Steam King of Thieves

King of Thieves

King of Thieves is a movie starring Michael Caine, Michael Gambon, and Charlie Cox. A true crime movie about a crew of retired crooks who pull off a major heist in London's jewelry district. What starts off as their last criminal...

Other Titles
The Over the Hill Mob, Ein letzter Job, Kralj lopova, A tolvajok királya, Rey de los ladrones, The King of Thieves, 盜王之王, Hırsızlar Kralı, El rey de los ladrones, Zagļu karalis, Εντιμότατοι κλέφτες, Rey de ladrones, Król złodziei, Gentlemen cambrioleurs, Ha'Oketz Ha'Gadol, Rei dos Ladrões, Varaste kuningas
Running Time
1 hours 48 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Drama, Crime
James Marsh
Mark Seal, Joe Penhall
Michael Caine, Charlie Cox, Michael Gambon, Jim Broadbent
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

A true crime movie about a crew of retired crooks who pull off a major heist in London's jewelry district. What starts off as their last criminal hurrah, quickly turns into a brutal nightmare due to greed. Based on infamous true events.

Comments about drama «King of Thieves» (24)

Raymond photo

I'm not going to try to argue with you on how brilliant this film is. I'm a fan of Ewan McGregor and Sean Penn and have watched many of their films and TV shows and know them for what they are. That being said. You won't find any 'Masterpiece of the Year' to be had here. There is one great scene that is just plain amazing but it is all overshadowed by the rest of the film. If you don't understand that then the story is interesting enough and it's definitely a film that you could see over and over again. You can definitely see the influences of The Godfather and any of the prequel trilogy. It's also a dark and gloomy movie which is very American in nature. It does a good job of portraying the corruption of society in this time period. In the end I really enjoyed it but was a little let down by the end. It has a couple of really great scenes that is worth the price of admission alone.

Joshua Murray photo
Joshua Murray

Good cast, decent acting, good plot. but as the two leading characters were so nice and I would have loved to see them in more adult roles I think it is just a little to big for them to take on. So, when the boy and the woman went home to his mother she told her that she had been raped. After reading that I kind of hoped they would take it further, but the film was about half over when I got home. I just wished the rest of the film was as well. I would have loved to see more of the old family that the lead character had a connection with.

Austin photo

After a moderately enjoyable, but pretty stale, first feature-length film, Robert Downey, Jr. decided to make a sequel. The second feature-length film that Downey, Jr. has done, is "The Iron Giant". I thought the story was very weak, and the main character, Mighty Mouse, wasn't very interesting. Not much action or emotion was put in the film, and the plot seemed to not really be in the movie, if you want a little more action and emotion to the movie, go see "Rango" instead. The cast members, however, seemed to be enjoying themselves. Stephen Sommers was very good at playing his character, and he put in some very great lines. I also thought he was very funny as he was always into a joke. He also seemed like a very nice guy. I think it was great that they gave some great performances from most of the cast. Jeremy Renner and Maggie Q were also good. Finally, I was very surprised at how well the film was made. I thought it looked very nice, it had nice effects, and the special effects and sets looked like a Pixar film. The only thing I didn't like was how silly the film seemed. I also thought that it seemed to go over the top in the last few scenes. This film is definitely not a must see, but it's definitely worth a look.

Brenda R. photo
Brenda R.

Oscar winner Leonardo DiCaprio brings back the films he made in The Wolf of Wall Street, The Aviator, and The Wolf of Wall Street. With a Razzie award and a Golden Globe nominated for best actor, there is definitely no denying that DiCaprio has achieved one of his best movie roles in a while. On the surface, DiCaprio plays a mobster who attempts to flee the clutches of the law, in order to make a few more bucks on the side. One of the major differences between this and his previous movies is the fact that DiCaprio's character is not professional, but rather he is an actor who is making a living off of acting in movies, and now he wants to live it for real. It was his career that he wanted to do, so he is willing to take on this second time around. Though he may seem like a model in the eyes of the law, he is one man who is not above committing illegal acts if he believes he can get away with it. As it goes in the film, he gets caught and tossed into jail, but instead of being a coward, he decides to go to prison and figure out a way to keep himself out of jail. This is a movie where you have to give it some slack, and I have to give it some slack, as it takes its time. I don't think DiCaprio is the best actor in the world, but he is definitely one of the best actors in Hollywood right now. This is one of his better movies, and it does what it sets out to do. It is not an average movie, but it does what it sets out to do. Some may say that it is a boring movie, but I feel that its formulaic, but it was all about setting up the action set pieces to justify the film. The film doesn't show you the action all of the time, instead it shows you what happens, and how it is going to happen. It sets up the audience for the actual action set pieces, but not only does it use action, but also tells a story about a professional gambler who is not only out of control but also cares for his family and his family's relationships. For a few hours, it is a very relaxing movie, and even the end credit sequences are pleasant. This is one of the best movies of 2015, and DiCaprio does not disappoint. I have seen it four times now, and I cannot wait for it to be available on DVD, so I can watch it again and again. Overall, this is a good movie, but I did not find it to be the best of the year. It is very entertaining, but not up to the level of what it could have been. It is the kind of film that is good for one viewing, but will most likely be forgotten the next day. It is definitely one of

