Steam 1917


1917 is a movie starring Dean-Charles Chapman, George MacKay, and Daniel Mays. April 6th, 1917. As a regiment assembles to wage war deep in enemy territory, two soldiers are assigned to race against time and deliver a message that...

Other Titles
Taistelulähetit - 1917, 1917: Speranță și moarte, Χίλια Εννιακόσια Δεκαεπτά, 1917 命をかけた伝令
Running Time
1 hours 59 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Drama, War
Sam Mendes
Krysty Wilson-Cairns, Sam Mendes
Colin Firth, George MacKay, Dean-Charles Chapman, Daniel Mays
USA, India, UK, Spain, Canada
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

British trenches somewhere in France. World war has been going on for the third year, heroic illusions have dissipated; general mood - boredom and fatigue. Stuff the belly, sleep, return home to Christmas Eve. On another quiet day, when nothing happens, two young soldiers, Blake and Schofield, are summoned to the general, who instructs them to send an important message to Colonel MacKenzie in the Second Devonshire Battalion, whose telephone connection was cut off by the enemy.

Comments about drama «1917» (178)

Philip photo

Well, there are a lot of war movies about soldiers in some war, but this one, is one of the best. I found it a very touching story, and I believe that people would be interested in this movie, because it is not just a war movie, but also a story about a father, and his son. I think that it's a really great movie, and I'm very glad that I bought it. I am very surprised that it won so many awards, it is a really great movie.

Katherine Hoffman photo
Katherine Hoffman

I recently watched this movie, and have to say, I'm glad I did. I am going to keep this review as short as possible, as I feel that I have to get this out there. Yes, I'm talking about the true meaning of War, and the reason I decided to see this movie. This movie tells the story of "The Great War", the war that divided mankind, and shaped our civilization forever. This movie has a great message to it, and to understand, you just have to watch it. War can be a beautiful thing, but it can also be a painful thing, and can only be understood by those who have experienced it. This movie is a master piece, and should be seen by everyone.

Scott Gardner photo
Scott Gardner

Not too long ago, I went to see a WWII movie and I wasn't a fan of the movie, because it was a very stiff movie. When I saw this movie, I fell in love with it. This movie is one of the greatest films of all time. If you want a real war movie, this is it. It tells a story of love, hate, and love. It is a romantic story of a guy who has lost his love and is given a chance to regain it. The two main actors (the real life Schindlers brothers) were both brilliant, and their friendship, friendship, and love is perfect. It is a true love story, but it is not the romantic kind. It is much more realistic and realistic than most war movies, because it is based on a true story. This is one of my favorite war movies of all time.

Jane photo

This is a great film about WWII and the fight for German occupation of Poland. The performances are top notch. When you get right down to it, this is a great war movie. It is a patriotic film that should be seen by anyone who has not seen it. It is based on the book by Werner Herzog and he has done a great job. The acting is top notch, as is the direction. The cinematography is great, as is the music. The war scenes are done very well. The characters are not very well developed, but they are very likable. The German's are very nasty. They were truly the Nazis. They were almost evil in their own evil way. They were the worst and most ruthless of all Nazi's. The Polish people did not like them, because they were the Jews. The Polish resistance did not like the Germans. They were the only people to really help the Polish people. Overall, this is a great movie and I highly recommend it to everyone.

Michelle L. photo
Michelle L.

this is a great movie. the realism of the filming and the war. it shows the bad that the men did and what they had to go through. i was worried about the end, but i was very impressed with the ending. there is a scene where she dies, but this is not the end. it ends the war, but how that will be done, will not be seen. the end of the movie is great. it is not only an anti-war movie, it is a movie about war. there is one thing that bothers me, the soldiers all look the same. that is a problem for a movie. i could not take my eyes off the screen.

Ryan photo

Before the first attack, this movie portrays the the story of the army of General von Tirpitz in the second World War, a regiment with a history that is far different from the one portrayed by Hollywood. In this movie, the book of "War Horse" by JRR Tolkien, you can read about the war that has taken place in France, the French and Germans fighting, the tanks that were the legendary model of the tank "Tiger". For me, this movie represents the end of WW II, the beginning of the end of the war, that started with the invasion of the Soviet Union, and the end of the war, where everybody should be honored. This movie should be shown to every person that is over the age of 10, because there are too many characters that are depicted in the movie, especially the character of Gertrude Gavroche. For this reason, I strongly recommend everyone to watch this movie. I hope you will enjoy this movie, and tell your friends.

Nicole photo

I like the movie, and it is a fine piece of work. However, I felt that the characters were not given enough time to develop, and the story was somewhat confusing. Also, the acting was terrible, and the script was generally weak. The only good thing was the scenic views of Afghanistan. The script could have been better, and the characters were not given enough time to develop, but the movie is still worth seeing. It is definitely not an action movie, and I would not recommend this movie for anyone.

Donna B. photo
Donna B.

The film was so engrossing and my attention was drawn from the start. I love the way the film uses a small town setting in a different time period to illustrate the story. I think the film would be very good to watch at a family party or on a rainy day. The cinematography was excellent. I think the setting was beautifully used and added to the story.

Walter photo

I really loved this movie. It was different and so much more than what you see in the modern movies. It has a much more nuanced, real-world feel to it than the movies we get all the time. Some of the characters were not so sympathetic, but they were still pretty strong. I do think the film was a little overrated, but that's not a bad thing. I think most people who like this movie would agree that this is a must see for anyone interested in war, or the human condition. It is a very interesting look at the human condition, and I think anyone who likes war movies, or war films in general, will like this. The ending is also a good ending. I hope everyone sees this, as I really enjoyed this movie and hope everyone sees it, as well.

Jerry W. photo
Jerry W.

A film which starts off as an uplifting, white-knuckle movie about the heroism of a German soldier during World War I, but then goes back to the point of view of the main character's wife who is suffering from amnesia and may or may not know what happened that fateful day in 1917. It's the tale of a German soldier who was once a hero and now has a secret he can't reveal. But it's a pretty good film, and if you can look past the somewhat excessive use of the f-word, it's a worthwhile and interesting film. It does have its flaws, but for the most part, it's a very good film that shows the various sides of the war and is well worth seeing.

Kenneth W. photo
Kenneth W.

I'm not going to go into great detail about the actual movie, because there is a ton of detail that is on other reviews. For me the movie is about one of the greatest accomplishments of modern military leadership: A front line army in Europe, in WWII, that is nearly impossible to defeat and can only be completely defeated by one who is in command. The movie shows that even in the face of overwhelming odds, the U.S. Army is capable of not only maintaining a high degree of discipline and control, but can be the ultimate force multiplier. The movie has several high points, and it was a great effort, but unfortunately the movie has some really weak points that keep it from reaching its full potential. It's one of those movies that makes you question why the director didn't choose to show this in a theater instead of a TV broadcast. I was really looking forward to the movie, and it really was one of the best movies I've seen in the last year. But it's not perfect, and it doesn't show all the lessons that it's trying to teach. For example, the movie's main character, Captain Schoeler, is the most evil person in the movie, yet at the end he seems like a really good guy. The movie is set during the war in Europe, and the movie spends a lot of time in the European theater. However, the movie's focus is on the American military in the Pacific Theater. This is a huge shift for a movie about the U.S. Army in Europe, because they spent a lot of time focusing on the European theater, but in the end it's still primarily a U.S. Army story. But it's not really a bad movie. It's a good movie. I was pretty disappointed at the end, but it's still a good movie. It's an extremely well made movie, and it's definitely one of the better war movies of the last year.

Michael D. photo
Michael D.

This movie is one of the best war movies of all time. The best war movie ever. This movie is about an American general who goes to Russia to teach them a lesson. This movie is great because it has a great story and great characters. This is not a war movie but more of a drama. The acting in this movie is great and they made the best out of the cast. This movie is a must see because it is great. I give this movie a 7 out of 10. If you haven't seen this movie you should see it.

Andrea E. photo
Andrea E.

The story is inspired by the true story of Sergeant Major Randall P. Jenkins who is the first black man to graduate from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. The year is 1917, after the world war had ended. The U.S. Army was still in full combat gear, and Jenkins was given the opportunity to go to Africa where he would serve in the most famous African American regiment in the U.S. Army called the 14th Field Artillery. The regiment's motto was "Duty and Honor First". The regiment was known as the "Potomac Horsemen", and Jenkins was their valor hero. It was also the year of the Great Depression, and the U.S. Army had an opportunity to fire artillery for the first time since World War II. Captain William R. Seward, one of the senior officers, was always troubled by Jenkins, who was seen as an "old man" with a "lot of gray hair". The head of the 14th Field Artillery was the senior officer of the regiment, Major General Curtis G. LeMay. LeMay was the highest ranking officer of the 14th Field Artillery. As a result of Jenkins, LeMay's plan of disarming the German's in the Black Forest had a chance of success. After the war, the U.S. Army recognized the importance of a black officer in the field artillery as well as the professionalism and dedication that Jenkins displayed on his journey to Africa. Also, LeMay had received letters from Jenkins on the African continent, but his record of sending letters was not very good. LeMay was compelled to be more efficient by taking an African American into the U.S. Army and having him serve as a field artillery officer. On September 14, 1917, Jenkins arrived in the U.S. Army, and was given the rank of Lieutenant Colonel, and given his name as Randall. While he was there, he earned the rank of Major General, and was sent to Africa to do some field artillery work. While in Africa, he was able to learn how to use the U.S. Army cannon. After his arrival in the U.S., Jenkins was given a big opportunity to become a field artillery officer. He was given the opportunity to fire the U.S. Army's new artillery, which was a heavy 50-pound gun. This artillery fire was nicknamed the "Rocket Launcher". Jenkins proved to be a leader, and after he was given the responsibility of firing the Rocket Launcher, he was given the title of Major General. The soldiers in the U.S. Army were starting to treat Jenkins very well. The only thing that he didn't understand was how to do the job properly, and how to do the job properly would prove to be a major problem for him. However, when Jenkins was asked by LeMay to train the 4th Field Artillery Regiment, he was more than ready to learn. After the 4th

Craig C. photo
Craig C.

It's difficult to review the book "The Iliad" because, though it is a great epic, it's also difficult to comment on it because it is such a text. In my opinion, the book is much more entertaining than the movie. As a matter of fact, if the movie had not been made, the Iliad would never have been written, and therefore I think the book was superior to the movie.

Anna Romero photo
Anna Romero

I was able to catch this at the Austin Film Festival. It is a first-rate work. It is a brave and strong statement about the events in Vietnam and its impact on our country. I found it very moving, moving to know that so many people who had to fight in the war in Vietnam, did not come home. The director and producer have a great deal of courage in putting the movie together. The characters are very real and convincing, especially the main character, Ed (Kevin Costner). He shows a lot of courage and takes a lot of risks to make this film. The film is about a family's journey of their lives from war to peace. It shows a lot of courage and honesty, showing the human spirit and the strength to face danger. The film also shows the history of the Vietnam War and its impact on our country. The director has made a film that will bring the audience to the edge of their seats and to feel a lot of emotion. I hope that the film can be shown in the theatres.

Evelyn photo

This is a brilliant movie. What a wonderful script. The acting is superb. If you like war movies, you must see this one.

Dennis Duncan photo
Dennis Duncan

I saw this film when it was first released on VHS in the late 1980s, and I was very impressed. While many other films have been made about WWI, this film takes a different approach. It doesn't attempt to present the German army as a bunch of incompetent, violent psychopaths. No, it presents them as honorable, decent men who gave their lives for their country. This is a film of stunning beauty, and I would like to see it on the big screen. The cinematography is incredible, the actors are excellent, and the score is great. The story is also a real gripping one, that is both tragic and uplifting. The story was written by the same person who brought us "The Long Goodbye," a masterpiece. This film is not only a beautiful film, but it is a great story, and it should be seen by everyone.

Beverly C. photo
Beverly C.

This movie is a kind of slice of life, and it is not necessarily a happy one. It's a story about what happens when the countries of the world are divided in two camps. A movie that's based on the "mirror" concept. The characters, especially, the Americans, are shown as good and loyal, while the Germans are shown as the bad and evil, but the movie shows them as two sides of the same coin, only the German side has the strength and will to fight for its rights, while the Americans lack the same courage and will. The way in which the movie tells this story is interesting and entertaining. It's a movie that you should see if you are interested in politics and history. It's very interesting to see how the world works, and how it can change in a very short period of time. I liked the way the movie was set, the actors, the actors and the actors were all great, and I also like the movie's concept, it's not really complicated. The movie also has a good message, and I believe that this message was well presented. The movie is not about "us" vs. "them", it's about "us" and "them", and the differences in strength, will, and values that define our nation. 7 out of 10 stars.

Charles photo

The movie made me cry, it made me laugh, and it made me laugh and cry. It made me laugh because the movie was funny and the actors were great. I'm not going to give away the ending, but i do want to point out that all the stars that I have commented on are not stars that i have seen in other movies. They are not "in" movies. I have seen them in other movies but they are not the stars that I would say. I am not saying that they were bad actors, but they are not in the movies I have seen. This is a very good movie, i recommend it to anyone who likes to laugh and cry.

Crystal Dixon photo
Crystal Dixon

Another great film made by the Italians. This time about WWII in Germany. A story about a strong soldier and his wife who stay with their son in Germany. The second half of the film is the romance between the couple. The film is more realistic and the story is more real than in the American films. They are usually too gory to have real meaning. The romance between the main characters is shown with a lot of love, humor and a lot of emotion. If you like the previous movies by the director, you should see this one.

Mary photo

I liked this movie very much. I think it was a very well done movie, and the cinematography was very well done. I liked the way the movie was shot, and the fact that the characters were very well developed. I think the acting was very good, especially from the two main actors. I liked the way the movie ended. The thing that bothered me the most about the movie was the very last scene, and how it was not properly concluded. I did not like that. This movie is a very good movie, and I recommend it to people who want to see a very well done movie. It is a very good movie, and I think it deserves more credit.

Eugene F. photo
Eugene F.

I think this movie is a lot better than the other movie. You have to watch the movie at least twice to catch all the good points, which you need to see in the movie. You will see some mistakes in this movie, but they are worth it. It is the best movie I have ever seen, because I know how to see the movie correctly. It is not so complicated and the actors do their job well. I think this movie deserves a better rating. Because the other one was better than the movie. But the only thing that the movie is good for is people who like War movies.

