Steam A Small Good Thing

A Small Good Thing

A Small Good Thing is a movie starring Stephen Cope, Tim Durrin, and Shirley Edgerton. We've sought ease, comfort and wealth - but are people happier with more money? What is the science behind a good life? Following several people...

Running Time
1 hours 11 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
History, News, Documentary
Director
Pamela Tanner Boll
Writer
Pamela Tanner Boll, Nancy Kennedy
Actors
Tim Durrin, Shirley Edgerton, Mark Gerow, Stephen Cope
Country
Greece, Rwanda, USA
Year
2015
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

For the longest time, we've been living as though the more we have -- the more money, the more goods, the more territory -- the happier we'll be. Following six people in one community over a year, A SMALL GOOD THING looks at the small truths that are creating the New American Dream.

Comments about history «A Small Good Thing» (68)

Kathy Castro photo
Kathy Castro

This movie does not show all the situations but it shows how the situation has changed over time. It also shows that the citizens have changed. I think that it is very important for people to see how the American public has changed over the years. I do not think that we have ever seen a movie that has shown the changing attitudes and beliefs of the American people. If you want to see a movie that is based on facts then I suggest that you watch this movie.

Marilyn J. photo
Marilyn J.

The title is a bit misleading. Although it was a nice look at the inner workings of a well known university in Sweden, the film was nothing more than a puff piece. The 'story' is very weak, and the 'dramatization' was weak. It was neither as informative nor as interesting as it should have been. To those who feel that this is a great documentary, then you are mistaken. I think the purpose of the film was to provide a good look at the Swedish system, and the way it has been run since the 70's. To those who believe that it was a great documentary, then you are probably as stupid as I am. The truth is, this film was not a great documentary, and it didn't do anything to help the Swedish system. The only reason I give it a 7 is because the film was interesting. If you are a student in Sweden, then this film is definitely not for you. But if you are an American, or if you are in the US, then watch it. I have never heard of any university in the US where a student can enjoy the life of a professor, or the freedom of speech, or the non-censorship of speech. The freedom of speech is a thing that is far more important than the freedom to produce films. And, of course, a film is something that must be free from censorship. And the movie is free from censorship. It is one of the few films that can be shown in the USA without the censor. But, again, I think that the film is not as interesting as it should have been. I think it is better to watch it with an open mind. It is not that the film is a terrible film, but it is not the greatest. If you are a student in Sweden, then this film is not for you. If you are an American, then watch it. It is worth watching. But, again, this film is not the greatest. 7/10

Sarah photo
Sarah

I watched this film on Netflix a couple of weeks ago. I had not seen a film about the new route in Keystone, Nebraska, since I lived in the area for 10 years, but I don't recall that there had ever been anything made about the operation. I did not know that the film was being filmed in Nebraska. And I loved this film. I liked the fact that it showed the many views of the town and its environs, from inside the walls of the prison, to the homes, and the fields of wheat. The film had a really good pace and was beautifully shot. I thought the film was well-directed and well-produced. And I loved the fact that the film focused on the positive aspects of the town and not just on the negative aspects of the operation. The characters were realistic, and the interactions between them were realistic. It also had a really good message and good messages about compassion, forgiveness, and life. Overall, I thought that the film was well-made, well-directed, and well-produced. I recommend it to anyone who is interested in this topic. It is well worth seeing.

Nicole D. photo
Nicole D.

This documentary is made in 2009 and it is interesting to see how the US gets into situations such as the one the former president was in. This documentary also shows the current political scene and also shows what is happening in Iraq. The documentary is quite interesting and has some information about the current situation in Iraq, and some things about the US military that is using the country. The film is very informative, but the narration is quite difficult to understand. The narration also makes it difficult to understand what is going on, but this is understandable since the narration is very slow. The documentary also shows how America has become more of a criminal and how it is a big part of the problems in Iraq and other countries. Overall, this is a very good documentary that gives you an idea of how the United States gets into all kinds of problems, including its own problems. This documentary is also good to see the current political scene in the US, and it is also interesting to see what is happening in Iraq.

Christopher photo
Christopher

I saw this at the AFI Film Festival in L.A. I'm not a huge fan of Quentin Tarantino, but I did like this movie. It's a good story about the importance of what you have, and what you do to get it. This is the first film that I've seen by Tarantino, and I'm looking forward to seeing more of his work. This is a must see movie for all fans of Tarantino.

Patricia photo
Patricia

This documentary is a great example of what can be done with a film. It tells the story of the global warming movement from the perspective of the people who are fighting it. The film includes interviews with the leaders of countries who are fighting global warming, and gives a pretty clear picture of what the movement is all about. It also features some great interviews with some of the world's leading climate scientists, and gives a good overview of the science behind global warming. The documentary is also very well made, with a great use of slow motion, great sound, and great photography. Overall, this is a great documentary that you should see. I give it an 8 out of 10.

Kyle photo
Kyle

I am not a big fan of any of the movies this movie is about, and I was pleasantly surprised by this one. It was different from other documentaries, and it was a little better than I expected. I enjoyed it, and I hope that the producers will release it on DVD.

Jane photo
Jane

I am really a fan of Michael Moore, but I do think that he exaggerates the situation. I am not sure about the complete amount of oil in the world, but I am pretty sure that most of it is in the Middle East. If the government of Iraq had made the decision to withdraw, then the situation would have been much worse. Iraq would have had a much larger population and a much larger oil industry. Iraq had a more developed and wealthy economy, and it would have been harder for the oil companies to find it. The US could have had more control over its oil resources, and the US had a much better control over the Middle East than Iraq had. It is interesting that in his film, Moore doesn't seem to realize that there were oil fields in Iraq. Moore only shows that it is difficult to find oil in the Middle East. I would like to know how much oil there is in the Middle East. I hope that Michael Moore makes more documentaries that show the economic, political, and social problems in the Middle East. My vote is 7.