Keith photo

A movie like this is not for everybody. But I was convinced this was one of the finest pieces of cinema I've ever seen. The plot is complex and requires a certain amount of attention. However, the film works in it's own way, and I felt a strong sense of completion for the movie after leaving the cinema. I was fully satisfied with the film, with a film that is thought-provoking and masterful. Not something you would expect from a movie with so many superlatives. This is a film that you should see.

Elizabeth photo

A popular version of the Story of O which was probably written by someone who was of the opinion that the story is not very serious and that therefore, it is the role of the Smith of the film to show the "good guys" as all "evil". This version of O definitely makes more sense than the two versions listed here: this one with Sean Connery and Alec Guinness and this one with Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert De Niro. Sean Connery had the responsibility of the narrator in this version and he shows the role of a father well: it is quite emotional and the way he looks at his sons (although we never see it clearly) is very convincing. He has a lot of conversations with his sons: he is a father himself, he knows what he wants and he does not want his sons to know that he does not want them to do something wrong (and it is also a very good job to show that he does not allow his sons to do something illegal). He does not want his sons to make a mistake that would bring them in the police or the other authorities. And of course, he cannot accept a teenager (Adrian Brody) without knowing his background and the situation he is in. The whole cast was excellent. Alec Guinness was very convincing in this version: he looks like a father, he behaves like a father, he tells the story very well. He does not want to make a mistake that would bring him into the police or the other authorities and he never says a bad word. The only thing I disliked about this version of O is the fact that the most important character in this film is not shown at all: it is the narrator, Mr. Smith, but there are lots of films where he is the main character and that's great, it is not that important that he is not in the film. Leonardo DiCaprio is great in this version of O: he is not in a role that he can not act, he is a very convincing actor. I do not know if the two brothers are really brothers or not but the way they act is very convincing. And I do not know if there is a connection between these brothers: the three brothers seem to be very good friends and the narrator may have told us something about how they met but it is possible that they are not really brothers. All in all: it is an excellent movie and very enjoyable. 7/10

Kathy Johnston photo
Kathy Johnston

What we have here is an interesting film. A lot of the film is a series of flashback sequences, but that is not a bad thing, it is simply that the film is a bit confusing, and the flashbacks are used more than they should be, and that is what is so wrong with this film. It should have been shot like a documentary, because that is how it should have been, and the film should have been as short as it was, because that is how it should have been. The only reason I can think of why they filmed this film that way is because they had no money, and wanted to keep the film short. This film is really interesting, I would recommend it, but I would not say that it is an Oscar-worthy film. I would recommend it to people who are into the crime genre, or are into the gangster films. If you don't like that type of film, this is not for you. There are lots of things that I can say about the film, but I would rather not say anything. If you like crime films, this is for you.

Randy Scott photo
Randy Scott

M. Night Shyamalan is a very good director and most of his movies are very good. The Sixth Sense is a good movie but The Village was a lot worse than The Sixth Sense. This movie, though, is very good. The movie is about a mother, who keeps her son in a mental hospital. The mother is a big fan of a religion and it is the daughter's religion. The daughter is a lesbian. So, the mother is helping her son but is not really understanding what is going on. The mother and the daughter fall in love and then the mother is totally against the religion. So the mother is very lonely. But the daughter is a very good actress. She has a lot of acting skills. And I like the way the father treats his daughter. And the father's faith is very good. The father is the main character in the movie. So I think it is a good movie. It is really good and it is really good.

Angela A. photo
Angela A.

Another sequel of The French Connection. But this time the leads were on the rise, which made it more interesting to watch than most movies with similar plot. While the drug-related murder might have been a bit over the top and the acting all around a bit below average, the story was interesting and the actors did a good job. It's certainly one of those movies that I liked better the second time around.

Eric H. photo
Eric H.

A good film that may have been better in the hands of a better director. The main problem I had with this film was the ending. I think that the director could have left the audience in some doubt about what happens in the film. At the end of the film, you're left wondering whether or not the main character will make it out alive. This is not what the film is about. The ending of this film is a bit of a letdown. But it is still a good film that is worth a look.

Eugene J. photo
Eugene J.

