not very deep. If you are looking for something to do with the kids, the movie is not for you. I can't see how the film will appeal to the mature audience. I give it 7 stars out of 10.

Melissa G. photo
Melissa G.

I was lucky enough to see this documentary at a screening in November, and I can say that it was a very entertaining experience. The film takes a very simple story and then works to tell the viewer the story of a woman and her family. The story is about a small town in North Carolina. In the town there is a woman who lives with her husband who is a fisherman. There is also a younger son, who is not able to leave the town because he is too scared to go outside. One day, the woman sees a light that is different from the rest of the town. This light comes in the shape of a white rabbit. This rabbit becomes very popular with the townspeople, and they are looking for a way to get a piece of it. They start asking the townspeople for money, and the townspeople are not very happy about this. The rabbit becomes a symbol of the townspeople's greed, and the townspeople begin to hate the rabbit. This story is very simple, and it is told in a very interesting way. The film is very much about the village of North Carolina, and I think that the townspeople should be thanked for the townspeople's greed. The film is very entertaining and very informative, and it is a great story to tell to your friends about.

Cynthia photo

The film was enjoyable but I found it more entertaining than informative. It was a good film but the information was very superficial. I found it boring and not very interesting. I was not interested in the characters. I found it to be very shallow and not very realistic. It was not very detailed. It was not very original. The film was very predictable and boring. The film was good but I would not recommend it to anybody.

Jacqueline Sanchez photo
Jacqueline Sanchez

This movie was an excellent documentary. I saw it on HBO, and I will definitely be buying the DVD. I can't believe there is a lot of people that can't believe how smart and passionate John Doherty is. He's an amazing guy, and I have never met a more dedicated person. I don't think I've seen him before in a documentary. And I really liked the way he talked about the best way to help others. This guy has such an incredible talent, and I think he deserves all the recognition he has received. I think that he should be a big star, and he should be in the Hall of Fame. I think that he will be able to make a lot of money from this documentary. I hope he's going to get more recognition because of it. I think that this documentary will be a great asset to the world, because I think that it will really bring people's awareness of the great things that are going on in the world, and they will want to do something about it. I also think that it's important to know that John Doherty and other people that are doing this work are doing it because they really care about other people. This is a huge responsibility that they have, and I think that they will be successful in doing this. If you want to know more about John Doherty and how he does this work, check out his website. You will find out a lot about him. The DVD is really good, and it's well worth the money you pay for it. I would recommend it to anyone that wants to know more about what is going on in the world, and how the world can be improved. I hope that this documentary will help change the way people think, and help them get involved in the world in a way that they can make a difference.

Helen photo

This film is a must see for everyone. It is very well put together, and you can't help but feel like you are part of the movie. The main characters are all well portrayed, and the acting is superb. I can't wait to see this film again!

Richard P. photo
Richard P.

This is an interesting documentary about a few photographers who had a brief break in the late 1970s and early 1980s. They are often considered among the most prolific photographers of all time. Their work is often called "the dying of the light." I am not sure if this is accurate or not. This is more of a general history of the photographers than a discussion of the life of the photographers. One thing that the documentary does focus on is their work and their creative process. I think this is where most of the controversy lies. I thought the documentary did a good job of covering a lot of ground and providing a lot of information. It also had some great music and clips from their work. I think the documentary is a good place to start if you are curious about the photographers and the creative process. I would recommend this documentary to anyone who is interested in photography.

Marie photo

The film is a must see for those who want to know more about the history of the church. While some may feel this film is "homo-skewed", the viewer will find it interesting to know about the history of the church and how the church has changed over the years. This film is based on the book by historian and writer Bruce L. Kirchner, and it is a must see for all church history buffs.

Jean photo

It's difficult to explain what I think of the film. But it's not a very good film. I'm not sure why it was made. It looks like a movie about aliens. It's hard to understand what the purpose is. It's about the war in Iraq. But it doesn't make any sense. The movie is slow. There are not many scenes that are interesting. The best scene is the one where the doctor talks to the President. It is a great scene. It shows that the war in Iraq has something to do with the war in Iraq. The doctor gives the President the advice that he needs. That is the best scene of the movie. But it's not the only scene. There are many scenes where you don't know what is going on. The only good thing about the movie is the interview with the President. It is a good interview. I think that if you are going to see this movie, I think you should see the interview. Otherwise, you should not see this movie.

Ralph photo

Having not watched the movie, I was left to try and make sense of what I had seen. The film is a statement about what it means to be a human being and what is really important in life. It is a documentary that deals with the lives of those that were born in the same time and place as these animals. The film focuses on the animals themselves as well as their caretakers. It tells the story of how they were raised, the problems they had, and how they cope with their new lives. It is very emotional and realistic. I thought the acting was very well done, especially the main character. It is also very well made, there are many great shots of the animals in the zoo. I recommend this movie to anyone who wants to learn more about the life of an animal.

Angela photo

At the beginning of the documentary, a young man starts to talk about the rise of the "liberation of the cinema" from the last century. That is all. He then goes on to talk about how important the invention of the digital camera was in the history of cinema. A long pause, and then he goes on to talk about how the film industry is now "free" to make movies, but the cinema is still stuck in the same old ways, with the same old actors, the same old directors, the same old things. "The death of the cinema", as he says, is "not something new", it is the death of the cinema. No one even remembers how to make movies. The truth is that the cinema is dead. The only difference is that today, it's free to make movies. This documentary should be a warning, and it's a very powerful one at that. I recommend that you watch it, but don't expect anything new.