Rachel Tucker photo
Rachel Tucker

I just wanted to say that this is the best film that I have seen this year. The story is well told and it is a beautiful story of the film industry. I was very impressed with the images and the video quality. I would definitely recommend it to anyone that has a passion for film. The image quality was very good and I would like to know the name of the director and producer of this film.

Gregory Rose photo
Gregory Rose

Somewhere in the summer of 2007, a small, anonymous group of filmmakers produced a feature-length documentary about an American political candidate, showing how it became his campaign. The film, "The Death of a Liberal," was then followed by a two-part television series, "Tales of the Dead." While these two films are ostensibly about the candidates, they are really about politics in general. This is true, of course, but the documentaries are "candidate" films more than anything else. They are also about the American political system, and what goes into winning an election. The first film's principal character, David Beymer, is a journalist who has been covering the presidential race for The Washington Post. He is a longtime Democrat, but is well-known for his articles on Trump and Cruz. Beymer meets a young woman, Marlene. She is also a reporter covering the race, and they quickly fall in love. Their relationship is brief, but deep. It is not until they have gone on to work together for a year that they become engaged. The next year, they have their first child together. The couple decide to run for president, even though there is no Republican candidate who they are really excited about. They learn that they will probably lose, but decide to run anyway. But they end up winning. They decide to run for governor of Texas. They decide to run for president, too. The film's main idea is that, in this election cycle, there are now two candidates in Texas. The Democratic candidate is Wendy Davis. She is a college professor who is running for the Senate. The Republican candidate is Greg Abbott. He is a state senator. Both are getting a lot of press, and the media is constantly talking about them. But the media doesn't care that much. This is a new dynamic in American politics. Previously, the candidates had been the elected officials. They didn't have a lot of exposure. But now, the candidate is a person running for the office. It is not the media, the media, or a wide array of pundits that are interested in these candidates. It is the people in the election system, the voters. A lot of people want to vote for Wendy Davis, but she isn't a very popular politician. Even though she has a good chance of winning the election, people still don't like her. The media doesn't care either. She doesn't have much of a chance. If she wins, it is because she has an appeal to the base of the Republican Party, who want to see her succeed. When a candidate like Wendy Davis, who is running for the senate, gets a lot of attention from the media, she is going to be more popular. It is the same reason why all the attention will be given to Greg Abbott. The other main character is Ben Wikler. Wikler is a web developer in San Francisco. He is

Jeffrey photo
Jeffrey

The use of various documentaries about the Vietnam War and how they relate to each other and to the people in them is so powerful that it is almost painful to watch. It makes one realize that not all war is bad and that sometimes it is just a form of revenge. The documentary is also very revealing and interesting about the way people deal with the war. The ones who fight and the ones who don't. There are also some very disturbing scenes in the film. I really like this documentary and recommend it to anyone who wants to know more about the Vietnam War. I also like how the filmmaker showed a lot of footage from Vietnam and how it made me feel like I was there. I think this is a great documentary that should be seen by everyone. I think that this is a must see documentary.

David Andrews photo
David Andrews

A small good thing, was one of the most amazing things to happen to my life. When I found out that I had the disease I have, I decided to take a few months off my life. I had not thought much about it but I decided to take a few months off and really think about what it would be like if I was there. I saw a doctor who told me that I would be there for about 5 years and it was really nice to get a chance to reflect. I came back and I had a big smile on my face. I felt very comfortable in the way that I had done it. I had an amazing time. The movie was very interesting and it made me want to do it again. It was very nice to see my brother at the beginning of the movie. He is in a wheelchair and he is doing so well. It was so nice to see my mother and my aunt. I think they were really nice to me. The movie was very nice to me and I am so glad that I took the time to do it. I was so happy that I could share it with everyone. I know that I could use a little encouragement now and then. I wish I could have done more but it was so nice to do something so nice for myself. It is really nice to be able to be a part of something so nice.

Brenda Meyer photo
Brenda Meyer

This is a good documentary that focuses on the various acts of activism that have happened in recent years. It has an interesting collection of interviews with some of the same people, and it includes some footage from some of the demonstrations and the protests that took place in Europe and America in recent years. This documentary does a good job of capturing some of the most important acts of activism, including the rise of Occupy Wall Street, the Stop Online Piracy Act, the release of the NSA surveillance documents and the debates over torture. It also includes clips of the protests in Tunisia, Greece and other countries. This is a good documentary that is well worth seeing. I give it an A.

Tiffany F. photo
Tiffany F.

This is a nice look at a controversial topic that has not been touched on much in the recent past. In fact, I think the amount of information about this topic that is being revealed is probably a good thing. I don't know if this topic has been adequately discussed in the past. I'm not a medical professional but I don't think it's too much to ask that we learn about all of the possible causes of autism. It's not a new idea but some have been exploring the subject. The film does a good job of showing the issues surrounding autism in the past and current. It also touches on the subject of what the benefits of autism are, and how people may be able to benefit from the condition. The problem is that it's very easy to forget that we are talking about a mental illness. I think that it's a very interesting topic that has not been properly explored in the past. I think it's a great topic for a film that shows all of the potential benefits that autism can bring. It's certainly not a topic that is going to go away anytime soon. The film is not overly informative and there are a few points that are missing. The documentary is not perfect but it's worth a watch.

Megan H. photo
Megan H.

The history of this movie is an extremely moving piece of cinema, especially in a way that I don't remember seeing in any other film. It has no filler, everything is what it should be, and the accuracy in every detail makes it a film you will remember and remember for a long time. It also gives you the right to feel emotionally involved in the lives of the people, and that is a rare thing in this day and age. This film was done by award winning documentary filmmakers, and the way they connected the different story threads was really important to me. This was also a great documentary that showed how important it is to stay connected to your friends, family and all of the people you have met throughout your life.

Emma W. photo
Emma W.

