Steam Trial by Fire

Trial by Fire

Trial by Fire is a movie starring Jack O'Connell, Laura Dern, and Emily Meade. The tragic and controversial story of Cameron Todd Willingham, who was executed in Texas for killing his three children after scientific evidence and...

Other Titles
El caso Willingham, Feuerprobe die wichtigsten Beweise, Justiça Em Chamas, Chrzest ogniem
Running Time
2 hours 7 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Biography, Drama
Director
Edward Zwick
Writer
David Grann, Geoffrey Fletcher
Actors
Laura Dern, Emily Meade, Chris Coy, Jack O'Connell
Country
USA
Year
2018
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

The tragic and controversial story of Cameron Todd Willingham, who was executed in Texas for killing his three children after scientific evidence and expert testimony that bolstered his claims of innocence were suppressed.

Comments about biography «Trial by Fire» (16)

Michael B. photo
Michael B.

This movie is one of the best films ever. "Trial by Fire" is about a young man named Bobby Norris. I won't go into the details of this film, but all I will say is that it is very moving and very real. The dialogue is excellent and gives depth to the character of Bobby, played by Robert Duvall. I have seen this movie a number of times, and each time I watch it I am surprised at how good it is. It is the kind of movie that makes you wish you were in Bobby's shoes. I have had a personal friend in Bobby's situation, and I could see how the events in this film would happen to him. It is the kind of movie that stays with you, and in the end it has a message that you will remember long after the film is over. I am not the type of person who watches a lot of movies, but I strongly recommend that you do. Robert Duvall is not only one of the greatest actors of all time, but he is one of the greatest men I have ever known. Duvall is one of the top 5 actors of all time, and is the top 3 actor of all time. I would recommend this movie to anyone. I rate this film 9 out of 10.

Cheryl Carroll photo
Cheryl Carroll

I've seen this film on TV, but it wasn't until I was browsing through the IMDb database that I found out that it was a true story. I have to admit that I was skeptical, but it was the story of a woman who was abused as a child, and she went through a lot of physical and mental abuse as a result of it. The film was a great story of what happens when you are abused as a child. The acting was superb, especially from the child actors, especially the little boy, who was so very real. The story was gripping, and the film was very well done. I highly recommend this film to anyone who is interested in true stories.

Michelle J. photo
Michelle J.

I just saw this film in the theaters and I must say that it is one of the best films I have ever seen. I was really surprised by how good it was. I thought it was going to be a really slow movie but it was actually really fast paced. The only thing I really didn't like about this film was the ending. I thought it was a bit rushed and kind of anticlimactic. The other thing I really didn't like was that the characters were really stupid. They were not even funny, and the plot was really not all that great. I really didn't like the ending. Overall, I think this film is one of the best films I have ever seen. It is very realistic and realistic about a lot of things that we see in our daily lives. I recommend it to anyone who likes a good film.

Sandra Gardner photo
Sandra Gardner

A truly stunning portrayal of a real life civil rights event. This is a riveting movie for the whole family to watch. It has some graphic scenes and it contains some of the most realistic depiction of violence I have ever seen. It is a powerful film that will entertain the whole family, make you cry, and make you think. I highly recommend it!

Steven photo
Steven

This movie is a true story about a truly great man. I loved it! It tells the story of Charles Breckinridge and his fight for justice and freedom. The movie starts off with Charles Breckinridge in Washington DC in 1916. He is the one in the American Revolution. He wants to be a lawyer, but is discouraged from law practice because he is black. His younger brother is no longer interested in learning about the civil rights movement and he isn't interested in fighting for the liberation of African Americans either. Charles Breckinridge and his wife stay with their sister in Boston in the 1800s. When they are in Boston, Charles has the opportunity to get a job teaching English to black children. He also decides to teach them how to speak like "normal" people. His main focus was to make them "appreciate" the white people. The movie tells us that Charles did such a great job teaching English to the black children, that the racial discrimination that he was being forced to deal with just began to fade away and he began to learn to love the white people. His only regret in life was that he didn't "see" the white people that he taught to respect. This movie is a wonderful, moving, and emotional story of one man's life and how he rose to the top of society and became a man of great importance. It also tells us about the struggle between African Americans and Whites for equality. Even today, you can hear the white people saying, "Black people are still too oppressed." This movie is great and it is a great example of how we can become the greatest nation on earth!

