Steam Photograph

Photograph

Photograph is a movie starring Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Sanya Malhotra, and Sachin Khedekar. A struggling street photographer in Mumbai, pressured to marry by his grandmother, convinces a shy stranger to pose as his fiancée. The pair...

Other Titles
Retrato do Amor, Photograph - Ein Foto verändert ihr Leben für immer, Tu fotografía, Fotografia, Le Photographe, A fénykép, Ha'Tzalam Mi'Mumbai
Running Time
1 hours 50 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Drama, Romance
Director
Ritesh Batra
Writer
Ritesh Batra
Actors
Sanya Malhotra, Sachin Khedekar, Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Denzil Smith
Country
USA, Germany, India
Year
2019
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Two lives intersect in Mumbai and go along together. A struggling street photographer, pressured to marry by his grandmother, convinces a shy stranger to pose as his fiancée. The pair develops a connection that transforms them in ways that they could not expect. From Ritesh Batra (The Lunchbox).

Comments about drama «Photograph» (27)

Brandon photo
Brandon

The typical film of a very wealthy family is still a profitable one, even when the audience can predict the outcome and the ending. There are certain points in the film which leave you speechless, and which will forever remain etched in your mind. Of course, there are certain points in life when you will remember all that happened for the rest of your life. In the end, it's hard to make the same mistake twice. "Out of Africa" is one of them. I could see myself looking at the film again, feeling it as I did at first, and at the end, I will definitely be looking back at it as well. The documentary is meant to be viewed through the eyes of two old people: one is an educated woman and one is a farmer. For these two people, life has become much more difficult after the war and war is still the main topic of conversation. I can see how the younger person, who only has lived a few months, will come to the conclusion that it is still possible to live a normal life. And I can see how the older person will remember how to survive and how to maintain a happy life, even if it's a little harder than before. They do have time to meet, and have time to talk. That's what makes this film so special and powerful. The young woman's story is the more difficult, because she can't find any way to be independent. In the end, she decided to marry the man she loves, a military man who runs a cattle farm. That's what I would say is the hardest thing to live through, and that's what makes it so powerful. It's very difficult to watch that moment when the couple decides to marry. The filmmaker has created a very well-made documentary which will be talked about for a long time. The acting is also good. I liked the way they used local children, who have been involved in the war. Their stories are also interesting. I would say that this is the best film I have seen in recent times, although "Coming Home" is still one of my favorites.

Katherine photo
Katherine

Although my review is for this film, this film is quite good. The plot is actually quite enjoyable to follow. It tells the story of two people, one is wealthy and the other is poor, so naturally they begin to fall in love. I found the whole story about the rich and poor to be rather intriguing. So, in conclusion, I thought this was a good film. It really has a feel to it. It is an interesting story, with a great cast, and a very good director at the helm. I think you should watch this film if you are into love stories, or even a movie with a very good story, and it is not too serious, otherwise, I wouldn't recommend it. I would give this film a 7 out of 10.

Harold Elliott photo
Harold Elliott

The French Connection is a masterpiece that is best described by the title. It is also one of the best films I have ever seen, but if you're going to watch it as a documentary, it may not be the best. It's got a few superlatives to it, but it's no Pan's Labyrinth, or The Wizard of Oz. However, it is a film you must watch at least once. It has a great sense of pacing, a great sense of movie history, and a great sense of film quality. It's the only movie I have ever seen that keeps you watching it because you feel like you're watching it again. The cast is fantastic, but a few of the acting talents are not used all that well. There is one performance that is great, but everyone else falls short. I hope I'm wrong about this one, but I thought Billy Bob Thorton was the best. There are also some great supporting performances from Mary McDonnell, and Dan Hedaya. While his performance doesn't seem to be enough to save the film, it does give you something to think about. I did not like the ending, but I'm not sure what I would have done differently. It was an amazing film, but one that will leave you feeling just as empty as the characters do. I'll probably watch it again when it comes out on DVD, and that should be next year. The actors have done an amazing job with what they had to work with, and the director did a great job of keeping everything together. I highly recommend this film to anybody who hasn't seen it.

Steven Hill photo
Steven Hill

This movie tells the story of a young man who's wayward side gets him into trouble. It is a very good movie, and was a great show of the modern day style. It shows the difficulties of coming out of a troubled life and of how people can and will treat you for who you are, even when you are not the person they are looking for. The acting is very good, with Robert DeNiro, Helena Bonham Carter, and an impressive Oscar nominee that was in I Married A Witch, Eva Mendes. I highly recommend this movie to anyone who loves films that can show a message to a person who has a difficult life. You can tell they were trying to do something special, and they succeeded.

