Steam Red Joan

Red Joan

Red Joan is a movie starring Judi Dench, Sophie Cookson, and Stephen Campbell Moore. The story of Joan Stanley (Dame Judi Dench), who was exposed as the K.G.B.'s longest-serving British spy.

Other Titles
Ha'Sodot shel Joan, 紅色密令, A vörös ügynök, En spions bekendelser, A Espiã Vermelha, Crvena Joan, Uma Traição Necessária, Geheimnis eines Lebens, Η Κόκκινη Τζόαν, Red Joan: Au Service Secret de Staline, Tajemnice Joan, Red Joan-confessions of a spy, La espía roja
Running Time
1 hours 41 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Drama, Biography, Romance, History
Trevor Nunn
Lindsay Shapero, Jennie Rooney
Stephen Campbell Moore, Judi Dench, Sophie Cookson, Tom Hughes
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

English-born Joan Stanley (Dame Judi Dench), a Soviet and Communist Party sympathizer, becomes employed as a British government civil servant, and gets recruited by the K.G.B. in the mid 1930s. She successfully transfers nuclear bomb secrets to Soviet Russia, which enables them to keep up with the west in the development of atomic weapons, and remains undetected as a spy for over a half a century.

Comments about drama «Red Joan» (20)

Louis Hall photo
Louis Hall

With a title like "A Darker Side of Joan of Arc" and the title of the film itself, it's no surprise that the film was written by the same person that wrote the script for "The Da Vinci Code". The problem with that is that, in this case, the plot is very basic, and the film is too long. The problem is that the plot of the film is simple. The film was supposed to tell a story about Joan of Arc, the legendary women's knight. In reality, it's a story about the execution of a woman. The film is a simple tale, with a simple story. It's like watching a Hollywood production. The director of the film, Nicholas Winding Refn, wrote the script for this film. He did a good job in directing the film, but the script of the film is very simple. The film is not as good as it could have been, but it is not terrible. The film is a good watch for the viewer who likes a good story with a simple plot. I would recommend this film to those who want to watch a film about a famous historical figure, such as Joan of Arc. It is a good film to watch, but it is not as good as it could have been.

Lawrence photo

If I were to rank this movie, it would be in the top 5. The story, the acting, the special effects, and the music. This movie was one of the most creative and interesting movies I have ever seen. It was so good I watched it twice in one day. The acting was amazing, especially from Jason Priestley. The only thing that I didn't like about this movie was the ending. I wish it was better but it was pretty good. This movie was one of the best movies I have ever seen and it is a must see for all.

Zachary photo

There is a little bit of a twist to this film, but it's not very exciting. The title itself should be an indicator of the film's tone. The way the film opens with a vignette of two girls in love is cute, but quickly we move to the younger sister of one of the girls, a little girl who is being raised by her stepfather. This girl is the only one that really matters in the story. She's the only one who really cares about the older sister, the one who has everything going for her, and the girl who's about to marry her stepfather. It's all just so tragic and depressing. The plot is very slow, and even though it's an American film, it seems a little like it's from Europe. The film's biggest problem is that it has some really uninteresting characters, and the film doesn't do anything to develop them, except for the first 20 minutes. Even then, it's only a short period of time. It seems that the film just has a lot of plot points, and they are very long. The film is very slow and boring. The acting is pretty good, with great performances from the two main actors, and the girl who plays the younger sister is very good. She's a little bit too naive, but she's still very good. I think this film is very well-made. The direction is very good, and the music is excellent. The movie is not that great, but it's not that bad either. It's definitely a film that's worth watching. I give it a B.

Alan G. photo
Alan G.