The film is about the value of life and what is most important to us. This film is an important film. There are some bad things about the film, like the filming of the interview, but in general this film is a good film. This film is a good film. The movie was interesting, but at the end, I thought it was just like another movie. Like some other movie, this movie tries to say something about the world and how it is going to change, but it is just a typical Hollywood film. I think it is a good film, but I think it is a little overrated. The movie is worth seeing, but it is not worth paying to see. It is worth seeing for the message of life and how it is important to each of us.

Kyle photo
Kyle

This documentary is a film that will stand the test of time and is the very epitome of a well-made documentary. It is the story of a doctor who spent his life in cancer care. He does a good job of telling the story of his career and the people who cared for him and how he was able to overcome the various kinds of treatments he received. He also shares the details of his son's disease, which is very upsetting, and the extent of his son's prognosis. The reason he decided to make this film is because he wanted to share what he learned and what he experienced with others. The film is quite informative and at times depressing. It shows that cancer does not discriminate and can affect everyone of any age. The story of Michael and his son is extremely moving and was a wonderful example of how life was at that time for these two people. The documentary is well worth seeing.

Keith photo
Keith

This is a very powerful documentary that is a MUST SEE for anyone who has ever been in a relationship or knows someone who is going through a breakup. I have met a few women and even more men who have experienced breakups that were so overwhelming and personal that I feel the need to share the video. I know many people in my life and this video does NOT represent all of the things that go on in our relationships, but if you are one of those people who do not like this type of documentary you will likely hate it. I would recommend this film to anyone who is in a relationship. The people interviewed were honest and open and gave their stories without any hiding of their feelings. For people who do not like this type of documentary, I can assure you that you will hate this film. I can only hope that this film is used to raise awareness of this issue, and that people who are in relationships see this film and use it to understand what is going on in their relationship.

Thomas G. photo
Thomas G.

This documentary was made in 2006 and I think I saw it before then. The director was Jack Black and he had a point to make but did not seem to have a good handle on the subject of the documentary. I think the first time I saw this I thought that it was a pretty good documentary and the second time I watched it I thought it was just alright. I think it was the same story but they just had different things to say about it. I also think that the subject was better in the second time. I think the film is interesting and I give it a 7 out of 10.

Rachel M. photo
Rachel M.

This is a short documentary that covers the works of six prominent artists. They include: Larry Clark, Don Calfa, Harry Chapin, Les Chantiers, and Anselm Kiefer. The interviews were conducted in both French and English and were well edited and well presented. This is a nice introduction to the artists and is well worth seeing.

Christine B. photo
Christine B.

I saw this movie at the Chicago Independent Film Festival and it was great. I am in the process of researching an author for my next book and the very nature of my topic and subject matter made this movie a great fit. It was a very honest look at the government's view of the people and the people's role in maintaining and controlling it. The audience I saw this with was very honest and very excited to learn more about their government and how it was run. I was particularly moved by the portrayal of former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. I felt that the acting in the movie was very well done. I enjoyed seeing Mark Boal's work, but I really didn't like the direction that he took the film in. Overall, I found this movie very entertaining and recommend it to anyone who enjoys a documentary or an intelligent look at the government.

Gloria F. photo
Gloria F.

I have to admit that I saw this movie the first time and I didn't like it very much. It is a very slow documentary. The camera doesn't move, and it seems like it's a movie that is not that important to the viewer. I never got a clear feeling that it is important to the viewer. I don't know how the movie got such good reviews, but it's a bad sign. It's a little documentary that doesn't have much value to the viewer. It is a little film that has to do with a well known movie, that the viewer has to be involved in it to know what is happening. But it's not that good.

Jerry Webb photo
Jerry Webb

This movie is beautifully shot. It tells the story of the Panama Canal in a way that feels so personal and real. It is a journey into a hidden world that is so much more complicated than the image of the Panama Canal on the surface. There is a silent cinema as well as music. The movie is centered around a single visit to Panama by the director, James Cameron. The trip is very personal as it involves a lot of the cameras used in the film. There is a good mixture of interviews with people that were involved in the canal, and one of the most interesting interviews is with Juan Andres Romero, a filmmaker who was involved in the Panamanian movement. His film is a testimony of how something so grand and important could be lost in the process of building the canal. It is worth the watch.

Justin photo
Justin

Totally fascinating documentary. It is well worth watching. No one can completely understand the complexity of human behaviour - but this film does so in a compelling and fascinating way. I think it is the first such film that presents an analysis of the people involved in a mass disaster without using any social or political ideology or agenda. It is instead based on a number of interviews with experts and other experts - and it was conducted by a journalist for the BBC, so the BBC, a news organization, must be acknowledged. In my opinion, the film is an indictment of the system that allows people to profit from human misery, and is a call to action for people to make the necessary changes to get the lives they have. And to do it without the blessings of the liberal media, which, I am sure, will be looking for ways to censor this film. Watch it, and think about it.

Amy Little photo
Amy Little

Curious if anyone else has seen this, I am the only person to have seen this. I think this is a must see for all the climate scientists, it is a must see for all the protesters who feel their freedom is being curtailed and there is a lot of anger that they are being forced to accept the limits that the IPCC set for emissions of greenhouse gases. If the IPCC is not convinced that we can go beyond pre-industrial levels of greenhouse gas emissions we are going to be in for a really big mess. The film was so well made and the people who made it should be proud of it. It also reminds me of the documentary that was made about the Pope that was shown at the beginning of this year. If anyone has seen this film please let me know. Thanks.

Peter Olson photo
Peter Olson

This film, about the close of the war in Iraq, is an absolute must see. It gives a new perspective on the events of the war and provides a lot of background information on the people and the events. The film is also very informative about the reasons for the war. The film also shows the various levels of government involvement in the war. This is a must see film for anyone who wants to understand what happened during the war in Iraq. The film also gives the viewer a better understanding of the people who were involved in the war and their motives. The film also gives a more complete picture of the people involved in the war. It also gives the viewer a better understanding of what happened in the war. This film is an absolute must see.

Zachary H. photo
Zachary H.