Philip photo
Philip

This movie is actually quite accurate in showing the extent of racism against black people in the early 1960's. Though the portrayal of the media's portrayal of race relations in the 60's is a bit exaggerated, it is still accurate. One of the most important things that the movie does is to show how racist people are. In some cases, they are totally and utterly hateful of a person's race. In other cases, they may even believe that they are right and it is all their fault. Also, the movie shows how prejudices can spread and how hatred can take hold of people. The movie is very entertaining and shows a great deal of what goes on in some of the black communities in the 60's. I do believe that the movie does an excellent job of showing the changes in society and how the black community has changed over time. The only thing that I do not think is completely accurate about the movie is the way the movie was set up. A couple of the characters (including the black man and his wife) were portrayed as having power over the white man, which was untrue. I think that this was a mistake on the part of the director and the actor. In fact, the people that were depicted as having power over the white man were portrayed as being so racist that they would never accept a black man in their midst. I also think that the movie did not show enough of the violence that was caused by the black community, so I believe that this movie is a bit overrated.

Anna photo
Anna

This movie is about as realistic as a movie gets, but in a good way. The acting is mostly great. The story itself is not very unusual, but the characters, especially the kids, are so realistic. The fact that some people are killed by the government and some kids and adults are killed by the government is very realistic. The end of the movie really shows us that the government is not always right. It is a very, very good movie. It is a great movie to watch when you are just bored, or when you are trying to watch something that makes you think.

Mildred photo
Mildred

A great example of a movie that is superior to the average "action" movie. Great story and acting! There is something for everyone in this film.

Eugene R. photo
Eugene R.

First of all I will be brief about the good and bad points of this movie. It's good because I think it made a critical and sociological point about the Pakistani society. The bad points are that the movie is too long and the movie itself is a little bit boring. I think this was the reason why the movie received a low rating from me. This was also the reason why I only gave it a 9.4/10. This movie is definitely worth watching. I think it's also important to see the movie from this point of view and I think the director (who is from Pakistan) should be recognized for his work. I can only recommend the movie to those who are interested in social issues in Pakistan. This movie is the story of a man who is completely turned inside out by the suffering of his mother, his uncle and his brother. He believes that he is the only one who can save his mother and the rest of his family from the conditions of poverty. This is the kind of things he believes in. He cannot live in a house without a roof. He is afraid of the dark because he fears that he will die without his mother. His beliefs are wrong and he has no other alternative. The last two hours of this movie, are absolutely incredible. This movie makes you really think about Pakistan's social situation. A man can't survive in a house without a roof. He is afraid of the dark. This movie has really shocked me. I have to admit that it has a great emotional and social impact on me. If you like this movie, you will definitely like it. This is a good movie for all audiences.

Shirley B. photo
Shirley B.

I have seen some bad reviews about this movie but I am very glad to see some good reviews. I am from NYC, where this movie was released and went to see it with my family. After the movie, we were thinking of going to a film festival in Chicago, but now I am going to go to this one in LA. The movie is worth seeing! The story is very interesting and very well written. They have given the characters a very important role. You will not see the movie to see the screen play, you will see the characters! The scenes and the dialogues are very well written, they are really great. You can really see that the actors are very well trained. They have the charisma, they have the acting, they have the acting! And the ending is great. Overall, the movie is worth the money!

Lauren photo
Lauren

I didn't know what to expect in this movie, other than a moving film about a country that is supposed to be over 2,000 years old. With a title like 'The Trial of Robert Louis Stevenson' you would think that this is going to be about the same kind of thing, that is, a 20th century version of Stevenson's tale. Unfortunately, this isn't true. What this is about is the troubles of the British government in the second half of the 19th century. The story is told through the eyes of a political prisoner, Alex de Valera (Stephen Rea), who ends up dying in prison. He had been tortured for 18 years at the hands of the British government for being a member of the Scottish National Army. The government wanted to send him to prison because of his alleged connection with the leader of the Scottish resistance movement. Unfortunately, he was not connected to the nationalist movement. He was just a supporter of Scottish independence. So what does it mean to be connected to a cause, or to have a connection with the one who started it? The film is about two things. First of all, it's about the British government trying to silence an innocent man. As the second part of the film is about the two men who were trying to get justice done, the movie doesn't focus too much on them. It's more about how the British government will stop at nothing to silence Alex de Valera, even if that means they are going to kill him. The second part is about how Robert Louis Stevenson wrote this story, and how he came to be the man who would become a true English writer. The movie seems to be about the British government, and how they want to silence someone. However, Stevenson was in fact a true English writer who wanted to tell the truth and preserve the history of his country, as well as the events that happened. I think that's what this movie is about, because he wanted to tell the truth about a nation, which he saw as being corrupted, and he saw the British government as being the corrupt authority that tried to silence him. As a storyteller, Stevenson was brilliant, but as a writer he was brilliant. He was able to tell this story in a way that everyone could understand and relate to it. For those who are not familiar with Stevenson, he wrote this story in 1865, and it still fascinates me. I guess the only real complaint that I have about the movie is that some of the music, like the music at the end of the film, was quite irritating to me. I'm a fan of the Rolling Stones and would have preferred a bit more rock and roll music than the music used in the movie. It was also rather predictable, and could have been done a

Eugene C. photo
Eugene C.