I watched this movie for the first time when I was in college. I was confused by the "twist" and what was going on in the movie. I watched it again a few months later and I understood what was going on. The movie was great. It is about a group of people that lived during the revolutionary era of the late 19th century. The movie takes place in England and New York during the American Civil War. The main character is Edward Brooke. Edward is a young man from England who is trying to find his place in the world. He is interested in painting and he dreams of traveling to America. His mother has made a pact with a nobleman that she will go to America with him. When Edward arrives in New York he meets his mentor and his friend William Delano. William has many friends in America and they invite Edward to stay at their estate. Edward takes the invitation and they stay at the Delano estate. The Delanos had many servants and Edward soon finds himself with a full house. The Delanos wanted to impress Edward with his art and Edward is ready to impress them. Edward soon discovers that the Delanos are not the friends he thought they were. The movie was really well done and I think it is one of those movies that you can watch over and over again. I recommend it to anyone who wants to learn more about the times of the American Revolution.

Frances photo

I am writing this review after watching this film for the first time. I was a movie-lover in the 80's, having seen movies from the likes of Adam Sandler, Dennis Hopper, Judd Nelson, Tom Cruise, Bob Saget, Alec Baldwin, and so on. I just finished watching this film on the Blu-ray disc and it is a tremendous movie. It is a bit slow in places, but is a little slow at times, but it is very well done. The story, though it is about a woman who lost her child and is now a witch, is not too heavy. The acting is very good. But, the main thing that holds this film together is the casting. The cast does a fantastic job. The actors have given a very good performance, with the exception of the parents, who are only good for a few minutes, but you can't help but love them. This is not a children's movie, but has a lot of heart and is a great film. I highly recommend this movie to anyone.

Mildred Grant photo
Mildred Grant

I didn't know what to expect going into this film. I had seen the film on Lifetime and had heard about the history of the King and Queen. I had also seen the movie featured on The History Channel. I wasn't sure if I was going to be into this movie. The truth was that I wasn't. I had been told by my friends that it was "so bad it's good". I was wrong. It's so bad that it's good. I couldn't help but love it. This movie does the history justice. The acting was fantastic, the cinematography was beautiful, and the scenery was stunning. I don't think that I have ever seen a movie that was so beautiful. I have not seen a movie that was so good. I could not take my eyes off of this movie. There are so many emotions that the movie is able to create in you. The storyline is amazing. I felt so moved by it. The visuals, the music, and the acting were amazing. This movie shows you the true story of the War of the Roses. The good and bad sides of the King and Queen. It was an amazing movie, and I can't wait to see it again.

Ethan Hughes photo
Ethan Hughes

Having not seen the book this film was made to follow I didn't know what to expect from the film. What I got was a film that is very well made and actually good on it's own merits. The cast are great. The movie is filmed in a way that is very moving and emotional. The acting is excellent and the drama and emotion is very well done. I would have liked to see a little more depth to the story, but it is very well written. It is a good film to watch and a must see for anyone who is a fan of historical drama.

Patrick Ford photo
Patrick Ford

I loved this movie. It was all so real, very well acted and just good. Not a lot of big stars or stuff in it, but a lot of good stuff. It was nice to see the acting of a young actress. Very good job by her. It was a very good movie. I would say it was a little long, but the movie itself was really well done. It was worth seeing and I think that it was one of the best movies I have ever seen. It was good to see a movie that was not super-heroes and stars, and it was good to see a movie that was not the usual Hollywood cliche's, that was just good. I would recommend this movie to anyone. It was very good. 8/10

Sandra Bailey photo
Sandra Bailey

This is a beautiful film, a great example of what a good screenplay can accomplish. Although the subject matter is not particularly uplifting, the performances of all the actors were really great. I particularly enjoyed Nick Nolte's portrayal of the wayward young man, who grew up in a poor family and was obviously very interested in becoming a doctor. I also really liked the way each character was made into an individual rather than just a series of stereotypes. For example, the wonderful Sofia Vergara played the role of the attractive, charming, and sexy wife very well, while the tragic, and much more tragic, John Leguizamo played the role of the very strong, and more powerful, husband. Both of these guys have such great potential, and they really showed their acting potential in this movie. This film is a true work of art. I highly recommend it.

