Steam Food Evolution

Food Evolution

Food Evolution is a movie starring Raoul Adamchak, Charles Benbrook, and Karl Haro von Mogel. Using the controversy over genetically-modified foods as its entry point, 'Food Evolution' shows how easily fear and misinformation can...

Other Titles
Toidu evolutsioon, Food evolution
Running Time
1 hours 32 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Scott Hamilton Kennedy
Trace Sheehan, Scott Hamilton Kennedy
Raoul Adamchak, Charles Benbrook, Tamar Haspel, Karl Haro von Mogel
Audio Languages
日本語, اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Japanese, اللغة_العربية, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Food Evolution looks at one of the most critical questions facing the world today-that of food security-and demonstrates the desperate need for common sense, solid information, and calm logical deliberation. Using the often angry and emotional controversy over genetically-modified foods as its entry point, Food Evolution shows how easily fear and misinformation can overwhelm objective, evidence-based analysis. Food Evolution takes the position that science and scientists hold the key to solving the food crisis. But whose science? In the GMO debate, both sides claim science is on their side. Who's right? How do we figure this out? What does this mean for the larger issues of food security, sustainability, and environmental well-being? Food Evolution seeks to answer these critically important questions.

Comments about documentary «Food Evolution» (39)

Donna M. photo
Donna M.

There is a growing need for documentaries in the context of our modern society. We are constantly bombarded with media which leaves us with a need to find out what the world is really like. But is the pursuit of information actually beneficial or harmful? To find out the answer, this documentary, 'Food Evolution', was released in the last week of the year, as a result of the worldwide financial crisis and the consequent food shortage. It was written and directed by, Alex Epstein, and was created in collaboration with film producer Harry A. Bernstein, a former journalist who now works as a producer and director at a large advertising agency. He explains his reasons for making this film, as well as providing some valuable information regarding the underlying political beliefs that inspired it. The film opens with a conversation between a local farmer, his wife, and their grandson, who are all farmers in their own right. They all have big dreams for their farms. One of them, a farmer who has given up farming, is in dire need of money to pay for health care for his grandson. His vision is to have a roof over his grandson's head, to be able to feed him, and so that he can concentrate on his farm. He is trying to raise $6,000, but the farmer is looking for a loan with three years remaining to get a loan from the bank. This is the major reason for this documentary. The farmer, who has two sons, is angry about the failure of the U.S. government to support the farmers. The farmer begins to talk to his grandson, about how he felt as a farmer in his youth. His vision is to turn the farm into a multi-million dollar factory for profit. His dream is not of a home for his grandson, but of a place where he can let his grandson grow up and be happy. This is not just the farmer's vision; it is shared by other farmers all over the world. The farmer feels this way because the U.S. government continues to support the American farmers, while in other parts of the world, it continues to support the farmers that produce the food that the American consumer is buying. When the farmer walks into the office of his grandson's dentist, he is told he has to go and give the doctor a tour of the farm. This is just one of many examples. In his son's view, the American government is doing nothing to support the farmers. The farmer is angry that the American government is refusing to support him and his family. The farmer's motivation for the film is to help change the U.S. government's attitude toward farmers. But does this film really go anywhere? It is evident that the filmmaker does not have a clear goal in mind. What he actually wanted to show

Albert J. photo
Albert J.

Life and death. Evolution of intelligence. Passion and fears. Marriage and children. Job and money. That's all in this great documentary. Some people will see it as a philosophical rant about morality, and others as a warning about our deteriorating civilization. Some will see it as a humorous slice of life. The final segment deals with the big question: What does it mean to be human? Many will see this as a philosophical rant, but the point is that we are and will always be animals. Life is like a job, or a mission, or a fight, or a kiss. So, we must look to our inner self and look to our animal instincts. The human race will endure some of the most horrific tragedies and the most sad tragedies. There are some who will mourn the demise of civilization, but in that case, they have forgotten to look within and realize that humans and animals are still the same. There are others who will condemn Darwin and his ideas, and are either ignorant, or just don't want to see a fact. But the bottom line is that every single person in the world can see that Darwin and his ideas are an important part of evolution and are worth studying. I personally think that these films are just as important as any other documentary on the subject of evolution, because they are actually based on something you can believe. Darwin was not a religious man. His ideas were a personal belief, and for those who don't agree, you have to understand that his ideas were based on a scientific theory, and those who have studied Darwin know that Darwin wrote several scientific papers based on his theories. But Darwin also believed in God, and he believed in evolution. Darwin was a simple man, and his ideas were based on the scientific theory of evolution. It is important to realize that Darwin was just a simple man, and a simple man couldn't write the scientific papers he wrote. He could only express himself, and this has led to the development of great art. Darwin's ideas were a revelation, and Darwin's ideas are a revolution. And if you truly believe that Darwin was wrong, and that we evolved from apes, then you will learn that what Darwin believed in was just one of the many theories that evolved over time. And if you have the opportunity to watch Evolution of the Mind, then just take a look at the scientific evidence. You will realize that no matter what you believe, or if you have no knowledge of Darwin's ideas, it is not going to change the fact that humans are animals and that animals are evolving and living their life. So, take this documentary as a scientific truth, or you will never understand why Darwin was so important to humanity.

