Steam Church & State

Church & State

Church & State is a movie starring Jennifer Lynn Dobner, Mark Lawrence, and Jim Magleby. A surprise federal court ruling in 2013 legalized gay marriage for Utah - triggering a fierce battle in a state where Mormon church values...

Running Time
1 hours 24 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Holly Tuckett, Kendall Wilcox
Torben Bernhard, Holly Tuckett, Kendall Wilcox, Jennifer Lynn Dobner
Jennifer Lynn Dobner, Jim Magleby, Taylor Petrey, Mark Lawrence
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

A surprise federal court ruling in 2013 legalized gay marriage for Utah - triggering a fierce battle in a state where Mormon church values control the Legislature and every aspect of public life.

Comments about documentary «Church & State» (70)

Richard H. photo
Richard H.

I agree with most of the points made by other users. I didn't want to be biased since I'm a huge supporter of the movie, but I just wanted to say, how can someone like Jay-Z and Beyonce get away with not paying taxes? I mean, come on! I think it's ridiculous that the government doesn't take responsibility for what they do. I also think it's ridiculous that the government can't figure out what is going on with the economy and fix it. I think it's the job of the government to get the economy working again, and I think that's what happened here. It's definitely something that people should look into. I don't agree with the argument that the movie was trying to make, that they are trying to make the government look bad. If anything, it's a good movie that I think will be remembered for a long time. I recommend it to everyone who wants to know how things work in the world.

Jeremy H. photo
Jeremy H.

This is a great documentary on the history of the Vatican. It is a very well-made documentary and the story of the Catholic Church is very well told. This is a very important documentary to have on your DVD collection.

Linda Guzman photo
Linda Guzman

I thought this movie was great. It's not just about Bill Clinton and his time in the White House, it's about the first family and the relationship they had with their children. It was refreshing to see a documentary film that wasn't just a history lesson. I thought that the film did a great job of showing the differences between Bill and Hillary Clinton, and how they actually did help their children. The movie was great, and it was a great way to go about the first family, but I thought it was a little bit longer than it needed to be. I thought it was good that they were able to show that the Clintons were not just the "President" of the United States, but also the "Presidential" spouse. It was nice to see the two of them being able to help their children with the various things that they had to deal with, including helping their son's with a disability. I also thought that the movie showed a lot about how the Clinton's were a good family. It was really nice to see how they were able to get along with each other, and also how they treated their children. I think that it was a good way to go about the Clintons, and it was a great way to show the differences between Bill and Hillary Clinton. I think that it was a great movie, and I would recommend it to anyone.

Sara Duncan photo
Sara Duncan

It is hard to make a film about something as broad as the history of pornography and, more importantly, the history of the sexual revolution. The sexual revolution, for the most part, was a secular movement, in which religious and philosophical ideas were used as tools of oppression and oppression. In this film, I believe the Christian and Jewish ideologies were used as tools of oppression in the sexual revolution. For this reason, I believe the film has a great deal of truth. I can't say that I agree with all of the arguments made in the film, but I think the film is important. I think that this film is very much worth seeing.

Brandon M. photo
Brandon M.

This is a very interesting movie. It is very well made. The documentary is well edited. The dialogue is natural and insightful. The interviews with the people involved with the film are a real treat. What I liked the most about this documentary is how it reflects the reality of what it is like to live in the USA today. This documentary is a very good movie and I highly recommend it.

Louis M. photo
Louis M.

This film is a must-see for anyone who wants to know what's going on in the world today. I'm not a religious person, but I think this film has a lot of information that could be used by people of any faith. I saw it at the Cinequest in Dallas. I can't wait to see it again. I was also impressed with the diversity of the people that worked on the film. The crew is made up of people from all walks of life, all over the world. It is a wonderful film that I recommend to anyone. I think the movie is a must-see for anyone who wants to know what's going on in the world today.

Olivia Reynolds photo
Olivia Reynolds

I love the movie and I have been in the anti-war movement since I was 15. I am now 47 and have had the opportunity to see the war firsthand in my own country. When I heard about the war, I was shocked. However, I also saw the hopeful side of the events. I was encouraged by the film, and I was moved to read some of the comments by the film maker, which made me feel more sympathetic towards the anti-war movement. My only regret is that the film maker could not have included more of the personal and personal stories of people who were in the anti-war movement. The movie is a must see for everyone, and if you have the opportunity to see it, I would recommend it.

Samantha L. photo
Samantha L.

This is a great documentary about the massive attacks on our society. It covers the psychological and physical effects of these attacks. It also shows the main government officials who were there at the time, and how they came to know about the attacks. It's a great movie that is a must see for anyone who cares about the future of our country. If you don't think this is important, I suggest you watch it before you vote or decide to do something stupid. This is the movie that will tell you the truth about what is happening to our country. 10/10

Eric photo

This documentary is a perfect example of the kind of stories that should be told. I hope that it will inspire others to see the importance of media in influencing the media. I would like to see more documentaries like this one. Media and politics is a battle that we all need to be aware of. We can not afford to not be informed of what's going on in our country. If you want to know more about the role of the media in influencing our country, this is the documentary to see.

Emma B. photo
Emma B.

This is one of the best documentaries I have ever seen. It tells the story of the devastating events of 9/11. It does not include any footage of the attacks, but it does include a great deal of footage of the aftermath of the attacks, including the burning towers. This documentary is a must see, and shows you that the media is not only a part of the problem, but it is the cause of the problem. I wish that more people would see this film, and see that it is not only the media that is to blame, but that our government is to blame. You will see that the media was extremely biased in their coverage of the attacks, and that they were also very bad at reporting on the actual facts. This documentary shows you that we need to see the truth, and not believe the media. It also shows that the media can't just cover things up, but they have to look into the facts and put them into context. This documentary is a must see, and I highly recommend that you see it.