Theresa photo

I was a kid and I remember my dad putting the VHS tapes into the VCR and watching all the great war movies. I also remember watching documentaries on WWII. But I never thought of making my own. Well, after seeing this movie I finally did. And I am so glad I did. This is not a Hollywood movie. This is a true story. The story of how the Japanese made the atomic bomb. The characters were so realistic. They really lived their lives. They could not have been as cool as they were, in real life, they were probably super-dopey. But it was very good, because this was the real life of the people. The acting was perfect. Everyone in the cast was awesome. The battle scenes were beautiful. The soundtrack was really well done. This movie was very realistic. I felt like I was there, and I was there with them. I hope you all get to watch this. You will love it, I sure did.

Catherine Woods photo
Catherine Woods

The movie is about an American soldier who has a chance to be a hero when he's sent to France to defend the Allies from German German-American forces. The film is a good story with a good character development. It also has a good message. However, it's a little slow and not always predictable. The cast does a good job, and the story is well told, but it's just a little too long. The only thing I would have changed is the ending. I know the movie is about war, but I would have liked to see the Allies win the war.

Timothy photo

Well, this is not the best war movie I've seen, but it's still good. The thing about it is that it has a lot of action and a lot of action sequences. There's also some sad scenes, but I didn't really care about it. I did however like the way it was done, that the battles were like real battles, and the special effects were awesome. You can't really go wrong with these guys, they have some great action scenes in them. The special effects are not bad at all, they look real. Overall, I liked it, I think it's worth watching, I think it's a good war movie. I think the movie has good story, it's a good movie to watch.

Raymond P. photo
Raymond P.

I've just seen "The Great War", starring Sean Connery as Lord Lacey, a supremely capable and calculating English statesman, who is forced to step into the breach in order to protect his country from the threat posed by a Japanese invasion. And Connery, with his superb diction, is outstanding. He is not only able to convey his character's emotions with ease, but he is able to display a depth of character not previously seen in an actor. In this role he portrays an Englishman who is not afraid to stand up for his country and uphold the values of the British people, something that is rarely seen in films. He is also able to create a sense of loneliness and isolation, and he is able to portray the British people as being much more sympathetic than the average viewer may have been led to believe. The film is also very well acted. It is not the most dramatic film I have ever seen, but it is a very good movie, and one that I recommend highly. "The Great War" is a very good movie, and I rate it a 8 out of 10.

Sean Ryan photo
Sean Ryan

I was recently fortunate enough to view the original version of The Longest Day, starring Paul Newman as the key character, Lt. James Cole. I was not disappointed. It was as good as I expected it to be. I must say that this film is very similar to The Longest Day in the way that it depicts the scenes of combat in the Pacific theater. As an example, the scene in which the two planes are crashing into the Pacific Ocean, and the crew is running for their lives is exactly the same as the scene in The Longest Day where the Japanese are landing and the men are fleeing for their lives. The difference is that in The Longest Day, the scenes of combat are filmed realistically. In this film, the scenes are filmed so that they appear as if they were filmed in a studio. I think that this is very impressive. I think that it makes the movie that much more realistic. One thing I will say about this film is that I did not like the way that the film was set up in terms of the relationship between the two men. I was not sure that the relationships between the men were going to be as believable as the ones in The Longest Day. But overall, this is a very good film, and it is one of my favorite war films.

Kathleen D. photo
Kathleen D.

I'm writing this review in case anyone is reading this who has not seen it yet. I love this movie. I'm 19 years old and I've seen it three times. I always love it, but it never gets old. It's the movie that made me want to be a writer, but I haven't been able to find a job. I'd love to be able to get an agent, but I don't know what I would do. Maybe I should work at a restaurant or something. It's the movie that made me want to become a writer, but I'm still a teenager. This movie is for you. If you like war movies, this is for you. If you like good movies, this is for you. I'm always in a bad mood when I watch this movie. It's a perfect movie. 8/10.

Lisa Aguilar photo
Lisa Aguilar

A very good film about the war. It was made in 1983 and it is a real treat. The characters are believable, the story is well thought out, and the war is beautifully shown. The film is not what you would expect, and in fact it is very different from what you would expect. The film is not a war movie, it is a drama. The film is divided into three acts, each one a little different. The first act is the beginning of the war, the second act is the end of the war, and the third act is the battle of Stalingrad. The war is shown very well, and the cinematography is great. The special effects are good, but nothing really spectacular. The acting is very good, and the acting by the actors is excellent. The direction by Peter Weir is very good, he gives the film a very good look, and a very interesting look. The cinematography is very good, and the sound effects are very good. The film has a very good story, with a very good ending, it is very well made, and is very interesting. The movie is not for everyone, it is very hard to follow, but it is a very good movie, and it is a good film.

Roy S. photo
Roy S.

Based on a novel by John Cheever, which was adapted for the screen by David O. Selznick, "My Name is Joe" tells the story of a young man (Keaton) who suffers from a severe case of amnesia, and who begins to remember his past lives. His memory of his past life is so poor that it is hard to tell what he was doing and why he was doing it. Joe spends most of the film trying to solve this problem, and in the process he meets several people, including a doctor (Depp) who attempts to help him regain his memory. What makes "My Name is Joe" such an effective film is the way that it deals with the question of memory. The film doesn't dwell on the idea of memory loss, instead focusing on the fact that memory is an extremely complex and highly subjective process. In this case, Joe is trying to understand what he was doing in the past, and how he came to be doing what he was doing. As a result, it is impossible to figure out exactly what the director is trying to accomplish, and the result is that the film becomes a little bit boring. This is an example of the "shallow" nature of the film. Another problem that the film has is that it is too long. The first hour of the film is relatively uneventful, and the remaining half hour is just a slow, boring slog. The film is also a little bit of a mess. The film has a good idea, but it is so poorly executed that it makes it hard to like it. All in all, "My Name is Joe" is a good film that is worth seeing once. If you like the idea of memory, you will probably like the film.

Nicole R. photo
Nicole R.

The movie is a very good representation of WW2, as it shows the atrocities committed by the Nazis and the attempts to cover it up. The war was very long, and one should not think it was a one time event. All the war was a terrible tragedy, and the events of WW2 should not be glorified in a way that makes them look good. It is easy to understand why Hitler would want to hide what was happening, and he certainly did. The movie shows the atrocities of the war and how it affected many people, and shows the moral panic that was created. Hitler's efforts to hide it were admirable, but the movie is also very good because it shows the terrible mistakes that were made during the war. The movie is a very good representation of the war, and it should be shown in schools. It is a good movie, and I would recommend it to anyone.

Sean S. photo
Sean S.

I have been a lifelong admirer of Peter Weir's work, from my humble beginnings in early English class at the Edinburgh Academy of Music & Drama, up to my present day work at the BBC. While this film is not as successful as I hoped it would be, I must say that it did really improve my appreciation of Weir's work. The technical aspects of the film are outstanding, and all in all, a very rewarding experience. The only thing I would say is that this film should have had a much better script. However, this film is best appreciated when viewed on the big screen, preferably one with a magnifying glass and a proper set. Otherwise, do yourself a favor, and just watch it on television. Though the CG technology has advanced significantly in recent years, still, that technology is far from what you will see on this film. My opinion: do not miss this film. Buy the video if you can. But if you don't want to spend money on the movie, then do not go to the theater.

Thomas Morrison photo
Thomas Morrison

The film's premise, of a German woman traveling through a Nazi occupied France, sets the scene for a series of events that ultimately leads to the creation of a new nation. The film's central character, Clara, (played by the ever dependable Janet McTeer) is our focus. Her story is fascinating, as well as the various characters she meets along the way. Through this lens we see, not just the brutal and often senseless violence of war, but the difficult choices people make as a result of the war. As we move along the film, we are pulled into the situation, and are pulled back to the characters. In this way, the film works as a dramatic examination of a specific moment in time. We watch as Clara moves in to the small town of Ste-Anne-des-Prés, but has no idea of what is coming. One of the characters she encounters is the man she loved from her previous life, Claude. The people in this town are familiar to us from the years before, and their reactions are authentic. But the major problem is that Clara's life has changed dramatically. Her husband died during the war, and the war has altered her life. She is not allowed to walk the streets, and has a mental state that makes it difficult for her to fit into society. The film presents Clara's situation as a reflection of the people she meets, and this makes it a great film to watch. There is not a lot of originality to the film. It is very well acted, as well as well shot, but the whole feeling of it is really all that it can be. It is a slow film, and it is easy to get lost in the past and the present, and be unable to process what is happening. Still, the film works, and is a very worthwhile film. 7/10.

Nicholas M. photo
Nicholas M.

This film is part of the "World War II" trilogy. The first one is "Saving Private Ryan" which is about the assault on the beaches of Normandy. The second one is "Schindler's List" which is about the Holocaust. This movie is about the invasion of Normandy. The movie starts out with a speech given by Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower. He states that he is going to hold a parade in the center of the city, and that there will be a curfew in the city. He then states that the invasion of Normandy will be the last major battle of the war. He then says that he will be making an all-out assault on the beachhead, and that the entire American army will be landing in Normandy. The battle of Normandy is not shown in this movie. There are two scenes in this movie that show the battle. The first one is in the second scene of the movie. The second one is in the last scene of the movie. Overall, this movie is very well made, and the actors do a good job. It is worth seeing. The movie is great. The only thing I didn't like about the movie was that it was a bit slow moving. It would have been better if it was a little bit faster. Overall, this is a great movie. I would give this movie a 8 out of 10.

Ruth Gilbert photo
Ruth Gilbert

At the end of World War One, Western governments (including the US) invade Palestine to end the threat of armed resistance by the nationalist (Jewish) group Hamas. A large portion of the population is displaced, leaving the pro-Israeli Jewish communities without land to build on and the people of Palestine to fend for themselves. German-born writer-director Martin Scorsese made this unique film in a small town in southern France in the late 1930s. The first time I saw it I thought it was fairly ordinary, but after the next time I watched it I discovered it was a masterpiece. The story of this film is the main reason why I rated it so highly. It is an outstanding film on many levels. The film is very realistic. You see this town gradually being destroyed by German bombs. There are many shots of the towns' ruins, including the house next door that is destroyed and then taken apart by the bombs. This is a very realistic depiction of World War One. The acting in the film is excellent, even if some characters are a bit over-the-top. They speak in German and English, and at times you can't understand what they are saying, but that is probably because you can't understand the subtitles. I think the most memorable character in the film is the Jewish father, who talks in a really stereotypical way, but I like this because it shows how the Jews of France reacted to the invasion. The film is about the young boy who appears to be the main protagonist. He is really determined to defend his family and his community. The other character who appears in the film is a doctor, but she doesn't have a significant role in the film, just a supporting role. This is one of the most interesting and realistic films I have ever seen, and the acting is amazing. I haven't seen the original film by George Lucas, but I'm not sure if this is the same film. I know that some of the acting is different from the original film, but I don't think that makes a difference. The whole film is a masterpiece, and I hope that this film gets a great film festival.

George Carroll photo
George Carroll

This is the story of a platoon of American soldiers who are stationed in the small village of Amiens during the blitzkrieg in WW2. At first, they are happy to be away from their home country, then they realize that they have no choice but to stay and fight, and in the end, it's all for the greater good. There is no love story or happy ending here, and the viewer should be very careful about what they are seeing. This movie is disturbing, and should be avoided by anyone who has any understanding of the Holocaust. I found it very hard to watch at times, and could not stop thinking about the cruelty that was inflicted on the Germans and the French. There are no happy endings, and the audience should be very aware of the dark nature of war and the extent to which it has to be fought. This movie is worth watching and should be seen by everyone.

Robert Ryan photo
Robert Ryan

I have seen this movie many times over the years and every time I do I appreciate it more. I like it because of its realism. There is no music and I don't think you could get the feeling of the war with just a few words. Also, the movie is not about the war but more about the people and how they feel about it. The movie is very well-done and you can feel the emotions of the people. The movie has a great cast and is very well-made. The actors give great performances. I really liked it because I know how it felt. I don't know if it is true but there were only about 4 or 5 of us who stayed in the theater after the movie ended. So the film is a very good movie. I also like it because it is based on true events.

Marie P. photo
Marie P.

I just watched this movie last night and was very surprised. I am a big fan of the WWI movies and I was expecting a lot of the same movie. The movie was very well done, it had great action and good drama. There were times when I was in tears, but that was because I was so moved by the movie. I loved the scenes with the German soldiers and how they were portrayed. The movie had a lot of depth, it showed how German soldiers were killed, and how they were treated by the British and French soldiers. It also showed how the German soldiers treated the Americans and the British. I think it was a great movie and I highly recommend it.

Alan H. photo
Alan H.

The silent movie version of "Saving Private Ryan" (the film version, not the WWII film) has been widely released in the United States and elsewhere. The reason is that the film has been given the treatment of a classic Hollywood film. In the 1950's and 1960's, Hollywood was getting tired of the "Patriotic" films. Movies such as "Patton" and "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" made it clear that the Americans are the heroes of the world, not the British, and the French are the bad guys. If a movie made in the 1950's is seen today, it is seen as a "patriotic" film, but if it is seen as a film with a message, it is considered propaganda. "Saving Private Ryan" is one of those films that was ignored by the Hollywood machine, and has been given the treatment of a classic Hollywood film. The movie is very well-done, and the acting by the young cast is terrific. There is a very strong moral message in the movie, which the film gets very right. As the film was being released, I watched it twice and each time I liked it better. I am a huge fan of the film and have read several books about it. I think this is a great film.

Donna D. photo
Donna D.

I have to say that I've been a fan of Douglas Adams for about twenty-five years. In that time, I haven't read a single book by him and don't plan to. That's probably one reason why I thought this was the best Adams book I have ever read. I was happy to find this when it came out. I wanted to see a movie based on this book. I watched it recently and I was very disappointed. The story is terribly disconnected from the book. There are lots of changes that the movie makers could have made to bring the story to a better state. I can't say I hated the movie. On the contrary, I liked the movie very much. It has its moments of greatness. It was definitely enjoyable to watch but it was a big disappointment. I would recommend this movie to anyone who hasn't read the book and to anyone who hasn't read it. One more thing. The 3-D movie doesn't have special effects. Douglas Adams had to have special effects. I think it is amazing that the movie doesn't have special effects. It looks very real and it really looks like an actual picture of the book. If anyone is interested in seeing this movie, go to the Video store and rent it. It is worth it.