Kyle Stevens photo
Kyle Stevens

The documentary about "Darwin's ideas" can easily be mistaken for the promoter of a crank show or a madman, if not for those who claim that science has proven the existence of God or a creator. Even so, the claims made in this documentary are, I think, accurate. The film presents a balanced view of evolution and intelligent design, and is not misleading. The presenter, Robert Gallo, seems to be an objective science educator, and his conclusions are consistent with Darwin's ideas. The producers of the film, however, were not. The argument that one should not present the evolution story in the "wrong" light is ridiculous. The story is very well presented, with great photography, and not one frame is left out. There are over a dozen presentations of evidence supporting the theory of evolution. The films seems to be aimed at a certain group of people who are not "Darwinians," but at others, who can appreciate the science, and who believe in the possibility of God. Some of the reviewers who seem to hate the film are the same people who put Darwin's ideas down as primitive. To those who make that argument, please do yourself a favor and don't post on this board.

Joseph photo

You'll know it if you've seen 'Who wants to be a Billionaire?' and if you've ever heard of 'The World Bank.' Here, Richard Heinberg, the man who made those films, revisits the question of how humans' ability to think for themselves may have, or may have not, influenced the course of history. It is an important question that, once discussed, the history of mankind does not appear to have taught us anything new, and that's why it's so interesting. And as an interesting question, Heinberg makes the subject his own by discussing it over three distinct periods: the pre-industrial era, the Industrial Revolution, and the 21st century. (This is the only way to get a general idea of the questions he asks.) He seems to be making a sort of political documentary, as he talks about the rise of capitalism and of modernity as the world's greatest single natural force and then examines the effects of that advance on the world we live in. He explains that all the bad things people are doing now are largely the result of that advance. (This makes him seem almost too right-wing and hawkish to be political at all.) But he is not really right-wing, as he is not really hawkish. He is anti-capitalist, but anti-industrialist. He is anti-capitalism, but not in a lot of ways. He is anti-consumption, but not in a way that means he's opposed to the freedom of choice. (I suppose the term applies to a lot of people who say they are for freedom, but then they will probably never make a successful movie.) In between those periods, he talks about an alternative, and that is the way things were in pre-industrial times, before capitalism rose up. The land was much more abundant, so the need for a class of leaders was much less than it is now. There was still very much an age of relative peace. All this seems to me a sort of delicate balancing act. That the middle-aged professor is anti-capitalism is all to the good, but to me, the way to feel good about capitalism is to question it, and when Heinberg asks the question, he asks it about everything. The most notable thing about Heinberg's discussion of capitalism is the way he talks about it. He speaks of it in terms of profit and loss, as if it were a purely positive thing that everyone wants to maximize. He uses the phrase "nature of man," which really says something about how human beings have adapted to their surroundings. He uses the term "labor," which is a better way to talk about the types of people we have as our neighbors. It's like a call to arms. Then

Roy Gordon photo
Roy Gordon

Glad to see that other people got to the same conclusion as I did. I wanted to see if I could figure it out but my mind kept wandering off and was able to get back on track very quickly. This is a documentary that is trying to figure out how a little amount of the Genesis story could have become so important. It's actually based on one of my favorite books, 'The Golden Bible' by Ray Comfort. It talks about the fact that the people of the bible, whom are often called 'evils', didn't like to be confronted with a person that said he didn't like what God was doing. They were very secretive about their opinions and the reason for that was because they didn't want to be exposed to anyone that would disagree with them. However, it has been found that the people of the bible had thousands of things written in the bible that they wanted to be true. This documentary talks about the creation of the world and how it came to be and the reason that it didn't come to be that way. The explanations of how it came to be is very well done and I was extremely impressed. One thing that was really different about this documentary is that it uses a lot of video. It's not really a documentary in the way you would think of one, but it is very different than your typical documentary. The people that the documentary talks about, they are really very charismatic and the videos they are talking about, they are making themselves into a video that is going to appear in the Bible for everyone to see. The videos are actually very well done and I think that is a very interesting documentary to watch. I recommend it to anyone that is interested in the Bible and science and believes that the bible has so much truth to it.