This documentary was written by and for the families of the victims of 9/11. This documentary, in my opinion, was very informative and comprehensive. The information, however, is conveyed in a very simple manner, which is why I believe that this is an excellent documentary. The information conveyed in this documentary is not in any way misleading or sensational, and it is not a movie. The information conveyed in this documentary is not biased or politically oriented, but it is to do with people, not political parties, or any other groups. There is no real side of any of the families, and they are portrayed in a very realistic way. My favorite part of this documentary is the beginning, when the parents of the two people killed on 9/11 are interviewed. I really enjoyed that part of this documentary, because it made me want to watch it again. You know, it is not just a movie. It is an informative and entertaining documentary, and that is what this is. I highly recommend this documentary to everyone.

Bruce N. photo
Bruce N.

I have a huge crush on Justin Timberlake. I just loved his voice, and I am so desperate for him to play the role of Bowie, that I have written him a letter, and was even sent the DVDs. I finally found a copy of this film, and I am so grateful to see him do the part. He has such a talent for comedy, and this is what he is best at. I think it's one of his best performances. The story is incredible, and I have to say, I enjoyed it. But I think it's a great film, and I was glad that I saw it. It's a film that is worth watching, and I highly recommend it.

Bryan Rogers photo
Bryan Rogers

Towards the end of the movie, I realized that I'd just watched a documentary that I'd been waiting for. It was basically a 30-minute interview with me and a few other people who had been affected by the act. The conversation was interesting, and I was actually surprised to find out that the most of the people I was talking to had never heard of it. It made me realize that these stories that we hear about are very real. It's a shame that they didn't do a better job at telling them, but it's something that I wish could have been done better. I don't know if the content was really good or if it was just what they had to work with. Still, I was glad to hear what they had to say. In the end, I really liked the movie. It's well done, and I was glad that they didn't leave out any of the interesting parts. I hope that they do more documentaries like this one. They give you an idea of what it was like. I recommend it to anyone.

Judith photo
Judith

Loved it! Everyone is starting to talk about this. Please support people like you who have never heard of what the funding of a documentary is all about. You may not agree with the facts but you are very much informed about how the foundation's got it's money. Don't let these people tell you that you need to be a millionaire to do a documentary. I personally have a background in art as well as journalism and I just love the fact that I have access to the financial backing of this incredible film. I hope that more people will learn about this organization and its people. I will be attending more of their meetings and I will tell my friends about this amazing group of people. I think that they deserve to be in the same class as the great artists of the world.

Beverly Dunn photo
Beverly Dunn

Coupled with a great soundtrack, this documentary is not a disappointment. It is quite a gripping story of the problems facing the beautiful country of Peru. The documentary takes us from the tragic beginning of the country's independence to its second stage of independence and its current problems. It focuses on the views of the current president, who was not elected to the position, and on the opposition leaders who have been leading the protests against the president. The interviews are clear and very well written, with the help of the well-known Spanish film director Juan Andres and the great Peruvian music composer Andres Martinez. We also have access to the testimonies of the activists who have been involved in the protests and in the struggle to get the country out of its isolation. It is also important to mention the film director, Juan Andres, who has created the soundtrack for the documentary. The music is amazing, with the help of the great Peruvian composer, Andres Martinez. The only thing that I didn't like about the documentary is the last few minutes, which has a political message that was very unclear. I recommend it to everyone who is interested in this topic.

William Fields photo
William Fields

I'd seen about a half dozen of Anthony Bourdain's films before I saw this one, but they always felt like one step ahead of me. This one is a real surprise. I expected a lot more from it, but I was pleasantly surprised by what I got. I'd seen a lot of Bourdain's work and it is always great to see him tackle a subject that is so personal to him. This is one of his most personal documentaries, and I think it is the most well done. The way he pulls back and talks to the subjects is extremely interesting, and it is amazing how the documentary is edited. I thought it was a really great documentary. The most powerful part of it was that he has been filming this for years, but he is still very passionate about it. The best part of the documentary is when he talks about his journey in Australia, and his interactions with his family and friends, which was really touching. I really enjoyed this documentary. I don't think I'll ever look at his documentaries the same way again. I think this was a really good documentary.

Bruce Jensen photo
Bruce Jensen

This is one of the better documentaries I have ever seen. It's about the old and popular superstition about the Maypole, which seems to be a lot more ancient than we realize. It shows how the myth came about and how it has influenced people for thousands of years. I think that this documentary will be of interest to people who have a soft spot for the history of the Maypole. I think that it's a must-see for anyone who is interested in history and what myths may have influenced people's lives. I give this documentary an A+.

Ruth photo
Ruth

A small good thing is a documentary about a small part of the history of the world. In this case it is the human history of the Germans in Europe during World War II. I was intrigued to see the man who was a soldier in the war and how he learned about his country from a woman. The documentary goes into the time of the occupation and how the German people were divided between those who had to be controlled and those who were free to speak their mind. The documentary also goes into the meetings that were held during the occupation and the treatment that the German people had to endure. This was not a simple story of the German people in Europe. It was a story of the people who had to be controlled and who had to be treated like animals by the Germans. The only story that I found interesting was the last two minutes of the documentary. They explain why they made the decision to exterminate the German people and what happened after that. This made me realize that it was not about the people in Europe but about the people in Germany. I think that it is important for people to know that this was not just about the Germans but about the entire world. It was an important documentary that I would recommend to people. I rate this documentary 7/10.

Sharon Allen photo
Sharon Allen

If you can get your hands on a copy of this film, give it a watch. I had a chance to watch it at the 2012 SXSW Film Festival. I really enjoyed it. The director did a great job of being more accessible to the audience. He was able to tell a great story, and tell it with a straight face. I liked that he was able to get the audience to understand and empathize with the characters, instead of painting them as dumb caricatures. I was able to connect with them and get a sense of the emotions that they were experiencing. This was one of the most emotional films I have seen. If you're looking for a good family film, this one is for you.

