Steam Churchill


Churchill is a movie starring Brian Cox, Miranda Richardson, and John Slattery. Ninety-six hours before the World War II invasion of Normandy, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill struggles with his severe reservations with...

Other Titles
Warlord, チャーチル ノルマンディーの決断
Running Time
1 hours 45 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
War, History, Drama, Biography
Jonathan Teplitzky
Alex von Tunzelmann
Julian Wadham, Miranda Richardson, Brian Cox, John Slattery
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Ninety-six hours before the World War II invasion of Normandy, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill struggles with his severe reservations with Operation Overlord and his increasingly marginalized role in the war effort.

Comments about war «Churchill» (68)

David S. photo
David S.

I enjoyed this film, as I had read and heard that it was about a period in history that I was not familiar with, but it was a very interesting film. It shows that one's perspective is the most important thing when it comes to learning about a time and its people, and the film takes you back to those times and shows us how things really were, which is quite a common theme in history films. It is also good to see James Bond in an action film, it really adds to the action aspect of the film. What also helps this film is the fact that it is a historical account, rather than a dramatization of history. This allows the audience to learn about the events and people in the period and their impact on the country and world. I would recommend this film to people who are interested in history.

Diane photo

Historical re-enactments of wartime battles, with all the pomp, splendor and mawkishness, have always been a favorite of mine. My father was a WWII veteran and we grew up with all the wonderful movies produced by Hollywood that depicted the battle and the heroes. A few years ago I bought and watched The Battle of Britain, based on the book of the same name by Christopher Andrew. After watching it I realized that I'd never seen a movie that depicted the entire battle. I saw it as an American movie on the "British" side, but the movie showed the entire battle on the British side. It was a shame that the makers of this film failed to show us the entire battle. But, to tell you the truth, I don't have too much time for watching movies about Britain, or any other part of the world. My best chance for seeing an accurate historical movie is to see a foreign film. I'm not a fan of Hollywood. But, I do know that in this film they really tried to give you the whole story. In general, the battle scenes were great. But, to be fair, the Americans were a bit better in this one than in the previous movie. The British were all well-known actors (for example, Jeremy Irons and Eddie Redmayne). The British were portrayed as a bunch of reckless young men that really weren't very heroic in battle. The Americans, on the other hand, were portrayed as a bunch of well-trained, well-disciplined men. But, they were very professional. The American soldiers, however, were portrayed as almost a parody of themselves, playing soldiers that just looked "too good" to be real. All in all, this movie was a disappointment to me. But, I'll be watching it again. The movie is still interesting and entertaining, if you really want to know the whole battle. But, if you are more interested in seeing the battle, or just want a good movie to watch on a rainy day, this isn't the film for you. However, the movie is good, and I'd recommend it.

Terry Warren photo
Terry Warren

It is extremely difficult to make a movie about the prime minister of the time period. However, I think this film is done well. The scenes are well shot, the costumes and props are amazing. The acting by all actors is very good, as well as the direction. For me, the movie is quite interesting and I would recommend it to all, especially those who have been interested in politics. However, for me, I think it is quite long. The book of the film had many scenes that were not shown in the movie, and I think that was a problem. I think that one of the best parts of the movie was the description of the film itself. It was a long movie, but it is interesting and very well filmed. It has a lot of good information, that you will probably learn from it. My only criticism is that it was too long. My rating 7/10.

Roy R. photo
Roy R.

This is the best biographical movie about a historical figure that I have seen in a long time. The movie is about the story of Churchill's relationship with his wife, Clementine, and with his father, Lord Randolph Churchill. The film is a must-see for all historical buffs.

William Dunn photo
William Dunn

I can't say that I particularly enjoyed this movie, but I don't think it is a terrible movie either. The great thing about this movie is that it was about how a man would go about his life in the face of horrible circumstances. The other thing is that it is not a historical movie at all. If you are expecting a real account of how Churchill came to power, or how he was deeply affected by the war, you will be sorely disappointed. This is a movie about a man, and how his life in the military, and his relationship with his wife and daughter was the only things that made him happy. The movie did a good job of showing that his life was a war of survival, and he was not in it for the glory of it, but for the sake of his country. I personally didn't like the fact that the movie did not show Churchill's faith in God as being one of the many things that made him so great. He was always willing to sacrifice himself to his country, but he was never ready to sacrifice his faith in God. I thought that this was an interesting character development that could have made the movie more realistic. It also had a good balance between the family side of the movie, and the personal side. All in all, this movie was good, but not great.

Mildred H. photo
Mildred H.

In a world that has been diminished to the point that wars and natural disasters have been reduced to mere happenstance, what is the measure of what matters, the sacrifice and glory that can be found in the battle of life and death. In the modern era, war has been placed in a context that lends itself to the entertainment and entertainment industry. In this film, war is portrayed in a manner that only reinforces the truth of what it means to be a hero. It is a movie that would be set in a remote country with a population of only two people and with very few men fighting, it would be very difficult to portray the time in this film. The performance of both Stephen Dillane and Ben Gazzara is excellent, the chemistry between them is very believable and the story is told in a very realistic way. The only weakness in this film is the casting of Sean Connery as Winston Churchill. The actor does not fit the role of the part and he is extremely stiff, it is hard to believe that Connery was Churchill. Nevertheless, the performance of the cast is great and there is nothing in this film that should be missed. This is a film that should be viewed by all generations. It is an excellent example of how a film can be made that is realistic and entertaining without the need to be politically correct.

Andrew photo

Of course, most historians have no idea of what they are talking about. This movie is very accurate. I know of no real facts to the movie. I only know what I read in the newspapers and what I heard on TV. So, that is all. Some people might be offended by the movie. I'm not a historian and have no knowledge of anything about Churchill. However, if you read the book, you will see that it is full of inaccuracies. For example, I know Churchill didn't order his people to kill anyone, but he didn't order the people to kill. He did not order the army to attack. He didn't order the army to invade. He didn't order the army to destroy the libraries. I don't know what all the other historians are smoking! It is true that Churchill was a paranoid. But you should remember that he was in love with Clemenceau, who he married. I think this movie did a good job of telling the story of Churchill, who is one of the most famous historical figures in our world.

