Steam National Theatre Live: Macbeth

National Theatre Live: Macbeth

National Theatre Live: Macbeth is a movie starring Nadia Albina, Michael Balogun, and Stephen Boxer. The ruined aftermath of a bloody civil war. Ruthlessly fighting to survive, the Macbeths are propelled towards the crown by forces...

Other Titles
ナショナル・シアター・ライヴ 2019 「マクベス」, NT Live: Macbeth, National Theatre Live: Makbet, National Theater Live: Macbeth
Running Time
3 hours 30 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Drama
Director
Rufus Norris
Writer
William Shakespeare
Actors
Stephen Boxer, Michael Balogun, Nadia Albina, Anne-Marie Duff
Country
UK
Year
2018
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

The ruined aftermath of a bloody civil war. Ruthlessly fighting to survive, the Macbeths are propelled towards the crown by forces of elemental darkness.

Comments about drama «National Theatre Live: Macbeth» (19)

Barbara photo
Barbara

I was looking for a nice way to spend some time when I had some free time on my hands. I was not disappointed. I highly recommend this film. I can't wait to see it again.

David photo
David

First off, I am a huge fan of The Tempest. It is my favorite of all the plays. So it's with great trepidation that I watch this film. I'm not sure if I will be able to relate to it as much as I did with The Tempest. It is a very slow film and I don't think that I would have liked it as much as I did with The Tempest. The film is actually a great film, but it is also slow. There is a great scene in the film where Macbeth is talking to the Duke of Norfolk and they are talking about the battle that was fought at Maldon. It was slow and I was thinking "man, that was boring." I was not expecting that scene to be great, but it was. It was a great scene, but the film is a slow one. I was really hoping for a great battle scene in this film and I got it. It was a great scene. The only problem I had with this film was the pacing. It was really slow. I know that I can't compare this film to The Tempest, but I was really hoping that they would be able to do this film differently. I know that they wanted to keep this film simple, but I think that they were trying to do this film differently than The Tempest. I thought that they were trying to get away from the atmosphere that the Tempest had. I think that the film was just trying to get away from the atmosphere of The Tempest. It was a really good film, but I was hoping that they would be able to make it a little better than The Tempest. I know that I would have enjoyed this film a lot more if I had not seen The Tempest. The Tempest was the perfect film for this film. The Tempest is the perfect film to compare this film to. I would recommend that you see this film, but I think that you should watch The Tempest first. I think that you will be able to see more of the film and be able to connect with it better than I did with this film. I would recommend this film to people who liked The Tempest and people who were not fans of The Tempest. I would recommend this film to people who are fans of Shakespeare and people who aren't fans of Shakespeare.

Donald White photo
Donald White

This movie, simply put, is brilliant! I was looking for some new new things to see this movie, and found a great show of Shakespeare. The cast is so great, the scenery is breathtaking and the actors are all so brilliant. The fight scenes are so well done and to see the griffins acting really well, it's really amazing. The music, too, is really good. I think the score was done very well. I don't know what the heck everyone's talking about. I think the movie is so well written, it's so well acted, it's so well directed. I really don't understand what people can't like. I don't think anyone will ever get tired of watching this movie, and I think this movie deserves so much more praise than it's getting. The acting is just outstanding, the movie just about deserves it's 9/10, and the movie just about deserves a 10/10.

Dorothy Smith photo
Dorothy Smith

This is the best of two worlds, as you can not tell which is the master story and which is the sub story. First of all, I liked this movie a lot, the story line is amazing, you have to pay attention for the story. The setting is also amazing, beautiful Welsh countryside. It is filmed beautifully, the costumes and settings are well done, especially the setting and the backgrounds. I am glad that I saw this movie in the UK, I hope the DVD version will be better. The actors are perfect, they seem so comfortable in their roles, and it makes you feel that they are just making a movie about Macbeth. The story line is great, it is not the most original or deep story, but it is still good. It is unique, the movie does not waste time on revealing what happened in the past, or that Macbeth had to take a lot of stuff from other movies. It keeps the viewer at the edge of his seat. The music is also good, it makes you feel that it is a real piece of music. The movie is really good, and I recommend everyone to see it.

