Steam Izzy Gets the Fuck Across Town

Izzy Gets the Fuck Across Town

Izzy Gets the Fuck Across Town is a movie starring Mackenzie Davis, Dolly Wells, and Alex Russell. A woman at rock bottom must find her way across Los Angeles in order to crash her ex-boyfriend's engagement party.

Other Titles
Izzy zapieprza przez miasto, Izzy Gets the F*ck Across Town, Izzy Gets Across Town
Running Time
1 hours 26 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Comedy, Drama, Romance, Music
Christian Papierniak
Christian Papierniak
Dolly Wells, Mackenzie Davis, Alex Russell, LaKeith Stanfield
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

A woman at rock bottom must find her way across Los Angeles in order to crash her ex-boyfriend's engagement party.

Comments about comedy «Izzy Gets the Fuck Across Town» (15)

Jonathan Rice photo
Jonathan Rice

I had seen this movie for the first time when it was in the theaters, and I still like it. It is a great movie, the only thing I don't like about it is the music. The music in this movie is amazing, it is really cool. I really like the music and the movie is just like that. It's just a great movie. I like the characters, I like the story, I like the actors. It's really a great movie.

Stephen B. photo
Stephen B.

Before you condemn this film, I'd suggest that you look past it's unfortunate context and look at the positives. In that respect, you'll probably be satisfied. But why would you really want to see a film where the main character chooses to start a social experiment because he believes that he will lose his ex-girlfriend for "being the bad girl"? The idea is so incredibly cliche that it's almost painful to watch. The movie is basically the same thing that the BBC were doing in the Eighties, just adding "Pavement" to the title. It would be cool if the writers got a few words out of the characters and the audience, instead of writing this "out-of-left-field" dialogue and hoping that it would turn out funny. That's the problem with most films, in fact, that is the biggest problem that I have with the film. They use very funny, but mostly uninspired quotes and imagery to do the speaking, but they never seem to get that right. A constant refrain from the characters is that we never really know what they are thinking. They do things that they've never done before, and are not ready to say what they are feeling. I do like this film a lot, but there are too many negatives to be so enthralled. It's great to have a film where it is not obvious that it's going to be a comedy or a romance, and where you don't always know what to expect. At the same time, you can't help but be slightly disappointed if you expect too much of a sequel. It would be really cool to see that little girl again, and maybe even a bit more of the same conversation between the two characters. Otherwise, I'd like to end by saying that I love this film, and I can honestly recommend it. It is far from perfect, but it's entertaining enough for a few hours.

Michelle photo

Yes, some of the humor is predictable and the acting is good, but the movie is funny. The story is very nice. I think it's a great story, and i like the actors, especially Bob Saget. I recommend it to anyone who likes funny movies, and if you liked the movie "Rambo: First Blood Part 2", you should see the other one as well.

Betty photo

I've been a fan of the film since it came out in the early 80s. I saw it again when it came out in the mid 90s, and I enjoyed it so much that I saw it again last night. I thought it was excellent. I was very surprised to see that the film was rated so low. I'm a fan of musicals, and this was a very entertaining musical. I thought the acting was excellent, and the music was very good. I was very surprised to see that the film was rated so low, I'm glad that it was rated so well. I'm glad that this film is being released on DVD, because it deserves it.

Samantha Santos photo
Samantha Santos

As with a lot of comedies and horror films, this film suffers from repetition. A similar pattern occurs in this film, with the same characters and locations being used. There's a similarity with "The Love Guru", though in that film, the comedy is more about the relationships between the characters. This film, as it's title suggests, is a collection of bits from other films and other people. Not that there's anything wrong with that, I'm just wondering if it would have been better to stop at that and to make it more cohesive, as it was in the first film, rather than going back in time and trying to create this whole other time line. As the camera starts to start to appear more than once, one becomes a bit concerned about the repetition. The film is not flawless. While it may not be a bad movie, it's not a good movie, either. It starts out with a similar structure to the first film, but the film drags on for too long. There's a bit of a drag-out at the end, that is more fitting for the genre of the film. The pacing is uneven. While it starts out with the same pace of the first film, it loses it at around the 2/3 mark. The pacing can't keep up with the character development in the film, and as the film drags on, one begins to lose interest in the characters. By the time the film is nearing its end, there's no real tension building up. It feels like this movie would have been better off with a shorter running time. The characters are all fairly generic. Like the first film, they don't have any depth. The same goes for the characters in this film. They're all fairly generic. There's not really a reason for the characters to do the things they do. The same goes for the villains. The villains in this film are just as generic. The ones who are mostly given lines are some of the same guys from the first film. In the first film, there was some good chemistry between the three main characters, and they all had likable sides. The villains here are all pretty generic, and not much of any depth. The film is about a DJ, Danny, who is a big local DJ and gangster. He's friends with his friend, Stan, who is a big rapper. Danny gets a job, by coincidence, with his former friend, Rick. They get a gig at a radio station, and the following morning they are in Chicago at a nightclub. It's there that they meet Dan the owner, Carl. When they leave, it's a sign that they're not going to be having much luck. In the end, the film ended on a depressing note. There's no real sense of satisfaction. This film doesn't have much character development, so the film was somewhat confusing, and the characters are rather generic, and not likable. The film is not flawless, and while it is a fairly decent comedy, it is rather boring. The film is highly predictable, which is quite refreshing for a comedy. 7/10.