Judith P. photo
Judith P.

I found the movie to be fairly good. It had an interesting story line and interesting characters. The acting in the movie was good. The visual effects were great. I would have liked a little more action and a little more fighting. I was expecting the movie to be more intense and dramatic. I think the movie was a good balance of action and drama. I liked the acting and the characters. I think the movie would have been better if it was a little longer.

Harold B. photo
Harold B.

One of the most challenging assignments that a director or screenwriter can ever have to face is to create a film that captures a story that should be told. And what would a story be without a hero? So what if this film is based on a biography of Winston Churchill, who is one of the most beloved British politicians of all time. So what if there are biographies of Mussolini, Hitler, Mao, Castro and more. They're all history. What makes a story memorable and gripping is the way that it is told. It doesn't matter whether the film is based on a true story or a fiction. What matters is how well the film depicts the events, and how much impact the film has on the audience. It is this power that J.D. Salinger had in his work and that James Cameron had in his film Titanic. It is the power of the film itself that is the most important part of a story, and how well the film is told that counts. The writing of the film was brilliantly done. It was never dull. The entire film is riveting. The film stays on the edge of your seat. At times the film is too long, and at other times it is too slow. The movie moves at a quick pace, which is exactly what it needs to do. The film is very entertaining. And when the film is at its best, it is one of the best movies of all time. It is the most interesting and riveting movie of all time, and it will be a part of history. And to tell it as it was intended, not as a factual historical document is the only way that the movie will be remembered. Every word of the film has a meaning. And every word is very important. The acting of the cast was outstanding. The actors all delivered superb performances, and it was remarkable to see the way that the actors were chosen for their performances. I will never forget the scene where Winston Churchill looks at the audience. He looks very serious, and when he looks at the camera, it is a beautiful look on his face. The cast did a wonderful job. The film was excellent. I gave it a 7 out of 10. The only reason I gave it a higher rating is because of the beautiful cinematography and the beautiful editing of the film. I would recommend this movie to anyone. It is a must see.

Dorothy F. photo
Dorothy F.

This film shows Churchill as a man who is brilliant, but lacks a strong personality. It is an interesting film to see how this man became Churchill. This film is great because it shows the great man from the perspective of his opponents. Churchill is brilliant in many ways, but he is also very arrogant and shows a lack of discipline in his life. It is interesting to see how a man who came from a poor background to become a powerful leader. The film is a great example of the relationship between a man and his work and how it shaped his personality. This film was based on the book by Sir John A. Macdonald. The book was about Churchill's life in politics and how he became the prime minister of the country. I think this film was about his personal life. Churchill was very much different from other politicians. He had a strong personality and had a strong personality. In this film, we see how he came to be the leader of the country. It is interesting to see the people's opinions about Churchill. I think this film was very interesting. It was not based on the book by Sir John A. Macdonald. I think this was an excellent film.

Arthur H. photo
Arthur H.

In his own words, Sean Penn's 'The President of the United States' is the story of how Winston Churchill made the decision to commit Britain to the 'World War II'. For the sake of brevity, I will refer to it as Churchill's World War II, as it is one of his most well-known works. I read this work by Churchill in my English class, and I was fascinated by the book, as I always read the histories of World War II. That's what I expected to see in this movie. I have to admit that, with respect to the book, this film didn't do it for me. I was left thinking that it was nothing like the book, and I was left wondering why it was changed so much. I was left wondering if the film makers were going to stick to the book or if they were going to bring the book into the world of film. I was also left wondering how this film could be the best of all the other films, and what I should have done if I was going to see it. Well, that's my review of this movie. The film itself is a wonderful movie, but I felt that the film was lacking in some areas. It was not as dramatic or as emotionally moving as the book. I also felt that the film was more than a little boring. I will say that I did enjoy the movie, but I don't think it was the best film that I've seen. I did enjoy the film, but I feel that it was slightly too long. I think that it was probably too long for the film itself. This film had all the emotional strength that I was looking for, but it was also a little boring. In fact, the only thing that I would like to see in a film that was more emotionally powerful would be a film that was a little longer than the 60 minutes it took to get to the film itself. I think that this film was a good film, but I still think that it could have been better. I give it a 7 out of 10.

Deborah photo

It's a real pity that the movie bombed at the box office, and the one who can blame the director. It was a very effective historical film that may be a bit too cerebral for the casual movie goer. But I can't help thinking that if it had been done differently, this movie could have been a classic. I can understand why some people can't stand the film, as it's too cerebral for most people's taste. If you can tolerate a few scenes of the crowing and the wedding, this movie is worth seeing. I know I did. It's a good movie to watch with friends, and to watch in the mood of a movie night with a few friends. I'm not sure what else to say. Go see it if you can. If you don't like it, you don't like it.

Nancy photo

This is a fantastic film. It is a movie for all ages. The main thing that I liked about it was the direction. As I have said before this movie is full of symbolism. The history of the world is something you will be reminded of. This is a great movie for anyone who loves history. It was very entertaining to see the entire film. It kept me on the edge of my seat. I really liked this movie and I recommend it to anyone who likes history.

Andrew F. photo
Andrew F.

The movie is interesting but the narrative structure is extremely uneven. There is a very fine and very hard to get sense of characters, which are often hardly made out of the picture. The ending was very dramatic, but very short and not a real emotional effect. It does not work like the movie seems to think it does. This is not to say that the movie is bad, it just has many holes in its structure and is a little bit disappointing. If you want to see a good movie about the war, go for Paul Greengrass "Napoleon" or Paul Greengrass "The Executioner".

Julia Wade photo
Julia Wade

This is one of those films that starts out great and then, gradually, the picture loses its shine. If you like to watch a great film and then wonder why, go for it. But if you like films where the plot is not developed at all, skip it. The only thing that kept me going was the scenery. I liked the art direction, and the costumes and sets were great. If you are not a film buff, but you like a good story, I think this is for you. Otherwise, skip it. But if you have a few hours to spare, you can watch it on TV, on DVD or, better yet, on a big screen. It is one of those films where you are captivated from beginning to end. "Man of steel" was a very good movie. But this is a great film. A good movie. I give it a 7 out of 10.