Lisa Garrett photo
Lisa Garrett

This film is a bit of a mixed bag for me. On one hand I really liked the way it handled the evolution of species, the success of the free market in consumerism, the cruelty of the past and their impact on the present. On the other hand, it seemed to be completely ignoring what the implications of this were. In fact, what they seem to be ignoring are the obvious implications of the premise of a human being being the sole provider of their own survival. The question they ask is "What are the consequences of choosing that route?" I guess the question is, "How much more humanistic can we take it?" I think it's interesting that they actually answer that question, but I can't help but wonder if it's really worth it to answer it because there are very few questions that it really gets you thinking about. For example, is it possible that an all vegetarian society, with every piece of the body being considered human, could actually do away with meat and that we could live in a utopia on the same terms as they do. I guess that's an interesting question to ask, but to me it's a pointless question to ask since most of us already know the answer. Another interesting question is how much longer can we keep experimenting with different ways of preserving life. Even with a vegetarian society I think they could easily go back and forth, depending on the average man's level of knowledge and practice. Lastly, are there any solutions to the destruction of the environment, which seems to be coming from pretty much the same place that climate change is coming from. On the positive side, I'm not sure the answer is even remotely to come, since even in the near future we still have to deal with the consequences of animal agriculture. The film doesn't ask us to actually say no to animal agriculture, but it doesn't give us much of an answer, nor does it give us any sort of direction. I'm just glad that they didn't give us a solution and didn't give us an answer we couldn't live with, like a great big-shot philosopher like us are supposed to do. I also hope that in a few years they can focus on something else and do away with their beliefs, or at least leave those questions unanswered, and focus on something else.

Marilyn Holland photo
Marilyn Holland

No matter what your views on evolution, or the theory of global warming, it is difficult not to be impacted by the dramatic changes that scientists are reporting. Especially the science being presented is simply staggering. The idea of what makes life as we know it - everything from the eye to the world's plants - is explained in just a few minutes. And it is all in the name of the earth and its inhabitants. What about the weather, if everything is temperature and humidity based? Do plants have feelings or emotions? Would there be food if we never eat? And how about oceans if they are salinity based? It really is fascinating. And this documentary is one of the best that I have seen. Yes, I will say the viewers are given an accurate explanation of what makes life possible, but also what is a part of the norm and what is the result of modernism.

Emma R. photo
Emma R.

Saw this film at the Palm Springs International Film Festival. It was pretty funny, but I had a hard time following it. At the very end, I looked it up on IMDb and it said it was at a theater in three days. I figured it was a really bad movie, and I should give it a chance. It was just so bizarre. I'm sure they had a good time making it, but I didn't care. So when I see the credits I think, oh, there goes another cheesy B-rated B-movie.

Nicole Brewer photo
Nicole Brewer

This movie is interesting as it showcases the entire industry in how the cattle industry has evolved and affected the landscape of the country. They are speaking with cattle ranchers who are producing 3-4 million head of cattle yearly. They are talking to farmers who are producing the same cattle in more than 1,000 acres, who are supplying beef to grocery stores and restaurants. They are talking to consumers who are concerned about how their food is being grown, stored and packaged and the environment in which it is grown. They are asking the question, what is being grown on the land where these cattle are raised? What is being shipped to the grocery stores and restaurants? This film is one of those "hidden gems" that are incredibly insightful and well done. It has information that most other documentaries do not. It is a great documentary to see. It is not too heavy handed and it is as interesting and engaging as a 3-D film. The characters in the film are likable. They are working for the animals and they want to be successful. Most of them are ranchers and producers. These are not the greedy greedy jerks who are trying to put animals before profit. They are the very smart and educated people who are trying to make a difference in the world. They are getting it wrong and this is one of those films where you can easily identify with one of the characters. There is humor and sentiment in this movie. You will be able to identify with them and get a sense of what their lives are like. A lot of the people interviewed are self-professed vegetarians. Their take on the world is very different than ours. They seem to know more about what they are eating and where it is coming from than we do. It is refreshing to see someone from the vegetarian perspective. I would love to see this on TV or DVD. This documentary is in my top 10 of best documentaries of all time.

Mildred photo

If you haven't seen this yet, see it. It is pretty good. It's also pretty strange and not 100% what you would expect. It's more of a documentary on evolution. You can't be surprised that the talking heads have different opinions. If you are hoping for a pure documentary, you will be disappointed. If you want to learn about evolution, this movie is an excellent choice.