Marilyn photo

This is a good movie with many fine points. It's the first American war movie made in the last twenty years, and it's not the least bit anti-war, it's simply about the moral and ethical implications of war. I think the movie is a very well done piece of work, but I agree with others who say it's a little too long and some of the scenes could have been cut. I'm not sure why the Germans were sent to the hospital in the first place. The fact that they were war criminals certainly didn't help their case. I'd say that it's worth watching, but I'm not sure it's great. If you're interested in the war, then I'd say you'd have a better chance of finding something else to watch.

Larry Cruz photo
Larry Cruz

The 1940s were a time of great change in the world. War was becoming a greater threat than it had been in decades. The Nazis were on the ropes, with Hitler being pushed back to his seat in the Reichstag. The Allies had already defeated the Germans, and had begun to push the Red Army back. As the war ended, the Allies had a lot to be thankful for. The United States and Great Britain had united to defeat the Axis powers, and the world had seen a world of peace and prosperity. The war had only driven the Allies further apart, and the world had become increasingly dangerous for the rest of the world. The film shows the horrors of war and the horrors of the camps. It tells the story of how the Jews were treated by the German army during the war. It shows the brutal treatment of the prisoners, including forced labor. The film also shows the people's desire for revenge. The Holocaust was a huge event, and it had a huge impact on the world. The film shows the horrors of the camps, and the people's desire to get revenge on the people who did these atrocities. The film is also very realistic, and does a great job of portraying the events. The film is very well-made, and the acting is great. Overall, I really enjoyed this film. The acting is great, the story is very good, and the visuals are great. This film is definitely a must-see.

Grace Knight photo
Grace Knight

There are many things to admire about the film. The set, the costumes, the dialogue, the costumes, the cast. The film was never really a personal film for me. I saw the film on a tour in Washingon, D.C. and then brought it back home to see my friends. The film was an odd mixture of what I thought were great films, especially the war film, but I found it lacking in the direction, pacing, story and overall plot. The direction of the film was great, and I'm sure it was intended to be, but it was very lacking. The film has a great pace. When you think you've seen all that's going on in the film, something else happens, and the film slows down. The film is quite well photographed. There are many good locations. The film is very well-edited. The cinematography of the film is very well done. There are many good performances from the cast. It's not the greatest film in the world, but it's very good. It's certainly one of the better films I've seen in the past few years.

Benjamin photo

The movie is good. It gives a good picture of the war. The cinematography is great. And it was directed very well. It's not a masterpiece. The screenplay could have been better. But it was OK. The cast was good. I have to say that it was done in a good way. It was not a movie that I felt compelled to watch twice. But I'm sure you will like it. If you are not into war movies, I suggest you watch it.

Willie Bates photo
Willie Bates

I was very much surprised to find this movie, which I had always considered to be a disappointment. It's actually pretty good and a lot better than I expected. It's well made, has some good performances, and it's definitely worth the time to see it. The movie is set in World War I, which in itself is a pretty good story for a movie. It's about a man who was born and raised in the United States and is a doctor who lives in the same neighborhood as a German who is fighting the Germans in the trenches. He gets caught in the middle of the conflict and is the only one who knows what's going on. He takes the information he learns and gives it to the Germans. He also learns a bit about his own history. The movie is quite intense and there are some really intense moments. I'm not going to go into any more details but I do recommend it. I gave it a 7 out of 10.

Bryan H. photo
Bryan H.

When I first saw the title of this movie I immediately thought that I was in for some great war-stuff but instead I got a very typical film with some interesting and enjoyable elements, the only real flaw is that it has been over-worked. In my opinion this movie is a 9 out of 10. This movie's best feature is it's very well made and realistic, the fight scenes are of course awesome but they're well done. The actors are fine, they all do what they are supposed to do. The other things in the movie are pretty much just good enough, but I don't feel that there's much that can be done with them, the script is OK. I think it's very interesting to watch this movie, it's not an ordinary war-film, it has a very interesting theme and it's very very well made. I think that everyone should see it at least once, I think that this movie is quite good.

Elizabeth R. photo
Elizabeth R.

I first heard about this film when it was first shown in the cinemas. It was one of the first films that I watched in a cinema. It was in French, but I was able to follow it. It was a very nice film, with great performances, and good dialogue. I was not disappointed. I thought the movie would be one of the worst films ever made, but it was not. I think the cast was perfect for the movie. The story is interesting, and it's well-written. The film does not drag on, and is a good watch. It has a good message. I can understand why this film was not well-received. I hope that it gets a good rating, because I think it is a very good film. It's not a masterpiece, but it is a very good film. It's one of the best films I have ever seen. I rate this film 7/10.

Deborah K. photo
Deborah K.

I read the reviews and it is very upsetting to see that so many people just didn't get it. I watched it and really enjoyed it. Its not a masterpiece, but it was entertaining. It had a very good story and it was well directed and acted. I really think that some people just don't get it, and just plain don't like war movies. I liked it, because it was different, interesting and very well made. The acting is very good, and the scenes are very well done. The camera work was very good and the sound effects were also very good. The war scenes are very realistic, but you don't feel that. Its a war movie, but its not a horror movie. Its a war movie and its about war. Its not an epic, and its not a comedy. Its not a drama, and its not a drama. Its a war movie, and it was very well made and entertaining.

Rebecca Duncan photo
Rebecca Duncan

Saw this movie yesterday and thought it was good. It is a bit more than a typical war movie. It has a great score and is very good for an indie film. It is about a bunch of friends going to war to kill Germans and the leader of the group is a woman. It's hard to explain the story but the movie is very well written and has a good message. It has some funny moments as well. It was good to see a film that was not very political. The first war movie I ever saw was WWI and that was one of the worst movies I have ever seen. I am not a political person but this movie makes you think. It is a movie about a group of friends and how they go to war to kill Germans. The main characters are all in their 20's and 30's and they all have problems with their pasts and how they deal with it. It is a great movie and it will be one of my favorites in the near future.

Jacob photo

World War One is one of the most horrific experiences of history. And to know that it is almost forgotten, is to let down our American governments. This film is as much a masterpiece of cinema as any film ever produced. It is so long that it would not have been possible to finish it in 90 minutes and still be able to tell a compelling story. It is a unique film, a rare example of what the average American would have taken to be a great war film if it had been released in the 70's. Few American films have been as important or influential, and few films have been made to a greater extent than this. Most films have not been made to a greater extent, and most American films have not been made so well as this. The great value of this film is in its artistic standards. In this case, the quality of the film is almost art. It is the best film ever made about war, and has been recommended by many to anyone with an interest in this subject. This film will be remembered as one of the greatest, and one of the best films ever made.

Jane Morales photo
Jane Morales

I am not a big fan of war movies, I like them for their entertainment value. In the meantime I like the way war movies portray the war, especially the way they depict the German soldiers. I have never seen a movie like "Saving Private Ryan" so I am still not familiar with the real story of the USS Maine and the lives of those who were lost. However I was captivated by the story and the acting. It is the first time that I have seen an American movie that did not make me want to change the channel. I will watch this movie again and again, I have never been to a movie theater before but I think this is a great movie.

Christopher Mendez photo
Christopher Mendez

I just came across this movie tonight and I've been wanting to see it for a long time. I love World War II movies, and this is one of the best. It is extremely well shot and never loses focus. If you like this movie, please check out "The Seventh Day" also about the Holocaust. This movie was on my all time top ten list.

Julie Contreras photo
Julie Contreras

Excellent film which documents how the war in World War 1 affected the lives of civilians living in Russia. The portrayal of Russian soldiers is exemplary, with the inclusion of some very well-chosen quotations from Russian officers. I am not sure I have ever seen so much brutal, harsh language towards Russian soldiers. This is a film you will enjoy watching, regardless of your nationality. The war is not portrayed as a battle between two sides, or even between troops, but rather as a battle for survival of a civilian population, and that is what this film focuses on. It's worth watching just for the 'wars' and the 'scenes' that emerge from the war. What does it take to survive in war? The film doesn't just bring out a warm feeling towards the Russians, but also a sense of compassion towards the civilian population. This film has to be one of the best films I have ever seen, and for a film with so little to do, it deserves to be one of the best.

Kenneth photo

I have watched the film in the past few months and it is not as good as I had thought. The plot is similar to many war films and the war scenes are shot with a very low-budget. But there is one thing I liked and that is the use of the widescreen format. I liked the large screen that was used to display the pictures and the scenes were very interesting. The direction was very good, and the actors were great. I think that if you are not into war films you would enjoy the film. The film is not too long, but it is very fast paced. The use of a wide screen and widescreen format will be the only thing I can say negative about this film. There are no doubt some faults with the film. The script is not too original, and the acting was very poor. But there are some things that I liked, like the large screen and the use of the widescreen format.

Angela photo

BONNIE AND CLYDE WERE HORRENDOUS! For a movie that has nothing at all to do with war, it is more likely to have fun than gore or historical inaccuracy. At times the camera cut to an on screen romance between the two main characters that must have been very difficult to film. Despite some small problems, it was simply one of the best movies I have ever seen! It was great for a while, then it was boring. The plot was just a little to silly. A whole new direction to go with the war drama. And they could have used more scenes with the battles. It would have been an epic, like the best war movies from the 1930s. But they didn't do it. They didn't even do any actual battles. And then we get to the second half of the movie, and it is just completely boring! They added all these romance scenes that I don't understand why people keep bringing up, they just don't work! I think we've seen the best war movie from the 1940s! I have never seen such a bad war movie in my life! There wasn't a single battle scene that was pretty. I could have done without all the love scenes. When the movie was over, I wanted to tell people how great it was. But I wasn't able to. And that's a real shame. After seeing this movie, I will definitely remember this movie for a long time. It was wonderful, but at times it was just dull.

Jean T. photo
Jean T.

This movie is based on the "Invisible Man", a fictional character created by Ernest Hemingway in his book "The Sun Also Rises". In the movie, the fictional character is called "St. Francis" and he is an Irish man living in the New York City area in the 1930s. The narrator is played by Michael Caine, and in the movie he speaks directly to the viewer. The movie is based on the book "Invisible Man" by Ernest Hemingway. I read the book as a young boy in high school. I have been reading it over and over again and I still love it. I believe that the movie is a great tribute to the book. The movie is entertaining and well acted. There are a few scenes in the movie that are not very realistic, but the story is written from the point of view of the protagonist. The movie is very good. It is worth seeing.

Austin McCoy photo
Austin McCoy

This is a film that's been made over a period of time, a period that would be relevant to many generations. From the German soldier's perspective, the picture of the war is an accurate one. As the two boys start to grow older, the battles of the first year of the war are played out. The film is well shot and very well put together. The film is well paced, and the story holds together very well. The acting is good and the dialogs are good, but the story is still a little hard to swallow. But that's just the problem with WWII films. You can't really understand the characters, and then you're surprised when they actually do something. It's like they are superhuman, and they have superhuman powers, but that doesn't make them any less human. That said, this is a very good film. 7/10

Kathryn F. photo
Kathryn F.

To me the greatest cinematic achievement of the year is "La vie d'Adele", but "La Vie En Rose" is the movie that made me want to see it in the first place. This is a pretty slow movie, but it is an extremely moving story, and is very well directed. The film is about a young girl who is about to be married to a rich young man. In the midst of this the young girl is raped, and when she is rescued by a woman she is told she has been impregnated by her attacker. The woman takes the girl to a hospital, and tells her that if she gives birth to a baby the rapist will be put to death. This is a fairly unusual situation, and the movie shows the main character going through this ordeal with the help of the women who were in the hospital with her. There are many subplots, but none of them are very important. The movie is a bit long, and I didn't feel like I was really following the story. There are a few action scenes, but they don't really go anywhere. The film is definitely a slow film, and it is not very exciting, but I really liked it. I think it is very important to know the background of the film, because it is a story of rape, and of course it is also a story of human nature. If you don't know the background of the film you will not be able to really understand what is happening. The performances are very good, especially from Isabelle Huppert, who is absolutely brilliant. I think she was the best thing about the film, but it is not just her that is great, the performances are also very good. I would recommend the film to anyone, it is definitely a good film, but it is not a great film. 7/10

Madison Hudson photo
Madison Hudson

It's the late 1920s and a young British officer is sent to the front with the intention of finding a missing sailor, but soon finds himself caught up in the French Resistance and the fight to keep the country from going over to the Germans. His orders are to help get the Frenchman out of jail, but the situation gets out of hand and he has to try to keep the peace and keep the peace. The story is told in flashbacks, but the acting is very good, especially the lead actor, who is very good at the part. This is a movie that can be enjoyed by the whole family, but it is not a film that is to be taken seriously. I think that the main point of the film is that, it shows that even in the best of times, and the best of times have their downsides.

Charles photo

By the standards of its genre, this film has nothing to recommend it. It is an aggressively slow-paced, character-less, art-house film, with a running time of almost two hours, which would be more than enough to make it a bore if it had been over two hours longer. The script is bizarre, too. Where a good film should follow the rules of its genre, this one indulges in far-fetched supernatural occurrences. Every character seems to have a god-complex, or a dragon-complex. There is a good deal of historical verbiage, but the language is mostly foreign (at least the subtitles). The whole thing is a fairly formal and deliberately amateurish affair, but the actors all seem to be having a good time, and that's enough to make it bearable. Good performances all around. A really long film that would have been over before it began, if it had been over two hours shorter.

Crystal photo

This movie is based on a novel of the same name by William V. Moore, and was written at the height of World War I. This movie has some strong points, such as the desolation of the German troops, the horrible murder of women and children, the slaughter of civilians, and the deliberate destruction of military facilities. This is what can be said about this movie. However, the film does have a major flaw. It is too slow-paced. It was released in 1916, and the movie takes about 40 minutes to go from the beginning to the end. The movie's title "The Division of Russia" has been changed to "The Division of Europe" in the movie. The movie was also released in the same year as the film "Roots". This movie has strong points, but this is a flaw that detracts from the movie. This movie was released in 1917 and is not based on the war, but the desolation of Germany and the horrors of the war. This is not a film for people who are fond of historical films. It is not a film for people who love war movies. This movie is for people who are interested in world history.

Willie photo

The French are in a desperate battle with the Germans. They are the new colonial powers in South Africa, and their military machine is as powerful as the Germans'. A coalition of nationalist and Nazi parties are struggling to form a government and stop the Nazi's from getting their hands on a great American diamond. "The Eternal Jew" is the first of the two books written by famed British novelist R.H.G.Wells, who co-wrote the final chapters of the series with his wife. The second, "The Arab," is a much more dark and gritty book, but still not as detailed as the first book. While I can't say the book is all that great, I found it was very enjoyable, and if you are a fan of the series, you will enjoy it as well. Some of the dialogue is a little hard to follow, but the action sequences are still impressive. Overall, this is a pretty decent action/war movie that is worth watching.