Susan photo

This film was a great,great,great movie!The war had a great effect on Churchill.The film showed Churchill as a leader and the effect of the war on his life.A great actor,a great director,and a great story all rolled into one.I liked this movie a lot.I give it a 7 out of 10.

Eric Phillips photo
Eric Phillips

This movie is actually really good. It is not as good as 'A View To A Kill', but it is still very good. It is interesting that even though he was a very important person in the history of the United States, it is generally not talked about as much as he was. Some of his ideas are still very important today, like the idea of American hegemony over the world. He believed that the United States had a monopoly on global military might and that Britain, France, Russia, and China were simply puppets of the United States. But the movie makes it clear that he was far from being a perfect person. He was the first president to admit that he had not read the Constitution, and he was also the first president to call for war in the first day of his presidency. I think that this movie is interesting because it shows that while many people will not want to admit that it was a mistake to invade Cuba and that the war was unnecessary, it is also true that many people want to be forgiven for the decisions that they made and that they would rather be absolved from any guilt than admit that they made the same mistakes that their leaders were accused of. I think that this movie is very important because it makes people think about how much people are willing to forgive their leaders.

Zachary Banks photo
Zachary Banks

A film that takes us on a journey through history, politics, and human emotions. A political thriller with a fantastic cast and an interesting plot. But most importantly, it shows the deep emotions and turmoil of a country that has seen a lot of conflict and hardship. With the war in Korea now a distant memory, the story begins as John Foster Dulles (Tom Hanks) is being elected to the position of United States President in 1961. He is the one that will decide who is going to be in the White House and who is going to be on the other side of the fence. However, before he is elected, he is being interviewed by a Senator who was involved in the war. This Senator was involved with the Chinese and his daughter was in a Chinese prison camp. He decides to leave his interview to get his daughter out of the camp. John decides to take him to the hotel. While he is there, he begins to bond with the Senator and starts to realize that he has feelings for his daughter. While his son and daughter are in the hotel, they begin to bond with each other. The next day, John meets his old friend and foe, Joseph Stalin (Robert Redford) who becomes the U.S. President. He tells John that he has had a relationship with his daughter in prison. This is the start of a love triangle with the Senator and his daughter. As the movie continues, John is on the run and goes to Vietnam to help the Vietnamese people. There he meets fellow Vietnam veterans and is forced to become a diplomat in the country. At the same time, John becomes a political candidate for the office. He is able to win the election and is able to lead the country back to a normal life. The movie is great and really shows how people in the political arena have to deal with a lot of emotions. The love triangle between John and the Senator is great and really shows the complex emotions that people have to deal with. This movie is great, a great political thriller, and a great movie to watch.

Brian photo

The movie is well worth seeing. However, I found it very confusing. Some of the subplots were not explained very well. The movie did not explain why JFK was assassinated. How he died was not explained. The movie did not show JFK's assassination as the greatest tragedy in U.S. history. The movie did not explain why the U.S. became a world leader in the first place. This movie is not for everyone. I believe that it is a good movie, but some people may not like it. I recommend watching it if you are interested in history.

Eugene K. photo
Eugene K.

This movie shows the rise of one of the most prominent people of the 20th century. This is a very good movie but I was disappointed with the actual performance of the main character. It seemed that the director didn't allow the actor to show any emotion. At first I thought that he was supposed to be silent but then I realized that he had to do a lot of facial expressions. The actor portraying Winston Churchill was very good but he didn't show any emotion in his face. This makes it hard to believe that he was actually Churchill. I am a Churchill fan but this movie made me think that he was a somewhat "charismatic" man. I am not saying that Churchill is not a charismatic man but this movie made me think that he wasn't very charismatic. At first I thought that the film makers were making a point to show the country's strength and patriotism but after I saw the movie I realized that it was actually a very negative movie. I found that the movie was making a point that all of the British people are arrogant, dishonest, and selfish. I think that the movie is very one sided. I felt that the movie showed the people in a very negative way. I don't know what the director was trying to say with this movie but I think that he should have tried to make a movie that was more positive. This movie is just plain stupid.

Ronald Nguyen photo
Ronald Nguyen

I was reading some comments and I must say I found the movie to be a bit boring. I found myself watching the movie thinking of how many times I have already seen it. I guess I should have put it in the 3-7 range. And for the movie, I would have had to agree with a lot of comments and I would not have rated it above 5. I would have rated it a 6. (I am a 9) If the movie was a little bit more dramatic, maybe it would have been better. I would like to see the movie again and I really hope they make it available for DVD. I would recommend seeing it.

Julie photo

Let's start with the cast. It's the best thing about this movie. I don't like Ian McKellen as Gandalf the White, but the other three are terrific. Christopher Lee does a good job as Gandalf, but he is only in the movie for about half of the movie. I think that the casting for Gandalf is one of the most important elements to make this movie work. The other big strength of the cast is that the movie has a little bit of everything, from the sword-and-sorcery to the historical-theater scenes. The movie is not a visual spectacle, but the music score is awesome and all the actors do a good job with their roles. As for the story, the story is a little predictable, but I don't really mind. The movie is pretty much about war, and Gandalf does a great job of portraying Gandalf the White, the greatest of the wizards. The acting is fantastic, and the movie has a great message about war, about saving a world and about the strength of a good leader. The only thing that I did not like about the movie was the romance between Ian and Arwen. The only thing that was not good was that the main character was a woman. I have not read the book, so I can't say whether that was intentional or not. I can say that the movie is great, but I don't think it's better than the book. I think that this is an excellent movie that deserves to be seen, but I don't think it's better than the book. The movie has some flaws, but it is great, so I don't really mind. I rate this movie a 7 out of 10.

Sarah C. photo
Sarah C.

This film was a nice change of pace. A film that really allowed the viewer to get to know the real leader of the British Empire. It was great seeing all the players from different countries. The actors were wonderful and acted as one. It was a shame that there wasn't enough of this type of film being made. But it was a good film to watch and well worth your money. This is what the British Empire was all about.