The early part of this film is utterly convincing. But the plot is rather one dimensional. The characters all have one or two qualities that work for them. The other side is too "weird" or "off-the-wall" to be taken seriously. The dialogue is inane, the script is even more off-the-wall, the acting is so wooden. Then in the last third the story suddenly changes into something else, something that is highly improbable but of course plausible. The performance is not as good as the first part, but in the last third it becomes a rather irritatingly "star-crossed-twins-in-reverse" story. The plot is ruined by some rushed editing, the plot is ruined by the inappropriate music. The sound is very wrong, sometimes the music is too loud and at other times too quiet. Then the special effects are hardly plausible. The "unbelievable" ending is a clever piece of acting, but the first half was even better. I recommend this film for people who like urban legends, who like a bit of mystery, and for people who want to see a good thriller.

Brandon Jenkins photo
Brandon Jenkins

The scene in the movie where the father and son meet was one of the most beautiful scenes I have ever seen in a movie. The way they interact with each other was so real and emotional. It was really moving and powerful. The other thing that made this movie so great was the way it depicted the relationship between the father and son. The father was a very caring and loving person, and the son was a very aggressive, jealous and very rebellious person. The father had to work so hard to keep his son from going to jail. He always had to explain to the son the consequences of his actions, and how the consequences would affect his son. The son was also a very smart and clever person. He was always in the right place at the right time, and he knew exactly what he was going to do. This movie had me on the edge of my seat, and I never thought that I would actually like it so much. I went into the movie with high expectations, but I left the movie with a really big smile on my face. I felt that it was a very honest, honest and realistic movie. I definitely recommend this movie to anyone who likes to watch a good movie. I hope that you all give this movie a chance.

Scott Stanley photo
Scott Stanley

Before I go any further, I'd like to say that I'm not a fan of Clint Eastwood. I find him as a performer to be too over-the-top and over-the-top-but I do like his films. I just don't like his acting. Now, for some reason, I had been looking forward to seeing this film, and I'm glad that I did. This film was a surprisingly well-done one. Clint Eastwood plays the lead in this film, and he is absolutely brilliant. He is incredibly believable in this film, as well as extremely well-cast. It is a well-acted film, as well. I think the acting was the best I've seen in a long time. The film is directed by Oliver Stone, who also directed the great JFK. Oliver Stone is a very accomplished director, and he knows what he is doing. This film is a very entertaining one. It is very good-looking. It has great action scenes, and it is very interesting. This film is a definite 8 out of 10 stars, and I highly recommend it. 9 out of 10 stars, and I recommend it. I'm going to go ahead and say that I think this is the best Clint Eastwood film to date.

Johnny Salazar photo
Johnny Salazar

I had a great time watching this film. It had just enough of everything, to make you feel good about the fact that you did watch this movie. The cast was great and the story, well, that is simple, in the same time, with a lot of great performances. But, there was a little bit of a problem. Because it felt, to me, like this film was a love story. It is based on a book by John Grisham and by all accounts, this film seems to take place in the same time period as "The Godfather". But I was not very interested in this film. I didn't like the character played by Tobey Maguire. He seemed to try to hard to be somebody else. He didn't have a good enough voice to me. The only reason why I didn't give it a 9, is because it was great. It had everything that you could want in a film, if you like good stories and good acting. It was just me, who didn't like it. It would be interesting, to see the likes of this film to see what else does not like.

Julie S. photo
Julie S.

It has been over a decade since the last movie from the fantastic "Heathers". I enjoyed this movie, but it doesn't give a lot of reasons to think that it was an improvement on the first. I love movie comedies, but it did have one thing that I liked. Kevin James has such a great voice. I like his funny character. He's funny and sad and is definitely one of my favorite actors. I haven't seen the movie since it came out, and I was like. wow, this is awesome. Now I have no idea why, it's like it was missing something. Now I'm just thinking "Oh wow, the movie was so good".

Matthew Pena photo
Matthew Pena

Oh my gosh I could see all the folks in the audience went up to them and gave them applause and thank yous for what they did. I can see why they did. The acting is good all around. I think it's great to see Christian Bale back in action after the Batman movies. The music is amazing as well. I like that all the pieces fall into place. You can just tell that everything works together to make this a great film. The other thing I really liked about the film is that you can really see the differences between society in this country and others. I think people need to look at the flaws in the system and make changes to help the little guy. This is the message that is being put out today that has me thinking about things I want to be able to change. This is a great movie and I would recommend it to any fan of action films. I recommend seeing it!

Teresa F. photo
Teresa F.