A period piece about a battle between the Ku Klux Klan and the Black Panthers. I found the movie very well done and kept me on the edge of my seat from beginning to end. I was riveted and involved with the characters. I'm usually a little distracted by the fact that I'm not sure who the main character was but I found the acting to be really good. I have a feeling that the actors involved were really aware of their characters and did an outstanding job. The movie took the focus away from the Klan and focused on the Black Panther movement. I have a few problems with this movie. I don't think that it would have been fair to make a movie about the KKK if the movie was completely negative towards the KKK. There were a lot of incidents that I found unjustified and I'm really tired of movies making that mistake. I also felt that the movie wasn't long enough. It could have been a little longer. The movie seemed to move at a faster pace than it really needed to be and that just kept me from getting more involved in the movie. The movie took away from the characters and that really bothered me. It also didn't go into any details about the KKK so I didn't feel like I was getting all the details that I would have liked to know. I'm not saying that I don't like movies that do a good job of showing the Klan as well as the Black Panthers. I just don't think that they should be done with complete bias and prejudice towards the KKK and to make the film a completely black and white movie. This was a great movie and I think that it is a perfect time to see it.

Ronald R. photo
Ronald R.

I did not read the book, but I was a fan of the film, so I decided to watch it after the first 10 minutes. The characters were great, but the setting was interesting. The action was good and the acting was very good. I loved the story, but I think it could have been better. But anyway, watch the film and enjoy the movie, I hope you'll see it.

Lawrence photo
Lawrence

The trial of U.S. District Judge James E. Pohl is almost an episode in the life of the American justice system. What begins as a small case for the federal government can quickly become a story of increasing and escalating involvement of the federal government in a number of cases. The government's insistence on ferreting out the largest and most profitable potential profits is mirrored in the judicial reluctance to strike down the civil asset forfeiture laws, which are the bedrock of civil asset forfeiture in the United States. The United States is the only country that allows such procedures to be employed. The film provides an opportunity to consider whether the war on drugs is a war on the poor, on the disenfranchised, or on the majority, as the federal government proclaims. In addition, it is also an opportunity to consider the dangers and dangers of the U.S. government, which can become a much more personal and oppressive institution in the future. The movie also provides a potential glimpse of what the United States may become, if this kind of government abuses are permitted to be institutionalized. As the film ends, it gives an example of what has become of the American government, and of what may come if the current system of law enforcement continues to expand. Overall, the film offers an interesting insight into the American judicial system, and into the dangers of expanding and institutionalizing this kind of government power. If the film is anything like the book, the book will change your perspective.

Tammy Guerrero photo
Tammy Guerrero

Spoilers herein. On one hand, the character of the "poor kid" is actually a very good story to tell. It shows that the other children in the family were actually very nice, loving and smart. On the other hand, the situation of the rich kid is also somewhat problematic. It is a simple story, but we can see that it is simply impossible to live as the rich kid in a poor society. It is more likely that he is suffering from an inherited mental illness, that would have caused him to be "poor" and "unattractive" in the first place. However, the true social and psychological effects of having such a "poor" upbringing could not be hidden, but would actually be more difficult to hide than the non-existent physical and mental health problems of the kid. I think that the fact that most of the major characters in the movie are portrayed as having been "homeless" (in a similar way as in the "drama" Tideland) and "unemployed" (and what a huge exaggeration that is) is a mistake. It would have been better to have depicted the poverty of the kid as a very serious problem, which would have made us think, and therefore care more about him, but rather than showing the kid as a miserable failure (as in the film version of the poor kid in Tideland) the movie should have shown him as a successful person, with a well-planned career and a happy family. My overall impression of the movie was that it was indeed a very good movie, but I was a bit disappointed in the very end. Unfortunately, it would be too difficult to tell the story of the poor kid, but I think that the same can be said of the poor girl in the story.

Amber photo
Amber

Arlington, Texas is a beautiful town but not a city. However, thanks to an amazing development plan, the land is to be developed into a billion dollar city. The story follows three brothers, three children, and the struggle they have to come together to complete their project. They're in the process of building an oil refinery but before they can make it big, they have to take on a great deal of risk. They're all different but they all share the same interests in building a pipeline for the oil refinery. As the movie progresses, they all take on different personalities. They're brothers and they're all in the business of the oil industry. They're very different but they're all the same. This is a very interesting movie. It has a lot of emotions and it is also very interesting to watch how each character thinks and how each character feels about the work at hand. They're all very different. This is the type of movie that doesn't have to have an ending to be effective. You can't predict it but you can tell the story. The movie is very exciting and a little bit sad. There's also some funny parts as well. I would recommend this movie to everyone. It's not something that I would watch with my mom but I would definitely recommend it to someone else. It's very interesting and it's well-made. The story is very interesting and the characters are very different but they're all the same. This is a good movie. It's about a good story and a good story told well. This is a movie you should see. It's a very interesting movie. I give it an A.