Donna A. photo
Donna A.

I've seen this film once and really enjoyed it. It had me glued to the screen, and I have been searching for it ever since. I'm so glad I found it, because it's a great movie. It's worth watching again and again and again. This is a great film, and if you like history, I think you'll love it. It's not like many other films that portray WW II from a point of view from the Allies, but you really have to be in the right mood. For example, if you're a WWII buff, I think you'd love this film, but if you're not, I don't think you'll be disappointed. I love it, and it has become a favorite of mine. The film is set in the early part of the 20th century, and is set in England, with a few locations in Scotland. Churchill is the British Prime Minister, and his father is a Duke. There are no other British royals in the film, except for the Prince of Wales, but it's more about his father and the Duke. There are three major stories in this film, and I think the three stories are very interesting. The story of Churchill, and how he became the leader that he was. The story of his time in the army, and how he came to his current position. And the story of the Nazis, and the strategies they used in their war. The film is very well done, and it's very powerful, but it's not the best film I've ever seen. I think it's a great film, but it's not as good as I thought it would be. It's worth watching, but not as good as I thought it would be. It's one of the best films I've seen, and it's definitely worth seeing. I give it a 7/10.

Austin photo

Came across this movie by chance on the TV late at night, looking for something to watch and found it to be entertaining, with a story that could have been quite dramatic, and with a great cast. I know it was made in 1981 but I don't remember seeing this type of movie before. I also don't remember seeing the other actors with a name and movie name in the credits. It's a good movie. If you like films about World War II, and stories about the political and military situation in the world, I think you'll enjoy it.

Kathleen photo

I wasn't looking forward to seeing this film at first because I've heard some bad things about it. But I was very pleasantly surprised by it. Yes, it is a bit of a slow start, but it gets better and better as it goes along. There is also a lot of great acting by the entire cast. The most notable is Daniel Day-Lewis as Winston Churchill, who was a young man when the film was made. He was very convincing as Churchill and his accent was very good as well. I was very impressed with his performance, especially considering the fact that he's an American actor. His portrayal of Churchill was especially impressive, and he gave a very believable portrayal. In fact, it was one of the most convincing portrayals I have ever seen of a Churchill. I also liked the portrayal of Churchill's daughter, Clementine, who was also an excellent actress. Her performance was also very good. However, the performance of Winston Churchill was perhaps the most impressive part of this film. I can't say that he was a very good actor, but he did a very good job of playing Churchill, and his performance was very convincing. His performance was especially good when he was at the end of his life, because he was a man who was going to be a great leader, but he was not able to do that. This film is about his life, and he was a great leader. Although it is a bit of a slow start, it still gets better and better as it goes along. It was definitely a film that I recommend to anyone who wants to see an excellent film that will have you thinking for a long time afterwards. The acting is very good, the direction is very good, and the film is very exciting throughout.

James photo

I first heard of this movie on a late night TV show. I have never been so excited to watch a movie before. There was a lot of talk about the war, and I was interested. I have never seen a movie this good before, and I loved it. When I heard about the casting of Brad Pitt, I was excited. I am a big fan of his, and I really liked this movie. He did a great job. Even though I am a huge fan of Brad Pitt, I found his character of Churchill to be an interesting and brilliant one. I also thought the story was very well done. I think the movie was a good representation of the times. I felt that the movie took place in 1917 and 1918. It had a good story line. I thought that the actors did a great job in their roles. The characters were good, and the actors did an excellent job. I would recommend this movie to anyone, especially to anyone who is interested in World War I, or World War II. It is definitely a good movie for all ages.

Kelly R. photo
Kelly R.

The movie starts of very well. It makes us feel like we are part of the entire story, we don't know how the story is going to end. It is a well made movie. It really gives us a real feel for the time period of the story. It is not just a movie that is supposed to give a real feel for the time period. The acting is excellent. The actors, especially Morgan Freeman, just do not disappoint. They make you feel the emotions. It really does not matter if the movie was made in 2015 or 1945. This is not a movie to make you feel nostalgic. It is a movie that will make you feel like you are part of the story. The movie is entertaining. It is not going to be a masterpiece but it is entertaining. It has a great story. It is not a history lesson. It is a story that makes you feel like you are part of the story. The movie was a great movie and it will be one of the best movies of 2015. It is not as great as "Bourne Identity" but it is still a good movie. I give it a 7 out of 10.

Ronald Salazar photo
Ronald Salazar

In 1938, the First World War was starting, and the United States was not in a position to do anything except call on the Allies. That didn't stop the American public from demanding that they call on the British, and so, Winston Churchill was born. Churchill, like the rest of the world, was at war. But Churchill was actually so young. As a child, he was sent to the front line in the trenches of France, and he soon learned to read and write. When he returned to Britain, he was named Prime Minister. Winston Churchill is the figure of the film, and the film is based on a biography by Michael Foot. The film itself is extremely well-made. The script is smart and the performances are excellent. However, the film's greatest strength is the story. It is an historical drama about the British Prime Minister who was the driving force behind World War II. It is also a film about a child who grows up in a man's world. The film is well-paced and maintains a fairly steady pace throughout. It isn't a great film, but it is a very good one.

Timothy photo

The story begins with the assassination of John F. Kennedy by a deranged gunman on November 22, 1963. The details are told in flashbacks to the victims' lives in the days following the assassination. There are elements of all these lives interwoven with one another. While it is said that the film is not historically accurate, it is nonetheless a very good film. While it does not really contain a lot of action, it does have a lot of characters, that give it a real sense of realism. It was very good to see such a well-known cast, including Samuel L. Jackson and David Morse. It was also a very good cast, considering that the film was made in 1981. This is a very good film to see, and I can highly recommend it.