Karen Curtis photo
Karen Curtis

The filmmaker, Neil Marshall, is also a cinematographer. He is an accomplished actor and a very prolific director. His films are great but he has a tendency to make a film that is different from the ones he has made before. This is one of the few films that is different from the others. It's a really great documentary about the one-time subject, Mark Wahlberg. The film starts off with a conversation between Mark and the filmmaker, Marshall. The two of them talk about the hardships that they experienced when they were growing up in the 80s. Mark talks about how they had to work twice as hard as their peers to achieve what they wanted. Mark also talks about the time he was rejected by his sister and the way his family treated him. The filmmaker then shows clips from interviews with Mark and his sister, Joanna, in which they talk about how they were treated. The film then switches to the present and it starts with a documentary about the Hollywood Follies. This is when Mark Wahlberg was a child and his family was constantly having problems. They had a car that was stolen and they had to deal with the consequences of it. It's a great movie about the difficult times in Mark's childhood. He has his father in the movie but he also has a mother who is divorced. This is a very hard movie to watch because it's very dark and I think Marshall should have made it a little bit lighter. It's a very sad movie. The interviews with his sister are very interesting. They talk about how she dealt with the abuse and the alcoholism that her brother Mark was living with. I thought the movie was a lot of fun. I think it's a great movie that people will enjoy. It's a great story about the struggles that Mark went through as a child and his sister. The film is a good film and I think it's one of the best documentaries about the Hollywood Follies. I really recommend it.

Robert M. photo
Robert M.

I saw this at the Sundance Film Festival. It was well-presented, and I liked it. I also thought it was well-made, and I liked the way it was presented. The first half of the film is about the John Lennon Assassination, and it really got me thinking about this. It was really gripping. The documentary goes on to explore the rise and fall of the Free Palestine Movement, and how it was used by both the Israelis and Palestinians. It also went into the causes of the Vietnam War, and how the U.S. Government helped to finance it. I think the main problem with this film was that the documentary was very linear, and focused on the evidence presented by the researcher. I felt that the film was very balanced, but didn't really go into as much depth as I would have liked. However, if you're interested in the history of the conflict between Israel and Palestine, then I think you will enjoy this documentary.

Jean Romero photo
Jean Romero

After watching this documentary, I realized that it's very difficult to give this documentary a rating above 6. However, it's really hard to give a rating above 5. It's like giving a movie a 10 when it's a really bad one. I gave this documentary a 7. This is my opinion, and I can not give a higher rating because of that. This documentary shows the actual life of 'The Albert Schweitzer Affair', a very unique and interesting story that happens to be very unique and interesting. When the story was being filmed, people kept calling this documentary 'A Small Good Thing'. However, when you watch it, you realize that it's more of a 'Small Good Thing' than a 'Small Thing'. It's kind of like that the movie is kind of a small piece of a larger story, which is about one man's life and his obsession with one woman. However, I still think that it's a good documentary because it shows a story that is very unique and interesting. I also think that it's very good because it has some pretty good actors in it, who can't help but make you feel good about life. This documentary is one of the best documentaries that I have ever seen. It's not a documentary that you should watch because you don't have anything to do, but it is a documentary that you should watch because it's really interesting. Overall, I give this documentary a 7. I give it a 7 because it's a good documentary, and I also give it a 7 because it's a good documentary.

Sandra C. photo
Sandra C.

I am not a fan of John Lewis. He is a very polarizing figure. The reason I liked this film is because it has some truly disturbing images. It's not a good film, but it's an important film. I feel like I've seen the documentary on the Flint water crisis. It was well done. I don't think I've ever seen a film that makes you think so much about a subject. It's a good documentary that will make you think.

Nicole photo
Nicole

The documentary about the life and work of John Lennon was one of the best documentaries I've seen in a long time. I saw it with a friend who is also a big John Lennon fan and he was amazed at how good the film was. I have to say that I was surprised at how well the film was. I've read reviews that say that the documentary was too long, and it seemed to be so. However, I believe that the documentary was a good length for a documentary about one of the most controversial and controversial people in history. I was very impressed with how good the documentary was. I think that the film was done very well. I think that the film was a good length and it was very interesting. I believe that it was a good documentary. I think that the documentary was well done. I think that the documentary was very good.

Hannah Lucas photo
Hannah Lucas

This is a very insightful and insightful documentary about the new tamer, the ''Young Turks'' that has been growing and growing since they were set up in Turkey. It is a tremendous production that I look forward to see again and again. This documentary is a reminder to us all that we have a duty to think and talk about these issues and to not be afraid to be honest about them. This is an excellent example of how a lot of people have the same interest in this subject matter. I also applaud the courageous way that they have chosen to make the film. This documentary was well researched, well edited, well produced, well filmed, and well produced and made. It is a true tribute to a great movement. I look forward to seeing it again.

Kyle R. photo
Kyle R.

This documentary is not what I expected, though I have been a Bernie supporter for many years. The documentary focuses on the achievements of the Bernie movement, and the early challenges it faced. It is a very interesting and insightful documentary. I really do recommend it.

Phillip Wagner photo
Phillip Wagner

A Small Good Thing (2016) * (out of 4) As the 80's was coming to an end, several bands were looking to cash in on the success that the decade had provided them and have a new album ready to release. The Beatles, The Doors, Pink Floyd and The Who all appeared to be ready for the big time. Of course, none of them were able to put out an album in the eighties, but the way things turned out for The Who, The Beatles, Pink Floyd and The Doors, they may be in for a good surprise. WE DON'T NEED NO STRINGS ATTACHED is a documentary that follows these groups throughout the eighties, discussing what their success meant for them, what it meant for their music and what the future held for them. With many great interviews and moments, this documentary provides a lot of information and looks into how these groups' careers started, the music they made and what they had to deal with as a result. In this documentary, it's clear that the music that these bands created and released during this period was very special to them and made them feel like they were part of something special. A few things are shown here that I really like in this documentary. One is the idea that these bands were able to make the music they made look so good in order to get more money from record companies. Another is that this money, money they made in the eighties, was something that they had to take care of themselves. It wasn't something that they had to rely on others and took care of themselves, but they did. Another thing that I really like is how the music was talked about and talked about when they were young. As they get older, I liked the idea that some of these young people looked back on those years and felt like the music they were making was so special and special to them and they wanted to share that with others. For me, it's a good documentary that is worth watching. The music that these groups did were not only good and special to them but something that they could talk about with their friends and family years later and share with others. I think that it's really interesting to hear their perspectives on what their music meant and how important it was to them. I really liked the interviews with all of these bands and what they had to say and I think that this documentary is worth seeing.