Scott photo

This is a documentary that has been touted as a "game changer" for our planet, and I would have to agree. Not only is it packed with interesting information and insights, but it also does a really good job of presenting the connections between agriculture, food, and our environment. What I find most interesting is the fact that most of the people in the audience didn't know about it, or the extent to which it applies to them. In that sense, the documentary is very successful, as it not only addresses the audience that may not have known about this, but also is effective at not only giving information to those who do, but also educating the audience to what I feel is a more powerful and effective message. The documentary is very entertaining, and I would definitely recommend it to people who enjoy documentaries. However, I would definitely say that this isn't something that most people will need to see in order to become involved with the issue. If you want a good, fast-paced documentary, I would definitely recommend seeing a documentary like "Planet of the Apes", which also tackles the same issue. Rating: 7 out of 10

Amanda Stanley photo
Amanda Stanley

I have been following The Believer for a few years now, and it has become a favorite of mine. The Believer has taken a potentially negative subject, and then uses it as a positive example of how we can use our food for good. We are one of the most destructive species on the planet. We are constantly killing and destroying the environment, the water we drink, the air we breathe, and the animals we share our planet with. But, we can still make our choice to change this destructive habit, and change the world for the better. By choosing to eat organic, you are taking a big step towards a sustainable future. I also applaud the fact that these folks were able to get everyone involved in this campaign, without the major corporations doing anything. We need to be very active in changing our society for the better. I believe that everyone should read The Believer. The Believer makes a good point, and I believe that it can help everyone. Everyone should take action.

Mildred photo

I've been a fan of Henryk Sienkiewicz for a long time, and a friend of mine recommended this film. I went to see it on opening day and was very impressed by the fact that the film was still relatively new. I felt that the first hour was mostly of discussion, and it would have been interesting to see what Sienkiewicz had to say about things like 'communism', 'prostitution', and 'the enemy'. However, once he started talking about how we were now the absolute masters of the world, I was immediately interested in the fact that Sienkiewicz was someone who was actively advocating the destruction of the existing order and the replacement of it with something better. From that point on, I thought that I had to see the film. As a bonus, there were a lot of scenes which had my attention. But, I thought that it would have been more useful to have read the book, and I had already read the book at the time of the movie, so that certainly helped. However, after seeing the film, I thought that there were some good things about it. It was a good way to demonstrate that Sienkiewicz was a humanist, even if his arguments were not very well-known. Furthermore, it shows how an ideology of humanism can work on a large scale in a humanist society. Finally, there is a good reason for why Sienkiewicz is a very important humanist. A lot of times in the book and on the film, Sienkiewicz says that we are most in danger when we believe that our moral and social values are already there in our constitution, and that we are not capable of changing them. Nowadays, this is not a problem anymore, and it was quite inspiring to see that Sienkiewicz also believed that we should now take care of our environment, and how we should make it a better place. Nevertheless, it is not easy to use that idea in the 21st century. After the film, I was disappointed that the ending was not very exciting. However, I do think that the ending was quite appropriate, because it showed that Sienkiewicz was really a very sympathetic person who believed that there should be a radical change in our current social order, and that the only way to do that was to destroy the old order, and to make the new order more humane and compassionate. For this reason, I rate the film 7 out of 10, because it is a very good introduction to Sienkiewicz's work.

Peter photo

I have a problem with natural born killers. They're biological make-up and are not accountable for their actions. I'm not here to bash their personhood. I'm not here to defend their existence. I'm not here to cheer them on. I'm here to try and get the truth. That truth is a little bit of a mixed bag. I found it to be a strong argument. I did find the images to be absolutely real. It's clear that they are doing what they're doing and what they're doing is a direct result of their surroundings. I found it to be very educational. The "fathers" are obviously terrible fathers. They are walking patterns that come from their past experiences and their desire to survive. And they have the power and capability to do whatever they want with the people they surround themselves with. They are supermen. It's very clear that they have the ability to make a bad situation worse by their actions. If they ever feel the urge to raise a family they will be compelled to do so. The problem I have is that they seem to know that the people they are raising will eventually not make it. They will be forced to "disappear". I found that to be a very strong argument. The one good thing that came out of the documentary is that there is this awareness about what is happening with our food and farming system. I recommend this documentary to anyone interested in changing our country's food supply. It's very well put together.