Patricia Carr photo
Patricia Carr

Why, yes, this movie is beautiful. I know a lot of people aren't aware that so many other movies are beautiful, but this one is so. The cinematography is breathtaking, with the woman performing the dance in the frame giving the effect of moving air. The music in the background contributes to the overall tone of the film, conveying a sense of melancholy and quiet isolation. The most lasting impression I got from this film is how beautiful and sensitive a woman must be to dance and move so well. I can't imagine dancing any better than she did. (Not her finest moment, though, she seems to have forgotten about it at the end of the film.)

Grace W. photo
Grace W.

The movie is a rather simple drama with a strong lesson to all of us who read the book. I really enjoyed this movie, though I have read the book a few times and then watched this movie, I still was still amazed and impressed by the performance of the actors. They showed how and why they are so likeable and actually what's there inside their heart. The story was simple and rather a good idea to begin with, but the movie will keep you in it's grasp. I think there was enough for all to enjoy, just enough to keep the viewer's interest. It may be not as emotional as the book, but the film shows how important reading the book is to the person. Some may not like the ending, but this was rather well acted and realistic. I must admit I liked it a lot and I would definitely recommend it to others. I gave it a 8/10.

Melissa B. photo
Melissa B.

THE COMPANY that released the film is the way it is because of the outstanding performance by Director Hiroshi Kurosawa.The story is a simple one: a great deal of time passes in a man's life when his best friend gets drunk and goes to the police station. He finds a case and eventually the judge who did not find the murderer of his friend arrives and he in turn starts to do his best to solve the case. Also he finds an old photograph that his friend took of his lover. What is more fascinating is that the film is the story of a man who tried to make his best friend's life happy,but found that he lost his best friend. I have not been to Japan for many years,but I was intrigued by the film. It is a perfect film in my opinion. It was a bit disappointing in the beginning,but in the end I felt that the film was about the film. It was a film about the end of friendship,and the best friend,and the old photograph. It was a wonderful film. It will leave you with the feeling that the film is just a part of your life,like a part of your pictures,like a part of your life.

Kathryn photo
Kathryn

I went to see this film a week ago with my girlfriend and was very pleasantly surprised. There are a few elements that I thought were a bit weak, but the plot was very interesting and I really liked the fact that it was a romantic comedy. I have not seen all of the films on this site but I am certainly looking forward to seeing many more. I enjoyed the film and think it is very good and recommended.

Ann Bates photo
Ann Bates

This was a great film for me. I found it refreshing to have a film that looked at aging without leaving out all the old memories. The music was also great. The dance scenes were as fresh as they get and the photography was just beautiful. It is a film that needs to be seen to be believed.

Jerry D. photo
Jerry D.

Saw it in theater, and I did not want to miss this movie, because I had seen such a great performance by Oscar Isaacs in his first movie. But the movie was too much of a pain to watch. A very sad story. And the casting is very bad. Kevin Spacey was really irritating, really awful. I think they just picked him because he had been in quite a few big movies lately, and he is already seen in many movies, but this time he was bad. Michelle Williams is also very irritating, and could have been better cast. I had seen all these actors in their most famous roles, and had them play them, so why pick them? Also the romantic scene was too much, and it did not make me feel happy. Also, why do they make the kid feel better because he did not do drugs? And I think the parents, well.why are they happy about all this? They were just so happy that they were not afraid of losing their son. The movie is really sad, and very sad. But it was good, and I can recommend it to anyone who likes romantic movies. So if you are looking for a good movie to watch, this one is a good choice. I would recommend it to anyone who likes romantic movies. And if you like this review, you should see this movie!

Carol Armstrong photo
Carol Armstrong

Truly excellent performances by all three leads - these are some of the best I have seen since the first Woody Allen film - but really there is no other contender for the best of the bunch - although we certainly wouldn't mind seeing Kevin Kline in another Allen film. I am trying to think of a film that would have been a better fit for Allen's style - I could be right. Though not a typical Allen movie, this is certainly not his least-likely work - and although that would have been better, it would have made this less enjoyable, so I am choosing this to be the exception. Allen, I guess, must have been so thoroughly enamored by the experience that he simply made no effort to improve his script. Let's hope the next film will be better than this.

Phillip V. photo
Phillip V.

