Steam Monrovia, Indiana

Monrovia, Indiana

Following the 2016 presidential election, Frederick Wiseman's documentary dissects small-town America to understand how its values impact and influence the political landscape of the nation.

Other Titles
Running Time
2 hours 23 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Frederick Wiseman
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Comments about documentary «Monrovia, Indiana» (16)

Jerry photo

The best documentary I have ever seen. As I left the theater, I was so moved by the experience of watching it. It is the greatest film I have ever seen, and has made me cry and laugh so hard that I had to pause it, take a deep breath, and take a deep breath again. It is heartbreaking, it is a great, powerful film. I was deeply moved by the humanity of this young girl, whose family has been torn apart by the death of her beloved husband. It is an incredible film, a must see for all of us.

Helen E. photo
Helen E.

This is a pretty good movie that is not afraid to push the envelope in the fight against HIV/AIDS. It's not a perfect movie, but it is an excellent one and if you like movies about this issue, you should check it out.

Bruce Douglas photo
Bruce Douglas

I came across this film while browsing the local listings for the Criterion Collection. I was impressed with the documentary format, as it allowed for a very honest and detailed portrait of a city and the people that live there. The more I thought about it, the more I thought about the concept of being a "dead American" in the late 50s and early 60s. In many ways, that was what this film was about. It was really about the people that lived through that era and the people that were part of it. And to me, that was very interesting. I had not known much about the people that were around, so the most important thing I learned from this film was the history of "The Dead" and what they lived through. A very important part of the film is the interviews with the family members, because in many cases the family members are the only ones that knew who were "The Dead". They did not have the opportunity to interact with the other people that were part of the "Dead". In many ways, the interviews are more of a personal journey, where the family members are trying to find out who were these people that they loved. It was interesting to hear about the different sides of the family's opinion on their own son. And it was also interesting to hear what they had to say about their "dead" son. The other very important part of the film is the interviews with the dead. Some of these are very touching, like when the family members talk about their son. I also found the "interesting" things in the film that are very interesting to me. I found the very real photographs that were used in the documentary. They are very interesting. One particular photograph was of a "Mountain Girl" statue that was made in the early 50s. That was a very emotional image. Another very interesting thing that I found interesting is that some of the photographs are from different years. I think that that is important. The photographs show the change over time, so that the viewer can see what has been changed. Another very interesting thing that I found interesting was the way that the film was edited. In some of the interviews, it was clear that the editing was a little bit choppy, because it was obvious that they were not in chronological order. I think that it was very important that the interviews were kept in chronological order. It also helps the viewer to understand the story better. The interviewees gave a very detailed explanation of what happened to their son, and to their "Dead". And I think that the editing helped the viewer to understand the story better. I recommend this film to anyone that is interested in seeing the stories of "The Dead". I think that this film is very educational for the viewer, as well as the families and relatives of the "Dead". I think that this is one of the best documentaries I have ever seen.

Ethan photo

The first one was the best one, the second one is OK, the third one is a good documentary, but the fourth one is the worst one. The movie is a collection of interviews, all of which are about the 1994 epidemic of HIV/AIDS. The interviews were so long, that it became impossible to follow them in real time. I had a hard time keeping up with the director. The only thing that was good about this documentary is that it can be watched on a small screen. The movie could have been better. I would recommend this movie to people who are interested in the topic of HIV/AIDS. I would say that this is a very good documentary. I would also recommend that people see the documentary about HIV/AIDS before they get a big STD test. They might be a little bit curious. If you want to see a good documentary about HIV/AIDS, see this movie.

Angela George photo
Angela George

I have been watching this film as i write this. I started watching after i heard about the tragedy in the hospital and i knew this film would touch me. Its been a long time since i have had a good movie to watch, so this was a great one. The movie shows the people's reaction to the incident in the hospital, the city in general and their response to the disease that struck the country. The actors that i mentioned were some of the most interesting in the film, especially the little boy. As i watched it i was wondering why so little is known about the disease, its not the typical thing that you can buy or even find on the internet. Its something that is passed on by blood, sweat and tears, its a disease that spreads like wildfire. The people in the city were very human and i loved the way they were portrayed. They were like human beings in a disaster. I felt that the film touched me in many ways, i was moved and also confused, i do not believe that a documentary film like this will ever reach the American market. This film is also a great testimony to the people of America, to the human spirit that is hard to find in most of the rest of the world, and to the people of Liberia and Sierra Leone that have to deal with a very frightening disease. I also loved the contrast between the reactions of the people and the government. It was as if a switch was thrown on. The government was telling the people that its only the government that is responsible for the people's reaction to the disease, and the people were much more understanding. I do not feel that this film has been sanitized. Its an honest film with all the questions that you would have if you watched it.