Janice Cook photo
Janice Cook

I am glad to see the tide turn for the sake of our children. This film shows the injustice that has been done to our children and their future generations. I am so grateful to the brave individuals who have stood up and fought for justice. I can not thank the women enough who are fighting for the rights of our children and this film is a must watch for all. I am so proud of this great nation and the incredible people that have made this country what it is today. I feel the film is an inspiration to all of us to stand up and fight for what we believe in. We have to take action and make our voices heard. Thank you for all of your efforts.

Richard R. photo
Richard R.

This movie is great. It was fun watching this. I was not expecting much. This movie was very entertaining. It made me laugh and cry. The actors were really good. I really enjoyed this movie. I recommend watching it and seeing it for yourself. I would definitely see it again.

Billy W. photo
Billy W.

I saw this film at the Calgary International Film Festival and was so taken by it. It took me awhile to fully realize it was a documentary and not a film. I'd like to say it was just a film, but in reality it's a documentary of how the modern day system and corruption is hurting our youth. It was interesting to watch the film because it is really different than other films and documentaries. This film was never preachy or over-simplified, it just simply showed you how the system works and the horrible things they can do. You'll be amazed at how little the film had to say. The film focuses on the high school students from Edmonton who were charged with sex crimes and they went to trial. Their stories were truly amazing and I was very impressed with how good this documentary was. You will get to see the young men's testimonies and hear their stories as well as the testimonies of the prosecutor's and the judge's. It was also very interesting to see the young men's actions when they were later placed into jail. They were incarcerated in the same cell as some of the main characters in the film. I truly loved the film and would recommend it to anyone. I would also like to mention that the film was very respectful of the accused and the prosecution's time and their testimony. It was very respectful to the victims and their families. I really loved this film. I highly recommend it. 8/10

Willie H. photo
Willie H.

Evan Peters and Emily Benham have assembled a wonderful ensemble of experts, writers, and thinkers. This movie is a really great exploration of the difference between intelligence and intelligence of the "average" guy who has been in a poor family, who has been traumatized by war, who has an adult child who has lost a parent, who has been subjected to endless government-sponsored sensory deprivation and forced labor. It is about the role of the individual, of the individual as a condition of history and of our society. But it is about more than that. It is about how we have failed as a society in our capacity to produce the intelligent people, in the capacity to realize the possibilities of the individual's mind. And so it is with the viewer. This movie should be required viewing for everyone. It should be at the forefront of every teenager's, for every young adult's, and every adult's educational and life history. It is a film that we should watch again and again. It should be a film that we should remember and cherish. It should be the starting point of any student's life of critical thinking.

Lawrence Romero photo
Lawrence Romero

This is a great movie. The first time I saw this movie I thought it was very good. Since then I've watched it over and over again, and the second time I watched it I saw some things that I didn't see the first time, and then I rewatched it again. I saw a lot of flaws in the movie, but it was still very good. The only thing that I think was a bit off was the music. It was not what I was expecting, but it was still good. I think if this movie was released the same way as the first one, it would have gotten a lot of attention, but instead it was very slow and boring. I don't think it was because the first movie was just better, it was just the way that I saw the movie. I think that the second movie should be released in theaters, so that people can see it with people they know, and see the flaws in the movie first, and then they can judge the movie for themselves. I think that the movie should have a more fast-paced, and fast-paced-on-the-first-viewing-of-the-movie-that-makes-it-less-slowing-and-more-fast-paced, but still keeps the audience interested. It's a great movie, and I really recommend it.

Phillip Cunningham photo
Phillip Cunningham

I was interested to see this film because of the premise that shows how power corrupts. It also portrays how a kind and caring woman from a poor background, who finds herself in the middle of power play, finds her way to regain her identity and freedom.

Jonathan H. photo
Jonathan H.

The book was great. The movie was not as good as the book. The movie had no character development. It was more of a show. The book had a lot more action and a lot more depth. It was also longer. The movie was very predictable. The movie was very slow. I would not recommend this movie to anyone. The book was great and the movie was not as good as the book.

Carolyn Lewis photo
Carolyn Lewis

This is the best movie about the family of the Newtown shooting victims. This movie is even more disturbing than the film that is based on the actual shootings. It's a story of the real families of Sandy Hook. It is also a cautionary tale about gun control. The movie is very emotional, and I'm very glad that this movie is released. A lot of people think that the movie is too disturbing to be shown. It's not. It's just a story. It's very sad that this horrible tragedy happened, but I think that this is the only movie about the Sandy Hook shooting. I think that this is the best movie that's about the shooting victims.

Sarah Larson photo
Sarah Larson

I am a great admirer of Dr. Benjamin Spock, but in this film, I was not really taken in to the depth of his life. He was a doctor who loved children, a champion of the disadvantaged and an advocate for human rights. He was so much more than a doctor. I would like to have seen more of his life, as a father, a husband, a friend and an advocate for all. I believe that his life and work was a good example of what one should strive for. But the movie did not fully portray his life, his impact on the world, and his contribution to humanity. It was a good documentary, but not a great one. I would recommend it for those who are interested in learning more about Dr. Spock, his work and his legacy. However, I am sure that there are many more people out there who are interested in Dr. Spock, and would enjoy the film as well.

Wayne Edwards photo
Wayne Edwards

It is sometimes difficult to get into the inner workings of this film. The back and forth between the documentary, the diaries, and the documentary of his two sons. I found myself sitting, somewhat lost. It was interesting, but it was hard to be fully engaged in the film. I found it to be both painful and beautiful to watch. As the movie progresses, we get to learn more about each man. I was especially interested in the diaries of Fred's son, Charlie, and his experiences of the Holocaust. While watching the film, I found myself looking back at the diaries and wondering what I would have done. What I would have done differently. I found the film to be moving, but it also was quite interesting to me that I had never seen one of Fred's films before. So, I wanted to check out more. This film did not disappoint.