Debra photo

Ah, the era of the "horror" films: more musicals, more hip hop, and the omnipresent camera. And "Horror Movie" in the title wasn't really my thing. But when I saw the trailer I was excited, and I went to see this film and I was in a relaxed mood, so this seemed like the perfect movie for me. In the beginning I was thinking, "Okay, this is going to be a musical, the music. This is going to be a really good movie" and then. BOOM! That was not the case. I was really surprised with how the first half of the movie was done, it was like if you did not expect it. There was the terror of the victim; the suspense of the movie. All the ingredients were present and when you actually see the movie you will know the answer to your question. The bad. For me the film was only average. It was really badly done, if you compare it to modern movies it's a 'cheap' film. The acting was nothing special, not only from the actors, but also from the director and the editors. The music is really good but it's way too long. Also the only thing that was really good was the beautiful photography, the cinematography is very great and has a very nice look. You get to see the countryside, the beach, the sea and everything. But when you actually see the movie it's not that good. I think that even though the film looks nice, it's not that good. But also it's an artistic and the cinematography is really very good. I don't think that's why I didn't like the movie. The plot is a typical. It's predictable and also the subject is that it's very hard to relate with a musical and the last 30 minutes or so just don't work at all, and I can't say it's just an artistic mistake. But it's not the only bad thing that I have to say about the film. In conclusion, it's a good film, but it's not one of my favorites.

Harry photo

I can't think of a single thing to say about this movie. I just watched it on the TV. I just couldn't get enough. I think the acting was brilliant, and the characters were just great. I loved the music, and the dancing was just perfect. It was so different from anything I've ever seen. I recommend this movie to anyone who wants to see a movie that will make them think about life and what makes it so great. I hope to see more movies like this one. I think everyone should see it. I give it a 10 out of 10.

Kyle M. photo
Kyle M.

I was never a big fan of rock and roll, but I did like the music and the movie. The music was very good, the acting was great, and the story was excellent. I am glad that they made a movie about the rock and roll scene. I would definitely recommend this movie to anyone.

Eugene H. photo
Eugene H.

I really did enjoy this movie, and it really is an interesting character study. It is one of those movies where you don't need to think much to figure out who all the people are and what they're up to. Unlike some of the other Fiestaware movies, this one makes a lot of sense, and it has a great story. Alex is really out of place in his new town, but the main problem is that Alex is completely off-put by the lifestyle he has been living for the last year, and when he gets there he doesn't get it at all. He has to learn to live in the way he used to live in the past and find out who his real friends are. He decides to visit the friends of a man who is dying, and he gets to meet them, and learn about them. What I liked about this movie is the movie tries to show both sides of Alex's character, and it ends up being a lot more interesting than just "he's looking for new friends." The acting is great, and the way the actors act is interesting. I think this is definitely the film that can beat out Fiestaware movies as the best character study movie.

Carolyn B. photo
Carolyn B.

As the show went on I was beginning to hate it. So why did I keep watching? For the story, I was actually surprised how clever the movie actually was. Of course the plot is contrived but it is so well acted and the twists so clever. You are left with the question, why do they have to be clever, is it a sex metaphor, etc? I don't think so. I am still shocked by the clever ending. Really, my friend the day after she watched the movie said she could never have watched it again. She must have thought the ending was silly and stupid. We went to a movie with a pre-viewing of this and the whole theater laughed at it. We saw the first one when it came out, and it was great. This was nothing like the original. But what I found that I liked was how the story was almost the same. But then I remembered I had nothing to compare this to, so I went back and watched the original again, and this time I knew the ending. The movie was really entertaining. This isn't a masterpiece of a movie, it's a light movie with some funny moments, and a couple of things that are just silly and pointless. But they are so much fun that I can't look at the movie too seriously. So if you want a light movie with some good acting and a couple of things that aren't as cool as the original, this is it.