Ralph Adams photo
Ralph Adams

It's pretty obvious that this is an opinion piece, but, the viewer is probably not going to agree with it. It's a bit like a movie critic who said he was going to review The Godfather, but ended up reviewing Michael Bay's Transformers. Sure, it's pretty much the same movie. But, there's a lot of different perspectives to look at. It's a movie that relies on different perspectives, but, what makes it interesting is that, it's based on real people, and, we're forced to see it from their perspective. So, I liked it, but, it's not really a good movie. Maybe if you want to get something out of it, you'll watch it again. But, if you're just going to watch this and don't really care about the subject, I don't think you'll be very satisfied.

Louis photo
Louis

There are plenty of "happy" people on the planet. What about the rest of us? If we want to see a more uplifting documentary, watch "Citizen Toxie" (1990) about the war in Vietnam. There's a lot of frustration, sadness, and anger in that film. But this is one of the few that I can truly recommend, because it's a bit more "sociological". What's more, it's more well-done and well-shot than "Small Good Thing". We are not told that the people on the receiving end of this kind of propaganda are all nice, or good, or even nice, in a nice, positive way. In the end, they're all evil, or indifferent, or both. It's sad, but it's true. What a relief that's. "Small Good Thing" is so good it's not only a movie about this subject, but about the subject of all human-nature issues. It's an educational film, but also a moral one. If you have a strong desire to change your outlook on the world, I highly recommend it.

Peter H. photo
Peter H.

The title of this movie is "A Small Good Thing" because it was meant to be a short documentary. It is quite remarkable how well the title title of the movie has been interpreted by many people. I was thrilled to see the title on the poster, and I was also pleasantly surprised that the title seemed to be a word that people had never heard of before, which is a great sign. What the title actually meant is that the film is about climate change and what it means for people who live near the coast. People from all walks of life have some connection to the sea and its influence on their lives. This film will have you thinking about the changes that are happening to our planet, and the ways that we can save the planet. The topics that are covered in this film are very interesting, and I'm sure that many of you will find something interesting in it. The most interesting thing about this film is that it was created by a group of people who are on a mission to save the world, not only for their own sake, but to save the world for all of the people who depend on it.

Nathan photo
Nathan

I was extremely pleased to see that the film was created in such an honest, yet tactful manner. We get to know the individual's thoughts about the film and their individual reactions to it. There was no personal attack by the film maker. The director/editor and the editor were entirely positive about the film. They showed the film to the students and they all loved it. This is how I'd like to see this film developed. If we want to see an honest, fun film, we have to go to the cinema and watch it with a bunch of like-minded people. If we want to make sure it's the best film we can, we have to make sure that the filmmakers and the film makers are genuine and don't try to do something different from the mainstream Hollywood film making. The film makers should have told their story with the same openness that the students were shown in the film.

Albert photo
Albert

What the hell? This was not a documentary, it was a smear job. The three female scientists were only shown as an example of why there needs to be more study of the effects of stress on the human body. The article was just completely ridiculous. Not only was it completely full of lies, but it was intentionally confusing and too many facts were missing. The only thing that was true was that the production values were high. The other main issue that I had with this movie was the amount of unprofessional behavior of the researchers. While this is not the same thing as outright dishonesty, it was still just downright disrespectful. The scientists are not supposed to be working with all kinds of people, so the approach of not letting them talk to the public was totally wrong. The only person that didn't do this was Dr. Ed Stone, a respected, highly qualified researcher. It seems that in their effort to avoid criticism, they did everything possible to lie and mislead the public. They could have avoided this, but they chose to go the extra mile. The documentary was a perfect example of what happens when you rely on hype to get you to watch a documentary. I am glad that the movie has ended, but the damage is done.

Wayne photo
Wayne

If you want to know what is really happening in Iraq right now and why is there a war between the US and Iraq, this documentary will give you a lot of information. It is a war without a cause, but a war of greed and the US economy, so it's all of that that is driving the war. It's really informative and you can see the reasons why the US government wants to topple Saddam Hussein, but the facts are all in the documentary. And it does show that there is a good side to the Iraqi people, but it also shows that some of them are really being treated like savages. The Iraqis themselves are fed up with the US government and they are not willing to accept any more blood. It shows that the Iraqis are just tired of all the bloodshed and they want to get back to a normal life. It's a great documentary. It really makes you think about the war and how this country has been really put in a situation where it has been ruined.

Sharon Bell photo
Sharon Bell

My wife and I enjoyed this movie very much. The title of the movie, "The Little Girl Who Lives in the Woods", is pretty descriptive. The film shows the role that a little girl can play in a family. This little girl can use her voice to raise awareness about the dangers of the nuclear power plant. The most important point of the film is the fact that nuclear power is not the only source of energy. This little girl is a catalyst for changing the way we perceive our energy sources. If we could, we would do so much to reduce the amount of our energy needed for food, fuel, and other purposes. And, as I said, this little girl can make a difference. There is one scene in particular that I really like. The little girl is standing on the porch of her home, the wind is blowing, and the little girl looks up to see the sky. She smiles and waves to the wind. She is doing a great job of using her voice. It is such a moment that you can feel the energy in the air. You see the same energy in the people in the audience as well. You feel it. This is a wonderful film. I highly recommend it.