Shirley photo

First of all, let me say that it is a terrific documentary. As a viewer, I was very moved by the subject matter and I really liked the flow of the film. I thought that the idea of a parallel universe was something that was compelling to me. I think that a lot of us have felt that way when we thought that our lives were full of meaning and significance, but it's never exactly been the case. If you think about it, for example, if you think that you've "made it" in your career, you have to believe that there are things that you've not seen that would make you think that you had. It's this whole idea of "you have to believe in something before you can believe in it." The film is one of those ideas that is very close to my heart. It's a movie that I'm glad that I'm going to watch again and again and again. The truth of it is, I think that there are things that are highly meaningful and meaningful for everyone, and we need to be aware of that. We need to know that life is a bit more meaningful than just a job or an education or whatever. That's not to say that this topic is new, but it's not something that is new to people. I think that's where the story of the film begins. I have never read the book that this film is based on. But when I heard that the film was done by the same person that I first heard about when I was at college, it felt a little bit wrong to me. But I have to say that it did bring out a lot of emotion. I think that it was the writing and the story that was really the strongest part of this film. The acting was also very good. I think that the way that it was shot was very impressive and I think that was what really made this film feel very special and amazing. This is probably one of the best documentaries I've ever seen and I hope that it will be viewed more often.

Charles photo

As someone who was once a vegetarian for over 20 years, I cannot recommend this film enough. If you have ever been in that position before, this documentary is a great and possibly life changing experience. If you have never been vegetarian, don't think you're ready for it, or you're unsure about the whole subject, it's a great first step. I recommend this film to anyone who wants to see and understand how a meatless diet can benefit their health, the environment, the planet, and humanity. This documentary is also a great way to get some answers on other issues as well, like fish oil, etc. This film should be required viewing for everyone.

Roger B. photo
Roger B.

It's not as bad as it can be. It was an interesting movie and I enjoyed it. It's a balanced look at the future. If you're looking for a doom and gloom piece of the future. I recommend that you stay away from it.

Rose G. photo
Rose G.

This documentary about the scientists working on the genome project is a fascinating look at the work of the scientists behind the project. While the technical aspects of the project are fascinating, the larger story of the scientists and the world they live in is equally fascinating. In particular, I particularly enjoyed the footage of the "Human Genome Project", as well as the lectures given by the scientists on the project. The film focuses on the importance of the project in the overall struggle to understand and unlock the "human genome" - something that has already led to breakthroughs in science and medicine. However, the documentary also documents the scientists' personal, and sometimes gruelling, personal lives. The scientists speak about the daily struggle of living a biological life with no personal agenda, how they are kept up to date with the latest discoveries, and their worries about the direction the project will take. While some may find this too much information and too personal, it does make for an interesting story that is very interesting to see.

Judith Allen photo
Judith Allen

With one-and-a-half-hours length, it feels overlong and it was all too long, too. I mean, it is just not that great a documentary on the topic, and not that much of it was really about evolution. It was more about questions about human beings. But it wasn't very well done. I had a hard time following it, as I did not really care about the answers to those questions. The only thing that I really wanted to know was whether our offspring were really born with an ability to make new habits and get off on the wrong side of the tracks, or whether that ability was genetically inherited. The only person that I really cared about was Willie Soon, who was quite successful. I never thought I would see a documentary that showed a successful, smart and generous guy in the Philippines, but he's a very special guy. I also never thought that evolution could be all that cruel, but he was also so kind and wonderful. There were a few other people who were kind and generous, and they were also intelligent. In general, though, it was really sad to see how very smart people could have such sad, cruel lives. So, as you can see, I'm very disappointed with this documentary. And I thought that some of the things were a bit too long. I was a bit disappointed too, because I thought the audience would be impressed by the visual aspects of this film, but I think that there are some very few people that would be impressed by that. If you're interested in evolution, or really want to know about evolution and what it means, I think that this is not the documentary to watch. It's not that long, but it is not that good. I am also disappointed by the fact that some of the people were interviewed didn't get interviewed at all. They were probably the most interesting people in this film. Overall, though, I think that this is a very poor documentary on the topic. I think that there are other documentaries that are much better. I think that you should see the many other documentaries about the topic that have been made. I think that there is just a problem with the fact that this film seems to have been a commercial success. I think that it is a pity because it is not really a very good documentary. It's not really that good.

Kyle Walker photo
Kyle Walker

When a documentary about the scientific and philosophical claims made about man and nature is done without the most sophisticated science and philosophy, it is bound to be pretty dull. The actual scientific material being used is really quite weak and simply the basis of the whole thing. That being said, the video is far from being worthless. It is still a good representation of how some scientists want to see our relationship with nature. The interviewees are nice and very articulate, and the arguments are excellent. The question is, how do you make an effective documentary with such a limited subject? My recommendation is to watch this for science enthusiasts and to be skeptical about some of the claims, but there are other documentaries that are much more suited for this type of documentary.