Evelyn photo

The movie starts out like any other documentary style film. And like any documentary style film it is a really good watch. There are scenes in the movie that are very moving and hard to watch. I think the most important part of the movie is that it is very important to listen to the people in the movie. It is hard to find out who is who and who is not. The movie is very much about the injustice of the Spanish civil war. And this is very important for anyone who has never seen a documentary style film. There is a scene where Joan is telling her husband that her husband is not going to be able to live after the war. And the husband responds, "Yes, you are right, we don't have a lot of time". Joan says, "Well, we have a lot of time because we are married to a man who will not be able to live". I think this is an important point to understand. Joan was a very courageous woman who stood up for what she believed in and her husband knew that she would be fighting to end the war. She would fight to end the war for herself and her family. I think this is important to know and is a great movie to see. I recommend this movie to anyone who wants to learn more about the Spanish Civil War. I give this movie a 7 out of 10.

Emma T. photo
Emma T.

I think that the film is very much about the experience of a young woman who was born in a French colony in the 1700's and who lost her family in a war with a rival colony. Through her personal experience she has learned to understand her nation's colonial history and how that influenced her. She believes that she is a citizen of the Congo and that her family is still alive in the Congo. She is also a very stubborn woman. She doesn't want to go back to the Congo and she feels that she has to defend her people and her nation by fighting against the Belgians. The film is really about her world view. It was very interesting to see how she became a journalist and her feelings towards the world and her world. The film was very interesting. It was very interesting to see what she learned from her family's past and what was the influence that the colonial world had on her.

Nicholas Ortega photo
Nicholas Ortega

I saw this movie on HBO in 1983 and have been wanting to see it again for many years, so I decided to finally see it this past weekend on a rainy Sunday afternoon. I was a bit skeptical going into it as I was already familiar with the story. However, it was a wonderful movie and I would highly recommend it. The story is that of a prostitute who at the age of 13 was beaten to death by her boss, but was then forced into prostitution and the story follows her life as she starts a new life as a woman in New York City. I have seen many movies about women in this day and age, but this is the only one that I have ever seen that was truly about the women and not the men in the story. In the beginning, I thought the movie was going to be a little bit slow and boring, but then it picked up and was even better. The story is really well done and the acting was very good. I think the director should have gotten the Academy Award for this movie. The movie is set in New York and it was shot in New York, but it was also filmed in the old Italian and French streets of New York. It was shot with a variety of cameras, so there was a good variety of camera work. It is a very well done movie, and it deserves a much better rating than I have given it. The story is great, but I think the movie is also a little bit sad. I am sure that there were many other women in the story who had a similar experience, but it is also sad that the story of this one woman can never be told. This is one of those movies that you should see if you have any interest in the story of women in the twentieth century and what it was like to be a woman in the early 1900's.

Andrea W. photo
Andrea W.

I can't help but wonder how someone could actually have the guts to write such a flop as this. I was fascinated by the film's "innocent" content and by the image of the naked naked Joan. I had to see this film because it was on TV and I was bored, so I thought I'd give it a shot. I have to say I was disappointed. The movie tries to be "charming" and to a certain extent, it succeeds. I didn't find the acting or the story-line very believable, and the characters are so unlikeable that I was literally rooting for the bad guys. I've never been a big fan of Guy Ritchie, but I thought this movie was his worst work to date. I think he should stick to his own kind of movies, and if he ever wants to make a big budget movie, he should try to use real actors and not overact. As far as the nudity goes, I don't mind it at all. I think it's perfectly acceptable. It's not as bad as a lot of people make it out to be. But what's the point in watching a movie if you don't really care about the characters and the plot? In the end, I think the movie is very superficial and the viewer is left feeling empty. It doesn't seem like a movie about the trial of Joan of Arc. It seems like a movie about a single night in the life of the queen. I think the movie is a good example of a "Rouge" film. I can't believe I ever saw such a great movie. The only thing I can say is that it's a good example of a "charming" movie. If you like "Titanic" and "Kingdom of Heaven" then this movie is for you.