Jesse Olson photo
Jesse Olson

Like many of you, I'd like to think that the reason why I only went to see this movie because the ads said "chick flick", but I was pleasantly surprised to find a light, breezy, enjoyable film. The characters were engaging, the plot engaging, the storyline interesting, the camera work engaging, and the music enchanting. All that said, I was concerned that I would have an overly sensitive audience, but I think I was in the right place at the right time. I'll admit that I was surprised at how good the film looked on the video store shelves, but you do have to be prepared to adjust to not having the traditional "thon you were expecting". There are a number of scenes where you just know that it's going to be different, and they don't try to hide it, so if you're expecting some sort of standard, mainstream fantasy, you may find that you were prepared. It is a romantic comedy, but it's not going to be for all tastes. There are a few scenes that seem rather low-budget, but they serve their purpose, and serve the character well. The acting is very good, and the character's personalities seem very real and believable. The film has a very "mundane" feel to it, as opposed to a more "chick flick" feeling, although the only "chick flick" moments are some of the more overt ones (like the guy peeing on the girl's chest), and in the end, I really liked it. If you're looking for a good film, and you don't have to worry about the traditional genre-blocking, then I recommend this film to you. Just don't expect too much.

Eugene Foster photo
Eugene Foster

This is a film with two great stories, two great actors and great cinematography. The story of a bunch of ex-patriots who try to run away from the Soviet Union in the 50's is very interesting. It is a very simple story, but that doesn't make it bad. It is pretty well made and it's easy to watch. The two main characters - a popular American rock star (Alex, played by Dylan, who appears to be an unrequited homosexual) and his back-up singer (Brent, played by Jonathan, who looks like The Dude from The Big Lebowski and sings with his mouth open and like a professional debater.) - are a bit unbelievable and seem to be trying to make the story work. It's a bit too soon and also the leading man does not look like a great singer. But, for a movie in which the principal characters are hardly visible, it is pretty good. I just can't figure out why the film was not nominated for an Oscar. Maybe because the American music scene is so obsessed with representing our glorious American past that we get very little chance to see some films with films about other cultures. This film should have been nominated for a Academy Award, but for some reason it didn't. Maybe because it was too old to be nominated. I guess that's the reason I give it a 7 out of 10. I give it a 7 for the fact that it's a very easy to watch film with very good acting, but it's nothing more than a 7 because it's still in the right place at the right time.

Jane Rose photo
Jane Rose

It's actually not a very good movie. The writing is good, the actors are good, and the actors.well, they're good. However, the movie does not work for me. I feel like it was poorly edited and the editing didn't do anything to create suspense or comedy or any of those things that made the original work. It simply seems as if someone's written some kind of script and then this movie was thrown into the mix to get the desired effect. In a way, I think this movie is so weak, it would be interesting to see how many years passed between the original and this one, and how many mistakes were made in their production. I understand that it was a low budget movie, but for it to be so slow and boring, and so long, is highly unlikely. The original was not a documentary, it was a movie about a boy, a boy, a boy, and his journey through growing up and becoming a man. There was no real plot to the movie. It was there to show how the world of childhood and teenage/young adult is actually a very scary place, especially in this day and age. This movie is kind of like a scary (spoiler alert) reality show, but without the cameras. It's very intriguing, but that's about all it is. Now, my biggest problem with this movie is that I just don't care about any of the characters. They don't care about me or how much money they have. They don't care about how their friends and family are, they don't care about anything. That's why the characters are so damn bland. The movie is just too slow and bland. Every time they do something cool, the movie jumps all over the place. It's very hard to follow what is happening, what's happening, and what is going to happen. All in all, it's not a bad movie, it's just not my cup of tea. If you like movies that make you think, and aren't too slow or boring, and you're just looking for a good drama or action movie, I would highly recommend the original.

Sharon W. photo
Sharon W.

I saw this movie at the TIFF and loved it. It is a true story and it's a little bit like a love story. It's about a couple who met in the streets, and they got married in a small village in the middle of nowhere. They had no money and they had to fight to survive. The story is really inspiring. I was really moved by it. I think it's one of the best movies I have seen this year. I really liked the ending. I hope the director will make a sequel. I hope he will make a sequel to this movie.

Melissa Griffin photo
Melissa Griffin

I've seen this movie a couple of times and think it's one of Woody Allen's funniest. The movie is centered on the actor known as "Yogi Bear". This guy does many movies and he's never one to "act". He just plays the part of Yogi Bear with his heart and soul. The movie is pretty entertaining and I'd say if you like Woody Allen and "Black Adder" I would say give it a go.