Raymond Nelson photo
Raymond Nelson

I'm not sure how much I could give this film a 7. I'd be willing to go with a 6.5, but the problem with this film is that it's hard to know whether or not you're watching a documentary or a movie. The story of Churchill, as told in this film, is fascinating, but I just don't know what the point of it is. I've never been a fan of his, but I like the way he's portrayed in this film. I don't know if the film is just trying to say something about Churchill, or it's trying to say something about Churchill, but the truth is, it's a very complicated story. The film is very good. The way it portrays Churchill is amazing, but the way it portrays Churchill is not what I'd consider an impressive film. The film is told from the perspective of the British public. I'm not sure how true this is, because I've never really known Churchill, but I do know that it's a story told to the British public. The film is a very good film. It's very interesting, and it's very well-made. The performances are good. I like that it's told from the British public's point of view. I'm not sure how accurate this is, but I know that the film is telling a very interesting story. I just don't know what the point is of the film.

Judy B. photo
Judy B.

Starts with a pathetic attempt to get into British history by trying to show that Winston Churchill was not a good guy, and was more responsible for the death of over 60 million people than Hitler. In fact, he was the greatest evil character ever invented. His attitude and his speeches are very well known and his deeds are often called to be considered as a crime and a war crime. Yet, at the end of the film, the British have managed to make Winston Churchill the savior of the British Empire. For a long time, I considered this film to be an insult to Winston Churchill. But after a while, I began to realize the level of respect that has been accorded to Winston Churchill. I think the only good thing that has been said about this film is that it has made me remember how I felt about the British Empire and to recognize the fact that there is a lot of nonsense and nonsense in the history books that is just not true.

Rebecca Palmer photo
Rebecca Palmer

I must say I did not know what to expect from this movie and in that sense I found it not as good as the previous movies. The film itself had its weak points and there were moments where I could not understand what the characters were saying or doing. The main reason why I like this movie is because of the performances of the actors. Sean Connery is absolutely brilliant in this movie and portrays the British leadership as someone who is completely under pressure and can only survive by his own will and his own decisions. He's seen as a man of the people who always manages to find the right things to do for the nation, and that's the reason why he is loved by the British people. Then there is the lovely and talented Judi Dench who is so brilliantly charming and convincing as Queen Elizabeth II, and she is such a great actress that I'm sure she will be winning awards for this movie. Colin Firth is a great actor, and he does a good job in this film too, but his character is not as interesting as the one portrayed by the British royal family. I think there are some good points in this movie, but it does have some flaws. The bad points are: There are some scenes where the film is just too slow and not thrilling enough. I understand that this was a war movie and there are times when it would be a good idea to show scenes of battle, but in the first half hour of the movie the film could have been shorter. The film was also a bit slow and was not exciting. Overall, I think this movie is a good one, but it's not a classic like some people have made it out to be. It's just good movie that I would recommend to the average person.

Vincent Castro photo
Vincent Castro

There's a lot of brilliance in this movie, the acting, the dialogue, the script. The way they portray the leaders and the people who served them. It's very accurate. It's sad to see how some of the leaders have fallen from grace. The movie doesn't make fun of the leaders, it just portrays them as human beings, full of flaws and mistakes. The movie's focus is on the human side of it all. It's about an amazing man, Winston Churchill, a war hero and a very strong leader. I loved this movie, and I hope you will too. 7/10

Christian photo

This is a good film to see if you are interested in history and are interested in seeing how two men, who were enemies and had to get along in the middle of the war, both had to come to terms with their relationship and the differences they had in their personal lives. The film starts off with Churchill being very angry at the British government. He was under siege from his critics, and he was making some unpopular decisions at that time. This is when he was dealing with the Secretary of State for War. This was in response to the criticism he had received over the war. At this point, the film starts to show how the two men came together. The film shows how Churchill became more concerned about how he could make a difference in the war. He tried to find ways to get more people to help him. He was finally convinced that the only way to do that was by recruiting the young men of the British army. This is the same time that he was becoming more concerned about how he could help the British people. The film ends with Churchill being forced to resign as Prime Minister. The film shows how the two men came to terms with their differences. Churchill was forced to be a man of the people, a person who cared about what was going on in the war. Churchill was unable to change what he wanted to change. But Churchill, a man who believed in his country and his nation, was able to change his mind and bring his country back from the brink of defeat. I think that this film is a good film to see if you want to see how two men came to terms with their differences. The film is made by the same man who made Braveheart, and you can see that the film is based on his earlier film. However, this film is much better than Braveheart. It is a much more interesting film. I think that this film is better because it shows how Churchill overcame his differences and overcame his personal issues.

Janet photo

I was given a copy of this film at a local library and I was not disappointed. I was expecting a movie of historical importance. What I got was a very good movie about one of the most influential men in history. I think there is no other way to describe it. It was not easy to watch the entire movie. It was just about three hours, but I was so glad that it was over. The movie is based on the book "The Making of a Patriot". The movie is based on the movie made by Lee Marvin and George C. Scott. Both movies were both very good. I give the movie an 8.5 out of 10. I will say that it is not that good but it is definitely better than average.

Stephanie photo

A drama about the second World War based on the life of a British Prime Minister. This film is directed by Ridley Scott and is based on the life of Winston Churchill. I haven't seen any of Ridley Scott's other films, but I thought that this one was pretty good. I am not a fan of Clint Eastwood, but I did like him in this film, and he is very well-cast as Churchill. Eastwood has done some very good films in the past, and this was probably one of his better performances. I would recommend this film to people who are interested in history. My vote is seven. Title (Brazil): "To do a prato: No Brasil" ("To do a prato: No Brazil")

Jonathan Gibson photo
Jonathan Gibson

The film Churchill has been a staple of the British film industry ever since it was released in the 1970s. But now, with the technology and modern techniques available, this film is being compared to a foreign film, namely Joseph Goebbels' "Der Judenstaat" (The Jews Stare at the Sun). In the early 1980s, a new and very popular form of film was emerging, which was to be followed by the domination of foreign film in Britain for the next thirty years. So now, it is 20 years later and I have watched this film again. The film is also interesting, with some very strong performances, and wonderful acting by the main characters. The film is set in a time of great crisis and in a world that is more and more under the control of the Communists. In this world, Churchill, the prime minister, is at the centre of the world crisis, and it is the story of how he tries to come to terms with his responsibilities in this crisis. The film also has a strong message, with an underlying theme of "fighting for democracy" and "the faith that will save the world". The main character, Churchill, is a leader of this great struggle and who has a very strong sense of responsibility to the world. The film is also a drama and the way the story is told is very interesting, but in a sense I felt like the movie was more of a comedy than a drama. The film is a great film but it was not without its problems. One of the major problems is that the film does not take the characters very seriously, but this does not really affect the film. It is also a bit slow at times and there are times when the film is very slow. I think this is the main weakness of the film. It is not that the film is slow, but the film is more of a drama than a drama. Also the characters are very good in their performances. So I think the film is a good film. It is worth seeing, but I think it is not one of the great films of the film industry. The performances were good and the direction was very good. It is a great film but it is not one of the great films of the film industry. But the film was a good film, I rate it 7/10.