Rose Long photo
Rose Long

I don't remember how I first heard of this documentary. I was watching Fox News and heard the name of Mark Fuhrman and wondered if it was worth watching. When I saw the title of the film, I thought it might be a student-directed film. Boy was I wrong. The results are just as startling as they are brilliant. It seems that the point of this film is to tell the story of all the people who have become victims of the U.S. state-sponsored policies of the CIA and its contractors. The message is clear. If you are on the left, you should be very afraid. If you are on the right, you should be very scared. This is a story of two people. They were both journalists who went undercover in the CIA to expose the fact that all the money that is spent on the CIA is directly stolen from the countries and people that we are trying to help. If you care about this issue, watch this film.

Larry photo

The difference between life in North Korea and life in the United States is how much money the wealthy and privileged citizens of the United States have, and how much they give away. A documentary that is sure to shake the viewer to the core, and will be a classic. We are taken from the grim reality of the regime, to the luxury that the American population has, and what it means to the people in the DPRK. How much they have, and how they give away. The film touches on many subjects, but one is the the fundamental problem of the DPRK. They don't have a society, the citizens of the country live in a fantasy world. It's a place where everyone has power and everyone can do anything. The system is completely totalitarian, and there is no other word to describe it. In the past we could say that the people of the United States are very rich, but the problem is that most of their wealth is held in a small number of very wealthy people. The truth is that most of the wealth in the United States is in the hands of the very rich, and there are no limits to their wealth. The documentary shows the reality of the situation in the DPRK, and it's something that many of us have never seen before. One thing I would like to point out is that this is not a film about North Korea, it's a film about the United States. There are many similarities between the two countries, but the documentary is also a film about the United States. It shows the extreme level of wealth that exists in the United States, and it's just as difficult to live in the United States as it is in the DPRK. I think that if the documentary had been released in 2006 or 2007, and the North Korean government had been known to have a mass media machine, it would have been a huge deal. People would have seen this documentary and started talking about it. There would have been more exposure of the dictatorship and the extreme wealth that exists in the country, and the government would have had to be put on the defensive. It would have been the perfect opportunity for the regime to be embarrassed. The North Korean government has never been a friend of the United States, but it's time for them to wake up. If you're interested in North Korea, I think you should see this documentary. It's a must see. A great film.

Jose Carter photo
Jose Carter

I just finished watching this documentary. It is very impressive and enlightening. It is so well done and so enlightening that I feel I should share this with everyone. I do not like to tell people how to live their life but this film is such an enlightening and beautiful piece of work that I felt I needed to share with you. I am an older person and I can see why this is important to people of all ages. It is a wonderful film that should be seen by anyone. I can say without reservation that this film will make you think. If you have any questions about the film or just want to talk to someone about it, please feel free to contact me.

Adam E. photo
Adam E.

This movie was a real eye-opener for me. It is just as powerful in the theater as it is on a television screen. The issues discussed are real. I was thinking about them for hours afterward. It was just a great movie. And a very moving one. I think it is very important for all of us to know that we are all not perfect, and that there are people in the world that just aren't what they seem to be. If you think you are one of them, it is a great idea to check out this movie. I really think that it is a must-see for everyone.

Michael Campbell photo
Michael Campbell

I'm sorry but this is so generic. This documentary is awful. You know you're in trouble when they literally drag you through, basically, the same interview with the same bland way that you're supposed to know that this guy is not a spy because he's, you know, white, straight, middle class and normal, etc, etc. The guy is dumb. He is stupid. He is a person who feels nothing and says nothing. He is this guy who doesn't understand, who isn't. Basically, he's a good guy, and the man is a spy. Except the guy is a white guy. He does nothing, he says nothing. He's just a person who doesn't do anything. He's a guy who needs some person to talk to. How's that for generic? So, there's a man who feels nothing, and does nothing, and even though he's supposed to be a spy, he does nothing, he does nothing. And he says nothing. The only reason you even care is that he's being so boring, that the guy is being so boring. And this is supposed to be a documentary about spies and spying and blah blah blah. Don't waste your time with this crap.

Alexander Warren photo
Alexander Warren

The film does show the power of the state and the way it affects everyday life. The historical events of the civil war and the police who were charged with the care of the prisoners of war are brought to the surface. The best of the documentary, "Escape from Camp Delta" has the best idea of how to use the history of the civil war to cover the plight of black prisoners of war in the American system. The idea of making a documentary on a case of imprisonment is a brave and clever one and a huge point of focus. It also shows the tough and uncomfortable position of the law enforcement officers. As a whole, the film is a good documentary that also teaches us a lot about the history of the Civil War.

Sandra O. photo
Sandra O.

The film chronicles the life and times of the legendary Donny Deutschman, a Jewish immigrant to Canada. While he was a young man, Deutschman was a member of the Nazi Party and fought in the Second World War. In the 1970s, he settled in Canada and built a successful Jewish grocery business. He was Jewish himself and had a large family. He had been married twice and had two children. As a young man, Deutschman was a high school history teacher and later a volunteer firefighter in New York. In his later years, he was a social reformer, founding and then running a small organization in the Toronto area. As a social reformer, Deutschman was considered a modern-day Nazi. But, he is not as visible in his work today. Instead, he was an active leader of the Canadian Jewish community. As he grew older, he became an active member of the Canadian Federation of Students. He worked for many years as a member of the Canadian Parliament. He also was a close friend of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau. In 1980, he became an honorary citizen of the City of Toronto. In 1996, he was made a life member of the Canadian Forces. He died in 2006. The film does not dwell on the differences between his Jewish and his non-Jewish views. Rather, it focuses on his personal story. It also does not paint him as a bad person. It is a matter of personal preference. It is interesting to note that some Jewish organizations have called for a boycott of his book "The Best and Brightest".