Joseph B. photo
Joseph B.

I'm not a great fan of documentaries but this one is definitely an exception. This is a great film to watch if you have watched or want to watch a documentary. As a dad of a boy who is taking the same path as me and I am not a fan of vaccines I appreciate that a documentary was made. The video is amazing, the footage is wonderful, the story is good and all in all I enjoyed this film and look forward to seeing it again.

Sara Black photo
Sara Black

On the other hand, the story is well told. The show is a far cry from the book, but I think the movie is quite accurate. I liked the portrayal of The Beatles, although some of their songs are not included in the movie. The one line about "I'm A Believer" is gone, and the band's "Let It Be" has been replaced by "Help Me". I liked the part where John Lennon says, "I'm not going to be a hero. I'm going to be a human being". It's one of the most thought-provoking moments in the movie. The script is good, too. There are some things that could have been better. The story itself is not very detailed, but it's still good. The acting is great. I like John, Paul, George and Ringo, and I think they do a great job. I liked the way the movie was shot. The location of the Beatles' home is really beautiful, and the only problem is that the movie is too short. I recommend this movie to all Beatles fans, even if you are not a Beatles fan. The movie is a great guide to their life. It's a must-see for the fans of Beatles.

Judy Barnes photo
Judy Barnes

This is the best documentary ever made, the director's impeccable ability to show the systematic attempt to kill or destroy mankind is the best example of it. The guy was an incredibly bright and his ideas were so correct and detailed, I would have been interested in his ideas if I could have read his book, the only thing I can think of that the guy missed was the immense insanity of the Holocaust. I don't know what to say other than the movie is an excellent way to let the viewer think, but also to express your opinion, and to start a dialogue about the current state of our world. I hope this movie will be made and it will be shown in all parts of the world, I really wish it.

Betty D. photo
Betty D.

This is a documentary about a group of women who were involved in the Occupy Wall Street movement, and the story of the women's experiences in the movement. The film is mostly about the women who were involved in Occupy Wall Street. It is not a complete documentary, but it is a good overview of the women's experiences and their views on the movement. It does a good job of showing the differences between the women's views of the movement and the views of the men who were involved in the movement. There are also interviews with a few of the men involved in the movement, but I would have preferred to hear more about the women's views on the movement. I think that the women's views on the movement are interesting, and I would have liked to hear more about the women's views of the movement. It is definitely worth watching, but I think it is a good documentary. I would definitely recommend this to anyone who is interested in the Occupy movement, and is interested in the women's experiences in the movement. I would give it a 7/10.

Kathy Riley photo
Kathy Riley

I went into this film with no expectations. The only reason I came to watch it was because of the subject matter, and it seemed like a great film to watch. I was wrong. The film is very slow, and for the most part, boring. The film is a series of interviews with people involved in the making of the movie. I found the interviews to be very boring, and I didn't even understand what they were saying. The film is not at all about the subject matter. It's about how the movie was made, and how the people involved felt about the movie. That's it. I understand that the movie is a political statement, but I don't think it was well thought out. I don't think the movie was well thought out. I think the movie was poorly made, and it's very hard to follow what's going on. I would not recommend this movie to anyone. I think it's a good example of how not to make a movie, and how not to make a movie. It's very slow, and boring. I give it a 7/10. It's not a good movie, but it's not a bad movie.

Stephanie C. photo
Stephanie C.

As a former Marine, I was very interested in this movie. I am a big fan of the movie and I was very impressed with the information that was presented in the movie. However, I thought the movie could have been better. The movie started off very well, but then it fell apart and it lost me completely. I felt that the information that was presented was not very well put together. The movie also did not explain how the war began and what the motivations were behind the war. Also, the movie did not give enough information on the military aspect of the war. I think that a lot of people that watched the movie were also disappointed because they were not able to get the information that they needed to be able to fully understand the movie. I feel that this movie should have been longer and better presented.

Pamela photo
Pamela

The documentary "A Small Good Thing" (2012) is the second film by the award winning filmmaker Ken Burns. The film is an account of the efforts by President Lyndon Johnson to preserve the legacy of his mentor, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. during the Vietnam War. The film includes interviews with many of King's associates, including the famous civil rights leader, Coretta Scott King. It also includes interviews with many of the people that were responsible for the War and are no longer with us. The film focuses on the assassination of King, and the struggle of his widow and other members of his family to discover the truth about what happened that fateful day. This is an extraordinary film. It is very comprehensive in its coverage of the life of King and his accomplishments. It also gives some insight into the life of Dr. King. A very important film.

Olivia photo
Olivia

I have no idea why people like this film. I think it is a poorly executed documentary. I would not watch it again. I have to say, however, that this is not the best documentary I have ever seen. It does not do justice to the brilliant and stunning documentary, You Are Not So Smart, that I have watched several times. The documentary starts with the Soviet Union in the 1950's, and the invention of the transistor. The film talks about how the Soviet Union became a nuclear power. The film goes into a lot of detail about the economic system of the Soviet Union, and how their economy was "manageable" but not what the world wanted. The film is also very thorough about the problems of the people living in the Soviet Union. People were basically held in line, and there was a lot of child labor. The film shows how the workers are treated, and it is very interesting to see how the system is. The film ends with the Soviet Union in the 1990's. The film is divided into five parts, each of which has a different subject. The first two parts, dealing with the development of the Soviet Union and the people in it, are quite interesting, although the third and fourth parts are very interesting and have a lot of information. The fifth part is the interview with Albert Einstein, which is very interesting, as it is the one with which I was most interested. In the documentary, the documentary goes into the life of Albert Einstein, which is the best part of the documentary. The documentary is very good, but it is hard to understand, because there are a lot of scenes in the documentary that are very important, but are difficult to understand. I do not think the documentary is very good, but I do think it is a good documentary.