Vincent Phillips photo
Vincent Phillips

The above synopsis gives a rather good picture of what you can expect from this movie. However, if you are expecting a movie based on Shakespeare, you will be disappointed. This is not Shakespeare in any way, shape or form. It is a film about a famous English playwright, Prospero, who is actually a con man who is convicted for trying to extort money from people. As a result, Prospero is sentenced to death and gets put into a cell of the Macbeth prison. Macbeth is the Sheriff of Nottingham, who leads the fight against Prospero, and who is ultimately put to death by him. This is the first Shakespeare movie I have ever seen, and it was surprisingly good. There is not much detail about Shakespeare's work in this movie, so if you want to see what Shakespeare's plays are like, you will have to find something else to do. I found it fascinating that people in England think that Shakespeare was a genius. There are quite a few people in England who think that Shakespeare is a genius, and that this film does a good job of showing this view of Shakespeare. I would have liked to see more of Macbeth, but that may have just been because I had seen this earlier movie, which made Macbeth seem more interesting. This is a movie about the English people in the mid-16th century. One of the main characters, Prospero, is an English aristocrat who does not care much for the poor and needy. He also has an interest in Shakespeare and has been influenced by Shakespeare's plays, especially Macbeth. The two other main characters in the movie, Macbeth and Prospero, are really funny. Prospero wants to be King of England, but Macbeth is really just trying to see how long he can live. Macbeth will never win. He was put in prison for trying to extort money from people. He died in the middle of his sentence. I don't know how long he was in prison, but it is really short. When he finally got out of prison, he went into a typical English criminal lifestyle, such as stealing and being a gangster. I think most people would say that Shakespeare had the same views of English people in the 16th century as he had in Shakespeare's time. However, I would like to disagree. Shakespeare's plays were written by someone who did not have a good grasp of English history. Shakespeare wrote the plays in Shakespeare's time, and many people have noticed this. Shakespeare's plays were written for the mass market and it was not his style. Shakespeare's plays were written with Shakespeare's style in mind. If you think of Shakespeare as being "American", then you will have a problem with Shakespeare's works. I would like to say that Shakespeare was "English", but I have no idea what that means. This movie gives us a good view of how Shakespeare thought, and that is what we want

Brandon photo
Brandon

This was one of the best films of the year. The plot was interesting and exciting. The characters were strong and made us care about them. The actors were great and the camera work was great. It was very hard to believe that the director of this film was a comedian, because he really did make it very dramatic. I thought the actor that played the Sheriff was perfect for the part. The music was also great. The movie has a good mix of comedy and drama. It was very entertaining and I enjoyed it a lot.

Anthony photo
Anthony

There's no doubt that Macbeth is a better film than the original. But this is not a bad film by any means. The acting is solid, the sets and costumes are impressive, and the music is good, but it doesn't have the same intensity that the original had. I know that Macbeth is Shakespeare's most famous play, but it is a poor comparison for this film. The film is interesting, but it is not as compelling as the original. I can see why this film is so highly acclaimed, but it is not the same as the original.

Helen photo
Helen

I was very disappointed that Macbeth was omitted from the 2007 Edinburgh Festival programme. This was a shame because I thought that this was a very good production. I have to say that I really enjoyed this version. It's a great combination of music, staging and dialogue. The music is excellent, the dialogue is excellent, and the staging is excellent. The cinematography is very good, and I was very impressed by the camera work and the lighting. The characters were very well acted, especially the Lady Macbeth and her father, and the actors were very convincing. The musical score is great, and the singing is excellent. The cast is very good, with a very good performance from Timothy Dalton. The main problem I had with this production is that the scenes were very choppy, and I felt that there were too many gaps in the script. There was too much wasted time in the script. I felt that the story could have been told much better, but it was very good. I also felt that the director and writer should have gone back to the drawing board and re-worked the script, to make it more believable, but I think they did a good job.

