Steam Mary Shelley

Mary Shelley

Mary Shelley is a movie starring Elle Fanning, Bel Powley, and Owen Richards. Life and facts of Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, who at 16 met 21 year old poet Percy Shelley, resulting in the writing of Frankenstein.

Other Titles
メアリーの総て, Mary Shelley - Un amore immortale, Mary Shelley - Die Frau, die Frankenstein erschuf
Running Time
2 hours
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Drama, Biography, History, Romance
Haifaa Al-Mansour
Emma Jensen, Haifaa Al-Mansour
Joanne Froggatt, Elle Fanning, Bel Powley, Owen Richards
UK, Ireland, Luxembourg, USA
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Life and facts of Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, who at 16 met 21 year old poet Percy Shelley, resulting in the writing of Frankenstein.

Comments about drama «Mary Shelley» (18)

Emma photo

I was not expecting much when I went to see this movie. I saw the trailer, and I thought that it was going to be a good movie, but I was wrong. I thought that it was going to be a good movie, but it was not. The movie starts off with a young woman named Mary Shelley, who was a famous author of the time, and she was dying of cancer. She was going to die, and she wanted to write her last book. The film is a biography of Mary Shelley, and it shows her life, her relationships with her family, and her relationships with people around her. The film is very slow, and it's not very entertaining. I think that the story was not interesting, and it was not very interesting. I didn't really like the way that it was told. It's very slow, and it's very boring. The movie is not very good, and it's not very good. I don't recommend it to anybody. It's not very good.

Olivia Sims photo
Olivia Sims

Frankly, I am surprised at all the negative reviews. This is one of the best movies I have ever seen, and I saw it in 3D. The story is great, the actors are great, and the colors are brilliant. This is a movie for all ages, and I think it will be popular among the young people. I like the fact that it's not just a movie, but a documentary, that shows how people felt during that period, and how they acted. I also think the music is amazing, as well as the visuals. The movie is a must-see for anyone. The only thing I don't like about it is that it's only 80 minutes long, but I know it's a long time until the next one, so I will wait to see what they have in store for us. I give this movie an 8 out of 10.

Sara Dixon photo
Sara Dixon

I saw this film as part of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, a 100th anniversary year celebration. After the film ended, I asked the audience to leave the room for a minute or two and then I asked them to please come back in. I have to admit, I was very surprised at the extent to which the audience was drawn in by the story. I had always thought that the typical cinema audience tended to be more liberal in their views on issues, and that the more religious people tended to be more conservative. But, I was totally wrong. I asked people who came to see the film what their views were on the subject of religion. I received several thoughtful, well-thought out responses from people of all faiths, and I was amazed at the depth of that reaction. Some people were as angry as I was, some were as loving as I was, and some were somewhere in between. One person who came to the film said that the film was about how religious people see themselves as being. He was right. I believe that this film is a film about how religion is perceived by the masses, and how they perceive themselves. I know that it is not an easy film to watch, but I did not feel that I was watching a movie. It was a true depiction of how religion is perceived by the masses, and how the masses feel about themselves. I would like to see more films like this. The fact that it is so difficult to watch is what makes it such an excellent film. I am really looking forward to seeing it again. I know I will be surprised.

Edward Jones photo
Edward Jones

This is a fine movie, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. There were a few things that I didn't like about it, though. First, it seems that the production values were very low. It's not that the movie is bad, it just seems that they tried to make it look cheap. Second, the portrayal of the Japanese military was quite poor. The battle scenes were nothing like the movie. I was thinking that the film makers had no idea what the Japanese military was like, and I thought that the troops were depicted as being short, and had very little armor. I understand that there was a war in the Pacific, but they could have made the Japanese army look a lot more like the ones portrayed in the movie. All in all, a fine movie. It's definitely worth seeing, and I look forward to seeing more films from the director.

