Steam Brightburn


Brightburn is a movie starring Elizabeth Banks, David Denman, and Jackson A. Dunn. What if a child from another world crash-landed on Earth, but instead of becoming a hero to mankind, he proved to be something far more sinister?

Other Titles
Brightburn: A lángoló fiú, Brīnumbērns, Brightburn: Son Of Darkness, Đứa Con Của Bóng Tối, Brightburn: hijo de la oscuridad, Brightburn - L'enfant du mal, Brightburn: Syn ciemności, ブライトバーン 恐怖の拡散者, Brightburn: Hijo de la oscuridad, Brandenburg, Snažnogorući, Brightburn: Filho das Trevas, Brightburn: L'enfant du mal, Hijo de la oscuridad: Brightburn, BrightBurn, El hijo, L'angelo del male - Brightburn, Brightburn: El hijo de la oscuridad, Syn temnoty, Brightburn: Ζωντανή κόλαση, Brajtbern, 靈異乍現, ブライトバーン 恐怖の拡散者, Brightburn - O Filho do Mal
Running Time
1 hours 30 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Mystery, Horror, Drama, Sci-Fi
David Yarovesky
Mark Gunn, Brian Gunn
David Denman, Abraham Clinkscales, Jackson A. Dunn, Elizabeth Banks
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

What if a child from another world crash-landed on Earth, but instead of becoming a hero to mankind, he proved to be something far more sinister?

Comments about mystery «Brightburn» (14)

Hannah Williamson photo
Hannah Williamson

I thought that this movie was amazing. It was a lot of fun to watch it. I really enjoyed it. The only thing I didn't like was the ending. It just seemed a little odd. The ending was also good. Overall, I thought this movie was really good. It is definitely worth seeing.

Laura Morrison photo
Laura Morrison

It's a very strange movie, almost an art house film, but what it has is an incredible amount of tension and mystery. I won't give anything away, but there is a very strange twist at the end. The characters are believable and you can't help but be drawn in. The ending is very surprising. I don't want to give anything away, but it is very disturbing. The acting is great. The directing is excellent. The script is great. The soundtrack is excellent. This movie is not for everyone. It is extremely disturbing and has an amazing plot. I highly recommend this movie. The atmosphere is very creepy, and the acting is amazing. If you like movies like The Sixth Sense, you'll like this. I rate this 9/10.

Sean Williams photo
Sean Williams

A typical thriller, without the "what the hell is going on" part. The acting is okay, but nothing special. The story is pretty good, and some of the scenes are pretty scary. The ending is decent, but the movie was so long that it could have ended with less of the "what the hell is going on" part. So I would recommend this movie to anyone who has not seen it yet. I give it a 7 out of 10.

Wayne Burns photo
Wayne Burns

I enjoyed this film, although it does have a few flaws. I thought the acting was great, especially the character played by John Hurt. It was also great to see a film that had a very unique style. I was also impressed with the look of the film, especially the lighting and color grading. I'm not a fan of sci-fi films but I thought the visual style was very unique. This movie reminded me of the movies I liked when I was a kid, namely "The Andromeda Strain" and "The Andromeda Strain (1973)" (another brilliant film). The ending was very predictable, and I felt like I knew where the movie was going. I also thought the movie did have some elements of a horror movie, such as the possession. I think this movie was a great way to introduce young people to the sci-fi genre, although I think the film would be a little more successful if the film was a little longer. The ending was a little disappointing to me. I was expecting the movie to go on for a while, but I think it could have been a little longer. The movie was well worth watching.

Richard W. photo
Richard W.

To start off with, I must admit I'm a huge fan of the novel. The story was so engaging and I loved the characters, so I was really looking forward to the movie. I really enjoyed the first half hour, but then it got really slow. I started to think it was just me, but it seemed to get worse and worse. The acting was decent, but I can't really say the main characters were played well. I think it was a bit of a shock to the system for me to say the main characters were played well. I don't know if it was because I just didn't like them as much as the other characters or something, but they were a bit annoying. I really wanted them to die, but I couldn't really get behind the main characters. I really didn't think it was too much to ask for the main characters to be really awful, but I guess the film makers were trying to make it different, so I can understand. I don't really know what I was expecting from the film, but it was disappointing. The only reason I gave it a 7 instead of a 6 is because I really wanted the film to end. I don't know what to think of this movie, but I really wanted it to end, so I guess that's the only reason I gave it a 7 instead of a 6.

Nicholas photo

This film is a scary, thought provoking, and horrifying one. It was well directed, acted, and written. The acting was very good, especially by Woody Harrelson, a veteran actor, and by the child actors. The director made a well done film that was both suspenseful and scary. I give it a 7 out of 10. I don't know why people have hated this movie. I give it a 7 out of 10. I recommend this movie to anyone who is in a panic, or who has been in a panic.