Ashley Shaw photo
Ashley Shaw

I saw this movie on the TV a few days ago and I must say it was really good. It was very different from what I expected, but it was very good. The plot is a bit thin, but it is worth watching it. I can say that it is a good movie. I liked the fact that the story is a bit different, and I liked the fact that there are no white people in the movie. The actors were good, and the movie is really good. It is not a good movie for everyone, but I think that it is worth watching. I recommend this movie to anyone who likes war movies, or to anyone who likes a good war movie. It is very good. 9/10

John photo

This is a fascinating, disturbing and powerful film, and it's worth seeing many times over. My friend and I were shocked by the lines "The worst crime of all is that you think it's not your responsibility" and "The way I see it is that you're the devil's spawn." I was appalled by those lines, and still am, all these years later. The film is beautifully photographed, edited, and acted. The camera work is fantastic, as is the composition of the shots. I think the best scenes are taken with the camera in the rooms, where the shadows come from around the characters, making the actors and scenery all the more real. I can't imagine how difficult it must have been to get all these shots in the same day, and still be able to make them look like an art-form. I was impressed with the way they showed the "nature vs. nurture" battle, but it did take awhile to get there. There's also the sequence of scenes where the characters are taken into the confessional. The scene in the parsonage, the room in the mansion, the confession in the graveyard. This is one of the first films I ever saw in which I saw that all the characters had something to say. As I watched, I thought: "How could they be so helpless, and yet they could make a film about that?" I think this is a powerful and beautiful movie, because it's so real and touching. All of the characters are really real, and in their own way, vulnerable. It's a movie about people, but it's not about people. It's about a man and a woman who want to be free and see the world and all that is it's beauty, and they live their lives and live together. The film is really about life, and about what it is. There's really no conflict. In this film, there is only love, and one of the characters says that "I don't know which side of the line I'll be on." It's really about freedom, and about who you are. The dialogue is profound. Some of the lines in this film are so powerful that they stick with me, like, I can't imagine what was said, or even if it was said. I can't quite put my finger on what is going through my mind, but I can say that it's a film that has stayed with me.

Nathan photo

I watched this movie as part of a group of students on the History of War course at the University of Oregon. This was an interesting movie, but I have to admit that it's a bit of a bore. The story follows a group of American and French soldiers who are captured in the Pacific during the Russo-Japanese War. The soldiers are then assigned to the American military, which has a much higher casualty rate than the French army. The Americans do not know that they are being held prisoner and are forced to fight in a battle that is of little importance to the war effort. This is a movie that is far from a classic. It's not a "must see" by any means. But I really enjoyed it and it's a movie that I recommend.

Vincent photo

I'm an Australian but for some reason the film resonates strongly with me, even though I'm not a specific country. My grandfather came over as a refugee from the country. He was a man of impeccable moral integrity and a wonderful son and father. He was called John as a man who stood up for what he believed in, and was known for his honesty, his caring for the vulnerable. He was a good man, and he cared for the woman he loved. It was when he died that it all changed. He had it all, power, fame and wealth and was still alive. But he did not die happily, but with a little sense of loss. It was from that point forward, a terrible loss of the soul. And he died knowing, in his death, that he had loved a woman beyond all the splendour of wealth and power, a woman who was simple and simple-hearted, someone who only really cared about the food she had, and the company of friends, and the security of her home, and the safety of her children. That's what she gave him, and in return, he died with a sense of loss, and he died knowing that he was fulfilling the promise he had made to her. And that's what it means to die. If I had my time over again I would do something completely different. I would not be as generous with the money I had given my grandfather. I would keep my mouth shut and be as reserved as I could be, and I would do it with absolute honesty and valour. I would live with my grandfather and his wife and take my own life. But I wouldn't be doing what he did.

Carolyn R. photo
Carolyn R.

I can't think of a better movie that would be more appropriate for a screening in a classroom than "Schindler's List". It's an old-fashioned, low-key film that uses every trick in the book to illustrate the plight of the Jews. It's based on the book of the same name by Oskar Schindler, and is shot in a period that would be appropriate for this film. The movie is set in Nazi Germany during the Holocaust. It's based on a true story of how the man who saved the lives of 2,000 Jews by his hands, was forced to work for the Nazis. I believe that this film is a masterpiece. It's an excellent film, and I recommend it highly.

Billy C. photo
Billy C.

The only reason I'm giving this a 7 is because of the acting. You see, while the movie is certainly not a masterpiece, it is still a very good movie. If you like war movies, then I would recommend this movie.

Heather McCoy photo
Heather McCoy

The opening scenes of this movie are a bit slow, but are necessary for the two stories that come together to tell the story of World War I. The first is a love story between a German and a British soldier, but it's really not the story we're after. We are looking for a war movie, but the war isn't mentioned once. The other story is an Irishman trying to fight a war he can't understand, but it's more a history lesson. It's a very well told story and makes you understand the difficulties of World War I, but also makes you think of how terrible the war was. It was the first war we were told about, and also the first war we weren't told about, and you can't help but feel for the soldiers and the soldiers' families. I think the best thing about this movie is that it gives you an idea of what war was like for the soldiers and what the soldiers had to endure. The acting is very good, and the characters are believable. I think that this is a good movie for a rainy Sunday afternoon.

Evelyn photo

At last! We've got a film, and a film that really does capture the spirit of the war. This is an amazing movie. Every aspect of the war was well done. The acting, the directing, the cinematography, the production design, everything was absolutely perfect. I just wish that it wasn't so super long. Although the movie was about 100 min, it should have been trimmed down to 60 min. There were so many details in this film that would have made it a complete story. At least give us more dialogue. I don't think that any one really knew what the war was about, what it was about or even who all the people were. The characters were all really well cast, even the Germans. I was just as surprised as anyone else to see the English actors playing German. German prisoners, German troops, German prisoners of war, German generals, German officers, German engineers. No one seemed to have a problem with it. All of these things were brought to life by the actors. I especially liked the Russian, but the English accents really didn't bother me. I don't think that Americans were supposed to be as nice as the British in this movie. Overall, this movie is phenomenal. Everyone should see this film. It's a must see.

Edward Burns photo
Edward Burns

I have to admit I was a bit skeptical at first, as I was a bit wary of this film. Then I watched it and thought I must have missed something, I mean this is a real film. When I finally watched it I was blown away. It is just a perfect piece of film-making, one of the best I've seen, not just in the history of cinema. Everything just felt right. The cast was spot-on, a true screen original, I think the director really knew how to take the movie to the limit, then when the story finally unfolds, the attention to detail is magnificent. The camerawork was so well done, especially the long and close-ups. The direction is just plain beautiful and respectful, which is something you don't always see. The writing was just so creative, especially the dialogue. The script was very profound and brilliant. And the editing was just perfect. This film is just one of the best films of all time. This film is perfect in every way, you simply cannot deny it. The film won the Oscar for Best Foreign Language film of the Year, and I think it should have won it for the world premiere screening in Venice, as I felt that it was a masterpiece. If you don't see this movie in the theatre, then you are missing out on something special, and you are missing a masterpiece. I am amazed and amazed by the quality of the film.

Gerald Wilson photo
Gerald Wilson

The decision to cast Nelson on a picture so similar to Terence, partly influenced by Terence's own memoirs and partly because he could easily cast himself in a similar role, was probably the most persuasive in his casting choices. The movie, however, is far too overrated. It lacks any sort of true plot development, and indeed, there is not really any real point to the film. If you look at the trailer you will see that the film is largely about the guy's experience as a conscientious objector during the war, and his awakening to his former feelings of guilt. You get the impression that his action in World War I is the motivation for the entire film, and that it is the only one that really matters. That is not really the case. Although the first half of the film is mostly about him, the story has nothing to do with him. There are no real flashbacks to the war, and the film ends without any explanation of his life after the war. The second half of the film, in which the characters of the original Terence are brought to life, does contain some dramatic moments, but it is mostly a superficial story of the brother and his life after the war. The whole film has been made for a certain reason, and it is really not much of a story, and you can do with much better.

Ashley photo

This movie was a lot more interesting than the first one. The first one was pretty dull, and even I wasn't that keen on the second one. I liked the first one, and liked this one, but it wasn't anything special. The movie was about the US forces going into France to help them. It was not about the German forces going into France. The movie did a good job of showing the various personalities of the soldiers, and the politics of the time. It was very interesting to see how the different factions reacted to the war. I really enjoyed it.

Kenneth W. photo
Kenneth W.

I think this film is one of the most important and daring movies of the decade. The direction is outstanding, the acting is great and the script is magnificent. The events in the movie are so real, the way the characters act is so believable, the atmosphere is really powerful and the overall film is very powerful. I think the way the movie ends is brilliant, because in some way it is very reminiscent of the end of "The Magnificent Seven" (1963) and it is really a shame that this film was not better known. In general, I think "The Magnificent Seven" is a great movie and I really recommend it.

Mark B. photo
Mark B.

This is one of the most realistic war films I have ever seen. It is not for everyone, but if you are a history buff, or are interested in the subject matter of war, you should check it out. The movie was shot in black and white, and is much more realistic than other war films. The film was based on the book, "Man of War: The Life of Gen. Patton" by Arthur A. Lipsitz. The film was filmed in real locations, and the locations were real. There were no actors in the movie. The story of the movie was based on Gen. Patton's life, and the actual battle scenes were recreated from the actual battle scenes. I really enjoyed the realism of the movie, and the great acting by the actors. I also found the movie to be very touching. The movie was very inspiring and I am very proud to have been in the film. I would recommend this movie to anyone who is interested in the subject matter of war.

Judith photo

The film tells the story of two brothers, one a Nazi, the other a Jew, who become friends in WWI. This is a good movie, not because of the historical context, but because of the great acting. Both actors are great and their acting is perfect. I think it is a great movie to watch with a good friend.

Susan Shaw photo
Susan Shaw

One of the most underrated movies that I have ever seen. In fact, I'm even surprised that it hasn't been seen by more people. I will list all the reasons why this is a must see. I am quite surprised at the number of people who didn't enjoy this movie. There are a number of reasons why people didn't like this movie. First of all, it was based on a real situation. There are a number of shots that depict the German troops escorting refugees out of the towns in which they were being rounded up. A very well done portrayal of a real situation. Secondly, the acting is amazing. Kinski, Barr, in particular, is in top form. So is the German leader. They all give fine performances, and all the different scenes are presented in an unassuming way that makes the whole movie look more real. Thirdly, the cinematography is amazing. For once, you actually don't see many people moving about in the streets. The cinematography is all about a set of landscapes, and all the different scenes are portrayed in a very beautiful way. There is a great shot of the German soldiers driving away after capturing the fleeing refugees in their jeeps. The open field at the end of the movie is also great. Fourthly, the music is amazing. I found it very interesting and well done. Fifth, it is a very slow movie. It is slow in many ways, but I think this is what really makes this movie so special. It is slow, but in a way that makes you feel very slow. In a way, you could call it an anti-war movie. Sixth, I like how they are using the sirens in this movie. They are used in a very deliberate way. Seventh, this is by far the best portrayal of the hardships experienced by the Allied troops during the war. Eighth, the supporting cast, especially the woman, are very good. Ninth, this movie does not have a predictable ending. It just ends on a different note than many other movies of this genre. This is not a movie that you watch, and you can't wait for the credits to roll. The fact that it ends this way is what makes it so important. This movie really is a very important movie. People who are looking for a good movie, this is it. People who are looking for a bad movie, don't bother. This is a good movie that I would highly recommend to anyone.

Tyler photo

This film is an interesting attempt to portray the French resistance. It is set in the time of the Third Reich, and focuses on the main character, the beautiful and intelligent German girl named Sophie. Sophie is a German woman living in Paris. She is a member of the Nazi party and is a German patriot. The film tells the story of how Sophie has been forced to move to Paris from Germany in order to live a more quiet life. She is a beautiful woman who has been given an important role in the resistance movement. She is also very intelligent and has a strong moral center. The film is a bit slow and it is difficult to follow the story because the characters are not very well defined. The film is full of symbolism, which is a good thing because it makes the film seem more realistic and makes it more interesting. The film is full of images and scenes that are very memorable. The film is an interesting portrayal of the resistance movement and the French resistance. The film shows the German girl's struggle to live in the French Resistance. This is a good film to watch if you are interested in the resistance movement. I would recommend it to people who like films that are a bit slow and have a strong moral center.

Jason Fernandez photo
Jason Fernandez

The German invasion of France in World War 1 is a story that is often told. It is a common story that many people know the ending of. It is also a common story that many people know the beginning. This film shows the beginning of the story and tells the story of the German invasion. The film is set during the night of November 20, 1917 and is shot at night. It tells the story of the Germans who invade France and the French resistance. It shows the life of the French people during this time. This film is a good film and shows the invasion and the people who fight to save their country.

Sharon photo

As the title states, this is a film about war. This is a very sad film, with a good ending. This is a film about the suffering of the men in the front, and how they felt after the war. It is a very depressing film, but it is very powerful. The film is very well made. It is a very well made film. I think that it is a very good film, and it deserves a 9/10.

Danielle photo

If you're looking for a movie that shows the horrors of war and what it does to the human body, then this movie is definitely for you. But if you're looking for a movie that has a lot of depth, you're going to be very disappointed. This movie is a great movie for showing how the world works in the war years. I don't really have anything to say about the movie except that it's great. I think it's the best war movie I've seen since Saving Private Ryan. This movie is also very emotional and it shows that even in the worst of times, there are still good people out there that have the courage to stand up for what they believe in. This movie is very realistic, which is why it's great. It's also one of the most brutal war movies I've seen. The battle scenes in this movie are very realistic, and it's very graphic. I don't want to give anything away but I will say that this movie has a lot of violence. I think that the director did a good job in showing how the people feel about the war. I'm not going to say that this movie is perfect. I would say that it's one of the best war movies I've ever seen. I think that it's one of the best movies of the year.