Ryan photo

I read the book last year and after watching the movie last week I have to say that I am glad that I read the book first. This was not my type of movie at all. The acting was good, but some of the scenes were just not believable. The characters could not be more different from one another, and the chemistry between the two main characters is very off. I am not a fan of Kristen Stewart, and I was very disappointed in her role as the Queen. I was hoping that they could have gotten someone else to play the part, but I am glad that they did not. I felt that the love between Elizabeth and Percy was very over the top, and the actions of the prince were not believable at all. The love between Elizabeth and Percy was shown through the film so much that I really don't understand why the scenes were so cut and changed. I think they could have had better focus on the relationship between the two main characters, and how the Prince could have felt about his actions. I am glad that they did not use the book in the movie, but I do not think that it was a good choice. I give this film a 8 out of 10, and it was a great film to watch.

Frances Johnston photo
Frances Johnston

This film is the story of an 18th Century English lady whose father is murdered by his lord. She flees the country and travels to Scotland where she falls in love with the young (understandably naive) Scottish nobleman Thomas Macaulay (Robert Carlyle). Their romance slowly begins to mature and they both become involved with a beautiful Scottish man named William Gray (John Hurt). The two of them eventually marry and work to raise a son and a daughter. However, the following years bring tragedy for both of them as they struggle with their marriage, their son, and the death of their beloved father. All of this is told through the character of Emily Blunt as she is the only woman who can identify with her character and thus, the rest of the film is her journey through love, loss, and loss of her husband. Emily is very good in this film. Robert Carlyle does a great job as the character of Thomas. His facial expressions, voice, and mannerisms are all perfect for the role. He is a great actor and I think his performance is even better than the part that he plays in the film. John Hurt is also very good in this film. His character is very realistic and also very interesting to watch. I was especially impressed with his performance in the scene where he is accused of murder. John Hurt is an interesting character. His face is not only expressive but also has a very interesting and sometimes comedic quality to it. His portrayal of Thomas is very convincing. I think that he is one of the most underrated actors in Hollywood. He plays a good part and does an amazing job. I give this film a strong 8 out of 10. It is definitely worth watching.

Amy photo

The entire cast were outstanding. especially Kate Winslet and Maggie Smith, who played the two sisters, but especially Frances De La Tour who played the mother of the families, was great. The score by Vangelis was also excellent. I can't understand how this movie was rated so low. It has a great story and i just love it.

Harold S. photo
Harold S.

There are some questions about "Frankenstein" that I don't think anyone will ever really be able to answer, and perhaps that's why this movie is so much more interesting than a lot of other historical biopics. "Frankenstein" is a classic in the eyes of the English-speaking world, and the fact that it is still remembered by many of the same people who read the novel and watched the movie probably reflects that. It's a story about a genius scientist who had everything going for him, but lost his way and became a sadistic monster. It's a story about the people who had worked with him, and the way that he changed them. It's a story about a society that was coming to an end. It's a story about life, death, and love. And for me, I liked it. I've never really been interested in the relationship between Mary Shelley and her brother, but in the end, I thought that it was a pretty interesting one. The acting is also very good. Michael Gambon gives one of his best performances, and he certainly has a lot of work to do. He's so good that I felt for him. However, I felt that the movie was a bit lacking in the romance department. I didn't think it was necessary to show such a tortured relationship between a boy and a woman, especially in the second half. I did find the scene where Mary Shelley and her brother did their tests to be a bit strange, and I didn't really get the chemistry between Mary and her brother. But I still thought it was a good movie, and I'm glad I saw it. It's not a great movie, but it's definitely worth seeing. It's worth seeing because of the performance by Michael Gambon and because of the interesting themes that it raises.

Ruth B. photo
Ruth B.

It is a most unusual thing to have one of the most famous novelists of all time as a director. And if that doesn't put you off, you might want to look at the movie. For all the publicity that has been given to the "The Whore of Bath's" screenplay, I have to say that I found it rather slow and a bit choppy, but it was well worth watching. Though I don't think it is a great movie by any means, I think it is worth watching, and it is an excellent example of what can be done when a director is not afraid to take chances and take a risk on a script and a cast. It is not an easy movie to watch, but it is an excellent movie, and I really recommend it to anyone who wants to see a movie with a little more substance, and that is what this movie is.