I am a 35-year-old woman, who has been dating a male since she was 15, and I've never been one of those emotionally withdrawn girls. I like a lot of things about life, but not everything is great. I think it's actually kind of amazing that my man would fall in love with a 37-year-old, in spite of our age difference. This is, I believe, a fairly common phenomenon. People of this age are actually more mature than they look. But, in general, I am not all that interested in relationship-type situations, and I don't particularly like romantic comedies. I've read reviews for this movie and I don't think it will turn out well for me, but I still feel like I've been given a chance to think about this. I'm not sure what it is, but something about this movie really resonates with me. I mean, it's not really a tear-jerker, but it's pretty easy to fall in love with the main character. (Also, he's just plain cute. Maybe he's like a teen version of Kevin Costner, and I don't mind it.)

Sharon G. photo
Sharon G.

I thought this film was very good and I thought it was a fine exploration of life in the sixties, the stuffy man and his wife and the woman who doesn't want to give up her individuality but has to be on her own. The acting was fine, but this film is a little long, but it also becomes very well put together and it gets to its points very quickly, which is what makes a good film. But in a sense it is a little shallow because of the actors who are wearing tuxedos or stilettos but what happens is that it is kind of sad because there are some wonderful people, like Joe Don Baker and Kate Moss, and they are very happy in the things that they have to do, but I was disappointed because the film itself was just OK. But what's good is that it is a beautiful film because it is about friendship and that is very important in a film. The screenplay is nice, it's very nice, it is more literary than a simple script, but it is a good screenplay.

Crystal Gonzalez photo
Crystal Gonzalez

There are several things I liked about this film, I think it's the location of the house. I liked the shots of the trees and the lake, I thought it was a great shot of the characters as well. There were a few things I didn't like, though, such as the voice-over and the narration. I don't know if they were trying to be "a real story", but I found it very annoying. Maybe the filmmakers were trying to make it more realistic, but they just came off as phony. Another thing I didn't like was the way they presented the characters. They showed the family from the beginning, and showed how the family reacted to their son's death. This wasn't realistic, but I guess it worked in their favor. They weren't trying to make it seem as if the family was in mourning, but they were trying to make it seem as if the family had feelings of anger and grief. Overall, this is a good film, and I would recommend it to anyone.

Ruth F. photo
Ruth F.

I'm not a huge fan of Stephen Frears, but I thought that this movie was great. It is a bit long, but if you're going to watch it and don't have anything else to do, you'll get to the end. The story is pretty good and it gives you a good feeling about life. It also makes you think about how long life really is, and I think this movie is a good explanation for why life is so long. It is not so easy to live a good life and I think this movie gives you the right answer. The acting is also good and it is not too bad. I don't think this movie deserves the bad reviews that it gets. The only thing that I would say is that this movie isn't that deep, but it is a good movie and it is worth watching.

Aaron S. photo
Aaron S.

Yes, it is an awful movie. But it is a beautiful movie. It is a story about love, and the death of innocence. The scenes that play throughout the film are beautiful and unforgettable. My favourite is when the protagonist gets back in the studio, and tells his friend that he's sorry for losing his virginity. This is the moment where I understood the character of the protagonist, and I really cared about him. His friend tells him that he is not a coward, and that he could die for him. And then the movie ends. The movie does not end. I was waiting for it to end, and it never did. I did not care about the characters. I wanted to watch the film for the music. I wanted to listen to all the songs that were played during the movie. I wanted to listen to the lyrics of the songs, and I was not disappointed. The movie was beautiful, but it was also sad, sad, sad, and sad. This is the saddest part of the movie. It is the part where we all realise that life is not a fairy tale. And we should stop to think about how beautiful the world is. For those who do not know, this is the story of Romeo and Juliet. In this story, Romeo is called a coward because he wants to live as a man. Juliet, a woman, has the choice to be either a coward, or a man. The movie ends with Juliet dying, and Romeo dying. It is a sad, sad, sad movie. It has a good message, but it is also a sad, sad, sad movie. The music is amazing, and it was the only thing that I could not live without. It is just so beautiful, and the way it is played is amazing. The actors all do an excellent job, and I love the way that they sing. The director did a fantastic job, but the soundtrack is not the best I have ever heard. If you are in the mood to watch a beautiful movie, go see this movie. It is beautiful. And you will not be disappointed.