Tammy photo
Tammy

Truly amazing documentary about the lives and struggles of the individuals involved in the World Trade Center attacks. It is a tribute to the resilience and courage of the individuals involved in the events of September 11, 2001. The people interviewed for this film are very well known to the public. They all are in a lot of ways, heroes. I believe that this documentary does an excellent job in showing the stories of the individuals and the importance of this story. The documentary is made up of very interesting and well-made interviews with the individuals. The interviews are done with a lot of humour and are very entertaining. The interviews are interesting to see the stories behind the interviews. I believe that the documentary is very well done and I would recommend it to anyone who is interested in this story.

Michael H. photo
Michael H.

I watched this movie a couple of weeks ago and found it to be quite refreshing and it did a great job of illustrating the politics of the era. I think it's a good movie and I highly recommend it to anyone who likes history or politics. I don't know if the director was a historian or not but I think he did a great job of telling the story of the time.

Frank photo
Frank

As I watched this film, I couldn't help but think of the last time I saw "Mystery Science Theater 3000." It was when I was 7 years old and I watched a rerun of "Strange Bedfellows," and it was all about the famous game show "Who Wants to be a Millionaire?" Then, I saw "Mystery Science Theater 3000" again and the last segment of the movie was the "Who Wants to be a Millionaire" segment. I thought it was a little creepy and I couldn't wait to see it again. As the movie progressed, I had to admit I was surprised at how much I enjoyed this film. While it was good, it wasn't anything I had seen before. It was different. It was entertaining, but it wasn't exactly memorable. I think the main thing that bothered me about this movie was the music. I don't think the music was good, and I think it was a little overdone. The music in this movie is kind of fun, but it's also distracting. I didn't really enjoy it. I like the music in "Mystery Science Theater 3000" but the music in "A Small Good Thing" was distracting. If you don't mind the music, you'll probably enjoy this movie.

Laura photo
Laura

It's a little bit of everything. It's a film that takes a look at a day in the life of a young woman living in a small town in the United States. She lives with her mother, who is in a nursing home, her younger brother and sister, and a few other friends. One day she decides to go to a local park to take a walk with her friend and a man. The next day, she finds herself in a car accident. The woman survives, but her brother dies. The man was her brother. The woman has been diagnosed with cancer. Her family and friends are not sure if she will live or die. The film focuses on her and her life in the hospital. The film is very well made and very interesting. It is well worth watching. It's a good film to see and I recommend it to anyone who likes to look at a day in the life of a woman in a nursing home.

Charles photo
Charles

I recently caught the documentary "I am Not a Witch" on the History Channel, and I have to say that it was an excellent documentary. I'm not a witch, but I have heard a lot about witchcraft, and I have been a bit skeptical about the whole subject. This documentary really convinced me that witchcraft is a real thing, and that it is a very real thing that is practiced all over the world. There are people who are truly witches, and I think that the people who are the most aware of what they are doing are the ones who are being persecuted the most. I think that the documentary did a good job of explaining the history of witchcraft, and explaining how it has evolved over time. I really recommend this documentary to anyone who is interested in the subject.

Jerry photo
Jerry

This documentary about the relationship between Mother Teresa and Mother Teresa's Foundation for the Rights of the Child has an interesting story and I was very impressed with the way it was put together. It's a must see for anyone interested in the life of Mother Teresa.

Amber Moreno photo
Amber Moreno

This is a good documentary. There is a lot of bad info in this documentary and most of it is not true. But overall it is good. The music is also great and gives the movie a feel good feeling. And that makes this documentary a good one. I hope they release it on DVD. It is good that they finally are making a documentary about this great rock band. This is a very good documentary and I would recommend it to anyone who has a love for music.

Stephen D. photo
Stephen D.

I saw this film last night at the Tribeca Film Festival. It was a long movie, which was interesting but not really very good. The cast was good, with Viggo Mortensen, Sam Elliot, and Tom Hardy in it. The story was really interesting, but I didn't find it very captivating. I also didn't find it very funny, and I don't really like Sam Elliot, so that didn't help. It was very slow paced, and I just didn't find it very interesting. The film is based on a book called "The Adversary", which was a very good book, and I'm sure it would have been better as a movie. I also didn't like how the director was not able to capture the natural beauty of the Isle of Skye. I think that the film should have been longer, and I think that the ending was a little too forced. I would have liked to see more of the people involved in the film, but I understand that it was a long movie. The film was definitely not a good film, and I think that it would have been better as a TV series. I would recommend that you watch it, but it's not really worth going to see.

Ann photo
Ann

For some reason this movie has been in my DVD collection for a while now. I was never really interested in it. I only recently caught it on TV and was fascinated by the subject matter. I am a history buff and have always been interested in the British monarchy, but I wasn't familiar with the Royal Family. I finally watched the movie and was fascinated. The acting is pretty good and it is well produced and presented. It is very enlightening to learn about the history of the British Royal Family. I was especially interested in the wedding of Elizabeth II and Prince Philip. It was a very interesting look at the birth of the monarchy. It was interesting to see how the Queen was and how she handled the wedding. I would highly recommend this film to anyone who enjoys history and can appreciate a good documentary.

Marie Brooks photo
Marie Brooks

I remember being really moved by this documentary as a young teenager. I have just watched it again, and was particularly touched by the impact of the filming in the town of Hadley on young people who were being persecuted by the police for having homosexual or bisexual inclinations. For a young man to be in the home of a man who was so concerned about him and his situation would be really frightening for anyone, especially an outsider. The cinematography is wonderful, and the way the documentary is told is so moving. The whole movie is really about an old man trying to figure out what to do with his life. And his reflections on the gay and lesbian scene in the early 60s. The story is told in two parts. Part one, "Sex Lives of Children in the 60s", is really amazing and I highly recommend it. Part two, "The Search for Freedom", is about the search for some sort of answers, and the interviews are really enlightening. As I said, the first half of the movie is really good, and the second half is pretty interesting. However, the documentary is a bit too long, and the interviewees don't really make their point. However, I really recommend this documentary, it really moved me as a young teenager, and I really think it is an important documentary.