Sara C. photo
Sara C.

I am not a fan of the novel, but this movie was a pleasant surprise. It was well-made and the acting was excellent. The movie was a bit long, but the story flowed well. The film was a bit slow, but I think that was intentional. I was not a fan of the ending, but it was not that bad. I would definitely recommend this movie to anyone who is interested in the book. I have not read the book, but I would definitely recommend it to anyone who is interested in the story.

Denise photo

It's not a spoiler to say that this is a very strong film and a must see for any director. It is the story of a British woman, Helen Mirren, who tries to convince the King of an alleged romance between her and her brother-in-law, John Malkovich. This is a well done film and is the best of the films that Jennifer Connelly has ever been in. It is an extremely strong story and the story is well told. I highly recommend this film for anyone who wants to see a really good film and I really think that this is one of the best films of the year.

Juan E. photo
Juan E.

I was pretty skeptical going into this movie. I'm not a fan of the original, or the previous adaptation of the novel, but I am a fan of the new version. I found it to be better than the original. I thought it had some of the charm and romance of the original, and some of the feel of the novel. This is a good movie for the whole family. There is some great scenery, good music, and the story flows well. I thought the performances were good. Colin Firth and Emma Thompson are great. I thought all of the cast did a good job. Colin Firth was really great as the King of England, and Emma Thompson was just wonderful as the Queen of England. Both were quite good, but I thought Colin Firth was more fantastic as the King. It was nice to see a British actor in a British movie. This movie was good, but it's not my favorite. I still think it's better than the original, and I still think it's better than the sequel. Overall, a good movie. I recommend it to everyone.

Victoria photo

I was surprised to find that I had never heard of this film before. I'm glad I watched it and that it was as good as it was. The film tells the story of the 19th century writer Mary Shelley, and how she inspired the works of others to come. It is a fascinating story, and I was very interested in the film. I was glad that I watched it. It was a good film. The acting was very good. I would recommend it.

Cynthia photo

Having seen this film, I have to say I was surprised to learn that one of my favorite literary works was based on an actual event in history. As I said, the film is a faithful adaptation of the novel of the same name, and the movie has many of the characteristics of a true biopic. The cinematography is great, the acting is good, and the production design is gorgeous. The script is realistic and believable, and the performances are just as good. In my opinion, this film was made with the utmost respect for the work and the characters, and should be seen by anyone who likes history. I especially enjoyed the story of Lady Charlotte's sojourn in 1618, in which she is played by the wonderfully underrated Julianne Moore. It is one of the most incredible performances I have ever seen, and Julianne Moore is simply magnificent in the role. Overall, the film is an accurate portrayal of the events that led to the witch-hunts that ravaged England in the 1640's, and it was well-worth watching.

Kyle C. photo
Kyle C.

I saw this film with my best friend. She and I have been watching historical films together since we were teenagers, and this one seemed to be the best one we have seen to date. It is a very moving film, and I think the actors did a wonderful job. I think most people who haven't seen it, will enjoy it. I recommend it to everyone.

Jesse photo

I found this film to be a very good adaptation of the novel of the same name. The story is told in a very interesting way, with many beautiful shots of the French countryside and a very interesting story. The acting is also very good, with the exception of the villain, who is a little bit too over-the-top. Overall, this is a very good movie and I recommend it to anyone who likes historical fiction, or who is interested in the story of the Shelley family.

Ruth D. photo
Ruth D.

this movie is worth seeing.the story is not a mystery, but the picture of it, is indeed a mystery. and that is why it is so interesting to see it. it has a message that could make anyone thinking about what happens in our lives. the acting is not very good, but it is not that bad. and the music is not too bad either. the whole movie is not very deep, but it is interesting to watch it. and for the time of the movie, it is worth seeing.

Pamela photo

I really liked this film. I loved the fact that it was a bit of a love story, and that it was a true story. I also thought that it was very realistic, and that it was very moving. I thought that it was a very good movie, and I recommend it to anyone who likes history, or romance.