Nathan Ortiz photo
Nathan Ortiz

First of all, I must say that this movie is absolutely wonderful. The portrayal of the "Man of War" by Tony Soprano is incredible. The way he has taken the role of the man of war and changed it into a man who really was a man of peace is astonishing. He is a superb actor, and it is a shame that he is not more recognized for his acting talents. The main actors in this film, and the actors portraying the characters, are superb. The scenes with the French man, Pierre, and the Italian man, Costanza, are extremely well done. The scene with Soprano is brilliant. This is a brilliant film, and I recommend it to everyone who likes war movies. I rate it an 8 out of 10.

Albert Carter photo
Albert Carter

I'm not going to waste your time with a review of this movie, since I'm sure you already have. I just wanted to say that I am so glad that I never wasted my money on it. I love history and I love movies. I just think it's unfair that it is so hard to find a decent, well-acted movie with a little bit of reality. The movie was very realistic, and you can't get that from the trailers. I was really surprised at how good it was. It was not one of those "let's see how many good things can we say about the movie" movies. It was a good movie, but it was not great. The only thing that was very, very bad about it was the ending. I think that this is a movie that would not be appreciated by most people, but if you like history and movies, I would recommend it.

Gloria Evans photo
Gloria Evans

The life and times of the Sonderkommando in the concentration camp at Auschwitz are told in this film. It is a documentary about the events that took place during the war. There are some great performances by the actors. It is a good film about the horrors of the Holocaust. It also tells the story of the Sonderkommando. The story is told by the people who were there, their memories, their experiences and their decisions. It is also told by the Germans who were there. There is a great mix of the different stories. This film is based on a book by the same title.

Patricia G. photo
Patricia G.

I was surprised by how good this movie was. It was different from most war movies, and in a good way. I've seen most war movies and this was one of the best I've seen. The war scenes were realistic and the movie seemed to be about a day in the life of the soldiers, not about the war itself. It was very interesting and entertaining. I'm not sure if the acting was good, but it was definitely the best I've seen. I think this movie would be good for people who are just starting to learn about the war and want to see something different. I think this movie would be very good for families, especially when their loved ones are still fighting in the war. I can't wait to see it again. I would give this movie an 8/10.

Ronald photo

The most difficult thing about this film is to say how you feel about it. I think this is a great film because it is so moving, it touches your heart, and it makes you think. The idea of the Holocaust is presented in a way that makes you feel sad and it makes you think about the good things in life, and the bad things. The film is not anti-Semitic, and in fact it is based on a true story, but I think that the way the film is made and the way it is presented, makes it seem that way. I think the director is very good at creating a mood that makes you feel uncomfortable, and the film is very well done. This is the best film I have ever seen, and I would highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in the Holocaust. 8/10

Jesse R. photo
Jesse R.

I have been following The Little Hours for a while now, and after seeing it, I felt it would be good to share my experience with the world. I love the book, and can remember several things that the movie didn't mention, so I thought I'd better read the book first before the movie. The movie is great, and you really need to see it, but don't go in thinking it's a documentary, you'll regret it. The movie is great, but it's also a lot of fun. The opening credits sequence is terrific, and although it does rely on some of the locations in the book, it's a great sequence that is still awesome. The score is great, and also adds to the atmosphere of the movie. There are many really great sequences in the movie. I don't want to say more than that, but I will say that it's a great sequence. The acting is good. Jessica Chastain and Ryan Gosling are great. I've read other reviews that have said that they would have liked a different character played by Jessica Chastain, but I thought that Ryan Gosling did an excellent job. I especially loved his character, and I think his performance is the best one. The story is great, and the message is great. The story, I think, is important, and I love that it was tied to the book. I also love the ending. The movie is definitely worth seeing, but it's not a documentary, and you shouldn't read the book before you see the movie. It's worth seeing for Jessica Chastain, Ryan Gosling, and The Little Hours.

Kelly photo

I'm not a big fan of war movies and I'm not a big fan of Steven Spielberg. But I thought that I would give this movie a try. I am a big fan of John Woo and his movies, so I thought that I might enjoy this movie. I thought that the movie was OK, but not great. There were a few scenes that I thought were really cool, but I thought that the movie overall was kind of forgettable. I think that it would have been better if they made a better movie, but I think that the movie was OK.

Harry P. photo
Harry P.

This is a truly disturbing film about a man who commits suicide by jumping into a river. It is a very disturbing film and will probably not be for the faint of heart. But it is well worth watching.

Margaret Matthews photo
Margaret Matthews

I think the film was well done and I really enjoyed it. I think the message of the film is just as important as the story line. The story line was quite interesting and the ending was quite unique. I think the film really held my interest and made me think a lot. The film has an interesting and well executed message. I thought the actors did a very good job with their roles. I thought it was a good film and I would recommend it to anyone.

Patrick photo

Guns and war are a ubiquitous theme in war films. Some of them are more powerful than others, but no film can be called an effective war film without the themes of guns and war. The classics include All Quiet On The Western Front (1914), which is the earliest film I can think of with a war theme, and One-Eyed Jacks (1916), a more recent one. The other major theme that war films had to deal with was the violence. In World War I, movies showed the horrors of war in graphic detail. This movie is about the aftermath of that war. The war was hell on earth, but one of the reasons that the war was so awful was because of the violence that surrounded it. It was a war between civilized countries. It is difficult to picture the horror of war without the violence. There are a few war films that make the violence and the violence from a war film seem acceptable. One of them is The Rifleman (1930), which is about a young U.S. Army sergeant in WWI. The rifleman was trying to be a hero but he also wanted to save the lives of his comrades. There was not enough blood for the movie. The movie showed his struggles to keep his sanity and his way of life. This movie is good because it shows how war destroyed lives. One of the things that makes this movie interesting is that the good guys in the movie are not good guys. One of the soldiers is played by Glenn Ford, who plays the role very well. Another good character is Richard Chamberlain who plays the role very well. This is a good movie that is worth watching. However, this movie is not a great movie. It is not the best war movie ever. It is good, but it is not great.

Christina photo

My opinion on this movie. This movie was pretty much the perfect movie for me. I don't like war movies at all but this one is so much better than the other war movies I've seen. The acting is pretty good, and the story is pretty good too. It was a pretty good movie. It was well directed, and the actors did a good job. Overall, I think this movie is a pretty good movie. 7/10.

Michael photo

Noir is one of the most misunderstood films of the past 30 years. It is also one of the most successful. The makers of "Noir" were a group of New Yorkers who had a particular aesthetic in mind. Their hope was that the subject matter would help them to further their careers in film. The film was a success because it attracted a group of idealistic young people, who had a lot of their own problems to deal with. To these people the subject matter was an ideal medium for discussing those problems. It also appealed to the youth who felt they had to fight the system. They believed the system was not fair. The film also appealed to the proletariat who felt they had to fight the system. They believed the system was unfair to them and to everyone else. This may seem like an overly simplistic view, but in my opinion it is. All three groups seemed to agree that the war was unfair and needed to end. The young people wanted to see the war end. The proletariat and the workers wanted to help the soldiers. And the workers and the proletariat all agreed that the war was unfair. "Noir" also inspired many filmmakers to follow their own artistic vision. We all have our own ideas about art and whether it is a good idea or not. For many people "Noir" seemed like the best thing to do. The film was a success because it appealed to the youth, but not to the proletariat or the bourgeoisie. The film appealed to the proletariat and the bourgeoisie because they had the same problems that the young people had. "Noir" also inspired filmmakers to follow their own artistic vision. "Noir" is one of the best films ever made, but it is not the greatest. A true classic is the greatest of all, but no true classic is without flaws. One of the biggest flaws is the ending. In my opinion the ending should have ended with a fair fight between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. This film would have been a great success if it had ended with the proletariat winning. For this reason it is considered one of the greatest of all time. 8/10.

Nicole D. photo
Nicole D.

This is a film about a soldier who has to go on a mission with the United States government to deliver a package to the dictator of the Congo. I think this film is very powerful because of the whole feeling of war that it is, as well as the relationships between the soldier and the girl who is his companion. Overall, it is a film about the consequences of war and what happens to people when they are exposed to it. I think this film is one of the best film I have ever seen. It is a very good war film and I recommend it to anyone.

Diana photo

Watched this on TV and it was very interesting. It was quite accurate and also the people portrayed were quite believable. I think the real horrors of war are far more horrible than what is shown in this film. I enjoyed the film and it was well worth watching. It was an interesting movie to watch and I think it should be shown in schools to show how people are affected by war. It shows the misery and destruction of war, not just the horrors of it. I do think that the women were portrayed quite well. I thought they were very good and they seemed to know what they were doing and what was happening to them. I liked the fact that the film was very true to the facts.

Amy Gomez photo
Amy Gomez

A movie that has a great story, a great cast, and a great cinematography is hard to beat. The movie focuses on the way the soldiers in the front lines of the war of 1918 are viewed by the people of the country they are fighting for. I thought the acting was great, and the story was fascinating. It has a great story, the characters were interesting, and I think the director captured the feel of the war perfectly. The movie had a great feeling of history. I recommend this movie to anyone that is interested in the war in the United States, and the soldiers in the trenches. I give it a 9 out of 10. I think it is a great movie, and I would like to see it again.

Melissa Cooper photo
Melissa Cooper

It's a great story, and it's well acted, especially by a cast of experienced actors. However, it's not a movie you can watch over and over again. There are a few moments of brilliance, but the story is largely what it is, and it does what it does. It's a movie that I will likely never watch again. But I do recommend it, because of the excellent cast.

Russell Sims photo
Russell Sims

If you have ever wondered what it would be like to be in a war zone and what war really is like, this film is for you. For those who have never been to war, this film is the equivalent of seeing a war film for the first time. It really helps to understand what war is like for the average person. The movie was really well made, with great performances by all the actors. It is definitely worth seeing. This film is not for everyone, but if you can get past the gore, and the fact that it is not 100% accurate, this is a very good film. It is well worth watching, especially if you are interested in war and/or history.

Aaron photo

In the film, the Japanese soldier learns that his mother and father died in a fire, but he refuses to accept the truth. In fact, he is an atheist. He believes in the power of the mind. In the end, the Japanese soldier commits suicide, because he does not want to accept the truth. He believes that he can't believe in anything. This film is an important and unforgettable work of this great director. It is also one of the best Japanese movies ever made.

Albert photo

I was a tad confused about how to get the movie going. The characters didn't seem like they had much personality. I kept watching hoping the director would come back and explain it, but he didn't. He just kind of strung a lot of scenes together. It did help that I knew the movie was set during the American Civil War. What I didn't realize was that the movie had been made in 1917. As I thought I was in the 50's or 60's, the day scenes looked more like the 1930's. I don't understand why the director went back and changed the year. It was very jarring to me. I know the director was making a documentary film. I could just imagine him setting up a time machine and traveling back in time. It would have been a great movie. I would have preferred if the director did not go back in time. He made the movie very well. I like the music. I wish it had been longer.

Steven V. photo
Steven V.

I liked the first two movies better, but this one is a real contender. It's not the best film of the year, but it's certainly up there.

Brian Bennett photo
Brian Bennett

I am a strong supporter of war movies, as the genre is currently the most popular in movies. I feel that War is a film that makes you feel how war feels to us all. I didn't see it until later, so I was unaware of the true horrors of World War One. I am surprised at how it did in the box office. The opening scene was very disturbing and you could feel the tension build up. I am glad I watched it and I would recommend it to anyone who wants to see something that has a message, but not feel cheated by being told it is about a war.

Russell F. photo
Russell F.

This is one of the few WWII films that doesn't take itself too seriously. The acting is great, the cinematography is great, and the cinematography alone is worth the price of admission. The story itself is a bit slow to get going, but once it gets going it is very well done. The only negative is that the ending is kind of abrupt and it doesn't leave much of a lasting impression. It's not a bad movie, but it's not a great movie either. But it's definitely a very good movie. I recommend this film to anyone who likes WWII movies.

Samantha Harrison photo
Samantha Harrison

This is a very interesting and well-made movie about the Japanese internment of Japanese Americans in 1942. The acting is superb, particularly the lead role played by Harry Belafonte. This is a movie about a very significant and painful event in American history, and it is done very well. It is not the movie that will bring tears to your eyes, but it will leave you thinking about the events that took place. It is a very important movie to watch, and I recommend it to anyone who is interested in American history. It is certainly not the movie that you would expect to watch, but it is an interesting film, and you should not miss it.

Craig photo

With all the talk about The Wild Geese, it's hard not to get a bit excited when I read about this. A pretty decent war movie, even if it is a bit dated, and I wasn't expecting much, but it was surprisingly well done. The acting is good, the story is good, and it's entertaining enough. The biggest problem is that the war isn't that exciting. They don't show much of the fighting, and it's mostly just one big battle in a way that feels really short and lacking in tension. There is a bit of a cliffhanger ending, which is good, but it does have a lot of potential for a movie that could have been great. 7/10

Cynthia Chen photo
Cynthia Chen

A good war movie. There are a lot of war movies and I always love war movies. The first one was a little bit too much. This movie was a bit too long and it was a bit boring. It was very depressing and depressing at the same time. I thought it was a little bit overrated. I don't like war movies that much but I like this one. It was very sad but it was a good movie. I give this movie an 8/10. It was a good war movie.

Brian Murray photo
Brian Murray

In this film, a team of survivors of the first World War are sent to a small town to find the whereabouts of a missing girl, in order to get the girl back. It is a very good film. It is not an Oscar worthy film, but it is good. I rate this film an 8 out of 10.

Howard photo

The most outstanding feature of this film is the acting of both the actors and the director. While they are clearly in their prime and one of the most famous actors in the world, the rest of the cast also delivers a performance that is usually impossible to predict. The film is not all flawless though. It is sometimes hard to follow. At times, the sound is so distorted, that you cannot understand what is going on. The editing is also very uneven, with some scenes showing the same action, but with different events. Still, I think that this is the most important aspect of the film and makes it unique. Overall, it is a good film. However, if you are expecting an Oscar winning film, you will be disappointed. The film is interesting, but it is not a masterpiece. I would recommend it to any movie-goer, but I would not recommend it to people who are looking for an Oscar winning film.