John C. photo
John C.

This is a great documentary about one of the most powerful diseases in America. Though the science is still uncertain, many believe that AIDS is a result of a vaccine accidentally given to a man. That man, Bob Crane, has been living with this disease ever since he was a kid. His story is riveting and powerful. We find out that many in the medical community are fighting to stop the spread of this horrible disease. It's amazing to see a doctor and his wife trying to do something for a man in their own community, even though the disease has completely wiped out their family. His wife is determined to help him stay alive, even though he has passed away. It's a very poignant documentary. It's not the kind of documentary that makes you feel good about the world, but it's important and makes you think. The doctor's wife was a little apprehensive about the topic, but she said that what she wanted to share with the world was that she did her best to help her husband. I truly believe that her husband and the world would be a better place if everyone would fight to stop AIDS. If you are a medical professional, watch this film. If you are not a medical professional, see it anyway. There are many heart-wrenching stories in this film. If you are not gay, or if you don't think AIDS is a big deal, you should watch this movie. If you are a medical professional, watch it. If you are not gay, see it anyway. There is nothing wrong with helping those who are struggling with AIDS. It's great to see a movie like this one, showing us that we should care.

Judy photo

I was so moved by this film that I think that every time I see it I get a new appreciation for the humanity of the people and what they must endure. I also found the ending as dramatic as it was heart-wrenching. It really touched me. I want to thank all the people involved in making this film and all the people who shared it with me. It has been a gift to me. I can't wait to see it again. I can't wait to see what kind of things they will do with the footage. I am excited. Thank you to the people involved in making this film. You will have me in your debt forever. I am so touched.

Gary O. photo
Gary O.

In 1984, in the midst of the AIDS crisis, the local radio station, WABE (now WGN-TV), was one of the few stations to broadcast news of the epidemic. Because of this, listeners were treated to the stories and interviews of the people who had been impacted by the disease. The film, "AIDS in America," focuses on those who suffered the most, the people who had the most to lose, and the small community that had the most to gain. The film has been edited from a few hours of footage to two hours, and the result is an engaging and emotive film. The idea of capturing the stories of these people was inspired by the experience of working for WABE, and it works. The emotional elements are captured by the interviews, and the good-natured people who are interviewed. "AIDS in America" is a powerful film that deserves its place in the history of the AIDS crisis.

Grace photo

I saw the video of this film in the IMAX theater. And what a piece of cinema! The movie is about the people of Liberia. A real slice of life. It is a film that shows the sadness and poverty of the people of Liberia, the emptiness of the city of Monrovia, the corruption of government, the drug use, the violence, and the atmosphere of uncertainty. When the film is over, you leave in a state of shock and melancholia. I would recommend this film to everyone, especially those who are already familiar with the Ebola crisis.

Christian Shaw photo
Christian Shaw

Voting at the end of the month of November for the Oscar nominations is really a test of your common sense. For me, the best part of this film was the emotional manipulation of the people of west Africa. They had the reality of what is happening to them, but they also had the joy of living. The Oscars should really recognize this film for the amount of emotion it brought to the viewer. I saw this film in a movie theatre in Toronto and was moved to tears. There are so many scenes that are sad but also full of the joy that the African people had at this time in their lives. The Oscar should be given to the best documentary that has been made about Africa in the past 15 years. This is the best film of the year that has brought to the forefront the life and the culture of Africa.

Matthew Sullivan photo
Matthew Sullivan

This movie was an amazing experience. It just so happened that I am in the city that the footage was shot. I do not want to be in the city, but just the story line caught my attention and kept me interested. I feel like I have known that this is going to be a very moving story. It is too bad that people cannot tell stories like this anymore. I know it was hard to get an opportunity to be in this movie, but it is a testament to the great work that was put into this film. Thank you to everyone who made this film a reality. I hope to see many more documentaries in the future.