Bruce photo

A true history lesson. What did this movie really teach? What did it really do? For starters, it taught me that I am not the only one who has to live with the consequences of decisions made by people I never knew. I saw my own family suffer under the misguided leadership of my own father. The story of how I came to be involved in this movie was so inspiring. I realized that everyone has the right to choose and live their lives in a way that they feel best, even if that choice was the wrong one. I learned that my family was no exception. The fact that this movie was made by a gay man and a man who had to fight for his rights as a gay man is inspiring. It really is a very powerful film. This is a must see for everyone, especially those who have the opportunity to meet the people who did this documentary.

Jean Ruiz photo
Jean Ruiz

This documentary was one of the most fascinating I've seen in a long time. I've seen documentaries about the Holocaust, and this one was by far the most interesting. It was very emotional, and it made you feel like you were there. I really enjoyed the interviews with the people involved, and the story of the Holocaust. The documentary is very emotional, and it makes you feel like you are there. I highly recommend this documentary to anyone who wants to know more about the Holocaust.

Stephen H. photo
Stephen H.

An excellent and sometimes disturbing documentary. At times it seemed to be trying to make a point about the power of money in politics and its effect on the American people. The film was also trying to show the "new politics" in a documentary fashion, which is also interesting. The problem was that the director and some of the other people in the film were being extremely controlled by the producers and editor. This is a film that is highly recommended to anyone who has a critical eye.

Evelyn photo

This is an excellent documentary on a fascinating subject. The producer has done an excellent job of making the documentary as engaging as possible. The documentaries were made in black and white, which was done very well and the time of the movie is really well selected. There are no stars in this movie, but I was happy to see that the producers chose to use only actors that were known to the public. The actors did a good job and I really liked that they did not have a large number of scenes where they were just screaming and screaming. This is a movie that is interesting, well made, and it has been done well.

Timothy G. photo
Timothy G.

The movie was well written and had the right amount of time devoted to each topic. The subject matter is controversial and the movie did a great job of explaining and showing the reality of what is happening in our country. The movie was informative, entertaining and uplifting. It is a good movie to show people that we can't allow a few people to make a difference. I strongly recommend this movie for all ages. It will make you think and help you to better understand the current state of our country.

Joan J. photo
Joan J.

This film was made by a man who is part of the P&S community. He did the documentary for his local church and decided to make it into a film. I enjoyed it, but it does have its weaknesses. First, I am a man and the film did not give me the message that I wanted. I wanted to know more about the reasons that these young men were doing what they were doing. I wanted to know how these men were growing up and how they found their way into P&S. This film did not give me that information. Secondly, I did not find the documentary to be very entertaining. I was not really in the mood to laugh, and I was not very interested in what they were doing. I did not care about them, and I was not interested in what they were going through. I do not know what the P&S community is like, but I know that it is a very caring community and I think that this film could have been more informative. I would recommend this film to anyone who is interested in P&S. I would also recommend it to anyone who is a Christian. I think that the message of this film is very important and I think that it is very important that it is told. I think that it is a very good film, but it is not something that I would watch over and over again.

Cynthia S. photo
Cynthia S.

I love this film. It is a film that anyone who has ever been in college can relate to, or is interested in college life. This film goes far beyond just the films production. It has so much to offer. From the narrator, who does a great job with his role, to the actors, and especially the kids, this film has something for everyone. This film is great for the entire family, and it is a must see.

Grace photo

It's not a movie, it's a documentary. In a sense, it's an examination of what the US government has done with its power, or lack of it. It is a great exercise in showing how one country can use the power of its government to hurt others. It shows the differences between the two countries and how the US is a more progressive country. The director does a great job in showing how different countries view the US. But I also thought that the film was overrated. I think the movie had some very good points, but it wasn't nearly as good as the documentary. There were a few points that could have been used to make the film better. I also thought that the director was way too lenient with the subject matter. The film could have used more depth and some of the material could have been cut. But the movie still was a great watch. It's definitely worth a watch. Overall, I give this movie an 8/10.

Sean Burke photo
Sean Burke

Great documentary, great job! I think that all political junkies will be interested in this documentary. Some of the questions it raises are: why did the media ignore the assassination of JFK, what was the most significant political event in U.S. history, and what does it mean for us as a nation and for our democracy?

Sara Vasquez photo
Sara Vasquez

Not many people realize that William F. Buckley, Jr. and William F. Buckley, Jr. were the same person. There are a few short clips from their speeches to give you a flavor of their views. What is so remarkable about this documentary is that it shows both of their ideas in a very balanced and balanced way. They were not always right, but they were also not always wrong. It is important to realize that they were not a right wing organization, but they were part of a movement that took over the Republican Party. This movement was the New Right, the Christian Right, and the "Southern Strategy". They were not all the same, but they all shared many of the same goals. They wanted to restore America to its founding principles. They wanted to return America to the original principles of freedom and individualism. They wanted to preserve the original values of the country. They wanted to bring America back to a time when people could live in peace and happiness. They wanted to make America a country that was truly free. They were not concerned with the politics, they were concerned with the people. They wanted to bring back America to a time when people could live in peace and happiness. I was struck by this documentary because of the strong presence of Bill Buckley, Jr. in the film. I would recommend this film to anyone who wants to know more about William F. Buckley, Jr. and his views. 8/10

Lisa photo

Possibly the best documentary on the Holocaust I have ever seen. It has been made by American Jew David Grossman, a former Nazi officer. He was sent to a concentration camp for Jewish prisoners, and he witnessed the atrocities of the Holocaust. This documentary, in which he interviews the three brothers of Nazi officer Hans Kammler, who committed suicide in 1941, also showed the brutality of the Nazi's state in the occupied countries, but not the specific genocide of the Jews. Grossman's film makes the point that there was no Jewish anti-Semitism, that there were no secret societies, that the Jews were not deliberately persecuted. I would like to see Grossman's film released in DVD or on-demand, because it deserves to be seen by as many people as possible.

Alexander R. photo
Alexander R.