Benjamin Robinson photo
Benjamin Robinson

A documentary-like tale about a corporate engineer, Tom Staggs, who was originally recruited to work at the lab where his father worked, was then demoted, and made to work in the trash, in order to finance the purchase of the lab, and the further development of biotechnology and synthetic biology in a manner that was much more profitable to Monsanto. In the process, he became the first "perfect cell" (that is, he passed all of the necessary human biologic tests) in the world. This made the world of biotech and the organic farming movement popular, as Staggs gained fame as a hero, and millions of people thought that the only way to truly be free was to use GMOs, and was used as a tool for several other biotech movements. This documentary was fascinating to me, because the theme of the film is that many people simply did not care that much about GMO issues. As a result, they were willing to overlook the fact that Monsanto's first big "success" was the creation of the first GMO crop, and the adoption of GMO crops for growing everything from apples to soybeans. While the farmer's movement was still active, there was little movement on the way of GMO labeling. Many farmers simply did not care what Monsanto did, or what they had to sacrifice to produce a GMO crop, such as the loss of their jobs, or the disappearance of their crops. One of the most interesting things that I observed in this film is the difference in the way that people reacted to this documentary, and the two stories that came before and after it. The first story is about the GMO issue, and how it affects people's lives. In this story, one farmer, Roland Gause, had been working on genetically modified corn for several years, and he was appalled to see what Monsanto was doing to the environment. He went on a protest walk, after his company refused to give him a proper trial for the GMO crops that he had developed. He also was appalled by the way he was treated by Monsanto. In the face of such discrimination, he was willing to risk his health in order to make sure that his people and his farm were safe. However, as he watched the situation worsen, his own health was also deteriorating. When he decided to go to the hospital, he was told by the doctors that he would only be in for three weeks, and that he would not make it to his birthday. This made him realize that he was very angry about what was happening to his family, and he started talking to his friend, Jack Lynch. Jack is a farmer who is the co-founder of the organic farm, River Rabbit, and he tells Roland about the problems that he had to deal with from his farmers. However, it is the

Danielle photo

There is a reason that this documentary is called "Food Evolution" it's because the people that produced this film do a great job of showing the evolution of food. A good example of this is how the first modern foods were introduced to America. The best example of this is the pineapple, when you think about the first pineapple, you don't think about the pineapple, but instead it's the crab and the melon. There are a few problems with the food in this documentary, there are too many great food documentaries that are 100% nutrition free. Food Evolution is not about nutrition. In fact, it's a movie that is balanced and brings together scientists, food experts, and what the food experts have to say. The movie is very informative and you'll learn a lot. The food industry is not the bad guy in this movie, but it is the person that is "trying to figure out what they did to kill the world's food supply." In the beginning of the movie, when they're talking about Rockefeller and his creations, the food industry is shown as the biggest enemy to the environment, but it's actually the corporations that have poisoned our food supply and our environment. Another thing that is funny about the food industry is how the FDA has the same system as the tobacco companies, so we have people that believe that you can "prove" that there is a link between tobacco and cancer, but the fact of the matter is that the majority of the people that smoke aren't people that are smoking. That would be crazy. The movie also talks about why the food industry is very secretive and why the people who have a concern about food have to be very careful of who they contact. I do have a problem with the way that it's presented because it's not really true. The food industry has not been a great threat to the environment, they're not causing people to die, but they have caused money to be made and it has made people think that they can do something about the problems. I have a problem with the fact that the media has been very biased. It's easy to see how the food industry would be, but if you go to any website that shows a lot of the food industry's failings, it's the opposite. The movie is very informative and if you're looking for a way to reduce your carbon footprint or to learn more about what is good for your health, then this movie is for you.

Denise S. photo
Denise S.

I love this documentary. It's so informative and funny. It's a must-see. The message is clear and makes me think about what I'm doing in my daily life. I also recommend the documentary because it's so enjoyable. It's a fun, easy-to-watch documentary that's not about politics or religion. It's about what makes us human. It's about the simple things that make us human. I highly recommend this movie!

Peter photo

I just came back from seeing the screening of the film at the Black Screen on Broadway, and I am so glad I did! I was in the audience for the last screening of the film, and I was so impressed with how great it was. I was very disappointed in how bad the reviews were. I didn't see a single negative comment about the film. The negative reviews were from people who either didn't see the film or didn't understand what it was about. If you haven't seen it yet, go to a theater and watch it. You won't regret it!

Walter photo

This is an excellent documentary about the food industry and the use of chemicals in farming. It has a lot of information and facts. It shows how much work goes into the production of these foods. This documentary is very informative and well done. I recommend it to everyone who wants to know more about the food industry.