Evelyn photo

This is one of those films that makes you think and ask questions about the time and place it is set in. It is no less than a history lesson and I could say the same about those who had the misfortune of being involved in the Suez Crisis of 1956. I felt very much connected to this film. The history of the film is also interesting. This is not one of those films where the ending is predictable. The film is not long and yet the ending is something very meaningful. I could not wait to see it come to a close. I felt the movie was good and well-acted. I am glad I watched it and I highly recommend it.

Linda L. photo
Linda L.

When I first heard of this film I thought it would be some kind of, 'feel good' picture about WW2. As I read more about it I started to think it would be a patriotic movie about Winston Churchill, who was the head of the government and was the man who stood up to Hitler. I thought I had seen it all, but it turns out that this is actually a drama. I don't think that is what it was meant to be. In this film Winston Churchill, played by Colin Firth, tries to persuade his son to follow his path in life. The son is played by Dominic West. The whole idea behind the film is that the father wants to see his son lead a peaceful life and the son is doing what he wants to do, that's why the father wanted him to follow his path in life. However, Winston Churchill is trying to change his son's life, so he gives him the chance to join the army and live a life he doesn't want. I thought it was a good film, the acting was great and the director did a good job. However, this film wasn't something that was going to be put in my top five of all time. It is not one of the best movies ever made, but it was still very good.

Amy Reynolds photo
Amy Reynolds

I really enjoyed this movie. I am just waiting for the DVD. I thought it was great. It shows what happened to Britain at the time and shows the things that were happening during the war. I was surprised to see what happened to people like Winston Churchill. I thought it was really well done and the movie really shows what really happened during the war.

Lisa photo

If you want to see a gripping, award winning film about the aftermath of WW II, then this is the film to watch. If you want to see a documentary about the events of the Second World War, then this is the film to watch. A great story about two brothers who lost their parents to the war and how they tried to make their lives as normal as possible, while dealing with the feelings of loss and guilt. This film is simply perfect.

Dylan photo

There is no other movie that has ever captured the war-torn world of war as well as this. The Battle of Britain is an amazing film that captures the emotions and history of the entire British Empire. This is a must see movie.

Roger P. photo
Roger P.

One of the most gripping film of all time. Wherever there is war, there is always a war hero. Each year they are born. James Brolin, Tom Cruise, Alec Baldwin, Michael Clarke Duncan, Jack Lemmon, and even Philip Seymour Hoffman. Even Harrison Ford has his "Jack" in "The Shawshank Redemption". In his magnificent "Band of Brothers", Tom Cruise portrays the protagonist and the role is the same. As a matter of fact, there are many people who act like this. The movie makes you cry, laugh, and make you believe that these men are a part of history. As a matter of fact, this movie is a great inspiration. It is like "Jaws" in that there are some things you can never ever forget. A great movie to be watched with your family and friends, and with the entire family. My grade: A+

Crystal Schneider photo
Crystal Schneider

I'm a great fan of the "who was the best British general?" debate and I always see Richard Burton as a prime candidate for the title, even though he never led Britain into a war. But here we have the first chance to debate the issue: was Churchill really that good an officer? I can't say that I agree with that view, but it's a fascinating question and we're not likely to have an answer until someone else does. Still, the film does provide some illuminating information about Churchill's early career and his final days. It's easy to get bogged down in some of the details that are hardly as interesting as the basic story of Churchill's extraordinary life. What I liked most was the depiction of Churchill as a leader. What I also liked was the casting of William Defoe as Churchill. Defoe is a natural at playing Churchill and his charisma helps the film to work. I think the portrayal of Churchill's relationships with his close friends is very interesting and we get to see a lot of what it was like to be a Churchill friend, especially during the war. Finally, I think that the documentary about Churchill is really well done. I'd like to see the movie version.

Doris D. photo
Doris D.

I went into the cinema to see this film expecting the standard Hollywood ending - a hero sacrificing himself to save the world, saving a little girl and the rest being the wars and the bombs. But as I left the cinema I felt this is what the film was trying to say - that we have to be humble and allow the value of life to be put in our hands. It's a nice story, and I would definitely see it again - I thought it was great, but a bit like the end of The English Patient, you want more - which is why I went to see it again - the film did it's job perfectly - the whole idea was to end on a high note - and it did - the ending was perfect, and the message was really clear - that this is just a movie, and if we want to have a life we should allow it to happen to us. The cast was excellent - not only did you get to see Tom Cruise do a really good performance, but you also got to see the wonderful new face of Sir Ben Kingsley (or was it Sir Richard), who did a great job in his portrayal of Lord Chamberlain, and did a great job with the role - he didn't really overact - and he was just perfect for the part - everyone else also did a great job, so much so that I was surprised when the film ended - I didn't know that the character of Lord Chamberlain had a son. And when I did see the film again - I really loved the film. It was great - I hope this film gets a wide release, because it is such a great piece of work. 10/10.

Catherine V. photo
Catherine V.