Madison photo
Madison

As I see it, there are two choices. First, we can fall in love with the brilliant art of cinema. We can try to follow the way it is done, hoping that it will be as masterfully delivered as it has been in the past. I've heard this many times, and the truth is that the best cinema is actually quite shocking. The characters that we see in the theatre are far more authentic than they are in real life, and that's a really strong part of what we are supposed to feel. The more the theatre makes us feel, the more it makes us feel. The less the theatre makes us feel, the less we feel. It's a powerful force, and we are very grateful for the way it works. Then there's the other option: we can go to the theatre, have a little look at the scenery, and be deeply moved by the actors. We can try to emulate the way that actors do it, and we'll be really disappointed. This is the same choice that I used to make: I've heard the movies in which the performers really take us by the hand and lead us through a real scene. I loved the way they did it, and it was the main reason why I was into it. Then, a couple of years ago, I found out that "Macbeth" was going to be performed live. The story of the Macbeth in Shakespeare's play was very powerful, and in this production the actors took me by the hand and led me through it. I felt like I was part of it, not just watching the actors move around, and even singing along, but actually acting in it. And then it was over. I could watch it again and again, because it was so satisfying. But I couldn't watch it again. I could still watch the movie, but I could only do it on my own. It was like I'd lost myself in a real place and time. I wanted to be there with the actors, so I could really experience it. When I realized that I could only watch it one time, I decided that it was time to see it again. And I was so glad that I had. I felt that I had experienced the same great thing that the actors had. I wasn't just watching the play, but I was living it. The play was not only powerful, but it was very real. It was real in its portrayal of the madness and tragedy of a man, and it was real in its treatment of its subject matter. The movie was like a theatre piece, but it was real. And it was not only a great play, but it was also a real play. It was the real thing, as it was real in the theatre. I was grateful for that. And that's what I feel as a viewer. I felt that I could see and experience the same thing that the actors did, and I was more moved by it. So

Ann C. photo
Ann C.

Here is a unique film about a play that is the core of Shakespeare's last play, the play that would ultimately be titled Macbeth. It has been one of the best plays in the world for a long time and it is really fun to see the English National Theatre re-do this amazing production. It is not simply an adaptation of the play, it is a full-blown production. You can see the stage, you can see the actors, you can see the sets. And you can see the music. This is a great example of how Shakespeare's work is being taken to the next level. They really did a great job and they did it well. The film itself is rather dark and depressing, but not too depressing. It has a great cast and a great story. It has some of the best special effects ever. And it has good, some of the best, music ever. You will be lost and at the same time you will be entertained.

Peter Rivera photo
Peter Rivera

This is the first and only production of Shakespeare's Macbeth, and for some strange reason, the movie version of it was a disaster. The audience were laughing at the same time as the actors, and I don't think that's what the play or the screenwriter intended. The film is much better than the stage version, and it's not that the cast is bad, but the film is much better. The play is an extremely difficult one, and this movie shows it, showing the stage version of the play, but without any sort of political message. The production was done as a stage production, and it's great to see the stage version. The characters are much more human, and I think that's what the stage version was lacking. The cast is excellent, and the cinematography is very good. I think that this is one of the best productions of Macbeth I have ever seen, and I don't think that anyone will ever forget it.

Diana Daniels photo
Diana Daniels

This was a wonderful production of Macbeth with a good story. I was in a theater with a bunch of theater people who all loved it. I am a HUGE fan of Shakespeare and Shakespearean plays. I love the way this play was presented. I especially loved the opening. The theater was filled with people, and everyone was on their feet in their seats, even with the thunder and lightning. They were not seated in the back row, but were standing in front of their seats, and I thought it was wonderful. I don't think this was a part of the original play, but the audience did not mind, and everyone was talking about the performance. I did notice that one person did not like it, but I think it was because of the lighting. They could have done without the lightning, but they did not have to change the lighting in the original play, so it was better. The production was great. I thought the costumes and makeup were wonderful. I think it was the best of any production I have seen so far this year. I think it is worth seeing, even if you have not seen the play. I would give it a 9 or 10 out of 10.