Terry Johnson photo
Terry Johnson

Most of this film is nothing but a compilation of scenes from several films and other visual tools to show the war, but the powerful message is still clear and it is what I have come to expect from Robert Duvall. "Four Corners" is one of the best American films of the 20th century. This film is unique because it uses many different methods to tell the story. One is to show a group of soldiers or police trying to find out about an event in a group of people that happened in a village of a long time ago. The other method is to show the footage from the past. One can say that the camera in the room with the war movie is being used to show the soldiers' feelings on the world today. Finally, we have to have a film which has a great message, yet also has strong acting. The actors in this film gave the performances of the year. Robert Duvall is at his best, and I was really surprised when the final scene of the film was shown to me. I was not sure if this was the scene that ended the film or if it was the end of the film. I do not know why it was not shown to me, but it is not a moment that I will forget. It is a memorable moment, a memorable image. Duvall's performance was so powerful, and it is not just a performance, it is his role. In addition, the other actors, such as Michael York, Kim Basinger, and Paul Newman, give great performances. While the story is not an extraordinary story, it was a very strong film. It shows the terrible impact of war, the desperate people who lived during the war, the Japanese Americans and the Japanese. While the film does not show the Japanese in a positive way, it does show them in a powerful and consistent way. As I said, the film has a great message, and it is one that I will never forget. I give it a 8/10.

Dylan photo

I love films that deal with historical events. I have read a few books on the subject of WWI, and seen many films on it. I really liked the Lord of the Rings Trilogy, but this film was a great film. The acting was excellent, especially from Mr. Grant and Mr. Jude. It was really suspenseful, especially in the first hour of the film. The ending was very interesting, and the actors were very good. The sound was really good, too. I would recommend this film to anyone.

Raymond Wilson photo
Raymond Wilson

This is a movie with a serious message. Although the premise was good, the execution was not very good. For a movie to be so good on the technical aspect it needed to be done with more professionalism. Also the end was not very believable. One of the best movies to come out of Hollywood in the 80s.

Kyle G. photo
Kyle G.

The movie is a very interesting one. I have read a lot of comments about how it is a political film and I must say that I didn't really get it, it is a good film but it is a bit different from the normal movies you would expect to see in the political field. The acting of the cast is very good, especially Leonardo Dicaprio. The movie is a very interesting one and I would recommend it to people who are interested in war and history.

Sarah Richardson photo
Sarah Richardson

I first saw this film in a class at college and was deeply impressed. I remember that it was one of the most powerful films I had ever seen. I have not seen it since and it still haunts me. It is one of the few films I have seen that I can watch over and over again without ever getting tired of it. The film is about a young Jewish boy, Abraham, who is sent to a concentration camp in Germany by his father. He is quickly separated from his mother, and sent to a boys school in Poland. He is so shocked by what he sees that he begins to feel a strong desire to escape from the camp. He escapes to a secret hiding place and is sheltered in a monastery. When he finally escapes to the outside world, he is caught by the Nazis and imprisoned. He is told that he must work for the Nazi's and must do whatever they tell him to do. He does this by helping them in their war effort. He eventually escapes and finds a young woman who he falls in love with. He then leaves the monastery and joins the Nazi's. When he finds out that the young woman he is in love with is pregnant, he is determined to find her and escape. I don't want to give away the ending, but I can tell you that it is a powerful one. The acting in the film is absolutely phenomenal. I don't think anyone could have pulled off the roles that were assigned to them. They all did a marvelous job. The film has a very simple story line, but it is very effective in showing the horrors of the Holocaust. I highly recommend this film to everyone. It is a powerful, well-made, moving film that deserves to be seen by everyone.

Samuel Smith photo
Samuel Smith

A decent movie, that is very well done, in the same league as "The Deer Hunter". The two films are the same as each other, but in my opinion the movie is better. The plot was strong, the story was moving and the movie flowed very well. I think that this movie has been out for a very long time and I think that the movie was released at a time when the U.S. Government was in turmoil and the movie should have been released earlier. The movie would have been better if released in the mid to late 1970's. This movie was a perfect blend of action, drama, and suspense. It was entertaining and at times even beautiful. The movie should have been released in the late 1970's. The plot is very strong and the movie moves at a good pace. The acting was good, but not great. The film makers should have focused on the action and the drama rather than the acting. The movie could have been longer, and the movie could have been better in many areas. I give this movie 7/10, but it is not a perfect movie.

Jacqueline H. photo
Jacqueline H.

A story of a young soldier who goes to war and doesn't come back. This movie may seem like it is just another Hollywood bomb but it really isn't. It has an effective suspense and several great scenes. The war scenes are amazing. The cast is great and makes you feel for the main character. For one thing, the character's reactions to the situation are believable. The other great thing about this movie is that you really feel for the main character. I really loved this movie and recommend it to all people who are interested in war movies.

Samantha G. photo
Samantha G.

I have watched this movie many times and I still love it. It is one of the most beautiful movies I have ever seen. It has a great story and a very touching story. It is a story about the human spirit and how it can be destroyed. The main character, played by Paul Bettany, is a little boy. He is in a very dark time. He is suffering from a brain tumor and the government does not want to let him live his life. He is treated like a monster. He has to have a "therapy" with a woman. The movie is a great message to the audience and it gives a great message. It is a great movie and a great movie to watch.

Roger Long photo
Roger Long

I have to admit that I have not seen the TV series, so I had not watched the movie, but from what I saw, it was very well done. I did not get to see the movie in the theatre, but I have to say that it was worth the wait. It was very well done, and I really liked the actors. This movie is not a war film, but I found the story of the Nazi's to be very believable. The film was filmed very well, and the characters were well developed. This is one of the best films I have seen in a long time. If you want to see a great war film, go to see this film. I would highly recommend this film.

Kathryn photo

I've watched many of the films of German director Werner Herzog, and this one is a good example of his style. It's also one of his most realistic films, showing how an ordinary family in a German village was transformed into a near-perfect family by the Nazi occupation of the country. Herzog used a very traditional narrative to portray the Nazi occupation, and some of the characters are almost cartoonish. Nevertheless, it's an honest film that shows the brutality of the Nazi occupation, and how the family is made a target of the regime, and how they try to resist. The acting is superb, especially by Herbert Lom. The supporting cast is also good, but the strongest part of the film is the camera-work. It's very realistic, and even a little sadistic. It's a great film, and a great film for anyone who likes movies about the Nazi occupation.

Rose photo

This is the most realistic and least sentimental movie I have ever seen. The acting was superb. I thought the story was gripping and the directing was very good. I didn't care for the ending, but it didn't ruin the movie. I would recommend this movie to anyone who has not seen it. I also recommend it to anyone who wants to see a movie that is very well done. It is a movie that I will see again and again. I was very impressed by this movie.

Christopher Wilson photo
Christopher Wilson

This film tells the story of a young girl who has to leave her home in Russia and goes to England to live with her uncle in the country. The uncle teaches her to respect her elders and she tries to adapt to life. She discovers that she is a different person when she sees a movie with one of her brothers. She helps her brother to write a film about the story of the Trojan War. She also decides to fight against a corrupt government and her uncle, and her uncle tries to help her. The end of the film is very sad. I think the film has many meanings and it is very moving. The scenery is also very beautiful. The film is not too long. The story is a bit long, but the film is very good.

Roger photo

This film is one of the best anti-war films I've seen. I had to watch it twice because I wanted to know more about the characters. I don't know why it was made, but the movie is amazing. I recommend this film to anyone who is a war fan. It is a real eye-opener and a great way to think about the war.

Michelle photo

War is a cruel and bitter mistress. The famous saying "War is Hell" rings true in the film The War of the World's. The film tells the story of the Japanese's attempt to conquer the Chinese coast and the American counter attack to stop them. This is one of the best war movies of the 21st century. The story is told in a very unique way and in a way that the audience will really be able to follow the story and feel for the characters. I was very impressed by the acting of the actors. They all did a very good job. The directing was very good. I thought the film had a very well developed story. The action was also good. It had the typical themes of war movies, like revenge, sacrifice and honor. Overall, I think the film was very good. I recommend it to all war movie fans and to anyone who is interested in war movies.

Sara H. photo
Sara H.

Not a great movie, but it is a must see. I would recommend it to anyone who wants to see a more psychological movie.

Christian Silva photo
Christian Silva

An excellent and thoroughly engrossing film, about the life of a young man who discovers his girlfriend is a spy. The film opens with the tale of an aspiring novelist who is drafted in to a secret army unit during World War I. He is given a chance to leave the army and find a civilian job, only to be drafted again into the army. He is drafted in again, and is selected for a different group of army men to try and fight the Germans. However, this group is not as good as his first group, and is now forced to fight on the side of the Russians. After this, he meets a young woman who he is attracted to, but it is not until the war comes that he finds out she is a spy. The film was very well done, showing a time in which most people believed that Germany would defeat France and England in a war of European Independence. However, after World War I, it was Germany who had to defeat France and England in a war of European Independence, and we were a little in the dark about this. The acting was excellent, but I liked the way the film moved forward, in the first film, we were shown the start of the war, and in this film, we are shown the war which takes place from the beginning. We get a little more information in the second film, about how war can cause men to be frightened and some of the strange things that happen to the men who are supposed to be fighting the war, but are not really. This film is very well made, but I do not recommend it to children.

Christine Pearson photo
Christine Pearson

This film is about a young German officer, who has been in the war for 3 years, who decides to help the Jews. He is assigned to a commando unit. His commanding officer, a young woman, has been the only woman in his unit. They have both been through the war. One of the problems in the film is that we don't know whether the German officer is a Jew or not. The film is very slow moving, and the ending is very sad. This is a very good film. 8/10

Betty B. photo
Betty B.

The war between England and France in 1917 is a great subject to examine for any movie buff. Not only was the film based on a true story, but it also covers a great deal of the history of the conflict, and gives the viewer a great deal of insight into what it was like. This movie is a must see for anyone who loves war movies. It is a great example of how movies can be the right thing to watch, and the wrong thing to watch. I give it a 7/10.

Carol H. photo
Carol H.

While I was not particularly impressed by the previous entries in the "War" series, I found this to be an improvement. The story, plot, characters, etc. are well developed and well acted. I enjoyed the film more than I had expected, and I think I might like it more than I did. This is not a bad movie, but I felt it could have been better. I would have liked to have seen more of the men, but I don't think the story is going to make you feel like you've seen all of the men, but I also think that the way the story is told is going to be confusing to some people, so I think it would be best if I watched the first film in the series. I think this film is going to be good for both adults and children, but it's probably not for the younger ones. I give it a B.

Henry Russell photo
Henry Russell

I just finished watching the newest version of the "A Bridge Too Far" film on DVD, and was pleasantly surprised by the excellent performances of Anthony Quinn and Paul Newman. This film is based on the book by the same name by Paul S. Kemp and Stephen Ambrose. The story is set in a German village during the German invasion of the Soviet Union. Some of the characters from the book are in the film, but all are new. The new cast is the best part of the film. There is a lot of time devoted to the experience of the war, and there is plenty of action to keep the viewer on the edge of his seat. The acting of Quinn, Newman and the others is terrific. It is hard to believe that Newman has been a major actor for so many years. He is really a good actor, and he portrays a character that is not one of the standard Hollywood types. He is a very complex character, and he makes it very easy for the viewer to understand the story. The story is not very predictable. In addition to the story, there are a few scenes that are memorable. One of these scenes is when the Germans come to the village, and they look at the place like they are looking at the lost city of Atlantis. The scene is very effective, and makes the viewer feel that they are really looking at a lost city. The other memorable scene is when the Germans begin to shell the village, and the villagers stand up and begin to fight back. The scene is also effective, and the viewer can feel that they are fighting back. There are many other memorable scenes in the film, but I will not spoil the ending. There is a lot of action in this film, and it is not easy to watch. The film is a masterpiece, and is a great war film. It is a great war film that makes the viewer feel that they are in a war zone, and that they are in a real war. The performances of the actors are very good. The movie is very well-done, and is not a film for the faint of heart. The film is very realistic, and the viewer is able to feel what the actors are feeling. I would recommend this film to anyone who enjoys war films. I would recommend it to anyone who enjoys a good war film, and I would recommend it to anyone who enjoys a good war film.

Sara Carpenter photo
Sara Carpenter

I saw this movie for the first time last night. It was so moving. I remember the scene where the little girl was walking in the fields with her little brother, and the little boy was standing on the fence. The little boy said "Don't leave him there". He didn't want to let the little girl walk away, he wanted to help her. The little girl then said "I can't leave him here." She didn't want to leave him. I could see the tears in her eyes. I think that is what the movie was about. I think that if you haven't seen this movie, you should go out and see it. It is a very powerful movie. I was shocked at the end of the movie. I don't know what I expected, but I thought it was going to be a comedy. I was wrong. I was very surprised at the ending. I really didn't know what to think. I'm not sure if I would want to see it again, but I think it is a very powerful movie. I think it is a great movie to show your children. It is very moving and very emotional. It is a very good movie. It is one of the best movies I have seen this year. I can't wait to see it again. I have already seen it four times. I think it is very important to see this movie.

Grace photo

This is one of the most powerful films I have ever seen. The film focuses on the political machinations that lead to the creation of the Soviet Union in 1917, and the issues of the war in Europe in the following years. This is a film that does not shy away from the dark aspects of the events, and also avoids the temptation to sanitize them, and shows the carnage in a way that is quite disturbing. The film does a very good job of showing the brutalities of war, and the corruption of the government. The acting in this film is very good, and the direction is superb. The story is very compelling, and the film doesn't over-simplify it, and has a very clear message. Overall, a great film. 8/10

Mary Rogers photo
Mary Rogers

This is not the type of movie you'd expect to see from the likes of George Lucas or Steven Spielberg, and is rather an action-adventure film with a good story, decent direction and solid performances from its cast. The film stars Arnold Schwarzenegger as the main character, a soldier in World War One. As the film goes on, he gets to know the character of Major Victor Singh, a Sikh who leads a small resistance group against the German army. The film follows their adventures as they try to escape the German army and to find the whereabouts of their leader. There are some excellent action scenes throughout the film, some of which are quite gruesome, and the film is quite violent at times, but it is not overly gory or overly brutal. The film is somewhat based on the real-life resistance movements of the British Sikhs, so the storyline is quite similar. There is a certain amount of historical inaccuracy, and the German soldiers may have actually been British rather than Germans. However, this does not detract from the film as it is a good film overall. It is well-paced and it's entertaining throughout. If you like action films, then you should definitely check this out.