Rachel B. photo
Rachel B.

It is interesting to watch how some of the most important people in the world have been influenced by the religious beliefs that they hold. The movie is very well done and the information is presented with the utmost accuracy. However, the movie is not a very useful documentary as there is no mention of the effects that religion has on our society. The movie leaves the impression that the most important people in the world are people that hold to the teachings of the Bible, which is not the case. However, the movie is very informative and provides a great amount of information about the world around us. It is a great movie that can be watched by people of all ages.

Andrea Carlson photo
Andrea Carlson

The Dying of the Light is a documentary film by director Peter Carey and it is set in a remote village in China and filmed by the village people and their photographer. They had been documenting the life of the people in the village for many years and had found it hard to get funding for the film because of the lack of knowledge and support from local people. Their biggest problem was that they needed to get a financial backing from a producer. They found it in the form of the local village head, who had been a friend of the director. He agreed to fund the film with his small investment, which was then distributed to the villagers. The director and the villagers managed to get funding for the film. The film focuses on the life of the villagers in the village and the photographer's attempts to get the film funded. The film also takes a look at the film festival that was held in the village. It has been very successful in raising awareness of the film and how it was made. It was the first film to win a festival in China and the director is very proud of that. The film is a good documentary that shows the real life of the people living in the village. It also gives you a look at the current problems in the village and how the film has been received by the local people.

Ronald Barnes photo
Ronald Barnes

In the mid-1970's, the young future son of a Texas oil man went missing in the Galveston Bay. When his body was found, the cause of death was a brain tumor. He was 25. He was the son of a big oil man who had to find a place in the world for his son. The oil industry was an important part of this. I read that this film was a Canadian production, but it looks like it was shot in the US. It's the best documentary of the whole film. I recommend it to anyone who wants to learn about the oil industry.

James Y. photo
James Y.

The closing scene of this movie is the most beautiful and powerful I have ever seen. There are so many people who do not have access to food, water or other basic necessities. It is sad to see this happen to these people. It is also sad to see the time and effort put in to help them. This movie is a must see. I feel it is also a good reminder of the amount of work that goes into making a movie. The director does a great job of letting you feel the pain and anguish that these people are experiencing. I have also watched this movie on TV a few times and it still gives me chills. The director is able to create a feeling of tension and dread that seems real. This is a must see for anyone who cares about this issue.

Michelle H. photo
Michelle H.

There's something that keeps happening to this documentary, like the time it's all about New York and then it goes to the 1960s and then to the 1980s and then to the present day. The best part of this documentary is the music. "The Living End" is one of the best song selections. The lyrics and the music match perfectly. There's also the short, but powerful and effective scene of Bob Dylan in an interview with Michael Stipe, the first time he's ever spoken to the director. Dylan has a lot of different views on what his "best song" was, but the one that comes out of this interview is "Blowin' in the Wind." He says he had a little bit of fun with that one, but he thinks that song is the greatest song of all time. He tells Stipe that it's one of the best songs he's ever heard. The film is well made and the music is great. I've seen this before, but I like it better this time around. 7/10

Dennis Jackson photo
Dennis Jackson

While I didn't know the film, I was pleasantly surprised by the documentary. It is definitely worth watching. While the film is mostly about the band, the story is also about the cult. I enjoyed the story, but was concerned that it would be too slow for a documentary. But it was really interesting. It gives a much better insight into the cult, and the motivations behind it. The movie is a good summary of the main story, and also gives a good look into what made the cult. I would recommend this to fans of the band. And I would definitely recommend this to any fans of the cult. Overall, I would say that this is a great documentary. It gives a good picture of the band, and gives a good look into the cult. However, if you are a fan of the band, it may not be as good. But I would recommend this film to anyone who wants to know more about the cult. And I would recommend this film to anyone who has not heard of the band.

Randy photo

I saw this film in 2D and I think it was a good move to go that route. I found it interesting that the director had the courage to show that there were still people in the world who have the courage to live their life, not only with their minds, but also their bodies and spirit. I liked the way he showed that there are still people alive today, people who care for others, people who care about the environment and are prepared to sacrifice their own lives. It was interesting to see the struggles that these people had to face to make sure their loved ones were okay, and also the efforts they put in to be healthy and active, but also their awareness of the negative impact of their lifestyles. I also liked the way he showed how people can lead their lives without thinking about the environment, and how we can make a difference by taking the steps we can take to reduce our impact on the environment, but also the way we can live our lives without being concerned with the effects we have on the environment.

Henry Soto photo
Henry Soto

I was lucky enough to catch this documentary at the Toronto International Film Festival, where it won the Grand Jury Prize. I was a bit skeptical at first, because I am not a big fan of documentary films. I am not a fan of documentaries about people and their lives. However, the story was so compelling, and the director was so effective at conveying the stories of these people, that I couldn't help but be drawn into the story. I have watched it twice, and I am still thinking about it. I would recommend it to anyone.

Nathan photo

This film was made in the late 80's and early 90's and is a great look at the evolution of the drug culture. It's a very realistic look at the effects of the drug and the people who use it. I think this film is great because it's not about the drug. It's about the effects of the drug on the people who use it and on the people who are trying to get it. This film is really a must see for anyone who is interested in the drug culture.