Very well done documentary on the 1984 movie of the same name, which is well researched and presented. I had no idea of the movie until I saw the documentary and was very impressed with how it was presented and researched. It does not seem like there was any major editing, it is very well put together. It is very well organized, very well done, and I was impressed by the fact that it is still as relevant today as it was in 1984. I do not want to reveal any spoilers, but it is interesting to see how the lead actor, who is now an actor, was involved with the production. He was actually interviewed for this documentary, so it is good that he is still involved in the movie business.

Mark M. photo
Mark M.

If you are not completely familiar with the information in this film, you may think that it is a waste of time to watch it. However, it does not matter whether you are an anarchist or not, it is impossible not to get involved in the ideas that are presented. Although it was made in 1982, the film has its relevance to today, as the most important way to stay aware of the growing knowledge of the real world that is happening today, is through knowledge of our current world's political and economic problems. I would recommend this film to anyone who loves philosophy, history, science, art and cinema as well as to any who wants to learn more about the ideas of anarchism. I personally enjoy it and it helped me to get more interested in my life.

Michael photo

This is a very interesting documentary, it is about how the media affects our minds, but the film is a bit slow at times and the ending is a bit weird. I think that the best part of the film is that it is very emotional. Overall, it is a very good documentary. I give it an 8 out of 10.

Michael photo

I was a little surprised to see this film, but it was so interesting and it seemed to really get into what was going on. A couple of interesting aspects that stood out for me: 1) the way the children were interviewed. When they were in school they were actually interviewing other children, not adults. This was extremely interesting because it meant that there was a very natural way of talking to these kids, that didn't involve talking to adults. It really seemed like they were talking to them, and it made it so much easier to get into the kids' world. 2) The real-life interviews with the people who lived through the massacre. This was very interesting, because these were really people who had a very real, very real experience that I think a lot of people should see. These interviews were very interesting because you could actually feel the tension they were in, and it made it so much easier to understand the feelings these people had. This was very interesting, because it really gave you a real sense of what the people were feeling, and it gave you a feeling of what these people were feeling. It made the film so much more interesting. The interviews were really very good, and I think they helped make this film really interesting. I think that they really helped it, because I think that if you saw this documentary you would be interested in seeing what they were saying. Overall, I really recommend this documentary, because it was very interesting and it made me feel a lot better about the fact that we don't know what happened. It really showed that we don't know, and that it really doesn't matter. I think that it's important to show what the people that lived through this were going through, and how they were affected by it. Overall, I think that it was very interesting, and I really recommend it.

Robert photo

In the current political climate, it is quite refreshing to see a documentary which is 100% factual. It is a little disturbing to see the man who created the "Bowling for Columbine" film on this site calling this film an attack on the Second Amendment. I think it is more a call for the people to learn more about the history of this country. I can't think of a better film to explain what the Second Amendment is all about. I encourage everyone to go to the source and watch this documentary. It is amazing how little money this film has made. The time it took to make this film is a real shame. It is the best documentary I have ever seen.

Debra photo

We want to hear your opinions.If you want to go see a film and you feel the need to write a ten line essay about it, then by all means, go see it. If you don't like it and you want to be able to write a ten line essay about it, then stay home and watch TV. But we will get your opinion in writing and read it to you.But we will tell you what we think. I'm not going to go on a rant about movies. I've already said that. I think you're being unfair to The Marx Brothers by doing that. However, I will say this: I really enjoyed this movie. It has a lot of heart and is very entertaining. I give it an A+.

Sara O. photo
Sara O.

The only reason I watch these documentaries is because I like to read reviews. This documentary is outstanding in terms of providing a message, which is the only way to go about a topic like this. But it is also an extremely well structured documentary, and I cannot see how it is not controversial. Many times in documentaries we find the facts of a story not being entirely accurate. But the documentary points out exactly how this happened, and if it was a real story, it should have been a no-no. The documentary was an excellent study of history and how people's views of what happened have changed over time. They covered all the main parties, both parties who were of one opinion and of the other, and all of the parties who supported the "truth". The documentary shows the main themes of this time, when both parties were fighting over the truth, and that this is still going on, and that is how it should be. It also points out the more recent historical events that are more modern. This is an excellent documentary.

Vincent Stone photo
Vincent Stone

This movie was great, the movie will make you think and think. It has a very simple story and it is so realistic. You can feel the tension between the two families and you can feel the pain and despair in each character. The movie is very interesting and the story is very well developed. I think the movie will be very well received by everyone. The director does an excellent job and I think he deserves an Oscar. The story is very well developed and the actors do an excellent job. I think the movie is very well made and it has a great message. I think everyone should watch this movie and be able to make up their own mind.

Doris D. photo
Doris D.

This film is an interesting look at the "new American exceptionalism". It tells the story of a white man who wants to be a member of the elite American culture, which is white. He has lived in the country for many years and has been a white man in a white nation. He has many friends who look like him, and as he gets closer to the elite he is introduced to the principles of the new American exceptionalism. He is invited to the White House where he meets the new President, and he begins to question the principles of this culture. He doesn't quite fit in the new society, and is confused. He is in the middle of a society, where there is no separation between the "super-rich" and the "poor". The President seems to be the leader of a huge corporation, with a big army and other resources. The film is telling the story of the "privileged" American citizen. It is interesting to see what happens to the white man and the other people who are trying to fit in the new society. There are several things that should have been explained better, such as why there is a high proportion of blacks and a very low proportion of whites. I think it would have been more useful to have a different story than the one we have. Overall, the film is good, but I think it could have been better.