Joyce photo

The feature was shot in North Africa and Sicily and in Afghanistan. It was directed by Charles C. Mann and produced by Robert Harris. The script was by Walter Carlin, who was also a writer on the TV series, "The Fugitive", as well as the documentary series, "John T. Caffrey: The Untold Story", which was made on a shoestring budget, by Art Linson. (Caffrey is shown wearing an "A" for original in the credits.) Here's the movie's plot: A film-maker with the screen-name, John T. Caffrey, is about to begin a six-month assignment, filming in the Afghan mountains. The film crew is made up of mainly young American and European film students, with a handful of the older and more experienced guys and gals. The filming schedule is split into three stages: filming in the Taliban-controlled town of Kapisa, then in Kandahar, and finally in Helmand province. The first three months are a blur for most of the crew. The second and final phase is less successful, with the Afghan village of Badakshah, a few miles from the Afghan-Pakistani border, being the center of a fierce battle. What makes this movie so effective is the atmosphere of war, with the characters constantly being put in danger. The cinematography is excellent and the battle scenes are quite realistic. The acting, however, is somewhat shaky. Still, it is worth seeing the movie.

Amanda Morales photo
Amanda Morales

If you like war movies, this one will have you in tears. The plot is the same as any other war movie, but the directing is spectacular. The sound is crisp and realistic. The cast is superb. Ben Kingsley and Richard Harris give outstanding performances. I don't think I could have chosen better actors for the roles of the characters. The cinematography is top-notch, the locations are authentic and the direction is first-rate. The score is incredible and the film is very moving. I have seen this movie twice and I am not bored by it, although it may take a while to get used to the two-hour time-frame. It is very moving and I could cry. I highly recommend it to anyone who likes war movies. 8/10

Robert C. photo
Robert C.

Well, first of all, I'd like to say that I enjoyed the movie, it was well done. It was a good portrayal of World War II. It was very graphic, and it portrayed the horrors of war with a lot of realism. It was well acted, and the cast was very well selected. It was a very dark movie, with a lot of action, and a lot of blood and gore. It was not for the faint of heart. I have to say that I was very disappointed with the ending, it seemed very rushed, and I think that was the only thing that disappointed me. But I will say that the acting was good, and the characters were very well chosen. I would recommend this movie to anyone, and I hope that this review can help people who are interested in watching it. I give it an 8 out of 10.

Laura photo

The French Revolution is the single most important historical event in the history of mankind. It is the catalyst for the rise of communism, the founding of modern western culture, and the development of a peaceful democratic system. It is also the backdrop of a great number of movies. Even though the events are complex and seem to be endless, the truth is that a great deal of these movies have been produced, and their popularity is largely due to their historical accuracy. If we were to take a survey of all of these movies, we would find that only a handful of them contain a significant amount of historical truth. Most of the historical inaccuracies are the result of the movie's director's vision of what the film should portray. In this case, this was to portray the French Revolution as a cause of the downfall of the French monarchy, and the resulting revolution as a cause of the rise of communism. The movie itself was nothing more than a plan to show the evolution of the French Revolution, and how this was to change the world. This does not mean that the movie was inaccurate. The movie did attempt to accurately portray the events and personalities of the French Revolution. However, the reality is that the vast majority of movies produced about the French Revolution did not accurately portray the events. In fact, the majority of the events portrayed in the movie were completely fictional. What this means is that the movie is not true to the events of the French Revolution, and is only about the French Revolution. This movie is not about the French Revolution, but it is about the rise of communism and the transformation of France from a republic to a monarchy. The movie is a great historical documentary, and should be viewed as such.

Pamela S. photo
Pamela S.

This film has a lot to recommend it, however I thought it did fall a little flat. For one thing, it could have been longer. The characters of the main characters are given very little time to develop. While this isn't a bad thing, it does mean that the audience isn't given much of a chance to connect with the main characters. As a result, there's a bit of an effortless quality to the film. I didn't get the feeling that they were struggling to come up with something new. For a war film, it's not all that original, and it's not all that captivating. There's a little bit of the same old cliches, and it doesn't quite have the same impact as it should have. It's certainly better than most war films, but I think it's one that doesn't quite reach the heights of its predecessors.

Billy P. photo
Billy P.

One of the best movies I've ever seen. I can't understand why it's not getting a lot of recognition. I mean, the acting is great, but the movie is all about the fight. The only thing I can't understand is why there are so many negative comments about the movie. It's a great movie, but the acting, the writing, the directing, the cinematography, the score, and the overall look of the movie are all very good. I don't know what the other reviewers are complaining about. I think everyone should see this movie at least once. If you haven't seen it yet, see it. You'll never regret it. My rating: 8/10.

Judith photo

This was a really good movie. I don't think it has the lasting impact of the great WWII movies like Saving Private Ryan, Saving Private Ryan or Saving Private Ryan 2. But it's really good nonetheless. In the beginning, we are introduced to the men of the R.A.M. The first one is a little kid, and the two next guys are no older than the little kid, so they are just around the age of 5, 6, and 7. This is a true story, based on a true story, and the movie, as you can tell by the title, is a bit fictionalized. The men are all extremely high ranking, with their rank as sergeant. The British are said to be in a bad deal when the Germans invade Britain. The men are then separated from their unit. This is shown through the movie, and you see them on different bases, or units. The sergeant is Captain Hadley Hadfield, the right hand man of the commander, and the two other men are First Sergeant Hartman, and Second Sergeant Sanderson. The only other thing you see is a few airmen and a few aircraft that have crashed and are flying all over the place. So this is the story of these men who are men, and have to carry out their duties. The story is told through flashbacks, so you see it through the eyes of these men. It is really quite interesting, and keeps you engaged. The movie is so slow moving at times, and it kind of drags on for a while. The movie doesn't do anything too special. You just watch the men do their jobs. That is it. It is good, just good. It is a story that will stick with you for a long time. It will change how you look at history and how you feel about it. It's a good movie, and I recommend it.

Tyler W. photo
Tyler W.

I'm not sure why I've seen so many bad reviews. This film is a very nice and quite different experience from the standard Hollywood movie. I've seen it and it left me in no doubt that it is not a typical Hollywood movie. It has a nice twist and a great story. The cast is quite good. I really liked Liam Neeson and thought he did a great job. He was very convincing in his role and did a great job of portraying the character of Major Wilkes. The rest of the cast was OK. It was a bit of a mixed bag for me. The story seemed a bit over-done at times. I'm not sure what the director was trying to achieve with it. The score was good, but not great. The first and last scenes were quite emotional, but the score didn't really grab me. Overall, it's a nice little movie that I recommend to any fan of the genre. 7/10.

Benjamin K. photo
Benjamin K.

The film is a propaganda of the anti-Nazi movement of France. The film is full of the "hero" roles, heroines, heroes, heroines, heroines, and heroines. The film is divided into 6 parts: 1. The three children 2. The Christian 2. The Jew 2. The Nurse 3. The Fascist hero

Joyce Morrison photo
Joyce Morrison

A very good and realistic war film. It shows a real story. A lot of the acting is good, especially that of Winston Churchill, which is often not a good thing. But I have to admit that in some places it is very well done, especially the last scene. A very good movie, which gives a very accurate picture of the war. The only problem is that it is too long. I recommend it to everyone who is interested in the history of World War I.

Henry W. photo
Henry W.

I like this film a lot. My wife and I were reminded of the movie that was based on the book by Christopher Moore. The movie was pretty good too, and we both enjoyed it a lot. The film has some great moments. There were a lot of funny moments too. I liked the thing that is in the beginning of the film, where an older man is talking to the boy about the age difference. When the boy was being beaten, he says "I am too old to have this talk with you". I think the best scene is the one where the older man comes in the store. He is talking to the boy, and asks the boy "How old are you?" When he asks the boy, he gives the boy a map. When the boy saw it, he opens it and it shows that he is exactly 2 years older than the boy. I think that was the best part of the movie. The best scene was when he tells the boy that his grandmother is getting old, and she's not going to be able to take care of her grand-daughter any more. It is really funny, and really makes me think about the way that older people treat the people that they care about, because it is usually because of a mistake, or because of their fault. I also like the scene where the boy is taking a bath, and he notices that the water is cold. He does not want to take a bath in the water, so he tries to soak the water in the bath. He is making the water cold, so the water looks blue, which is a color that is supposed to be hot. The scene is very well done. It is really cool. I also liked the scene where the man goes to see the nurse, and asks her "How old are you?". She tells him, "I am 18 years old". She explains to him that she is only a nurse, but she is older than him. The man is shocked and says "You're kidding me." The movie is very good. I think that it is a good movie, and I recommend it to everyone.

Larry photo

There's nothing new about the movie. The story is pretty much the same as the other war movies. But what makes this movie so unique is that it has a good story and a great cast. As I said before, it's not a masterpiece but it's pretty entertaining. I personally think that the movie could have been a little better. The movie could have made more of an impact if it had a more dramatic and dramatic ending. The war movies usually have a happy ending, but the ending in this movie is not at all good. There is a good scene but it's not enough to make this movie a good movie. I'm not sure why the director decided to end the movie like that. It's probably because of the movie's length. I think the movie should have been at least two hours long. This movie is definitely worth watching. It's definitely worth seeing. I give it an 8 out of 10.

Albert photo

When I saw this movie I thought I had seen it all. I had seen the WW2 movies in the past and this one was a huge disappointment. But I have to admit, this movie was very good. It had a great cast and a great story. The story is about a German officer who goes to the Soviet Union and is told that he is to be sent to the front. He has no idea what he is getting into. But he does not know that he is to be killed by a Russian sniper. The story is very well told. The acting is great. This is a movie that I would recommend to all people. The main character is a great actor and he does a good job. The story is well told and the movie has a great ending. I have seen a lot of war movies and this one is by far the best. I have seen some of the best war movies ever and this one is by far the best.

Marilyn photo

I must admit I had never seen this film before, and it was shown on a satellite channel on the USA. So, I had no idea of what it was about, and therefore, I had no expectations. Well, I must say, I was very surprised. This film is definitely worth seeing. The acting is superb. The story is brilliant. I think the only problem is that the film is too long. I would have liked it to be shorter. If you like war films, this is definitely a must see. I would definitely recommend it to anyone who likes a good film.

Catherine Wallace photo
Catherine Wallace

The second part of the celebrated war drama based on true events of the German attack on the Soviet Union in 1941. Directed by Sir Sidney Lumet, who also co-wrote the script with Edmund Goulding, "Stalingrad" has all the elements to be a great war film. It's also, unfortunately, a film that's very hard to watch. Lumet has made some good films, but "Stalingrad" is his most uninspired effort to date. It's not that it's bad; in fact, it's a very watchable film. It just has a very bad script and a very poor director. Lumet's approach to this war drama is, however, very interesting. He plays it like a documentary, and the film is at times incredibly sad. It's one of the few war films that I can say that I like. I also like the fact that he's not afraid to use the German language in the film, which is a rare thing these days. The film has two things that make it a great film. The first is the great German cast. None of the actors seem to know what they're doing, and that's a problem. It's obvious that the actors are trying to play the German accent as if they're really German, but they're not German. One of the most disappointing things about the cast is that the majority of them are German actors. In addition, the film is shot in German with English subtitles. I'm not sure what Lumet was trying to accomplish here, but it's not working. The second great thing about the film is the way it's shot. It looks like a documentary, and that's a great thing. The war scenes are also great, and the film is filled with amazing scenes. Lumet seems to be very fond of the war scenes. He does an excellent job of capturing the beauty of the war, and the terrible brutality of the battle. The film's biggest strength is its first half, which is almost flawless. The German cast is great, and the movie is incredibly beautiful. The second half of the film is just mediocre, and I found it incredibly boring. The first half of the film is incredibly beautiful, and I found the second half dull and uninteresting. Lumet is the same director who made the excellent "Apocalypse Now" and "Apocalypse Now Redux", and this film is one of the best examples of his work. The film is also about as realistic as a war film can be. The German actors are perfect in their roles, and the cinematography is amazing. Lumet makes some great war films, but this is a mediocre one. I don't think that Lumet is the greatest director in the world, but "Stalingrad" is not one of his best. The performances are great, but the script is poor. Lumet seems to be trying to make a documentary about the war, but he's not German, and the script is awful. I recommend this film to people who want to watch a great war film, but don't want to see a good one. The acting is great, but the script is awful. This is a great film, but it's not a great war film.

Lawrence T. photo
Lawrence T.

This movie is a must-see for anyone who likes World War II movies. The movie is divided into three parts: a) the attack on the Bataan Death March b) the invasion of the Philippines c) the end of the war. The movie is shot in black and white. The first part is done in black and white, and the second part in color. The color is done by mixing a dark blue with a yellow. The color mixing is done very well. The movie is a very interesting and emotional experience. I would recommend it to anyone who likes World War II movies.

Joseph B. photo
Joseph B.

I don't know how the rating is this low, I have seen this movie about three times and I still don't get it. In my opinion, this movie is a great historical movie. It is about the time when the war in WWI was just beginning. It shows the political and social side of the war and how the people of the German nation tried to keep their country and their lives. I don't know if this is the best movie ever made, but it is the best historical movie I have seen. I have seen the movie twice and I have watched it so many times that I still have not got it.

Jessica W. photo
Jessica W.

This is a short film of a number of novels written by H.G. Wells. One of the novels is called 'Curse of the Black Pearl' and is a controversial work of science fiction. It is about a monster that rises from the ocean, and when the monster kills all of the people on the island, they discover that the monster is a race of alien creatures, which have been on Earth for millions of years. One of the survivors is a young doctor (David Oyelowo) and his wife (Cate Blanchett). They take their daughter (Elle Fanning) to see the doctor's laboratory. The doctor has been working on this for years and the wife is too shy to tell her daughter about it. Soon, the family starts to find out that something very strange is going on on the island. The situation gets more and more complex as the story develops. I really liked this movie and I think that the acting was pretty good as well. Blanchett and Blanchett were excellent in their roles. David Oyelowo did a good job as well. Oyelowo plays a young doctor who works with the doctor's daughter, Elle Fanning. In the end, it is a great movie, and I think that you should give it a chance.

Andrea photo

I don't know what happened with this movie, I really didn't see much of it. I saw it on TV and it was really boring, it was very long and I didn't really understand a lot of the dialog. I didn't really like the movie. It was really confusing and I really didn't understand anything. I think this movie was very good but I didn't really understand it. Maybe I should give it a second chance and watch it again. I don't know.

Vincent N. photo
Vincent N.

Worthwhile viewing for anyone who has ever felt a little bit like a little kid. Some great special effects, great acting and an overall good story. An interesting war movie that is better than it's ratings would suggest.

Scott photo

The movie was excellent. The costumes, set design and the effects are great. This movie is worth watching if you like war films or if you like war movies like the ones you already have seen. One thing that annoyed me about the movie is that the war seems to go on forever. And that is why I like this movie, the war was never boring. The movie is not a masterpiece, but it is a good film to watch if you like war movies.