Benjamin Curtis photo
Benjamin Curtis

I've heard people say that this film is anti-Semitic. I disagree. It is anti-Zionist. The word Zionism is usually the same as 'Jewish'. It is a term which can be used to refer to the Jews as a people. So this film does not 'oppose' Zionism. It is about the relationship between a father and his son. This is what the father did. It is a simple story, but so much of the story is seen through the eyes of the son. We see the father with the boy. The son doesn't know this. But the father is a good man and he has to tell his son that the mother of the boy is not the mother he thought she was. The father is a good man and he has to tell the son this. It is an allegory of the story of Adam and Eve. The story is told from Adam's point of view. So the mother and father are the same. But the story is told from the son's point of view. It is a 'message' from Adam to the son. This is not a criticism of the father and son. It is just an observation of the relationship between father and son. A father has to tell his son that the mother of the boy is not the mother he thought she was. And so this film is about a father and son relationship, and about the father and his son's relationship. So I say that this film is anti-Zionist.

Justin Tucker photo
Justin Tucker

I've read the reviews that have been written here and was somewhat disappointed to find that I didn't find it very entertaining or enlightening. I was curious as to why this film was even made at all, considering the films success on the small screen and the fact that the director was really a comedian, it really wasn't surprising. But I do have to agree with the person who commented on the way that the film was made, I think it was absolutely brilliant. The scene of the two brothers wrestling for control of their parents house was just perfect, the way that the cameraman captured the intensity of their struggle was just perfect. However, as another person has commented, it was quite obvious that the man was filming it for a TV show, and I don't think that is a good idea, it makes the audience think that they are just watching a documentary and I think that's not the intention of the filmmaker. In the end, this film is quite different than I expected, I think it was really good, it was not boring at all and it was very realistic, it was very sad to see that the mother was not around to take care of the children. Overall, it's not an amazing film, but it's not a bad film either.

Jose photo
Jose

Positives: -Saw it on the big screen -Great acting from the whole cast -Great plot -A couple of actors that I will never forget.Negatives: -Mildly predictable plot -Not enough plot -Would have liked more character development.Final thoughts: A couple of American actors put in a British-American film. The film had an excellent script, however, and it was so enjoyable to see these actors in their roles. I highly recommend this film to any American who is a fan of any of the actors. If you liked this review, you should follow me on Twitter

Helen Foster photo
Helen Foster

I had seen the film in my history class as it was mentioned in the credits and I thought I would give it a try. I am happy to say that it was a good movie, although a little slow. I thought it was a good story about love, but what really made it for me was the way it was done. The way the different stories were told, was a great way to show the inter-connectedness of all of the different things in the movie. The acting was also good, and the plot was great. I think the only thing that I would have changed about the movie was that it was a little too long, I think it would have been much better if the movie could have been a little shorter. Overall, I would give it a 8.5 out of 10, and I would definitely recommend this movie to people that enjoy a movie about a love story.

Diana photo
Diana

After a night of drinking, Jack (Colin Firth) and his girlfriend (Jodie Whittaker) are driving to a hotel when they get into a car accident. When they arrive at the hotel, they are attacked by a crazed mobster (Adrian Brody). They run away and make it to the hotel but are robbed by another mobster (David Morrissey). As they run, the mobster has them kill the hotel manager and then have them kill a cab driver and the hotel manager. When the mobster and the hotel manager try to kill the two, the two run away and try to stay with Jack. The next day, Jack gets the hotel manager (Samantha Morton) to let him stay with her. The next day, Jack is attacked by the mobster and the hotel manager. The hotel manager is also attacked by the mobster but manages to kill him. Later that night, Jack and his girlfriend decide to make a new plan to rob the hotel and find a way to get back to civilization. "The Heist" is an action film about a young man who is trying to get away from the mobsters and the mobster's henchmen. Colin Firth is the bad guy in this movie and he is played by Adrian Brody. He is a very nice guy who is the reason the two stay at the hotel. He is a bad guy but he is played by Brody so he is playing the bad guy. This movie is very good. Colin Firth is very good and he is very good in this movie. I like the character he is playing. He is the reason the two stay at the hotel. The movie is also good because it is a good movie about a young man trying to get away from the mobsters and the mobsters henchmen. This is a good movie. I give the movie an 8 out of 10.

Scott photo
Scott

This movie is a cross between The Crying Game, The General's Daughter, The Artist, and The Favourite. I don't think I have ever seen the original version. I don't think I've ever seen the remake. The cast is amazing. The dialogue is a bit stiff, but it's very well-written. If you're a fan of the original, you should see this movie. It is a very good adaptation.