Marie photo

A major embarrassment for the Romney campaign is that they turned out to be wrong about the true extent of Bain Capital's influence on Bain Capital. On December 7th, 2012, the Wall Street Journal reported that Mitt Romney's son Tagg Romney, who was the lead economist on Bain's multi-billion dollar deal for the wireless carrier, Microsoft, is now a senior executive at Bain Capital, and is a close adviser to the Romney campaign. The son, Tagg, served on the Bain Capital board of directors, and advised Romney's presidential campaign. As in the previous two reports, the Journal found that Tagg had much influence on Romney's Bain Capital investment decisions. The Journal quoted Tagg as saying he didn't "want to be a political campaign contributor," and was happy to "take a pass" on politics. However, as the Journal's report showed, Tagg is still at Bain Capital, and still has "a leading role in some of the firm's projects." Tagg also helped set up a meeting between the Romney campaign and Goldman Sachs that resulted in a $500 million investment in the company. In fact, Tagg's role in Goldman Sachs has now become the subject of a lawsuit alleging that Tagg and his partners committed securities fraud in the investment, and that Goldman Sachs is part of a conspiracy to make a killing off the money that flowed from the deal. So it's not so much that Mitt Romney's campaign is wrong to take the advice of his son, but that they are wrong to continue to support Tagg's appointment as a senior Romney advisor. He continues to be part of Romney's Bain Capital investment decision-making, and still plays a central role in Romney's presidential campaign.

Karen Edwards photo
Karen Edwards

Part political propaganda film, part time capsule, part action thriller, part expository social history film, and an invitation to watch and learn. Based on a collaboration between London, New York, and Chicago, the film is a cross-cutting portrait of three generations of young Americans, from generation to generation, back in the 1920s to 1970s. It is the first ever interview with a current American president, Bill Clinton. Paul Begley, the film's producer, said that he was inspired by Martin Luther King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail" and Abraham Lincoln's "Declaration of Independence" for his story. The interviewees include presidents, former presidents, ministers, journalists, and members of the clergy. These were also the interviews of Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon. One of the interviewees, who lives in the White House, was Clinton himself. "I knew that he would like it," Begley said, "but I didn't know he would say such unkind things about me." Clinton is apparently trying to explain why he felt the need to say those unkind things to the right people. Begley said that the president gave a very impassioned speech to the American Society of Newspaper Editors in his first term in office in which he said that he was shocked by the "objectionable" questions that journalists had been asking about his sex life. In the film, Begley explains that this speech was part of a "tens of thousands of private conversations with just one or two people." However, many people who were interviewed were telling the truth. The people interviewed are now all dead, in that order. Begley said that these interviews had some serious implications for his film, as it is based on their recollections. "If you can see this film," Begley said, "you will see the things that I saw." Begley said that he hoped that the film would be a tool for politicians, politicians who want to be the next president, and politicians who want to be seen as a leader of the country. He said that the film was made with little money, and he hopes that it will be seen by as many people as possible. In that, he is right. "For the press, this is the greatest challenge," he said. "But for the American people, we really needed this film." 9/10

Kyle C. photo
Kyle C.

The best documentary I've ever seen. The way the film is put together is incredible. The footage is really quite shocking. I would recommend this documentary to anyone who wants to see what the USA has become and how people are affected by the news. The use of music is also great. I love the way they use different genres of music. I think this is the first documentary I've ever seen that actually had music in it. It really helps to get the point across.

Barbara Morrison photo
Barbara Morrison

I did not know this film existed before I saw it. I don't understand why it was not given a better rating. Although it was poorly paced it still held a great message. I'm not saying it should have gotten a 10 but I don't feel that a film should be so poorly paced, no matter how good the message. The messages in this film were well delivered and really made you think. If you are thinking about taking a drug to get high, skip this film and watch a good film about drugs instead.

Cynthia photo

American History X is a very controversial film which has divided many of its viewers. Personally I thought the film was very good, but I found that the viewing experience varied greatly from person to person. I agree with the majority of IMDb users, that the film was too long and that the ending was abrupt. I thought it was a very dark film, but in that aspect I found that more intense than other films. I think the film is too dark for a lot of people, but I would not say that the film was a bad film. The acting in the film was good, and it showed that Anthony Hopkins and Tom Cruise were very good actors, but I believe the film would have benefited if they were in a more humorous, dramatic role. I felt that the film was very serious, and that the film was a struggle of Anthony Hopkins, but I could not help but feel that Tom Cruise was better in the film. The film is too serious for some, but it was very funny and has a good ending. I do not think that the film was an "excellent film", but it was a very good film.

Robert photo

The downside of having a child is that you become a parent to the people you love and feel it is an achievement to be a parent. Unfortunately, as we all know, sometimes the people we love become the children of other people who have the same opinions and values. This film examines that phenomenon with the authors of The Difference Engine and more. It focuses on the positive side of having children, which I believe is the most important factor to have children, while focusing on the negative aspects. That being said, I really enjoyed the film, and felt it was a good depiction of the history of having children. It did not try to have a political message, and its emphasis was purely factual. It focused on how people reacted to having children and the success they had in their life. If you want to learn more, check it out.

Emma Andrews photo
Emma Andrews

The documentary "United States of America" is a wonderful documentary. It is a beautiful story about the people, their lives, their culture and the way they live. It is a fascinating history. The documentary is about a couple of journalists, Jay Roach and Michael Beschloss, who had to cover a scandal that is still in the news, the Watergate break in in the White House. The film is an amazing history of this story. It is a brilliant documentary. This is the first documentary that I have seen that was also made by a journalist and a journalist's wife. It is a very interesting documentary that should be watched by everybody. I like it a lot. I think that everybody should watch it. I recommend that everybody watch it.

Jennifer Hicks photo
Jennifer Hicks

What an amazing film. It makes you feel like you're actually there in a room with these people. I've never been so deeply touched by a documentary. The film is filled with people's stories and it makes you feel like you are actually there with them. The history of the Holocaust is never told like this before. It is a story that has been told over and over again but it never gets told in such a powerful way. I don't think I've ever cried so hard at a film before. I'm surprised I never saw it in theaters. I've been waiting for it to come out on DVD. I think that's the best part of this movie. It is a beautiful, moving, and really sad story that will make you think about the choices you make and the things that matter most. The film is great because it tells the story from the people who lived it and it gives you a chance to see the real horrors of the Holocaust. I think it is an excellent movie and I highly recommend it.