Edward Rios photo
Edward Rios

There's so much wrong with the US film industry. How they spend their money is just plain wrong. We have 1,000,000 moviegoers at our theatres, yet if there is only one movie that is good enough to be in the top 250, it is only 1 movie, Hollywood's latest. People are getting jobs based on how many people are watching this movie, and then we have the government taking millions of dollars out of the pockets of citizens. I hope this film hits the big screen, so everyone will see this, and all will know how wrong the US film industry is. I would love to see these guys go to South Africa, and they will find the people who will agree with the film. They will know that America is the biggest hypocrite. Thanks, for doing this.

Amanda photo

This is a documentary film about the AIDS epidemic, based on a BBC interview with Dr. Bruce Aylward, a virologist working with Dr. Peter Handley at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Dr. Aylward, known as Bruce, is seen as a rare "Hero" in the AIDS war, and Dr. Handley is seen as a typical, self-serving bureaucrat. The main events of this film are the signing of the historic legislation establishing the N.I.A.H. and the research and implementation of the public health efforts that resulted in the rapid reduction in the number of new AIDS cases. Dr. Aylward explains the problems of AIDS, including its "disease by numbers" and the lack of focus on those infected with the virus. He also mentions his frustration with the "politically correct" approach, as in the traditional clinical disease model, treating only the symptoms and not the disease. One of the most striking aspects of this documentary is the patient's face, as they describe their experiences of living in a "HIV hell," as they call it, while receiving treatment and interacting with their caretakers. Dr. Aylward shares that the behavior of most people in the community, in the clinic, is really, really boring and uneventful. It is this lack of stimulation that leads them to become depressed, and makes them lose their faith and desire to live. Dr. Aylward explains that the people who are most affected by the disease are those who are infected and do not have the capacity to keep their infection under control, due to lack of medications, intravenous and oral medications, social isolation and isolation from family members. Dr. Aylward also discusses the drug regimen that is used for treating the virus. He says that most of the patients are on a very large dose of a drug, for which he has no idea how they are getting it. Dr. Aylward also discusses how the medication is given and monitored. He says that the drug must be given regularly and must be taken in an environment where the virus cannot replicate. He says that the medication does not kill the virus, but merely stifles its growth and that the virus remains alive and able to spread, for a while, until the new drugs are developed. Dr. Aylward concludes that the drugs are very effective in treating the disease, but it is not enough to combat it. He says that there are not enough drugs being made and that the situation will get worse, and that it is not possible to give out too many drugs. He says that we cannot hope to eliminate the disease completely. This is a very interesting documentary, that is well worth watching.

Cheryl photo

Being a scientific documentary filmmaker, it is always exciting when I witness the perfection of a film like 'The Cove.' The cinematography, set design, editing, and musical score are the icing on the cake. The problem with 'The Cove' is that it is too long. Perhaps the film could have been trimmed to approximately two hours, in order to focus more attention on the messages it attempts to convey. Not all of the negative messages in the film are important, and they are not balanced by the positive messages. The acting is incredible. The acting is superb throughout the film. If the acting of the cast had been less of a positive factor in 'The Cove' would not have been as effective. The music is effective. The score is a masterpiece, combining classical music with modern instruments. A blend that makes the movie more immersive and emotional. The music alone should not have made 'The Cove' a great film. 'The Cove' is a perfect example of why a film is a documentary, not a movie. 'The Cove' should have been rated as a drama, and not as a film.

Sharon photo

This is a very strong documentary about the power of faith. Many people in the West may look at faith as something that is so bad, so immoral, so broken and evil, that the only way to get rid of it is by some form of therapy, which often results in death. In the East, however, we have very different ideas about the value of faith. The Japanese believe that faith is the most important thing in the world, and that it is the most important factor of human existence. The Japanese use this belief to help them overcome the very biggest problems in their lives, like they are always asking themselves, "What will I do to end my suffering?" Their belief in faith is also used to help them live their life as best as possible. It's interesting to see how people in the West relate to this belief. I don't believe that we are all as spiritually honest as the Japanese are. It's easy to find a few examples of people who live their lives according to the "divine right" of the Japanese. It's a very interesting look at this tradition. But I think it's also very interesting to see how people in the East are struggling with faith as well.

Walter C. photo
Walter C.

I saw this film at the 2016 Sundance Film Festival. The film is a documentary about a doctor who travels to Liberia to help treat a girl with Ebola. The film is narrated by the doctor, Dr. Kent Brantly, and his wife, Nancy. The doctor and his wife are both doctors who are in the process of being released from the hospital where they were treated for Ebola. The film is quite long, but it is also quite informative. I recommend seeing this film.