Jeremy photo

This film is based on a true story. The movie is not like most other movies, it is more of a drama. But it is an honest drama, with realistic characters. There are no heroes, just human beings. A true story that could be true.

George H. photo
George H.

We've all heard stories of World War II. I've seen the movie and I can tell you it's a pretty good one. This film does it's best to tell a story of a young girl, a young girl who's in love with a German soldier who is being killed in the war. The film is based on the book by Rolf Zeschling. The story is told in a slow and methodical way. There are a lot of flashbacks in the film. The film takes place in Germany, and tells the story of a girl who is at the mercy of her parents and her sister, and how her sister learns to protect her sister from her father. The film is very emotional and shows how the sister's relationship with her mother is also a struggle. I thought the film was a very good film. It did a good job at showing the horrors of war. I felt it was realistic and showed what it was like for the people who were in the war. It also showed the power of love. I would recommend this film to anyone who is interested in the war.

Aaron photo

When I read the title, I expected a film about the struggle for women's right in the 20th century, but when I saw the trailers I was reminded of the 1927 film "Amelie" about a German girl who can't speak a word of English. So when I got the chance to watch "Amelie" on Netflix, I got a chance to see a different version of the story, which I thought was pretty well done. It's a new story, and while I don't think it's better than the original film, I think it's a decent film. "Amelie" was a German film, so I don't know how it will be perceived in the U.S., but I found it to be an enjoyable film. There are some minor problems with the film, but it's still enjoyable. I thought that the characters in "Amelie" were well-written. You liked "Amelie," and if you have seen the original film, you will also like "Amelie." The characters in "Amelie" are very well-written, and their relationships are very believable. The film has a strong, original score that is very good, and it just adds to the film. The performances in the film are good, and I thought the direction was also very good. This is an interesting film to watch, and it's a good film to watch if you have time to spare. It's well-written, well-directed, well-acted, and it's a good film to watch if you have time.

Stephen Richardson photo
Stephen Richardson

I'll start off by saying that I am not a fan of John Lennon. The music and lyrics are mostly boring and even boring. But I am a fan of the man and of his songs. This movie is the closest thing I've seen to the real John Lennon. The acting is good. But I don't like the fact that they take the album and put a movie together around it. The songs are good but the movie is pretty bad. They make the movie look like it's from the 60s. I'm a big John Lennon fan but this movie was horrible. The movie is a decent watch for John Lennon fans but not a great watch for anyone else.

Frances photo

What a surprise this film was. I was expecting a dull film, but this was amazing. A stunning combination of documentaries, comedy and drama, it just goes to show that a great story, can be told in such a way that is great to watch. It is not perfect, but I think it is one of the best films of 2013 and I am looking forward to seeing it again. I had never seen the documentary before, but now I feel like I can get behind it and the story is so true and the way it was filmed was great. The acting is great and the music is beautiful. The film is worth a watch. I can not wait for the DVD release. If you haven't seen it yet, I recommend you do. I am giving it an 8.5/10.

Deborah photo

I watched this movie because of its great performances by the young actresses. I had no idea of who they were. I do not think they were good actors and I think this movie is not for people who want to see them act. However, I do think that this is a movie that one must see in order to get a good understanding of the times in which this was produced. I think the movie is interesting because of the references to today's world. The actors are very good and the director and the writer did a great job on the screenplay. The movie is not a drama and the main character is not the main character in the movie. In addition, the movie is not a movie for kids, it is a movie that one must see in order to get a better understanding of the times in which this movie was produced. I would recommend this movie to all ages because it is not for kids. I give it an 8 out of 10.

Katherine photo

I've never been so impressed with a movie before. I love history, and I love everything about this film. I think that all the actors did an outstanding job, especially Maori actor, John Travolta. I didn't see him in any other movie, but he did an outstanding job here, as did his co-star, Jennifer Lopez. The music, the costumes, the costumes, everything about this movie is amazing. I think that this is the best movie I've seen in a long time. I couldn't take my eyes off of it. I highly recommend this movie to everyone. My rating: 8 out of 10.