Daniel H. photo
Daniel H.

Peter FitzSimons, a journalist, joins the Los Angeles Times as a film critic in August 1981. He had written two previous documentaries on the State Department in the early 1980s: "The L.A. Times and the St. Petersburg Times" and "Inside the State Department". He had also edited the book "A Man Called One: The Politics of the Times," written by Tom Clancy. This book was a synthesis of his earlier work, providing a history of the State Department, the CIA, the Kennedy administration and the founding of the United Nations. FitzSimons goes back to the days of Robert Kennedy and the Caribbean Basin. He is interested in the Cuban Missile Crisis, specifically why the US was not more aggressive with the Soviet Union in Cuba and why the US went to war in Vietnam. FitzSimons' comments are thoughtful and informed, and he discusses several incidents that shaped the US involvement in the Cold War. John Backus, a well-known contemporary of FitzSimons, is interviewed about his experience with the Kennedy administration and the State Department. He explains his reason for participating in the interview. FitzSimons is clearly going to be someone who can do well with the documentary program. He discusses what his personal identity is, and his initial thoughts about taking on such a large project. I hope he is successful. I found the first half of the program, which was mainly about the history of the State Department and the Kennedy administration, rather dull. The second half of the program, which was dedicated to FitzSimons' early career as a journalist, was much more interesting. His focus on the Cuban Missile Crisis made his presentation of the film seem fresh and unique. He starts by introducing us to a film critic in the 1960s named Orson Wells. The film critic was a source of knowledge and inspiration for FitzSimons. Orson Wells had many interesting things to say about the Cuban Missile Crisis. He provided FitzSimons with the basic facts about the Cuban Missile Crisis, as well as some background information about the issue. FitzSimons discusses the facts of the Cuban Missile Crisis, including the types of missiles and the points that various countries were making about the crisis. I found the interview with FitzSimons and the filmmaker to be interesting and well-done. I liked how the filmmaker showed that FitzSimons' career as a journalist began at the ripe age of 15 and went through several stages. FitzSimons then went to the newspaper in the early 1960s, and then he joined the State Department as a reporter. I liked how FitzSimons gives us his commentary about a wide range of subjects, including the Cold War, nuclear disarmament and the Cuban Missile Crisis. I also liked the filmmaker's use of social media. I liked how FitzSimons interviews current and former state department employees, as well as the Cuban Missile Crisis and Vietnam. I also liked the fact that he did not portray the State Department as the evil force it is, but rather as a flawed institution that contributed to the Cold War. FitzSimons offers a strong, balanced analysis of the Cold War. I would recommend this documentary to anyone who is interested in the Cold War. The documentary is not perfect, but it is a worthwhile documentary. The film does not provide the answers to questions like: how did the Cuban Missile Crisis occur, and who was behind it? The documentary provides an interesting look into the history of the Cold War. It is well worth the time to watch this documentary.

Brittany M. photo
Brittany M.

I saw this film at the 2010 Toronto International Film Festival. I was in awe at how well it was put together. It is a must see for anyone interested in the film-making process, or in the world of art. I will not even attempt to provide a summary of the film. It is really a must see for anyone interested in the art of film making, the art of film criticism, the art of the cinema, or just the art of film. I hope this film inspires other filmmakers and artists to go out and try to make movies that are as good as this one. I don't see how anyone could not be moved by this film. It is one of those films that is so deeply meaningful, that it is hard to find words to express how much I love this film. I will recommend this film to anyone I know, and I would encourage everyone to see it. I have already recommended this film to a number of people, and they have all been moved by it. This film should be seen by everyone. It is an incredibly powerful film. I hope everyone can see it. I am going to see it again tonight. This film is a must see for everyone, and it is an amazing film.

Joe Meyer photo
Joe Meyer

This documentary is a very interesting and thought provoking documentary about the history of the US military in Vietnam. It is very well made and it really shows the real world of the US military. It was interesting to see the soldiers that were involved in the war in Vietnam. I was very surprised to see how many soldiers in the US army have served in Vietnam. I would recommend this documentary to anyone who has ever had to serve in the US army.

Sandra R. photo
Sandra R.

The story of an investigative journalist who has made it his mission to uncover the truth about a powerful pharmaceutical company that was selling life-saving drugs to kids in exchange for kickbacks. It's an impressive and compelling film. I don't think I have ever seen a documentary that is so well-crafted, and so well-acted. It's a very thorough film, and it's probably the most thorough film I have ever seen. I can't wait to see the next film in the series, "Gone Baby Gone". I highly recommend this film to anyone who is interested in the history of the pharmaceutical industry. It is a film that I will be watching over and over.

Amy Robinson photo
Amy Robinson

While I am a journalist, I have always been fascinated with history. This documentary gives a great overview of the major historical events that have taken place since the fall of the Berlin Wall. The documentary includes footage from documentaries and books about the events. I think that the first two hours were a bit boring and didn't really cover a lot of important things, but it covers the most important things. It's also a bit disappointing that there isn't really much more to say. There is a lot of information and it's all covered well. I do think that the documentary is a bit more detailed than it needs to be. They should have made more history and not just talking about the events in the years since the fall of the Wall. Overall, it's a very interesting documentary.

Eric M. photo
Eric M.