Jeffrey Hansen photo
Jeffrey Hansen

If you are not too concerned about the world around you and your environment, or the way you live, this documentary will be a good one to watch. If, on the other hand, you do care, it's a good documentary to watch. If you don't care or think the way the main character of this documentary thinks, you might not like it. It's not a documentary for those who don't have an open mind, or if you're not completely at ease with how your current life is changing. There is one scene in this documentary which I thought was a bit unpleasant and I was really glad it was over. It wasn't intentional. I liked this documentary because I did care, and it gave me some food for thought about what I'm doing and what I'm trying to do in my life. I gave it a 7, because it was an 8 in my book. Not a great documentary. Also, there is a scene in this documentary where the main character shows the reaction of other people who have seen her experiment, and her friends. In my opinion, it was pretty obvious she was upset and upset because of how her experiment was perceived, and how her friends and family viewed her. They were the ones that didn't want her to do it, and her experimenters, and even the researchers didn't know what she was up to. I think the main point was to show how little they had to do with it, and it showed her results and reactions to them. I think if you care about this stuff, and you're not totally overawed, you might like this. There is a scene in this documentary where she tries to convince one of her friends, to go into the woods with her to search for the El Dorado. I think it was pretty obvious that she wanted him to do this, and she wanted to see if he would do it. I think it was pretty obvious she didn't believe in his character when she was talking to him, and the camera angles showed that, and when she asked him if he would do it. But again, I'm not sure what I was getting from that. It wasn't a bad scene, but it wasn't a good scene either. It's not a bad movie. It's a good documentary. I thought it was good for a change.

Samuel H. photo
Samuel H.

One of the reasons I decided to watch the movie is that I do have a lot of questions about life and evolution. So, after watching the movie, I felt like there was really a lot of stuff that could be covered in a one-hour movie. As a result, I came to this website and found answers to a lot of questions that I had about the movie. As a result, I'm quite pleased to see that there are still people out there who are interested in the topic. Because of that, I'm giving the movie an 8 instead of a 5. First of all, I have to say that I didn't see that much in this movie. The fact is, I didn't find it very interesting, except for the fact that it showed what's been happening in Africa with what's happening in the rest of the world. I mean, in one word, I found it boring. Also, there were only a few things in the movie that were useful. The idea that animals were able to evolve from man, or evolution from man. And the ideas that evolution happened without human being. I'm not trying to say that the movie is bad, but there were only a few things that were useful. The main thing I found wrong about the movie was the fact that there were not any natural scientists on the movie. And I'm talking about the fact that in the movie, there was not a single scientist that looked like a natural scientist. And it was because that they didn't have them. The one thing that I didn't like about the movie was that there was only a few things that were interesting. For example, I didn't find any evidence that animals could live on their own. Or that they could walk on their own. Or that they could use fire to kill other animals. I also didn't find anything interesting that was completely wrong. So, I don't have a very bad thing to say about this movie. The main thing that I found wrong about the movie was that the only things that I found wrong was the fact that there was no natural scientist in the movie. Also, I found it extremely boring because there were not a lot of things that were interesting. As a result, I rated the movie a 7 out of 10.

Kyle H. photo
Kyle H.

The only reason I am giving this a ten is because the viewer can't help but see the power and value of these animals and the great care they have taken to preserve them and preserve the land they live on. You don't have to believe in God to feel that this is an important film. People are living in a world that is going to be gone soon and that's what this film is all about. This movie is for everyone. It is an incredible testament to the power of a little bit of hope.

Nicholas Oliver photo
Nicholas Oliver

This is the best documentary I've ever seen. I was too young to see it when it came out and I just can't believe how this movie got such a bad rap. I think that a lot of people just don't like this movie because they didn't like the subject matter. I think this movie really makes a point about what is really important in life and how the idea of evolution is not as important as what we see in our daily lives. It's really a beautiful film that should be seen by all. If you have a good sense of humor you'll love this movie.

Christian Chapman photo
Christian Chapman

This is the most informative and moving documentary I've seen in my entire life. It should be mandatory viewing for every person and everyone should see this film. It will change the way you look at your food and how you treat your body. I have a passion for clean living and am a believer that food is not just food, it is also medicine. This movie is very educational and a must see for everyone. I can't wait for it to come out on DVD.

Tiffany A. photo
Tiffany A.

This is a great documentary. I was a bit skeptical of this documentary due to its length, and the fact that the director was not a scientist. I was not disappointed. The way that the documentary was filmed was outstanding. The way that the scientists were interviewed was incredible. It was as if they were in the lab and they were talking to each other. The way that the footage was shown was amazing. The scientists talked about the issue, and the people in the audience were moved by the issues. I would highly recommend this documentary to anyone. It is one of the best documentaries I have ever seen.