I have never seen this movie before, but it was recommended to me by a friend who also saw it. And I was amazed. I just have to say that I am not a big fan of this kind of movies. The cast of this movie is great. Everyone plays their part very well. I don't think it would have been possible to do a better job. Especially The Sheriff and his deputies played a very good part. I think that the actors should have gotten a nomination for this movie. I also like the music in this movie, especially the scene where it starts. It is just great. I don't know why it hasn't gotten an Oscar. I also think that the movie is very different from the other movies that are out there. I think that it is a very good movie and it deserves a lot of recognition. The actors and actresses did a good job in this movie. I am very surprised that this movie is not getting more attention. I would like to say that this is a good movie and that it deserves to be in the top 100. I think that everyone should see it at least once. It is one of the best movies I have seen in my life. I am not going to give it 10 stars. But I give it 8/10 stars.

Jordan Lynch photo
Jordan Lynch

I like this movie because it was not based on a book. The story is realistic, the actors are good, the cinematography is good and the music is good. I enjoyed this movie for the reason that it is more than just a violent movie. It is a story of love and respect, not just the love of a man for his family but for all people and for the fact that we are all in this world and we all deserve to be treated with respect. As for the violence, I think that it was just a part of this movie, like I said, it was realistic and there is a message that I get from this movie. I do not think that the violence was needed to make this movie a success. I think that it was a movie that should have been in theaters because of it's honesty and it's message. I hope that other people will read this review and see what I am trying to say.

Sean McDonald photo
Sean McDonald

This film is a fascinating study of a small group of people who get caught up in a scheme to move a massive sum of money. This movie has everything, from amazing cinematography to interesting characters to gripping plot twists. It is the best movie I have seen in a while. It is a must-see for anyone who is into their movies and doesn't mind spending a little money to see them.

Scott O. photo
Scott O.

When I first heard about this film, I thought it was going to be some pretty good, light hearted film about a group of bank robbers who steal money from a bank. I mean it's got a bad guy, a woman, a mob boss, and a police detective, but who cares about them? What I got was a film that was really good, but not too great, it had a decent plot, a good cast, and a great ending. The main character, Tommy, was a gangster who went to jail after robbing a bank. The cop, Frank, was trying to get him out, but Tommy didn't want to get out of jail. It was a really great film, I didn't want it to end, and the ending was really good. When I first saw it I thought it was going to be another pretty good film, but I was wrong, I was right, it was a good film, but not as good as some other films I've seen.

Willie photo

This movie is not as good as I thought it would be. I thought it would be about a brilliant thief and his life and how he deals with all his problems. The movie starts off with a very realistic and interesting scene of the protagonist, The Joker, in prison. This is the best part of the movie because it really takes you into the mind of this genius criminal and you see his motivation. He thinks that he is a god. The story itself is very similar to The Big Lebowski and I thought it was a little too far fetched. The movie is not bad and the acting was pretty good but I still can't really recommend it. I think that if you're into crime films then you would enjoy it but I would say if you're not into crime films then I would not recommend it.

Ann B. photo
Ann B.

I never want to write a movie review on this site, but I'm going to make an exception for this film, because I feel compelled to speak out on this film. My friend and I saw this movie at an out of town special screening and were both blown away. We were both very pleased with the whole experience, even though I didn't think it would be up to par with the other films in the series. We were expecting something different and funny, which it definitely is not. It is a very serious film, but it still manages to be entertaining, particularly the story, the performances and the acting. Although I never considered it to be one of the best films I've ever seen, I still thought it was a very good film, and it is definitely worth seeing. I hope the sequels are much better, as I don't want them to feel the same way I did with this one.

Adam photo

I'm not sure where to begin. I can't even describe it in a few words. I guess I can sum it up in three words: the first act was excellent, the second act was good, the third act was good, but the last act was actually a bit of a let down. To be honest, I thought the first act was really great, but it seemed like the movie was really taking a dive into the third act. It was a bit confusing, and it seemed like the director was trying to make a movie out of the first act. When you think about it, that's probably what he was doing. I was quite disappointed. I liked the first act, but it was a good one. It was an entertaining movie, I just didn't like it. The second act was good, but the third act just felt a bit rushed. I would say it was the third act that was a let down. I have to say that the last act was the best part of the movie, and I really enjoyed it. Overall, I would say that this is a good movie, but it could have been better.

Ann C. photo
Ann C.

In my opinion, this is the best film of the year. It is not for everyone, but I think it is worth watching. I was very surprised to see the title of the film as it was a prequel to the 1999 film, "Shakespeare in Love". This film is not about two men who steal Shakespeare, but two men who steal the love of another man. I think the most important element to this film is that it was directed by the same man that directed the great "Shakespeare in Love", Robert Altman. The way he tells the story is very similar to the way he told the story in "Shakespeare in Love". I hope that he does not make any more films like this one. He is a great director and I am sure that he will make many great films in the future. I hope that he will continue to make films like "Shakespeare in Love" because he did a great job directing that film.