Lauren P. photo
Lauren P.

Gleeson's first time in the lead role, and with the status of the subject, was going to be his great moment. The background of this film is fairly well known. Stalin and the Nazis have a long history. This is a perfect example of how to introduce such a plot to the small screen. Gleeson plays a young officer who wants to join the OST. Stalin hates him, and has been looking for a reason to have him killed since he had doubts on his patriotism. He knows that Gleeson would have information on the war. He even agrees to let Gleeson have the chief prisoner, if he promises not to reveal anything. What he does not expect is a plan to have Gleeson assassinated. The plan starts with a train robbery, and then with a huge car race. There is a perfect plan in this film. It is a shame the writers did not reveal the real plan. Gleeson is going to be killed in the next part, but can he survive. There are many good things about this film. The actors played their parts well. Gleeson did great in portraying a young officer who is just out of college. Likewise, Rachael Mcadams played a good part as the female lead. She does not appear to have much going for her. The final scene with Gleeson being pulled into a trap, is just amazing. Not many films can have an ending as amazing. This film is a great example of how to do a war film. We can all see this and watch it, but it is still the great story of the time. There is only one scene in this film that is very little detail. I must say, if you want to learn more about the time period, this film will show you. The film, "The Hero" is a great example of the great films that are based on real events. I highly recommend this film.

Sarah K. photo
Sarah K.

I couldn't sleep this night, but when the lights came on in the room, I quickly found myself watching this film again and again. I just can't get enough of it! I absolutely love the entire film. Everything is so very perfectly done and feels very authentic. I hope this film inspires other writers to create beautiful art with genuine quality.

Amanda photo

This is the only war movie I have ever seen, I am still surprised that I have not seen it yet, I can watch it anytime, and I do watch it regularly. It is a must see for anyone who wants to understand the history of WW2. It is a well acted movie, the cast is great, especially the older actors like Jim Broadbent and Peter Cushing. It has a great plot, the only thing I do not like is that it is too long. I do not understand why it is so long, it is a well made movie, I give it a 7/10.

Marilyn Perez photo
Marilyn Perez

I'm surprised to see so many reviews of this film, but I'm not surprised at all. It's one of those movies where people get it, and then they think it's all overblown, and unrealistic. I don't agree. This is a very good film. It's very well made, and the characters are well defined. The editing is very good, too, and the acting is very good. I think that if you go in expecting a realistic portrayal of the war, you're going to be very disappointed. I think this is a very good film to see with your kids, or even your children. You can be very critical, but you can also be very interested. I think it's worth seeing, even if you're not a history buff. The war is a major part of the story, but it's also an important part of the story. I think the film is very good, and I think it's a good film for anyone.

Megan photo

I don't see why this film is getting so many bad reviews. It was a good film and I enjoyed it. It's not a perfect film, but it was good enough to watch. My vote is eight out of ten. It's not Oscar worthy but it's good enough to watch. It's based on a book by Ian McEwan and I have read it and enjoyed it. I think it's a great film and if you haven't seen it, then I suggest you do so before you're completely disappointed.

Hannah Bell photo
Hannah Bell

This movie is a must see for anyone who likes war movies, because it shows the horrors of war, from the beginning of the war till the end. It is very well made, with beautiful cinematography and wonderful set design. The acting is good, the story is very gripping and realistic. The battle scenes are very realistic, and it is very tense. The scene where the Americans take over the village and the Americans massacre the civilians, is one of the most shocking scenes I have ever seen. I highly recommend this movie to anyone who is interested in war movies, because it is a must see.

Kathy photo

The only negative thing I can say about this film is that it's too long. It is a pretty good film, but it's also too long and not as gripping as it should be. However, the film does have some very interesting things to say. It's really not a bad film, it just is a bit of a let down at the end.

James L. photo
James L.

The action is well executed, with an interesting plot, and it does a great job of telling the story of how the events in this movie came to be. The story, however, is not so compelling. It is a bit repetitive, and is more of a "shallow" documentary than a full-blown movie. The conflict in the movie is that the French and the Germans are at war. There is an American Captain, Lt. Col. Johnson (played by Tom Sizemore), who is trying to convince the French to join the war. He meets with a few French generals, who are not interested, because they are afraid that their country will lose the war. Johnson then goes to a little town in France and tells the people there that the war is over. The French are very reluctant, but then the Germans show up. The German soldiers tell Johnson that they have been holding out against the French, and that they have killed a lot of people. Johnson then asks if they are willing to join the war. The German soldiers tell him they will only join if they are going to be able to do some heavy work, and can take their horses. Johnson is interested, and tells them that he can show them the way to France. He shows them the way, and they all go off to the war. The movie is very gripping, and the story is very interesting. The actors all do a great job, and the direction is very good. The movie is worth seeing, and is definitely worth watching.

Arthur C. photo
Arthur C.

In the first half of the movie, there's a lot of scenes that are not at all necessary. It would have been better to have a bit more background information about the characters, and some of the scenes could have been cut. The movie is actually quite good, but there are several scenes that are just too long and just don't add up to anything. The story and the characters are good, and I really enjoyed the acting. In the end, I think the movie is worth seeing, just for the actors and the scenery. I was very surprised by how much I enjoyed it.

Thomas Graham photo
Thomas Graham

My wife and I watched this on TV. I was surprised by the many similarities between the film and the book. For one thing, the screenplay is really good. It had to be to get the book on the big screen. For another, there are a few more character and plot twists than in the book. The main difference is that the film is long. The book is short and has a lot of action. The film has a lot of action, but only one major battle. The book is full of action and twists. It is better than this film. I would recommend this film to anyone who likes war films. The acting is good and the characters are well developed. It is an enjoyable film.

Jason G. photo
Jason G.

This movie was a great idea. It took a somewhat niche subject and made it really accessible to a wider audience. I mean, really, this is a WWII movie. It has to be, otherwise it would have been a complete failure. In fact, I'm not sure the movie was a complete failure. The acting was really good, especially from the main characters. Some of the acting in the movie was pretty bad, but still, it was better than some movies I've seen recently. Overall, I thought this was a really good movie. I give it a 7 out of 10. It's not Oscar-worthy, but it's really good and it's really easy to watch. I recommend it to anybody who likes WWI movies.

Jennifer R. photo
Jennifer R.

I actually had to watch this movie a second time, just to remind myself that it was the real thing. It is not a war movie, and it is not a War-Time movie. It is a silent war movie. If you like this movie, you may like to read my review of the "Masters of the Universe" movies: "The Savage Curtain" (1994), "The Wartime Adventure of "Masters of the Universe" (1997), and "Master of Orion" (1998).

Catherine Arnold photo
Catherine Arnold

Great movie. Great acting. Great direction. Great camera work. Great sound effects. Great. Not a moment was wasted on the camera. There was no wasted emotion. It was all in the right place. You were at the right place. If you like war movies, you have to see this. It's not one that you will get bored with, and it won't let you down. If you don't like war movies, you won't get bored with this movie. You will be glad you saw it. I think it was a great movie. I will never ever forget this movie.

Janice Chapman photo
Janice Chapman

As the battle for the Somme rages on and on, French troops are more concerned with clearing out bunkers and barricading themselves inside, leaving the German defenders with their very own objectives. On the other side of the line, British soldiers are preparing for the inevitable battle for control of the trench. All of this is portrayed by a brilliant film that really isn't as cliche as you might expect from a WW2 film. In the first half of the film, you see a lot of British soldiers trying to keep their head above water. But as soon as they have won, the British soldiers begin to reflect on what their side is really about. They find that they have to do what they've done, which doesn't bode well for the British as the Germans are still fighting for the trenches and the cover. The battle scenes are very well done, and this is due to a very clever choice of music. The music for the German trench is so rich and full of emotion, that it just adds to the intensity of the film. This film is really different from other WW2 films, and this is because the characters are so unique and different. The British soldiers are quite traditional, but the Germans are completely different. The Germans aren't simply fighting for the glory of their country, they are fighting for their freedom. In the end, the film is about the love of country and the freedom of the individual. This is a film that you will definitely watch again, and it really is a great film to see with a group of friends.

William Valdez photo
William Valdez

The real stars of the movie are Lina Wertmuller and Jurgen Prochnow. The screenplay is an intelligent, gritty and realistic depiction of World War 2 in Belgium. The story is great and captures the uncertainty of life for the soldiers. The movie has a strong moral and emotional foundation to make you feel what these guys are feeling. The action is incredible. There are a few great shots. The German men are very realistic looking and you feel for them. There are no romanticized Germans here. All the men are very well represented. I think the cast of the movie was the best. I loved it and I recommend it to everyone.

James photo

This is a powerful film that depicts the brutality of war and the hardships of war. The war itself is very well shot and acted. The main character is a little bit eccentric and it's quite obvious that the film makers were trying to make a character that is likable. He is a war hero and his wife is in a wheelchair. The film is well directed and the acting is great. I recommend this film to anyone who wants to see a war film that has a lot of realism. There are no special effects and the film is quite realistic. The movie is quite long and I would recommend that you see this film on a big screen. The film is very well made.

Rebecca Hawkins photo
Rebecca Hawkins

I saw this film in the summer of 1998 at the Kennedy Center. I thought it was excellent. The acting was excellent, the script was excellent, and the story was excellent. I think this is one of the best films ever made. I thought it was outstanding.

Patrick Salazar photo
Patrick Salazar

This movie is absolutely stunning. I watched it about 2 weeks ago and I haven't stopped thinking about it. I don't understand how anyone could give this movie a bad review. It is not a movie you would see for the first time and you would forget about it after a few minutes. I am not a big fan of war movies, but this is one of the best I have ever seen. It is not only about the war, but about the people and the story. It is very realistic. The characters are well played and the story is very moving. The story is about the people who lived in the village and their struggle for survival. The story is told in a very unique way. It is very interesting and the way the story is told is very interesting. It is a movie about the people of that village and their struggle. I think the movie is a must see and I am very excited to watch it again and again. I will not be disappointed.

Bryan photo

I have always enjoyed this movie, especially when I saw it as a child. I have watched it many times since then and I still enjoy it. The movie is based on a book written by William Finnegan and adapted by Ken Burns. The movie is set in the early years of the Great Depression and the soldiers are the "bad guys." The movie is told from the point of view of a young man named Garth (Tom Hanks) who is enlisted in the Army and is sent to a farm in Nebraska to take care of his brother's farm. He doesn't like the farm or the work. The farm is run by a "prince" named "Prince" (George Clooney) who has a penchant for hiring the young men who work for him. The farm is run by a woman named "Mrs. Mulroney" (Diane Keaton) who runs the farm with her husband, "Mr. Mulroney" (George Clooney). When Garth is sent to Nebraska, he sees the farm as a place to escape. The movie is told from the point of view of Garth's friend, "Sgt. David Clark (Woody Harrelson)." Garth is the only friend who helps him survive the experience. The film is a combination of "The Big Sleep," "The Graduate," "The Great Escape," "The Wild Bunch," and "Saving Private Ryan." The acting is superb, especially from Tom Hanks and Diane Keaton. It's a real treat to see the movie again and again. The movie is a classic and is definitely worth watching. I rate it 9/10.

Johnny photo

This is the kind of movie that you can see at a college screening and everyone will enjoy. I don't know if the director intended it to be a comedy but it's not meant to be a serious movie. It is a satire of the war in Vietnam. I don't think there is a lot of humor in it. I think the movie is very serious. I have no problem with that. There are two things I don't understand. One is the long period of time that the movie is set in. It is a long time in Vietnam. The movie would be much shorter if they were to cut out all the scenes that don't really matter. I have to agree with the other user who said that this movie is really one of the best Vietnam movies of all time. I would say that this is a good movie for people who like war movies. If you like war movies, you will probably like this movie. I give this movie a 9 out of 10.

Mildred G. photo
Mildred G.

This is a very good movie. It's based on the book by Hugh Trevor-Roper and it has a lot of truth in it. It's a really good movie. It's about a group of war veterans, who were all wounded in WWI and are trying to find their way back to their families. The movie is good, but the film has some flaws. The first is that it takes a while to get going. The second is that there is a lot of fighting in it. I think that is good, but it does get boring. The third is that the film is a little slow, and it's too long. It is not a great movie, but it's a good one. I recommend it. 9/10

Amanda photo

As I watched this film, I thought it was quite a good film. I like war movies, but I can't say I'm a huge fan of them. It's not a film I watch often. But the acting was good, the cinematography was excellent, the direction was superb, and the music was great. I thought the scenes were quite well done, and the music was great. I really liked the film. It had a great cast, and the acting was really good. I also really liked the cinematography. The lighting was great, and it was well filmed. The scenery was very beautiful. I would definitely recommend this film to anyone who likes war films.

Johnny photo

I don't know if I have seen a more powerful film than this one. The acting is fantastic, the story is one of the most powerful I have ever seen, the dialogue is great, and the story is a great, powerful story about the horrors of the First World War. It is a great film that should be seen by everyone, but especially by people who have not had a chance to understand the First World War. It is a story that will stay with you for a long time, and you will be affected by it, and you will never forget it. The people who have not been able to understand this story, and the ones who were only able to understand it by seeing this film, will be changed forever. This film has a great message, and a powerful story. It is a must see.

Helen S. photo
Helen S.

I have never really been a great fan of war movies. The problem I have with them is that they tend to be very violent and take a lot of time to get to the point. This film, however, is a great film because it shows the true horrors of war. The way this film was made was incredible, and it's a shame that it was never released in America. I give this film an 8/10.

Harry photo

I saw this movie last night and it was great. The characters were likable, the story was gripping, and the acting was pretty good. I liked the French accents of all the actors, it was just a pleasure to watch. I think it's also a good way to introduce someone to the real life of World War I. All in all, I thought it was a good movie, and if you are interested in World War I, I would definitely recommend this movie.

Andrea H. photo
Andrea H.

I love the War of 1812, the Battle of Saratoga, and I love the War of 1812. I have read some of the other reviews and see that some people are saying the war was not nearly as good as the book. Well, I thought the book was better, but I thought the book was better than the movie. The book was an excellent war novel, but the movie was great. There are some things that the movie could have done better, but the movie was great. The movie was exciting, exciting, exciting. It had great battles, great drama, and great action. The movie is also a great drama, it has a great ending, and it has a great beginning. I thought that the movie was amazing, and I recommend it to everyone.