Tiffany Ortiz photo
Tiffany Ortiz

It was very touching to see how one family relates to nature. You can tell that their child is naturally curious about the world and can learn from their parents. The narrator says that they had to take the children to the dentist to remove the teeth they had been chewing on. The children learned that when they are having a bad day, they can cry and they can remember to "let the child in". If you can get an appointment, go to the dentist and watch the children. I think this is a great film to help you get out of your own way and understand the environment you live in.

Stephanie G. photo
Stephanie G.

I'm a non-scientist but I find this movie very informative. I find it very intriguing and it helps me understand how life came about. I love the fact that it doesn't end with the human race being wiped out. That is my favorite part. If you have the chance to watch it, you should.

Margaret R. photo
Margaret R.

I just watched this film at the Reykjavik Film Festival. The film is a compilation of several interviews with leading scientists and other scientists, explaining why we should care about our own environment and why we should care about the environment as a whole. The film is highly recommended, especially for people who have studied biology and/or the environment and want to understand how it works. The film is a mix of the scientific, the personal and the political. I am a biologist and the film made me want to study more about biology and the environment. I highly recommend this film.

Kenneth R. photo
Kenneth R.

I just saw this movie at the Los Angeles International Film Festival. The movie is based on a short book by Andy Bell, who also did the documentary on how the Bintu Indians in Papua New Guinea, New Guinea, changed their diet to a plant-based one. The documentary shows how they did it. In the book, they said that their diet was mostly meat, but now, they eat mostly plants and fruit. The movie shows the results of the transition. The movie is very well done. The actors did a great job. I really recommend it.

Jeremy Hayes photo
Jeremy Hayes

This is a very powerful documentary about the environmental disaster that the United States has been in for the last thirty years. When the United States started in the early 1980's, they were the leader in the world in the protection of the environment. Now, we are on the way to being number one. The documentary has three major parts. First, it takes you through a series of the most powerful companies in the United States that have been involved in the destruction of the environment. The major companies are ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips. Each company has been responsible for some major environmental disasters in the United States. We learn that ExxonMobil, the oil company, has been responsible for the largest amount of oil spills in U.S. history. The major oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico occurred in 1989, and the largest ever oil spill in the Pacific Northwest occurred in 1972. The second part of the documentary takes you through the history of the companies that have been involved in the environmental disaster. The history of these companies begins in the 1920's, when these companies were part of the American car industry. The company that is responsible for the largest environmental disaster is Chevron. They are responsible for the biggest environmental disaster in U.S. history, and it is the largest environmental disaster of all time. The third part of the documentary is a conversation with the people who are directly responsible for the environmental disaster. We meet the environmental leaders, the politicians, and the oil companies. The people are very honest about what they have done to the environment. The people who are responsible for the environmental disaster are very honest about what they have done to the environment. The United States is on the way to becoming number one in the world in the protection of the environment. We have to keep on going in the direction of protecting the environment.

Andrew photo

I am a science teacher in a school with a lot of science subjects. When I heard about this film, I thought it was going to be one of those boring documentaries that just tells you what you already know. I mean, the movie is really long, but it's worth it. It's just a real eye opener and can help you understand a little bit about how you are thinking and how your brain works. It's not easy to do, but you can see the difference that science can make if you are willing to take the time to understand it. I highly recommend it.

Joan P. photo
Joan P.

This movie is truly inspirational and inspiring. It's about changing the way you think and feel about food. I think this movie will change people's lives. I can't wait to see it again. It's a wonderful movie that I recommend to anyone and everyone. I hope everyone will watch this movie and learn something new about the power of food. I also want to say that I feel that this movie is very important and that everyone should see it.

Beverly Kennedy photo
Beverly Kennedy

I can't believe I was so disappointed with this movie. I thought it would be a good documentary on the future of food and how we are being taken advantage of. But, it was so depressing. It was like they filmed a bunch of people eating an unhealthy diet and then the cameras were turned off. I can't believe they didn't tell the real story. The documentary is supposed to be a factual look at the future of food and how we are being taken advantage of. I think they should have made the movie with real footage and let people make up their own mind about the future of food. They just made a movie to convince people to eat more food. I don't want to know what the future will be like and I don't want to be informed. I will be more informed by reading about the future and how it is being changed by food. I don't think this movie is going to change people's minds. The only people who will be swayed by this documentary are people who have already made the decision to eat more food. This documentary is about as convincing as a bunch of people drinking beer and then turning on the cameras. I give this movie a 6/10 because of the great technical quality. I am impressed with the sound quality and the way the food was cooked.