Gloria photo
Gloria

I found this film to be a great story of how the king of Scotland's son (he was not a bastard) was brought up by his uncle and his uncle's wife. The acting was superb and the story was very well done. The music was great and the story very believable. I thought that it was very good and not too long. I thought that the acting was excellent and I thought that the story was great. I would recommend this movie to anyone who is interested in a good film.

Roger photo
Roger

I was actually really excited to see this film, I'd heard it was good and I like Shakespeare. The first half of the film was pretty good, the second half was a bit slow, and I thought it was a bit too long. I did like the acting though, some of the actors did a great job. This is the kind of film I'd love to see again, and I would recommend it to anybody. If you don't like Shakespeare, you may not like this film, but I think you'll like it. The first half is good, but the second half is slow, and I think it's just a bit too long. I'd say it's worth seeing.

William Clark photo
William Clark

I liked this film because it had a very British feel to it. I also thought that it was very well acted. The plot was very good and the cinematography was very well done. I thought that the casting was very good, but the performances were very good. This is one of those films that I would recommend to anyone who is into the British tradition. I also think that this film should be shown to high school students. There are some great references to Shakespeare, such as the scene in the kitchen where Macbeth sits with his legs crossed, and his eyes fixed on the ground. I think that it was a very good film and I hope that it does well at the box office.

Jerry photo
Jerry

After seeing the film Macbeth, the movie quickly became one of my favorites. I enjoyed the way the story was told. The pacing was perfect and the acting was very good. The cinematography was a little dated and could have been a little better. The score was good, and the score was the only thing that made me aware of it being a serious movie. I believe this film would be great for older children. In fact, I would go so far as to say that this is the best and most frightening play I have seen in my life. The performance of the actors made this film a great family movie to watch.

Philip C. photo
Philip C.

I really liked this film, it was very well made, very dramatic and there were many important scenes that should have been in the play and they were not. The best scene was in the performance of Macbeth at the beginning when Macbeth starts to sing again but instead of the usual drop of the lute, his voice is so beautiful and it reminded me of how I heard it in the old days when I was a child. It is also important to remember that this was not Shakespeare's play and the language of the plays is very different. This is why this scene in the play is especially important, when the man in the hood comes up to Macbeth and says to him: "I see your son, Macbeth." I like the scene because it is very symbolic and yet, the viewer is given the idea that the actor was Macbeth. I also like the scene when Macbeth is stabbed in the head by one of the lovers and Macbeth says "I had him, I would have had him" and the lover says "Why?" to which Macbeth replies: "He had me, he would have had me" I also like the scene when Macbeth is being poisoned by the witches and when he dies and when the Macbeth in the play comes to life again and takes the head of the murderer to his house. The scene where the murderer and Macbeth are walking down the street is also very symbolic. Overall, a very well made film, good acting, good music and good direction. I do recommend this film for anyone who likes to see a new version of Shakespeare's play.

Jesse K. photo
Jesse K.

I've never seen this play before, but I have read the book. I thought it was a good adaptation. The movie was okay, but I did not like it. The movie is a bit slow and it's kind of dull. The scenery was beautiful. It's not very scary. The movie is a little bit depressing, but I think that's the point. It was a good movie, I liked it.

Alice L. photo
Alice L.

This was the first film I saw of the new British play Macbeth by Shakespeare. It is quite a good film. It is a comedy about a paranoid man who is obsessed with his own death. It is a bit too long, but it is quite a good film. The cast is very good, and it has some very funny scenes. I recommend this to anyone who likes comedies. You may be able to see the play at the cinema, but this is a good film.