Aaron photo
Aaron

I love this movie! It's very funny, especially the very end. I recommend everyone to see it.

Terry F. photo
Terry F.

The much-anticipated remake of the English-language movie "A Bridge Too Far" has been available in Australia since 2007, and the DVD is now available. The new movie is about a small, vulnerable town in a small Belgian region of Belgium that is not up to the demands of an American army. A German officer, Major Dobermann (Bjørn Ullrich), is on the road to an American invasion of Belgium, but the town's small and friendly population (who all belong to the town's minor Christian Church) and its refusal to accept German occupation, refuses to accept his presence. Dobermann becomes an important figure in the town, and an outspoken opponent of the invading German army. He is recognized by his son, Joseph (Julien Dufresne), who is an openly homosexual and a well-known person in the town. The town's pastor (Jacques Michel) is also a resident of the town, and he is strongly opposed to the occupation of Belgium by the American army. The young, openly homosexual Joseph and the conservative and traditional Reverend Franciscus (Dame Irene Laski) are the only two members of the town who oppose Dobermann's presence. It is not clear who the town's inhabitants are, but in the movie they all live in one house. Dobermann, and his small band of supporters, find it difficult to live in a town where the people are not up to their expectations, but the town's small, conservative population seem to accept his presence, and to like him. The townspeople are proud of Dobermann's heroism, and his actions as a small army soldier, but they are also proud of Dobermann's freedom and individuality. The townspeople and Dobermann's supporters try to find a way to have the town support Dobermann's presence. Their efforts are not successful, and the townspeople are tired of Dobermann's presence, but they do not seem to know that he is not the only person in the town who thinks the same. In the movie, Dobermann's supporters, and especially Joseph, are not members of the town's small Christian Church, but members of the town's small conservative and traditional Christian community. Dobermann's supporters are well aware that the town is divided between the conservative and the traditional, and that Dobermann is the only one who thinks this way. This divide is part of the reason for the town's apathy to the occupation, but it is also a reason why the town's conservative and traditional residents are not as apathetic as they seem. Dobermann's supporters are at first successful in having the town support Dobermann's presence, but as Dobermann's popularity increases, the townspeople become more and more vocal in their opposition to his presence. The townspeople, mostly the conservative and traditional members of the town, are not as tolerant as they seem, but the town

Amber photo
Amber

I had been looking forward to seeing this film for a long time. The film tells the story of a man who travels to the American west to be married to his long time love, and discovers that he is not what he thinks he is. The film has a great cast, with very strong performances from both Donald Sutherland and Keira Knightley. It is a romantic comedy and the performances are really good. It is definitely worth seeing, but the end is a little disappointing.

Edward Salazar photo
Edward Salazar

A very short, yet haunting, film. I feel very much the same way about this film as I do about An American Haunting, though the latter is only half as long. I found this film to be a beautiful and moving work of art, and a very intelligent film in general. I really do not think I would have liked it as much as I did if I had not read the book first. I have never seen the BBC TV version, but I would say this is one of the better adaptations of the book that I have seen. In the book, the child goes to a place where they feel that they are loved. In the film, it is very hard to see how the children could feel loved. I think the thing that I found most impressive about this film was that it actually felt like they were in the house for the whole time. They were so caught up in their own world that they were not able to hear anything that was going on around them. I would have loved to have been there. The story itself is very interesting, but the things that happen in the film are so bizarre that they make you say, "Oh, that's not possible". I will say that it is very hard to watch, and I will never watch it again. I think that it is a wonderful film, but I think that I would not recommend it to a lot of people. I think that the book is much better. I would suggest that you read the book first, then watch the film, and then read the book again.

Megan Rodriguez photo
Megan Rodriguez

I have to say that I was pleasantly surprised by this film. I'm a HUGE Terry Gilliam fan, so I have been following his career since I was young. So it was a great pleasure to watch his latest work. This film is definitely one of his best efforts yet. The story of a father's love for his child was interesting and touching, as well as the final scenes. As a father myself, it made me appreciate the time I have with my child. It also makes me wonder what I would do if I had the same love for my child. The film is beautifully shot and edited, with some great looking locations. The performances of the two main actors are fantastic. I loved the chemistry between Lola and Tom. I also really liked the way the two were able to keep their relationship together throughout the film. I was also impressed by the chemistry between Jamie Bell and Monica Bellucci. I think the only reason I didn't give this film a 10 is because it's not as visually stunning as his other works. It is definitely a movie worth seeing. I'm very glad I did!