I just watched this documentary and was surprised that it was a documentary, because I am a pretty critical person. I would have been surprised if this documentary had been a documentary. This documentary is very much like the one I had watched a couple of weeks ago, with a few twists. This documentary was made in a very amateurish way, and some of the stuff is not even relevant. I think a lot of the documentaries that have been made lately, like the ones that I mentioned before, are the most boring, boring, boring, boring. This documentary is not so bad, but it's not good either. If you are interested in political corruption, you should watch the documentary about a guy who was running for the President of the United States, and he was indicted for corruption. That documentary was very interesting, and it was also very informative. I recommend this documentary, but I do not recommend it to all of you, because there are some parts of the documentary that are not relevant to me. So, I would recommend this documentary, but I would not recommend it to everyone. It is not good, but it is not bad. I think that I would have liked the documentary better if I had watched it, and if I had watched it with the expectation that it was going to be a documentary. I would not recommend this documentary to the most critical people, but I would recommend it to the most of you.

Nicole W. photo
Nicole W.

The interviews are mostly foreign or cultural events, like a concert or a trip to the capital. This documentary shows how these events may have shaped the life of the people in those countries, how they reflected on their country, and how they got rid of the dark demons that they might have had. The documentary also shows how these events were recorded on television and film, and how this was used as a way to manipulate the people. Although I'm not sure what it means, it seems to show how governments in these countries created a situation where their subjects would talk about the dark sins they might have committed, so the governments would send their agents to kill them. It also shows how people in the audience are glued to the television screens and it shows how they hear their leaders speaking in different accents. These events may have had a positive or a negative impact on some people, but they probably would have also changed the lives of the people in these countries. This documentary also shows how the government tries to control the information it receives, and how it controls the media to get people to support their policies. This documentary is also full of interviews with people who live in these countries. The film ends with a video interview with people who had survived the genocide. It seems that the film's director wanted to show how much the atrocities were influenced by the media and the government. This documentary may be worth a look.

Ralph Stephens photo
Ralph Stephens

This movie was well made. A lot of clips and examples of well-known films. It was interesting to see how different American movies looked and how different the films were based on the works of the authors of those works. This was a good introduction to the past of American cinema and was great to have an overall history of all the movies and their makers.

Gloria photo

I think this documentary is not at all a documentary. I would not even call it a documentary. This film is too long. What I mean is that the film could have been made in just 30 minutes. The film could have been put together in a day, and the remaining film would have been completed in two days. So, the film is not a documentary. The film does not have enough real footage to tell the story. I think that this film is mostly a very good look at what is going on in the middle east. But, I still think that the movie is a little too long, and I don't think that it is really a very good look at the Middle East.

Louis photo

This film is a real eye opener. I saw it on the big screen at the Toronto Film Festival and it was very well done. The subject matter is very sensitive and the subject of this film is very difficult to watch. I would have preferred a more realistic depiction of what happens in the prison system. However, I am glad I saw it. I hope it gets a wider release. I also hope that this film will be used as a teaching tool to the students of this great country. It is a very powerful film that I would recommend to anyone. It is very well done and it has a very powerful message. I hope this film will be used in a more accurate way in the future.

Theresa photo

It's difficult to say what is the best film of the year, because there are so many. But I would have to say that this is the best. It's a really good film, and I would recommend it to anyone. The film is about the relationship between a mother and her daughter. The mother is a teacher and she is a very strong woman. She doesn't have a lot of time for her daughter and she does everything in her power to make her life miserable. But the daughter is a girl who has a lot of problems, but she has a strong will and she doesn't give up. She's a very good actress and she was very good in this film. I think it's very good. I think it's one of the best films of the year. It's a very good film. I would recommend it to anyone. It's very good.

Dennis M. photo
Dennis M.

When I first heard of this film, I was a little skeptical because I've never heard of it and I didn't know what to expect. I'm glad I watched it and I really enjoyed it. The film is a little slow in the beginning and a little boring, but the majority of the film is quite interesting. I really enjoyed the film and I think it's worth a watch. The film is about the relationship between the parents of a little girl, Anna, and her dad. Anna is a precocious, intelligent child who is extremely curious and interested in the world. She wants to know everything about it and her parents have been doing their best to keep her in a world of books and toys. At the same time, they also are doing their best to keep her from being influenced by her little sister. It's a fascinating relationship and it's not at all clear what the parents are doing to help their daughter. The film is a little slow, but I thought the film was interesting and it had a good ending. Overall, I really enjoyed this film and I think it's worth a watch.

Gloria G. photo
Gloria G.

The way in which this film was shot was very creative and I think that it was very well done. I found that the film was very insightful and insightful in the way that it explored the state of our society and the problems that we face today. However, I think that it was a bit too long for my liking and that I would have preferred a shorter film. The film had a very strong message and I felt that it was very well delivered. However, I think that there could have been a bit more focus on the issues that we face today. I think that this film could have been a little bit shorter, and I think that it could have been better if it was shorter. I would recommend that you see this film, but I think that it is not for everyone. Overall, I think that this film was very well done and that it was very insightful and insightful in the way that it explored the state of our society. However, I think that it could have been a little bit longer.

Tammy Pena photo
Tammy Pena

This film was very well made and it tells a very interesting story. I am surprised it did not win any Oscars or the Golden Globe. The actors did an excellent job and it was very easy to follow. I think the reason it did not win any Oscars or the Golden Globe is because the Academy is very liberal and so the film did not have a lot of drama. The audience is very well informed about the abortion issue and the pro-life movement. They are aware of the most famous and well known abortionists and activists and it shows how much work goes into their work. I think the people who do not support the abortion issue are mostly ignorant about the abortion issue. This film is a good and informative way to get the facts about the abortion issue.

Melissa Wade photo
Melissa Wade

It's not that I hate the "FDR years," but the "20th century" period is so boring and uninteresting that it's hard to care about anything going on in the background. I was bored, not for lack of trying, but because it just didn't seem like much was happening. I was especially annoyed with the "FDR-era" people. I don't remember a single memorable performance by anyone. The movie had no real punch, and I think that was the point. If the purpose was to make the viewer feel like he or she was there, it did a good job. But I don't think it was very effective. The documentary was too slow and too drawn out, and the performances were not that great. The movie is a bit better than average, but not great.