Kathy Kim photo
Kathy Kim

When I first saw the poster for this movie I didn't really know what to expect. I thought it would be a movie about the search for the ancient Egyptian relic, and of course the usual horror and horror-comedy tropes. However, I was wrong. It's actually a decent horror movie. It's not great, but it's a decent movie. I'm not sure if it's actually the best horror movie ever made, but it's definitely worth watching, if only to get a glimpse into the director's mind.

Andrew B. photo
Andrew B.

I have to admit that I had low expectations for this film. I knew from the previews that it was low budget, and I'm not a big fan of low budget films. But the film does have some good things going for it. The acting is pretty good. The story is a little bit confusing, but the pacing is good. And the visual effects are really good. It's a very well made film. I have a few issues with it though. The first is that the movie is very slow and the pacing is a bit off. It's almost like the director had a meeting with a calculator and then the film was done. The second is that there are a few scenes that are pointless. The most obvious example is the scene where Ricks and "Flick" are doing the "old man's work" routine. It's supposed to be funny, but it's just boring and pointless. It's just so out of place and distracting. The third is the ending. It's great, but it's kind of anticlimactic. It's like the director just says "I'm done." and that's it. I don't know if it was a bad directing decision, or if it was just the writer, but it just felt like a poor ending. I'm not sure if the director intended it that way, but it just felt like it was a rushed ending. The movie is not a terrible film, but it's not good either. It's good for what it is, but it's not a good film. I would recommend it to people who like low budget horror films. It's not the best film, but it's not a bad film either. It's just not a great film either. It's a decent film. I just don't think it's a great film. It's just a good film.

Wayne Estrada photo
Wayne Estrada

I liked this movie. I think it is one of the best of the new wave of horror movies that is being made. It's a remake of the classic "The Haunting". The remake is good, and I am happy to see that a remake of a classic movie like this one can be done well. It's the same story, but done differently. The special effects are great. I like the new look of the house. I like the new camera angle. I like the use of different colors in the movie. It is one of those movies that you can watch multiple times, and still enjoy it. I recommend this movie to anyone who likes a good horror movie. It is one of the best movies that I have seen in a long time. I have seen it twice, and I plan on watching it again. I give it a 7 out of 10.

Harry W. photo
Harry W.

The film is interesting in that it's not really a horror film. It's more about the characters and their relationships and how they become closer to each other as the film goes on. I think it's a shame that they are separated by the events that have occurred to them in the previous films. It's a shame that the film can't stay focused on the story. It's one of those films that you just need to sit back and watch it, not only for the story but for the characters and their development.

Brittany M. photo
Brittany M.

I watched this movie on a rainy Saturday afternoon, and I must say that I really enjoyed it. The first hour is just a mix of jump scares, and creepy little things that creep you out. There are some great visuals, and I really loved the score. The film starts to pick up a little bit, and the story starts to take shape. I really liked the ending, it was kind of a dark twist. I also liked the last scene, which is where I was a little bit more disturbed, and I think that was a great ending. Overall, I really enjoyed this movie. I'd definitely recommend it to anyone, it's not your typical horror movie, but it is still a good movie to watch.

Willie photo

For those of you who haven't seen this film yet, you'll be left with a feeling of disappointment. It's a great film with a lot of great moments. The plot is good, the cinematography is great and the atmosphere is fantastic. However, I think the film does suffer from a lack of a good villain. The film was supposed to be set in a similar vein to "The Sixth Sense" but it was pretty much just a horror movie with some supernatural elements thrown in. There was no real reason to set the film in the future. I could have sworn that the film was set in the past, but I'm not sure. I do think that this film is worth a watch, but don't expect a film like "The Sixth Sense" or "Saw".

Russell J. photo
Russell J.

This is the kind of film I really wanted to see. A movie that's hard to watch and that you'll remember for a long time after you've seen it. I was expecting a bad movie, but it was actually better than I thought it would be. The first part of the movie was really slow. It had a few parts that I couldn't understand, but it was still good. The first half of the movie was pretty slow. The second half was good, but not great. The acting in the second half was great, but the first half was a little boring. Overall, the movie was pretty good. I recommend it to anyone who likes horror films.

Kevin Ward photo
Kevin Ward

In the 1960s, a British journalist (played by the terrific Chris O'Donnell) and his producer (Hilary Swank) are called upon to interview a strange man (O'Donnell) who claims to have been in a horrific accident in the 60s. In his interview, the man claims that the accident was a case of mass hysteria, and that he was once a real person who survived the accident and escaped. After a lot of investigation, the British journalist is convinced that the man is indeed the man from the 60s, and is soon looking for him. Meanwhile, the producer begins to have strange visions of the man who survived the accident, and is now trying to find him. I have to say, I was a little bit disappointed with this film. For starters, I found it to be a little slow-moving and rather dull in some places. The plot is a little too simple, and the characters are fairly uninteresting. The special effects were pretty good, but not very impressive, and the production values were pretty low-budget. I also found the acting to be a little bit wooden and over-the-top at times, and the direction to be quite poor. Overall, this film is a little more watchable than I thought it would be, and is certainly not a waste of time.