This movie has the power to put a stain on the mind and heart of the viewer. The story of Churchill, played with superb acting by Christopher Plummer and Kenneth Branagh, is one of the greatest biographies ever written. The movie was wonderful, a perfect tribute to a great man, the only thing that really brings it down is the fact that it is not based on a true story. It is an adaption of the novel, so, it's only right that it would be based on the actual story, and I don't think it would have been possible. But, in truth, the movie is about the importance of men in the world, and the fact that they die and are lost. The film was great because it showed a man who was a brilliant political and military leader, who knew what he was doing, and who was too good for his time, and so great for his age. It was also a tribute to the hundreds of thousands of soldiers who died on both sides of the conflict, who were just trying to do their jobs, to defend their country, to fight for freedom. They died and were lost because of the corrupt world they lived in, and their leaders who could have brought it down, but instead chose to ignore it, and did nothing about it. I found this movie to be a wonderful tribute to one of the greatest men in world history, who was such a good man, a great leader. And, it is a great tribute to many, many thousands of others who died in the cause of freedom. I think that if I hadn't seen this movie, I would have never knew of Churchill's life and his time in politics. The movie tells the story of a man who took the crown and the glory that came with it, but only knew how to be a good man, and a good leader. In reality, Churchill was a wonderful man, but the movie tells us that, in the name of patriotism, the world would not allow him to do the things that he did, because of his age and his place in the world. The movie tells us that, in reality, Churchill was not just a great leader, but a great man. A man who died a hero, not a tyrant. This movie has many messages for people of all ages. And, it is definitely worth seeing. My family and I both loved it, and it was one of the best movies I have seen in the last year.

Terry Martin photo
Terry Martin

One of the best films of the year. A good portrayal of history and one of the best war films ever made. 10/10

Albert photo

I never read the history of Churchill, but I did watch the movie. The movie accurately portrayed his battles and the final result of the war. I was expecting an accurate portrayal of the battles and the final result of the war. I found it to be accurate. I do not know the names of many of the actors who played the major roles, but I think all of them were great. I highly recommend this movie to anyone who is interested in history. There are no scenes in this movie that are not a part of history.

Sharon Spencer photo
Sharon Spencer

First off, I'm going to say that "A View to a Kill" is probably the best of all the Bond films. The story is good and even though I hated the villain, I thought that he was a good villain. Roger Moore is a good Bond, he has a good sense of humor and his mannerisms fit in well with the character. I don't know if I would have liked it if it had been a younger Bond, but he was a good Bond. The film is certainly an improvement over the previous Bond films, it is definitely more well-rounded than the previous films. I just think that "Goldeneye" is the weakest of all the Bond films, it had some really good action scenes and a good villain, but that wasn't enough to carry the film. I also think that the new films are really dumb, but that doesn't stop me from enjoying them, they're just very dull and not that interesting. I'll give this film a 7/10.

Kenneth Alvarez photo
Kenneth Alvarez

I've watched this movie on the DVD for a few years now. At first I thought it was a farce. I finally saw it on TV and it was very funny. It was really interesting how the play was written and the way the movie was done. My favorite part is when Churchill was going to give his speech about the world being at war and he was sitting in the balcony of his room. It was a very funny scene. I really liked the parts of the speech that were in the background. The scenes were very realistic. I really enjoyed this movie and I think that it is very interesting to see how a real person would do the things that he did. If you are into historical movies and you enjoy them, you should check this out. 7/10

Robert J. photo
Robert J.

When I first heard of this film, I was stunned at how good it was. Now I have watched it, I am very disappointed at how slow it was. It started with a man that I knew well, he was the chief of staff of Winston Churchill during WWII. I felt this film was a good one because it made the point that many people that see history as just that, look at it as a story told to us. It told us that it was not just about war, but the whole drama of how we saw the war unfold. Now I don't know what was the use of the long scenes. We didn't know anything about Winston Churchill before the movie started, but after watching it, I understood what he had gone through. He was so quiet, but he was an incredible man. I hope this is a good film for you. The best part of the film was the conclusion.

Anthony photo

I'm a great fan of the book, and I saw the movie without reading the book. What a difference. The movie makes it much more realistic, and it also has a great soundtrack. For me, the biggest difference is the play on words, in a way it's like the play has a lot of "in" and "and" in it, but it's not really in the book. It's kind of like saying that it's like the man was still trying to find the "edge" to keep it out, but he found the edge and was not able to say it. It's not a huge difference, but it's a very big difference. I'm not sure how much of a spoiler this is, but it's kind of the point. I think if you read the book, you'll be disappointed, but if you saw the movie, you'll be very satisfied. I give it an A+.

Kathy D. photo
Kathy D.

This movie is well worth watching and entertaining. The movies script was not too complex. I believe that the screenplay was really good and the actors played their roles well. The real story of the film is the crisis and the struggle between the Japanese and the British in India. The movie is not for everyone but for those who are interested in the history of the relationship between Britain and Japan, and the struggle between the British and the Japanese in India, this movie is a must see. The actors did an excellent job.

Christina Wagner photo
Christina Wagner

This film has been quite a while coming, and for me personally it is one of the best films of the year, especially when you consider it's being released at the same time as another film called "Pleasantville". I can't wait for this film to come out on DVD and I am eager to see the film again. The story is a good one, as always and a very good character study. I thought that Christopher Plummer was great, and Colin Firth as always a wonderful portrayal of a romantic, flawed man. The music is wonderful, the visual style is absolutely beautiful, and of course the acting is amazing. People should see this film at least once, and when they do they will realize why it's so good. This film is a must see for any fan of historical films. The producers should be rewarded for their efforts, and I'm sure it will be for many years to come.

Angela Watkins photo
Angela Watkins

I was very impressed with this movie. The acting was great, the story line was great, the history was great, the directing was great, the special effects were great. I have read the book a few times and never remembered it. I just thought this movie was a great movie. I also love the music, and I thought the movie was well-acted. I thought the film was so well-written, I don't even know where to start. I think it is worth seeing because of the history that was told, the actors were good, and I thought the story line was great. I think it was one of the best movies I have ever seen. This is one of my favorite movies I have ever seen. I really hope you enjoy it as much as I did.

Daniel H. photo
Daniel H.

I had read many reviews of this film and they seemed to all have the same message.that it was a dud. Well, if you are someone who enjoys films with a dramatic story, this movie is for you. I found it a riveting and sad story. It was great to see a realistic film about the United States during WWII. It is about the trials of people who make the decision to fight, the trials and tribulations that they face, and the people who support them. It is an example of patriotism, of patriotism, of patriotism. To say that it is not a great movie, it is because it does not have a great story. It is a great movie because it tells a true story. No matter what the critics say about it, it is a great movie. I give this movie a 10 out of 10.

Brittany photo

I am a huge fan of the film and it is an excellent film.I will admit, I have not watched it in a long time.I think I will do that. There are some things that I don't like about the film,but it is the film. It is not a film for all people. Some people don't want to see war scenes,for those reasons I do not want to watch the film. I think it is the best film ever. I love the film. It is very good.

Jacqueline photo

I saw this movie last night and I was in a complete state of disbelief. I was convinced that it was just an amazing movie that everyone should see. What I was not convinced of was how awesome this movie was. And for the first time in a long time I was overwhelmed with the extent of this movie. I was awestruck and almost in awe. I just watched it twice and will be buying it when it comes out on DVD. I am a big fan of Churchill. His rise to power in the British Army is truly amazing. His plan to get rid of the North African states was truly amazing. I felt that the ending of the movie was brilliant and not the usual ending that you see in a movie. This movie will stay with me for a long time. I can't wait for it to come out on DVD and Blu Ray.

Henry Armstrong photo
Henry Armstrong

The film tells the story of Winston Churchill, the prime minister of Great Britain during World War II. In this film, we are shown his life, his career, and his political philosophy. The film focuses on the events of the war, from the beginning of the conflict to the end. This is an excellent film, and a must see for anyone who has a fascination with World War II. I rate this film an 8/10.

Christine W. photo
Christine W.

I saw this film at the Sundance Film Festival and I have to say it is a very impressive film. It is well acted, the direction is excellent and the photography is fantastic. It is very true to the real life of Winston Churchill. The film is based on his life and he is portrayed as a very interesting character. I think the film is very well done and I would recommend it to anyone who wants to see a film about a historical figure. I would recommend this film to anyone who is interested in history or who is interested in the film history of Winston Churchill.

Ashley G. photo
Ashley G.

The movie is about a British general who is in charge of a regiment of soldiers during the German invasion of Poland. He is assigned to lead the 2nd cavalry division in the attack on the German lines. He is also the commander of the 2nd army. The general is a man who does not have a lot of confidence in his ability. He is also a man who does not trust his men. But he is able to lead them to victory. The movie is a good one. I think the film is very accurate about the events that happened during World War II. It is a good movie that will be remembered for a long time. It is a very good movie and it is a movie that will be remembered for a long time.

Alan Lane photo
Alan Lane

I saw this film at the Edinburgh International Film Festival. It was a very well-made film, and the performances were top notch. The film was very well made, and it was very entertaining. I would recommend it to anyone who enjoys a good historical drama.

Adam R. photo
Adam R.

I'm not sure what it is about this movie that made me like it so much, but I really do. It is a very good film that deserves to be watched more than once. It is very well done, the acting is excellent, and the story is quite interesting. This is a very well made movie that is well worth seeing. The main character is very well portrayed, and the acting is good. The story is interesting, and the movie is well worth seeing. I think that this movie is worth seeing, because it is well made, and has a good story. The acting is very good, and the movie is well worth seeing.

Raymond H. photo
Raymond H.

This movie makes you think. It teaches you that there are still some good people out there. I've seen it twice, and it always makes me think. When it came out, I heard that people were complaining about it, but now that I've seen it, I really think they are right. It teaches you that life is really short, and you need to put your ego aside and get back to what's really important. It reminds you of all the people that made you what you are, and it's good to see that they're still out there. It also makes you think about the choices that you've made in your life. You need to see it twice. It's worth every penny.

Joan G. photo
Joan G.

I had high hopes for this film after reading some of the reviews. I had no idea that it would be so good. What I had expected was another film about Churchill and his wife that is supposed to be like a love story. Instead it is one of the greatest films of all time, in my opinion. It is one of those films that will stay with you for a long time. It is beautifully written, directed and acted. The music is a perfect choice for each scene. The cinematography is stunning. The cast is superb, especially the two lead actors, Sean Connery and Matthew MacFadyen. The supporting cast is equally good, particularly Timothy Spall, David Niven, and Sir Michael Gambon. The cast is also very impressive in their own right. Sean Connery is the ultimate man and his performance is amazing. The action scenes are intense and thrilling. The camera work is great and the editing is perfect. This film is a masterpiece, and the way it was made and the way it was made is the best way to make a film. It is a must see.

Crystal Perez photo
Crystal Perez

Winston Churchill was one of the most brilliant leaders the world has ever known. His greatest war to date was the Second World War. The war lasted from 1939 to 1945. He fought in the Pacific, in Europe, in the Middle East, in South Africa, in India, in India and then in Burma. His major achievement was the signing of the Suez Crisis Treaty with Egypt and Britain. At the time of his death, in 1964, he was 94 years old. It is fitting that the most admired and beloved British prime minister of all time would also be the best-selling author of books for children. As a children's book writer, I was fortunate enough to have a first-class copy of this magnificent work in my collection. After many years, this book has become my number one favorite of all the books for children I have ever written. It is so good that when my daughter (now 13) asked if I could have a copy for her, I couldn't refuse her. Now, if it wasn't for this, I wouldn't be so proud of being a British author, nor so proud of being a British politician. My only regret is that I never had the opportunity to see the movie. After all, this book is based on an actual historical event that actually took place in Britain in the early 20th Century. I don't know that this was a matter of any interest to British or American politicians, but to all others who are interested in the history of this great man, this book is an excellent choice.

Philip M. photo
Philip M.

It's easy to watch this movie, but hard to forget. This movie is so true to the true events that have taken place in history. It is so well made that it should be required viewing in high schools. It is a great movie, and one of the best I have ever seen. This movie shows the true story of Winston Churchill, and how his personal life and his career have been shaped by his political career. This movie is one of the most important movies ever made. It should be required viewing in high schools.